[6bone] Eastcoast tunnelbrokers..

[Haesu]

And yes, let us count how many tunnelbrokers are out there today that gives out only a /64 to endusers.

And considering we are getting connections from TB's until we work out in getting our own TLA space, how the heck does anyone expect us to abide to "MINIMUM /48" policy when our current TBs only offer a few /48's?? 

I am fully aware our current /64 assignment "violates" the extremity; but we are working to come to compliance to the RIR policies. And I bleieve the RIR policies apply directly down the chain to LIRs. Well, we are not a LIR yet.

Let's not go over the obvious...

-hc

-- 
Sincerely,
  Haesu C.
  TowardEX Technologies, Inc.
  WWW: http://www.towardex.com
  E-mail: haesu@towardex.com
  Cell: (978) 394-2867

On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 08:35:27PM -0700, Michel Py wrote:
> > Haesu wrote:
> > We used to do /120 at first when we were just building up
> > ipv6 network. Now that we have enough users, automatic /64
> > assignment is current policy.
> 
> This does not register with RIR policies. The current unified RIR policy
> (see 5.4.1 in http://www.arin.net/policy/ipv6_policy.html) recommends
> assigning /48 to users in the general case, as recommended by RFC3177
> http://www.arin.net/library/rfc/rfc3177.txt
> 
> This policy is common to ARIN, RIPE and APNIC.
> 
> Michel.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 6bone mailing list
> 6bone@mailman.isi.edu
> http://mailman.isi.edu/mailman/listinfo/6bone