[6bone] ip6.arpa ...
Pekka Savola
pekkas@netcore.fi
Thu, 20 Feb 2003 18:23:24 +0200 (EET)
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Gert Doering wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 05:44:06AM -0800, Bill Manning wrote:
> > So what I proposed to Andrei to take back to the RIRs was the
> > following:
> >
> > Recognise that the data published for 3ffe:: should be identical
> > regardless of anchorpoint. Plan for an active migration plan
> > from industry/user nameservers to RIR nameservers for this delegation,
> > based on the capability of the RIRs to support native IPv6 and
> > TSIG.
> >
> > I've not heard back from Andrei or anyone else on this proposal.
> > I intend to work with the RIRs, starting with APNIC, to migrate
> > the 3ffe:: zone to RIR servers.
>
> I'm glad to hear that there is some progress going on now.
>
> I agree with your proposal. The thing that RIPE thought up always felt
> needlessly complex to me.
Uhh, the proposal at least to me looks unnecessarily complex. There is no
need to tie the process to having IPv6 enabled nameservers, or (to a
lesser degree) TSIG capabilities. Those items can be worked out, though,
after the initial setup.
Folks want the delegations soon, not in a year.
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings