[6bone] Re: routing concern
itojun@iijlab.net
itojun@iijlab.net
Wed, 31 Jul 2002 23:53:33 +0900
>"they usually do not enforce enough route filters"
>- Filters belong on both INGRESS and EGRESS. You are just as responsible
>for filtering as they are.
of course we do filter bogus routes.
>"they usually are not serious enough about IPv6 (if they are serious,
>they should have been paying for IPv6 circuit)"
>- It must be nice to receive funding from 9 different organizations. Some
>of us don't have that luxury.
i have many hats. i'm not wearing my KAME hat now.
>"tunnel itself is not stable enough due to IPv4 troubles"
>- v4 connectivity in Japan that bad eh? Ya know, if you were SERIOUS,
>you'd have OC-192 from *your* edge into MULTIPLE peering points in the US
>and UK. I guess it's time for all of your v4 peers to drop you, huh?
yes, we are serious and have direct connectivity to multiple IXes
in the US. unfortunately we don't have any presense in Europe (yet).
itojun