[6bone] pTLA request NDSOFTWARE - review closes 23 October 2002

[Nicolas DEFFAYET]

On Sat, 2002-10-19 at 23:03, Pekka Savola wrote:
> On 19 Oct 2002, Nicolas DEFFAYET wrote:
> > On Sat, 2002-10-19 at 20:38, Rico Gloeckner wrote:
> > 
> > > Ok, let me rephrase you:
> > > | I close tunnels to small local Peers because i want to peer with Large
> > > | Peers around the world.
> > > 
> > > Did I understand you correctly?
> > > 
> > > If so, i hope all your Peers will decrease the Priority to you to a very
> > > minimum, because this is the best Way to fuck up IPv6-Routing.
> > 
> > I use MED, i don't have a bad routing, you can check:
> > 
> > http://noc.ndsoftwarenet.com/stats/aspath-tree/bgp-page-complete.php
> > 
> > I see all european pTLA/sTLA by European peer,...
> > 
> > My MED for tunnels:
> > 
> > 500: - 10 ms
> > 510: 10 - 25 ms
> > 520: 25 - 50 ms
> > 530: 50 - 100 ms
> > 540: + 100 ms
> > 
> > A lot of pTLA and sTLA don't use MED, i use MED for have a good quality.
> 
> Are you aware of the fact that unless you have 'always-compare-med' (or 
> equivalent), MED is only used when comparing paths for which the neighbor 
> AS is the same?  So, unless you have two connections to a neighbor AS, 
> it's of no use?

I use:

 bgp always-compare-med
 bgp dampening
 no synchronization

Best Regards,

Nicolas DEFFAYET