[6bone] 6bone pTLA 3FFE:4009::/32 allocated to VERAT
Nicolas DEFFAYET
nicolas.deffayet-extml@ndsoftwaregroup.com
Wed, 22 May 2002 21:31:41 +0200
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 6bone-admin@mailman.isi.edu
> [mailto:6bone-admin@mailman.isi.edu] On Behalf Of Michael Kjorling
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 8:01 PM
> To: 6bone
> Subject: Re: [6bone] 6bone pTLA 3FFE:4009::/32 allocated to VERAT
>
> On May 22 2002 09:13 -0700, Bill Manning wrote:
>
> > until then....
> >
> > ;; QUESTION SECTION:
> > ;9.0.0.4.e.f.f.3.ip6.int. IN NS
> >
> > ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
> > 9.0.0.4.e.f.f.3.ip6.int. 86400 IN NS noserver.
>
> Wouldn't it be better to simply not put in any delegation
> information? That would give a quick NXDOMAIN response,
> instead of the resolver having to go off and ask the root
> servers about "noserver", only to find out it doesn't exist.
>
> Granted, negative caching will mitigate this problem, but why
> put unnecessary load on the root servers when it can be avoided?
>
> Also I'm not sure how exactly a NS pointing to a non-existent
> RR is handled. NXDOMAIN, or SERVFAIL?
>
> Might have to check, just for the heck of it...
I think that it's a good idea to ask for nameservers in pTLA request.
It's plained to do stats on nameserver of pTLA like the RIPE ?
(http://www.ripe.net/ripencc/pub-services/stats/revdns/index.html)
Best Regards,
Nicolas DEFFAYET