[6bone] 6Bone registry entries when multihomed?

[Nicolas DEFFAYET]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Kessens [mailto:david@IPRG.nokia.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:57 AM
> To: Nicolas DEFFAYET
> Cc: 6bone@ISI.EDU
> Subject: Re: [6bone] 6Bone registry entries when multihomed?
> 
> 
 
Dear David,
 
> On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 06:43:31PM +0200, Nicolas DEFFAYET wrote:
> >  
> 
> I can put in more restrictive policies if the community 
> desires so. It's users like you who sometimes make me wonder 
> whether I should ask the community to put such more 
> restrictive policies in place. You might want to consider to 
> be more careful in what you are doing on the 6bone and the 
> work that you create for me with your continious changing 
> objects and mail servers that never seem to work. There is 
> serious people on the 6bone who want to work with ipv6. Your 
> project is causing an enormous distraction for many people 
> who want to find out about the real problems in deploying ipv6. 

I'm sorry if i create work for you.
6bone database is not fully automatic (except for mnter object who need
manual intervention) ?
I have decide this before this mail (i have remove ipv6-fr-cust and all
user whois)): i don't create anymore individual whois for users of
IPv6-FR project (it's not the same project that NDSoftware, IPv6-FR is a
french project for the developement of IPv6 in France). I have do this
because you have a lot of problem with mail servers of users and with
more than 40 users i can't maint individual whois in good conditions.
I don't think that you have problem with my mail servers because i have
many MX checked my monitoring tool.
I will now more pay attention to whois create/update/delete.

> 
> You are welcome to participate, whether you are small or big. 
> However, this participation comes with certain 
> responsibilities. One of these responsibilities is that you 
> take comments/concerns from other people seriously and fix 
> issues when they arise. You clearly have a problem with 
> private AS#'s leaking out and I would like to suggest that 
> you try to resolve that with your providers instead of 
> blaming other people for a problem that ultimately originates 
> from your network.

For information, i'm responsable of NDSoftware and IPv6-FR project, you
(and all peoples) can contact me if you have problem with this projects,
don't hesitate, i'm open to all requests (except troll like the Pim's
troll) for fix my errors.

I do very attention with my private ASN (all my routes are sent with
community no-export) and i don't provide transit except if the peer ask
me for it.

"Dear Nicolas DEFFAYET,

Peer is ok.
BTW, please give me your full route.
It seems disappear from yesterday.

Thank you."

I don't send anymore routes to v6bone (completel) because one of users
of 6bone have report me a problem (see previous mails). I will apply
this for each peer who reannonce my routes with my private ASN.
Problem with it => don't annonces routes anymore

If anyone find this policy bad, tell me.

I wait your comments...

Thanks

Best Regards,

Nicolas DEFFAYET