From tvo at enterzone.net Wed May 3 01:07:41 2006 From: tvo at enterzone.net (John Fraizer) Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 04:07:41 -0400 Subject: [6bone] Cisco IPv6 configuration issues Message-ID: <445864CD.2000701@enterzone.net> I'm moving our v6 network to our Ciscos but, I'm having serious problems. router#sh ver Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) RSP Software (RSP-JSV-M), Version 12.3(12a), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) Using the following config: interface ATM0/0 ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.224 ip flow ingress ip route-cache flow atm pvc 1 0 5 qsaal atm pvc 2 0 16 ilmi atm uni-version 3.1 no atm ilmi-keepalive ipv6 address 2001:4F0:xxxx::13/64 ipv6 enable ipv6 cef lane config-atm-address C5.007900000000000000000000.00A03E000001.00 lane client ethernet xxxx I wind up with the following: #sh ipv6 interface ATM0/0 is up, line protocol is up IPv6 is enabled, link-local address is FE80::260:3EFF:FE09:7820 Global unicast address(es): 2001:4F0:xxxx::13, subnet is 2001:4F0:xxxx::/64 [TENTATIVE] Joined group address(es): FF02::1 FF02::2 FF02::5 FF02::1:FF00:13 FF02::1:FF09:7820 MTU is 1500 bytes ICMP error messages limited to one every 100 milliseconds ICMP redirects are enabled ND DAD is enabled, number of DAD attempts: 1 ND reachable time is 30000 milliseconds Hosts use stateless autoconfig for addresses. The problem is that the IPv6 addresses keep going into [TENTATIVE] state. I don't need IOS to try to second guess me about address duplicates. I can't seem to disable the duplicate address detection though. When I configure the address, it will work for a minute or so and then, it goes into [TENTATIVE] state which of course, makes it not work. It will cycle in and out of [TENTATIVE] state every once in a while but, it's down more often than not. I've tried "ipv6 nd dad attempts 0" to disable DAD but, that doesn't seem to do what I'm needing because even when DAD is disabled, the interface will go into [TENTATIVE] state on the address I've configured. Something to note: This interface is running LANE. Does anyone have any suggestions? Thanks, John From tvo at enterzone.net Wed May 3 22:29:13 2006 From: tvo at enterzone.net (John Fraizer) Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 01:29:13 -0400 Subject: [6bone] Cisco IPv6 configuration issues In-Reply-To: References: <445864CD.2000701@enterzone.net> Message-ID: <44599129.5000003@enterzone.net> Antonio Querubin wrote: > On Wed, 3 May 2006, John Fraizer wrote: > >> I'm moving our v6 network to our Ciscos but, I'm having serious problems. >> >> router#sh ver >> Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software >> IOS (tm) RSP Software (RSP-JSV-M), Version 12.3(12a), RELEASE SOFTWARE >> (fc2) >> >> >> >> Using the following config: >> >> interface ATM0/0 >> ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.224 >> ip flow ingress >> ip route-cache flow >> atm pvc 1 0 5 qsaal >> atm pvc 2 0 16 ilmi >> atm uni-version 3.1 >> no atm ilmi-keepalive >> ipv6 address 2001:4F0:xxxx::13/64 > > > Have you tried adding 'eui-64' to the end of the 'ipv6 address' line? > That'll at least lock down the last 64 bits of the address. I've tried that. Makes no difference. It still goes into [tentative] state. I'm looking for a way to say, "Look you SOB... I *manually* configured this %^&#@ IP address! Don't ^&#^%^&#ggin' try to second guess me! Just %@^%#^&gin accept the address I've given you with the "ipv6 address" command!!! The ^&#*gin router won't do that though. It wants to treat me like someone who can't manage their own IP space and needs their router to do it for them. John From trond.skjesol at uninett.no Wed May 3 23:35:04 2006 From: trond.skjesol at uninett.no (Trond Skjesol) Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 08:35:04 +0200 Subject: [6bone] Cisco IPv6 configuration issues In-Reply-To: <44599129.5000003@enterzone.net> References: <445864CD.2000701@enterzone.net> <44599129.5000003@enterzone.net> Message-ID: <4459A098.5020004@uninett.no> John Fraizer wrote: > Antonio Querubin wrote: >> On Wed, 3 May 2006, John Fraizer wrote: >> >>> I'm moving our v6 network to our Ciscos but, I'm having serious problems. >>> >>> router#sh ver >>> Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software >>> IOS (tm) RSP Software (RSP-JSV-M), Version 12.3(12a), RELEASE SOFTWARE >>> (fc2) >>> >>> >>> >>> Using the following config: >>> I'm not using ATM any