question in draft-ietf-ngtrans-harden-01.txt

[Robert Rockell]

I will make changes (there a couple others I'd been meaning to make as well,
but have been busy with my real job) and post another draft by end of week.
good input. It seems like there should be something in there to quantify how
we give out pTLA's, especially if it is to be taken seriously, or it can be
used to influence how ARIN does it in the future, or whatever the scope of
this paper may be. Kay, do you have any ideas? I can't think of anything
quantitative that isn't militaristic. 

Thanks
Rob Rockell
Sprintlink Internet Service Center
Operations Engineering
703-689-6322
1-800-724-3329, PIN 385-8833
Ines|e gnyne qh vagr bz s|e Ino ngg una {e hgr bpu plxyne?

On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Bob Fink wrote:

->At 01:51 AM 8/31/99 +0900, =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCJU4lMCVBJTElJBsoQg==?= wrote:
->>Hi bob,
->>Thank you for quick reply.
->>
->>| It is meant to be vague so so to imply high reliability in any and all
->>| meaningful areas. It is unlikely it would ever be really measured as we are
->>| by and large self policing, but it tries to convey intent.
->>
->>I understand above.
->>
->>Is this RFC standard style to mention reliability?
->
->Though this is to eventually be an RFC, it is an informational RFC, not a
->standards track or experimental RFC, thus there aren't any hard and fast rules.
->
->
->>How about exactly mentioning like above(imply high reliability)
->>to avoid confusion?
->
->Ok, I'll ask Rob Rockell as he is the author. 
->
->
->Thanks,
->
->Bob
->