which BGP4+ used
Pedro Marques
roque@cisco.com
Fri, 17 Oct 1997 11:19:58 -0700 (PDT)
>>>>> "Masaki" == Masaki Hirabaru <masaki@merit.edu> writes:
Masaki> Kunihiro and Pedro, Thanks for letting me know. I haven't
Masaki> seen the -00 version, so I got confused. I'm still writing
Masaki> this by analyzing a BGP4+ packet I'm receiving rather than
Masaki> looking at the -00 version. So, the following differences
Masaki> may not cover all.
Masaki> 1) There is a length field, NLRI Length (2 octets) in
Masaki> Kunihiro's explanation, which doesn't exist in the -01
Masaki> version.
Yes. Those fields where removed in the -01 version.
Masaki> 2) The Length of Next Hop Network Address (1 octet) in
Masaki> MP_REACH_NLRI (Type Code 14) has a value 32; A
Masaki> global-scope address (16 octets) and a link-local address
Masaki> (16 octets) follow.
This is not a question of what the bgp-multiprotocol draft defines but
what a separate document, on IPv6 information over BGP will define.
This document will be based on the section on IPv6 in
draft-bates-bgp4-multiprotocol. If you look at that section you see when
the nexthop should consist of one or two ipv6 addresses.
The ipv6-bgp draft should be availiable soon.
Masaki> Does 6bone has a plan to migrate to the -01 version?
You might not be able to make a "plan" as it depends on the availability
of code from vendors...
Pedro.