[6bone] .int / .arpa

[FRLinux]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
| On 20-feb-05, at 14:34, Gert Doering wrote:
| I have a very hard time believing that both are true. If nobody uses it
| anymore, then keeping existing ip6.int stuff around is 0 work, so that's
| certainly the easiest option. If people actually use it, then yes, it is
| a burden, but apparently it serves a purpose. In this case too, it would
| be better to keep ip6.int.

I disagree with that. I have started ipv6 with ip6.arpa until i noticed
that some sites on the outside world couldn't resolve properly (read,
were taking a long time to resolve, it successful) which is why i *had
to* use ip6.int as well for our (read, both home and work, since i work
in a place which likes ipv6) zone. I am one of these who actually like
ip6.arpa much more than ip6.int, it is my own belief that it makes
actually more sense. So if tomorrow, someone tells me ip6.int can be
safely removed from my DNS, i will be more than happy.

Steph
- --
Mail sent on Gentoo Linux (http://www.gentoo.org)
http://frlinux.net - frlinux at frlinux.net
public key : http://frlinux.net/files/frlinux_public_key.asc


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCGjH9plbM2wjOZgMRAlycAJ0a7JBmxWVmttacx8YE0Ko5F5fy2ACcCq83
GlOG66BuxbZ8ojufjv/fO7M=
=ISCU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----