more, but when I used it IPv6 over ATM was only implemented on point to point links. Have you tried to configure at point to point link? -Trond >>> interface ATM0/0 >>> ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.224 >>> ip flow ingress >>> ip route-cache flow >>> atm pvc 1 0 5 qsaal >>> atm pvc 2 0 16 ilmi >>> atm uni-version 3.1 >>> no atm ilmi-keepalive >>> ipv6 address 2001:4F0:xxxx::13/64 >> >> Have you tried adding 'eui-64' to the end of the 'ipv6 address' line? >> That'll at least lock down the last 64 bits of the address. > > > I've tried that. > Makes no difference. It still goes into [tentative] state. I'm looking > for a way to say, "Look you SOB... I *manually* configured this %^&#@ IP > address! Don't ^&#^%^&#ggin' try to second guess me! Just %@^%#^&gin > accept the address I've given you with the "ipv6 address" command!!! > > The ^&#*gin router won't do that though. It wants to treat me like > someone who can't manage their own IP space and needs their router > to do it for them. > > > John > _______________________________________________ > 6bone mailing list > 6bone at mailman.isi.edu > http://mailman.isi.edu/mailman/listinfo/6bone > From tvo at enterzone.net Thu May 4 06:24:34 2006 From: tvo at enterzone.net (John Fraizer) Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 09:24:34 -0400 Subject: [6bone] Cisco IPv6 configuration issues In-Reply-To: <4459A098.5020004@uninett.no> References: <445864CD.2000701@enterzone.net> <44599129.5000003@enterzone.net> <4459A098.5020004@uninett.no> Message-ID: <445A0092.8010509@enterzone.net> No. I haven't tried point-to-point. I need to set up 3000 individual PVCs like I need another hold in my head. ;) I know that ATM over LANE works. It just doesn't work right with Cisco gear - unless someone knows something I don't. It's been running just fine on my linux routers for 5 years. John Trond Skjesol wrote: > > John Fraizer wrote: > >>Antonio Querubin wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 3 May 2006, John Fraizer wrote: >>> >>> >>>>I'm moving our v6 network to our Ciscos but, I'm having serious problems. >>>> >>>>router#sh ver >>>>Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software >>>>IOS (tm) RSP Software (RSP-JSV-M), Version 12.3(12a), RELEASE SOFTWARE >>>>(fc2) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>Using the following config: >>>> > > > I'm not using ATM any more, but when I used it IPv6 over ATM was only > implemented on point to point links. Have you tried to configure at > point to point link? > > -Trond > > >>>>interface ATM0/0 >>>>ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.224 >>>>ip flow ingress >>>>ip route-cache flow >>>>atm pvc 1 0 5 qsaal >>>>atm pvc 2 0 16 ilmi >>>>atm uni-version 3.1 >>>>no atm ilmi-keepalive >>>>ipv6 address 2001:4F0:xxxx::13/64 >>> >>>Have you tried adding 'eui-64' to the end of the 'ipv6 address' line? >>>That'll at least lock down the last 64 bits of the address. >> >> >>I've tried that. >>Makes no difference. It still goes into [tentative] state. I'm looking >>for a way to say, "Look you SOB... I *manually* configured this %^&#@ IP >>address! Don't ^&#^%^&#ggin' try to second guess me! Just %@^%#^&gin >>accept the address I've given you with the "ipv6 address" command!!! >> >>The ^&#*gin router won't do that though. It wants to treat me like >>someone who can't manage their own IP space and needs their router >>to do it for them. >> >> >>John >>_______________________________________________ >>6bone mailing list >>6bone at mailman.isi.edu >>http://mailman.isi.edu/mailman/listinfo/6bone >> From bob at thefinks.com Sat May 6 23:24:56 2006 From: bob at thefinks.com (Robert Fink) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 23:24:56 -0700 Subject: [6bone] 6bone phaseout countdown notification - 1 months until phaseout Message-ID: <2a8350a60605062324h368a1658xf4ba9bfffa466087@mail.gmail.com> 6bone Operators & Users, Per RFC 3701, "6bone (IPv6 Testing Address Allocation) Phaseout ", 3FFE prefixes only remain valid until June 6, 2006. After June 6, 2006 no 6bone 3FFE prefixes, of any size/length, are to be used on the Internet in any form. Note that on June 6, 2006 3FFE prefixes do not actively need to be returned to the 6bone registry; 3FFE prefixes will simply be invalid after that date and assumed to be totally under the control of the IANA. Network operators may filter 3FFE prefixes on their borders to ensure these prefixes are not misused. Because of this, it is