[6bone] 6bone pTLA 3FFE:4009::/32 allocated to VERAT

[Michael Kjorling]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On May 22 2002 21:31 +0200, Nicolas DEFFAYET wrote:

> I think that it's a good idea to ask for nameservers in pTLA request.

While I agree in principle, there is one problem with this. Without
knowing the prefix allocated, setting up the name servers to serve it
gets pretty tricky. I do think it would be a good idea to clearly
state that reverse DNS _is_ required in either RFC 2772 or its
successor, though.

The problem is that without some way to enforce that, it gets nothing
but a blow in the air. We don't need rules that are impossible or
extremely hard to enforce beyond the "would you please do this"
point - I think more or less everyone here can agree with that.


Michael Kjörling

- -- 
Michael Kjörling  --  Programmer/Network administrator  ^..^
Internet: michael@kjorling.com -- FidoNet: 2:204/254.4   \/
PGP: 95f1 074d 336d f8f0 f297 6a5b 2aa3 7bfd 8a70 e33e

``And indeed people sometimes speak of man's "bestial" cruelty, but
this is very unfair and insulting to the beasts: a beast can never be
so cruel as a man, so ingeniously, so artistically cruel.''
(Ivan Karamazov, in Dostoyevsky's 'The Brothers Karamazov')
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Public key is at http://michael.kjorling.com/contact/pgp.html

iD8DBQE86/wuKqN7/Ypw4z4RAgu0AKDSG1cAm23JkI0/A0vMjDBEUaC9ngCeMqQw
NrOrymUKY+n+8OHRUPnrKhc=
=OX5h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----