Proposed change in 6bone pTLA 3FFE usage - 2nd (final?)
Bill Manning
bmanning@ISI.EDU
Mon, 21 Jun 1999 08:50:16 -0700 (PDT)
nibble waste can be the source of hugh waste.
however, its what folks want, its do-able, and
I've been persuaded that my real source of concern
may not get triggered. I drop this isssue for now
and lets move on.
>
> Bill,
>
> > Well perhaps. The hack is really intrackable above a /16
> > delegation in the IPv4 world.
>
> in IPv4 the problem is much worse than in IPv6. To inverse-delegate a
> /9, /17 or /25 in IPv4, you need 128 CNAME pointers. In IPv6, the
> worst case requires only eight of them.
>
> Having personally delegated quite a few eight-host subnets according
> to the classless in-addr "hack", I think this is quite tractable.
>
> At least I don't think it's a good enough excuse to potentially waste
> gazillions of addresses by choosing bit boundaries a "user friendly"
> way. Although this is just the 6bone, I think that it would set a
> really bad example.
> --
> Simon.
>
--
--bill