highly recommend that all 6Bone participants take early measures to find alternative IPv6 services, instead of waiting until the last minute, in order to avoid service disruption. Please take appropriate action now. Regards, Bob Fink -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.isi.edu/pipermail/6bone/attachments/20060506/f7a36343/attachment.html From iljitsch at muada.com Tue May 9 13:22:00 2006 From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 22:22:00 +0200 Subject: [6bone] Cisco IPv6 configuration issues In-Reply-To: <445A0092.8010509@enterzone.net> References: <445864CD.2000701@enterzone.net> <44599129.5000003@enterzone.net> <4459A098.5020004@uninett.no> <445A0092.8010509@enterzone.net> Message-ID: <89B595CA-6442-4EF4-9712-70AF8BFC0DB5@muada.com> On 4-mei-2006, at 15:24, John Fraizer wrote: > No. I haven't tried point-to-point. I need to set up 3000 > individual PVCs > like I need another hold in my head. ;) I know that ATM over LANE > works. It > just doesn't work right with Cisco gear - unless someone knows > something I don't. IPv6 over LANE, you mean? Sounds to me like once in a while, the router sees an unexpected neighbor discovery packet with its own address in it, which I speculate could be caused by the broadcast server doing some of its emulation magic. It would be useful to tcpdump this to see what's going on... In the mean time, a practical suggestion: if this only happens for the global address, and all of this is between a bunch of routers, why not forego the global addresses on the LANE cloud and just use link locals? IPv6 routers are smart enough to borrow a global address from another interface when required and routing protocols only deal with link local next hop addresses anyway. From frlinux at frlinux.net Mon May 22 02:10:50 2006 From: frlinux at frlinux.net (FRLinux) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 10:10:50 +0100 (IST) Subject: [6bone] Cisco IPv6 configuration issues In-Reply-To: <445864CD.2000701@enterzone.net> References: <445864CD.2000701@enterzone.net> Message-ID: <56111.160.6.1.47.1148289050.squirrel@webmail.frlinux.net> On Wed, May 3, 2006 9:07 am, John Fraizer wrote: > IOS (tm) RSP Software (RSP-JSV-M), Version 12.3(12a), RELEASE Hello, Your IOS has been retired according to Cisco : http://www.cisco.com/kobayashi/library/iosplanner/retired.shtml > lane config-atm-address C5.007900000000000000000000.00A03E000001.00 > lane client ethernet xxxx We are not using any lane config on our ATM setup, so i can't be of any help here ... Steph -- Mail sent under Debian GNU/Linux http://frlinux.net - Site d'aide a Linux en Francais http://frlinux.net/files/frlinux_public_key.asc From bob at thefinks.com Sun May 28 23:43:01 2006 From: bob at thefinks.com (Robert Fink) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 23:43:01 -0700 Subject: [6bone] Return 3FFE:4014::/32 pTLA In-Reply-To: <6.1.2.0.0.20060529120413.04ee67f8@pop3.csloxinfo.net> References: <6.1.2.0.0.20060529120413.04ee67f8@pop3.csloxinfo.net> Message-ID: <2a8350a60605282343v32604017x62a32c3c1ad3c692@mail.gmail.com> Thanks for returning your prefix. As we are close to shut down we won't be bothering to update any more records in the registry. Thanks for your participation. Bob === On 5/28/06, CS Loxinfo IPv6 wrote: > > Hi, > > From RFC 3701, LOXINFO-TH would like to return the 3FFE:4014::/32 prefix > to the 6bone. > But we can't remove all records from whois.6bone.net because our password > was wrong. So, you can remove all our record from 6bone.net. > We have completed transition of the network to APNIC with 2404:B0::/32. > > Many thanks for enabling us to develop IPv6 over the past few years. > > Thanks, > CS Loxinfo IPv6. > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.isi.edu/pipermail/6bone/attachments/20060528/f0bc0ac7/attachment.html From jeroen at unfix.org Mon May 29 03:47:35 2006 From: jeroen at unfix.org (Jeroen Massar) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 12:47:35 +0200 Subject: [6bone] Return 3FFE:4014::/32 pTLA In-Reply-To: <2a8350a60605282343v32604017x62a32c3c1ad3c692@mail.gmail.com> References: <6.1.2.0.0.20060529120413.04ee67f8@pop3.csloxinfo.net> <2a8350a60605282343v32604017x62a32c3c1ad3c692@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1148899655.16150.9.camel@firenze.zurich.ibm.com> On 5/28/06, CS Loxinfo IPv6 wrote: > > From RFC 3701, LOXINFO-TH would like to return the > 3FFE:4014::/32 prefix to the 6bone. It might be nice though to also stop announcing the prefix to the internet: grh.sixxs.net> show bgp 3ffe:4014::/32 BGP routing table entry for 3ffe:4014::/32 Paths: (63 available, best #41, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Not advertised to any peer 12634 6453 8002 2516 7660 2500 4725 17715 4750 2001:960:225::3 from 2001:960:225::3 (213.204.225.3) Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external Last update: Mon May 29 09:36:47 2006 and 40 others of those paths... See http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/ for further information. Greets, Jeroen -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 313 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mailman.isi.edu/pipermail/6bone/attachments/20060529/1e6c8458/attachment.bin From chatchai at nectec.or.th Wed May 31 06:34:39 2006 From: chatchai at nectec.or.th (Chatchai Chan-In) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 20:34:39 +0700 Subject: [6bone] Return 3FFE:4016::/32 pTLA Message-ID: <447D9B6F.80409@nectec.or.th> Dear Sir Per RFC 3701, "6bone (IPv6 Testing Address Allocation) Phaseout", 3FFE prefixes only remain valid until June 6, 2006. NECTEC-TH would like to return the 3FFE:4016::/32 prefix to the 6bone. Thank you very much for give we use IPv6 from 6bone to develop IPv6 over the past few years. Regards, NECTEC IPv6. From jeroen at unfix.org Wed May 31 08:54:13 2006 From: jeroen at unfix.org (Jeroen Massar) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 17:54:13 +0200 Subject: [6bone] Return 3FFE:4016::/32 pTLA In-Reply-To: <447D9B6F.80409@nectec.or.th> References: <447D9B6F.80409@nectec.or.th> Message-ID: <1149090853.19401.143.camel@firenze.zurich.ibm.com> On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 20:34 +0700, Chatchai Chan-In wrote: > Dear Sir > > Per RFC 3701, "6bone (IPv6 Testing Address Allocation) Phaseout", 3FFE > prefixes only remain valid until June 6, 2006. > > NECTEC-TH would like to return the 3FFE:4016::/32 prefix to the 6bone. I've marked them as returned in GRH, do note that it still sees two very long incoming paths, I would not be surpised if they are ghosts: grh.sixxs.net> show bgp 3ffe:4016::/32 BGP routing table entry for 3ffe:4016::/32 Paths: (2 available, best #2, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Not advertised to any peer 31424 8237 16215 3549 6939 4725 3748 3786 17832 9270 4538 4538 24489 24287 24490 24490 24490 24490 24490 7575 11537 20080 20312 27750 2153 22388 7660 2500 4697 224 2603 6175 2497 3836 2001:4168:fffe::1 from 2001:4168:fffe::1 (217.147.223.2) Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external Community: 31424:1004 Last update: Wed May 31 14:27:25 2006 31424 8237 16215 3549 6939 4725 3748 3786 17832 9270 4538 4538 24489 24287 24490 24490 24490 24490 24490 7575 11537 20080 20312 27750 2153 22388 7660 2500 4697 224 2603 6175 2497 3836 2001:4168:ffff::1 from 2001:4168:ffff::1 (217.147.223.1) Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external, best Community: 31424:1004 Last update: Wed May 31 14:27:19 2006 Both paths are coming from the same peer and 3549 and 6939 clearly don't have it, thus there could be an issue somewhere in: 31424 8237 16215 GRH doesn't see anything from the other ASN's, they are all three here in .ch though. AS holders in CC. I wonder what software runs on those nodes. Greets, Jeroen -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 313 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mailman.isi.edu/pipermail/6bone/attachments/20060531/c9260087/attachment.bin From bob at thefinks.com Wed May 31 09:25:01 2006 From: bob at thefinks.com (Robert Fink) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 09:25:01 -0700 Subject: [6bone] Return 3FFE:4016::/32 pTLA In-Reply-To: <447D9B6F.80409@nectec.or.th> References: <447D9B6F.80409@nectec.or.th> Message-ID: <2a8350a60605310925l100ed2f1pf455254324fdd97e@mail.gmail.com> Chatchai Chan-In, Thank you for returning your prefix. Regards, Bob On 5/31/06, Chatchai Chan-In wrote: > Dear Sir > > Per RFC 3701, "6bone (IPv6 Testing Address Allocation) Phaseout", 3FFE > prefixes only remain valid until June 6, 2006. > > NECTEC-TH would like to return the 3FFE:4016::/32 prefix to the 6bone. > > Thank you very much for give we use IPv6 from 6bone to develop IPv6 > over the past few years. > > Regards, > NECTEC IPv6. > > > _______________________________________________ > 6bone mailing list > 6bone at mailman.isi.edu > http://mailman.isi.edu/mailman/listinfo/6bone > > >