[6bone] RE: [ipv6-wg@ripe.net] Update on IPv6 filter recommendation
Tim Chown
tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Fri, 16 May 2003 14:43:46 +0100
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 03:35:41PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
>
> The Internet is an *Inter*network. It's about connecting all of it
> together, not building small splinter networks that have no connectivity.
> There is currently no provision in the IPv6 policy for people that just
> want some local/VPN connectivity and no global routing. Maybe that needs
> changing as well. (Site-locals had some potential for "local" things,
> but they are dead, as far as I understand). David, could you put that
> on your list of things to consider?
Absolutely, indeed if we're deprecating site locals, and its associated
/10 prefix, we should probably be able to get /32 size globally unique
prefixes that can be used in otherwise disconnected networks? (e.g. a large
sensor network used by a utility provider) This seems a natural
consequence of such a deprecation.
Tim