February 2004 Archives by author
Starting: Thu Feb 5 15:34:41 PDT 2004
Ending: Thu Feb 26 15:57:04 PDT 2004
Messages: 59
- [6bone] Re: reverse 6dns painful (was
Re:reverse DNSconsideredpointless)
Jørgen Hovland
- [6bone] IPv6 problems with Cisco PIX Firewall 535 series
Netzahualcoyotl Ornelas García
- [6bone] Re: 6bone Digest, Vol 2, Issue 13
Mamatha Balachandra
- [6bone] SixXS down?
Aykut
- [6bone] 6to4 or 6bone direct(ish)
Andrew Aylett
- [6bone] Re: reverse 6dns painful (was Re:
reverse DNSconsideredpointless)
Petr Baudis
- [6bone] Re: reverse 6dns painful (was Re:
reverse DNSconsideredpointless)
Lukas Beeler
- [6bone] Re: reverse 6dns painful (was Re: reverse DNS
consideredpointless)
Peter Bunclark
- [6bone] Re: reverse 6dns painful (was Re: reverse DNS
consideredpointless)
Peter Bunclark
- [6bone] SixXS down?
Peter Bunclark
- reverse DNS considered pointless was: [6bone] Fwd: BCP 80,
RFC 3681 on Delegation of E.F.F.3.IP6.ARPA
Tim Chown
- [6bone] 6to4 or 6bone direct(ish)
Tim Chown
- [6bone] Fwd: BCP 80, RFC 3681 on Delegation of E.F.F.3.IP6.ARPA
Gert Doering
- Dynamic DNS update on Windows for IPv6 was: reverse DNS
considered pointless was: [6bone] Fwd: BCP 80,
RFC 3681 on Delegation of E.F.F.3.IP6.ARPA
Gert Doering
- [6bone] Re: reverse 6dns painful (was Re: reverse DNS
consideredpointless)
Gert Doering
- [6bone] Re: reverse 6dns painful (was Re:
reverse DNSconsideredpointless)
Gert Doering
- [6bone] Re: reverse 6dns painful (was Re:
reverse DNSconsideredpointless)
Gert Doering
- [6bone] Re: reverse 6dns painful (was Re: reverse DNS
consideredpointless)
Gert Doering
- [6bone] Re: reverse 6dns painful
Gert Doering
- [6bone] Re: reverse 6dns painful (was Re: reverse
DNS consideredpointless)
Colin Faber
- [6bone] Re: reverse 6dns painful (was Re:
reverse DNSconsideredpointless)
Colin Faber
- [6bone] A question about BIND 9 and IPv6 == A6 vs AAAA
Colin Faber
- [6bone] Fw: Commerce IPv6 RFC News
Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- [6bone] 6to4 or 6bone direct(ish)
Mark Himsley
- [6bone] Re: reverse 6dns painful (was Re: reverse DNS
consideredpointless)
Paul Jakma
- [6bone] Re: reverse 6dns painful (was Re: reverse DNS
consideredpointless)
Paul Jakma
- [6bone] Re: reverse 6dns painful
Paul Jakma
- [6bone] Re: reverse 6dns painful
Michael Kjorling
- [6bone] Throughput (was Re: 6bone Digest, Vol 2, Issue 13)
Michael Kjorling
- Dynamic DNS update on Windows for IPv6 was: reverse DNS considered
pointless was: [6bone] Fwd: BCP 80,
RFC 3681 on Delegation of E.F.F.3.IP6.ARPA
'Anand Kumria'
- reverse DNS considered pointless was: [6bone] Fwd: BCP 80,
RFC 3681 on Delegation of E.F.F.3.IP6.ARPA
Anand Kumria
- [6bone] Re: reverse 6dns painful (was Re: reverse
DNSconsideredpointless)
Edward Lewis
- reverse DNS considered pointless was: [6bone] Fwd: BCP 80,
RFC 3681 on Delegation of E.F.F.3.IP6.ARPA
Trent Lloyd
- reverse DNS considered pointless was: [6bone] Fwd: BCP 80, RFC
3681 on Delegation of E.F.F.3.IP6.ARPA
Matthew Luckie
- reverse DNS considered pointless was: [6bone] Fwd: BCP 80, RFC3681
on Delegation of E.F.F.3.IP6.ARPA
Matthew Luckie
- reverse DNS considered pointless was: [6bone] Fwd: BCP 80, RFC
3681 on Delegation of E.F.F.3.IP6.ARPA
Matthew Luckie
- [6bone] Re: reverse 6dns painful (was Re: reverse
DNS consideredpointless)
Matthew Luckie
- [6bone] BCP - Best Current Practice to IPv6 Network Deployment
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- [6bone] ID hbcjdenvvvv... thanks
Marc.Blanchet at viagenie.qc.ca
- reverse DNS considered pointless was: [6bone] Fwd: BCP 80,
RFC 3681 on Delegation of E.F.F.3.IP6.ARPA
Jeroen Massar
- reverse DNS considered pointless was: [6bone] Fwd: BCP 80,
RFC3681 on Delegation of E.F.F.3.IP6.ARPA
Jeroen Massar
- reverse DNS considered pointless was: [6bone] Fwd: BCP 80,
RFC3681 on Delegation of E.F.F.3.IP6.ARPA
Jeroen Massar
- [6bone] Re: reverse 6dns painful (was Re: reverse DNS
consideredpointless)
Jeroen Massar
- [6bone] Re: reverse 6dns painful (was Re: reverse
DNSconsideredpointless)
Jeroen Massar
- [6bone] Re: reverse 6dns painful (was Re:
reverseDNSconsideredpointless)
Jeroen Massar
- Dynamic DNS update on Windows for IPv6 was: reverse DNS
considered pointless was: [6bone] Fwd: BCP 80,
RFC 3681 on Delegation of E.F.F.3.IP6.ARPA
Jeroen Massar
- [6bone] SixXS down?
Jeroen Massar
- reverse DNS considered pointless was: [6bone] Fwd: BCP 80, RFC
3681 on Delegation of E.F.F.3.IP6.ARPA
Perry E. Metzger
- reverse DNS considered pointless was: [6bone] Fwd: BCP 80, RFC
3681 on Delegation of E.F.F.3.IP6.ARPA
Perry E. Metzger
- [6bone] BCP - Best Current Practice to IPv6 Network Deployment
Robson Oliveira
- [6bone] 6to4 or 6bone direct(ish)
Pim van Pelt
- [6bone] A question about BIND 9 and IPv6 == A6 vs AAAA
Pim van Pelt
- [6bone] Re: reverse 6dns painful (was Re: reverse
DNSconsideredpointless)
Dean Strik
- [6bone] Throughput (was Re: 6bone Digest, Vol 2, Issue 13)
Bradley D. Thornton
- [6bone] A question about BIND 9 and IPv6 == A6 vs AAAA
Richard Welty
- [6bone] Re: reverse 6dns painful (was Re:
reverse DNSconsideredpointless)
Ben Winslow
- [6bone] SixXS down?
Cyber Wolf
- [6bone] Fwd: BCP 80, RFC 3681 on Delegation of E.F.F.3.IP6.ARPA
Chuck Yerkes
- [6bone] Re: reverse 6dns painful (was Re: reverse DNS considered
pointless)
Chuck Yerkes
Last message date:
Thu Feb 26 15:57:04 PDT 2004
Archived on: Thu Feb 26 15:58:55 PDT 2004
This archive was generated by
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition).