Tunnels...

[Greg Maxwell]

On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, Bob Fink wrote:

> Jason,
> 
> At 10:39 PM 2/13/2000 -0500, Jason wrote:
> >Is it acceptable for me to dish out tunnels as an end site, and if I do
> >this, should I document them with tunnel attributes.
> 
> If you are a pNLA end-site (versue a transit) with a /48 then the only 
> tunnels would be for parts of your own network, i.e., some other SLA ID.

Since only my home is on the 6bone right now (as opposed to my work), I'm
not reall one to comment here but...

I don't agree, what about peering? Even end-sites can peer with other end
sites to exchange traffic among themselves. This is useful in the face of
v6-in-v4 tunnels causing very unoptimim paths between end-sites. This is
also useful when they are IPv4 peers in 'real life'/