[6bone] free transit
Michel Py
michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us
Tue, 3 Dec 2002 07:51:36 -0800
Hans,
> Hans Goes wrote:
> Ok.... But do we accept this way of routing ? I think it's
> a bad thing. In this situation traffic can route the whole
> world only because someone build a tunnel somewhere.
> A tunnel to Mexico can result in a shorter AS path but is
> too slow for real use....
This is yesterday's news. The bottom line is that you don't have much of
a choice today.
In the 6bone meeting in Atlanta I presented some slides related to this.
http://arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us/ipv6mh/ietf55ilj.pdf
http://arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us/ipv6mh/ietf55ilj.ppt
As far as I have heard, it all comes to money. Among the three models
described, it is commonly admitted that v4 tier-1 ISPs such as the one
you are working for will eventually form the IPv6 DFZ and become picky
about who they peer with. This requires that *you* build the IPv6
backbone that does not exist yet :-)
Michel.