[6bone] notice of intent to reclaim unused pTLAs, comment period closes 17 January 2003

[Michel Py]

> Bill Manning wrote:
> Your memory does not match mine. A pTLA is for experimenting
> (getting comfortable) with IPv6.  There was no intimation that
> these delegations required "ISPness".

Maybe you could refresh your memory by re-reading RFC2772, Section 7,
point 2 as quoted by Daniel yesterday:

> "The pTLA Applicant MUST have the ability and intent to provide
> "production-quality" 6Bone backbone service."

"Provide service". That does not mean any ISPness, does it?

Michel.