[6bone] Getting ISPs to use IPv6

Jeroen Massar jeroen@unfix.org
Sat, 1 Mar 2003 01:21:05 +0100


Daniel Austin wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> We're in a similar position here.
> Our company is not large enough to request a /32 from RIPE 
> (we cant allocate 200 customers ipv6 in the next 12 months, 
> nor can i lie to RIPE to let them believe it!)

And 200 customers is a really small figure.
If you have 200 dailup/dsl/hosting users you are there.
If you don't have 200 of such users you simply are not big enough.

There are some caveats though, but most RIR's won't make much fuss
when you can explain your plans and your customerbase well enough.

Good example is NREN's who might have eg 50 universities as clients.
But actually those 50 universities comprise of thousands of students,
buildings, classrooms, dailup facilities etc. It's just how you
formulate
'client' in this matter and the rules are not that strict at the moment.
You might try to contact your RIR and ask them before thinking that it
doesn't work out in the first place.

> We're not a RIPE LIR, so i cant even request it to be thrown out.
> But we're fully multihomed on PI ipv4 space....
> 
> It seems there's no similar position for us in ipv6 land.
> I have to rely on using static-routed IPv6 IP's from another 
> provider which means i *CANT* offer a production service on ipv6....
> but of course, this all goes back to the multihoming thread...

Who says that you can't setup private BGP peerings for 'your' /40 ?
As long as it doesn't pop up in the global routing table that's
perfectly fine.

Greets,
 Jeroen

PS: before somebody starts thinking 'he is prolly big enough' well..
I don't work for any ISP whatsoever and I am really not big enough on my
own.
So, just like everybody else I gotta have to rely on me paying a big ISP
for
some address space, but for that money they also make sure that I am
multihomed, that they get out of bed at 05:00 to fix stuff etc ;)
And actually that is fine with me.