[6bone] 6Bone registry entries when multihomed?

[Nicolas DEFFAYET]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 6bone-admin@mailman.isi.edu 
> [mailto:6bone-admin@mailman.isi.edu] On Behalf Of Pim van Pelt
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 8:35 PM
> To: Michel Py
> Cc: itojun@iijlab.net; 6bone@ISI.EDU; peering@v6bone.de
> Subject: Re: [6bone] 6Bone registry entries when multihomed?

I don't like reply to a troll, but i reply for many reasons.

> I normally don't engage in personal flames, but this has been 
> on my chest for a looong time. I'm sure other members of the 
> 6bone community will agree with me, so here goes (my 2 cents 
> worth of rant).
> 
> Deffayet claims 'RIPE wont give him an AS' but this is only 
> logical as he does not operate an autonomous system, nor is 
> he a LIR, rather 
> two or three cablemodems at residential sites.

First please respect me.
I'm not your dog, call me Nicolas or Nicolas DEFFAYET or Mr DEFFAYET,
not "DEFFAYET"

I don't claim this.

Have you read my mail ?
Be a LIR is plained for my project...

Have you create your network in one day ?

I don't use "cablemodems at residential sites".
It's the same if i tell that IPng.nl use 3 56k modems !

You are a troll expert :)

I don't like liar.


> AS65526 is giving transit to others, which is completely 
> ludicrous. This shows up in the looking glass at AS8954:
>    Network                       Path
>    *  3ffe:82a0::/28             15589 12337 15671 65526 7521 i
> 
> Now apparently AS15671 is non-well behaved (therefor the CC 
> to their contact), and it is leaking this as-path into its peers. 

All routes sent my me, are in ALL case with community no-export.
This is not possible (execept of ISP have bugy router who don't
understand community).

For information, community no-export = send routes to ibgp but NOT to
other eBGP.

I have shutdown the announcement of my routes to v6bone.

> 
> Looking at the prefixes that AS15671 announces regularly, 
> Deffayet's aren't amongst them. This leads me to believe that 
> Deffayet is not using a private AS number to establish a 
> session with his uplinks (he has three), but simply to 
> circumvent the RIR policies which denied him an AS number 
> (for, I might add, obvious reasons!).

I will get soon a public AS.
But for respect the RIPE allocation rule, i need 2 transit IPv4.

It's plained before for maximum the end of this year.

> 
> Now I ask again: can you please clean up the mess you are making ?

If you have problem with "my" private ASN: noc@ndsoftwarenet.com
But it's very very rare because all my routes are sent with community
no-export and i send all routes (transit) only to peer who request this
to me.

You can add filter if you want:

ip as-path access-list private-asn-in deny
_(6451[2-9]|645[2-9][0-9]|64[6-9][0-9][0-9]|65[0-4][0-9][0-9]|655[0-2][0
-9]|6553[0-5])_
ip as-path access-list private-asn-in permit .*


Best Regards,

Nicolas DEFFAYET