6bone Prequalification for Sub-TLA assignment

[Brian E Carpenter]

Yes. The proposal to prequalify via 6bone is an addition to
the criteria originally suggested by the registries.

  Brian

Seth David Schoen wrote:
> 
> Bob Fink writes:
> 
> > I don't really want us to delay on this prequalification any longer than it
> > takes to get an agreement in place. We do need to have Sub-TLAs assigned.
> 
> On another note, is there an already accepted set of standards for
> qualification other than this prequalification procedure?  I.e. if someone
> wants to be a TLA or sub-TLA somewhat later on, is there a prospect of a clear
> way to do this other than via 6bone performance reports?
> 
> It seems to me that, if all goes well, a flood of late adopters -- which is
> to say other-than-earliest-conceivable-adopters -- will appear sometime in
> the next year.  Do they continue to go through the 6bone prequalification
> process in order to receive IPv6 allocations, or is there to be another way
> in?
> 
> --
>               Seth David Schoen / schoen@uclink4.berkeley.edu
> He said, "This is what the king who will reign over you will do."  And they
> said, "Nay, but we will have a king over us, that we also may be like all the
> nations." (1 Sam 8)  http://ishmael.geecs.org/~sigma/   http://www.loyalty.org/