[6bone] ip6.arpa ...

Pekka Savola pekkas@netcore.fi
Thu, 20 Feb 2003 18:23:24 +0200 (EET)


On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Gert Doering wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 05:44:06AM -0800, Bill Manning wrote:
> > 	So what I proposed to Andrei to take back to the RIRs was the 
> > 	following:
> > 
> >         Recognise that the data published for 3ffe:: should be identical
> > 	regardless of anchorpoint.  Plan for an active migration plan
> > 	from industry/user nameservers to RIR nameservers for this delegation,
> > 	based on the capability of the RIRs to support native IPv6 and
> > 	TSIG. 
> > 
> > 	I've not heard back from Andrei or anyone else on this proposal.
> > 	I intend to work with the RIRs, starting with APNIC, to migrate
> > 	the 3ffe:: zone to RIR servers.
> 
> I'm glad to hear that there is some progress going on now.
> 
> I agree with your proposal.  The thing that RIPE thought up always felt
> needlessly complex to me.

Uhh, the proposal at least to me looks unnecessarily complex.  There is no
need to tie the process to having IPv6 enabled nameservers, or (to a
lesser degree) TSIG capabilities.  Those items can be worked out, though,
after the initial setup.

Folks want the delegations soon, not in a year.

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings