[6bone] RFC2772 rewrite -- bigger scope goals

[Tim Chown]

On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 06:18:22PM +0100, Nicolas DEFFAYET wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-11-17 at 17:30, Robert Kiessling wrote:
> 
> > I don't argue on the base of "can", whatever you mean by this. I argue
> > on the base of facts such as past incidents and the reluctance of ISPs
> > to offer IPv6 access to existing IPv4 services, caused by bad IPv6
> > network performance.
> 
> You can have good performances and guarantee the transit only when the
> most part of IPv6 Internet will be native.
> 
> I'm sorry, but cut 6bone and RIR is not the good solution.
> 
> The solution for have a better IPv6 network is have only native peering.

I don't think nativeness is the key issue (it is nice though).  The key
issue is open (and bad) transit... see Pekka's 6bone-mess draft.

Tim