From cfaber at fpsn.net Wed Jul 14 11:15:58 2004 From: cfaber at fpsn.net (Colin Faber) Date: Wed Jul 14 11:15:39 2004 Subject: [6bone] e.f.f.3.ip6.[int|arpa] update In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.2.20040630072604.02f63938@mail.addr.com> References: <58980000.1083866728@hades.hexago.com> <20040520013657.GI1665@yeenoghu.progsoc.uts.edu.au> <40BB8B80.1060807@fpsn.net> <6.1.0.6.2.20040531153902.02058ec0@mail.addr.com> <20040630014135.GA27938@progsoc.uts.edu.au> <6.0.1.1.2.20040630120424.01dce148@kahuna.telstra.net> <6.1.0.6.2.20040630072604.02f63938@mail.addr.com> Message-ID: <40F5785E.6070605@fpsn.net> Seems like things have started to stagnate again. Has anyone heard any word back from anyone at IANA about when they think they'll have the servers ready? *prod* *push* *jab* etc. E.E.F.3.IP6.ARPA From jeroen at unfix.org Thu Jul 15 00:37:20 2004 From: jeroen at unfix.org (Jeroen Massar) Date: Thu Jul 15 00:38:47 2004 Subject: [6bone] e.f.f.3.ip6.[int|arpa] update In-Reply-To: <40F5785E.6070605@fpsn.net> References: <58980000.1083866728@hades.hexago.com> <20040520013657.GI1665@yeenoghu.progsoc.uts.edu.au> <40BB8B80.1060807@fpsn.net> <6.1.0.6.2.20040531153902.02058ec0@mail.addr.com> <20040630014135.GA27938@progsoc.uts.edu.au> <6.0.1.1.2.20040630120424.01dce148@kahuna.telstra.net> <6.1.0.6.2.20040630072604.02f63938@mail.addr.com> <40F5785E.6070605@fpsn.net> Message-ID: <1089877040.5063.124.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com> On Wed, 2004-07-14 at 20:15, Colin Faber wrote: > Seems like things have started to stagnate again. > > Has anyone heard any word back from anyone at IANA about when they > think they'll have the servers ready? > > > *prod* *push* *jab* etc. > > E.E.F.3.IP6.ARPA With any luck it will be there when XP SP2 finally comes out (now planned for August 2004), which basically is one of the few OS's which is not capable of ip6.arpa resolving, the rest can also be upgraded. Of course one can install the RC which also works fine(tm). And otherwise..... it will be 6/6/2006 ;) When XP Sp2 is final I am dumping all ip6.int related domain's I have control over, too bad for people who are still using those spaces and when ip6.arpa isn't there yet, almost 2 years too late. Greets, Jeroen -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 240 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mailman.isi.edu/pipermail/6bone/attachments/20040715/7b7e02d6/attachment.bin From gert at space.net Thu Jul 15 04:18:02 2004 From: gert at space.net (Gert Doering) Date: Thu Jul 15 04:19:01 2004 Subject: [6bone] e.f.f.3.ip6.[int|arpa] update In-Reply-To: <1089877040.5063.124.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com> References: <58980000.1083866728@hades.hexago.com> <20040520013657.GI1665@yeenoghu.progsoc.uts.edu.au> <40BB8B80.1060807@fpsn.net> <6.1.0.6.2.20040531153902.02058ec0@mail.addr.com> <20040630014135.GA27938@progsoc.uts.edu.au> <6.0.1.1.2.20040630120424.01dce148@kahuna.telstra.net> <6.1.0.6.2.20040630072604.02f63938@mail.addr.com> <40F5785E.6070605@fpsn.net> <1089877040.5063.124.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com> Message-ID: <20040715111801.GN67702@Space.Net> Hi, On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 09:37:20AM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote: > With any luck it will be there when XP SP2 finally comes out (now > planned for August 2004), which basically is one of the few OS's which > is not capable of ip6.arpa resolving, the rest can also be upgraded. Of > course one can install the RC which also works fine(tm). The Cisco IOS resolver should also do ipv6.arpa "real soon now". [..] > When XP Sp2 is final I am dumping all ip6.int related domain's I have > control over, too bad for people who are still using those spaces and > when ip6.arpa isn't there yet, almost 2 years too late. Ditto. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 65398 (60210) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster@Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299 From jeroen at unfix.org Thu Jul 15 05:49:02 2004 From: jeroen at unfix.org (Jeroen Massar) Date: Thu Jul 15 05:49:47 2004 Subject: [6bone] e.f.f.3.ip6.[int|arpa] update In-Reply-To: <20040715111801.GN67702@Space.Net> References: <58980000.1083866728@hades.hexago.com> <20040520013657.GI1665@yeenoghu.progsoc.uts.edu.au> <40BB8B80.1060807@fpsn.net> <6.1.0.6.2.20040531153902.02058ec0@mail.addr.com> <20040630014135.GA27938@progsoc.uts.edu.au> <6.0.1.1.2.20040630120424.01dce148@kahuna.telstra.net> <6.1.0.6.2.20040630072604.02f63938@mail.addr.com> <40F5785E.6070605@fpsn.net> <1089877040.5063.124.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com> <20040715111801.GN67702@Space.Net> Message-ID: <1089895742.27190.30.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com> On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 13:18, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 09:37:20AM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote: > > With any luck it will be there when XP SP2 finally comes out (now > > planned for August 2004), which basically is one of the few OS's which > > is not capable of ip6.arpa resolving, the rest can also be upgraded. Of > > course one can install the RC which also works fine(tm). > > The Cisco IOS resolver should also do ipv6.arpa "real soon now". And the Cisco PIX will be doing IPv6 firewalling "really soon now" too ;) Or didn't you mean it sarcasticly ? :) Greets, Jeroen -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 240 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mailman.isi.edu/pipermail/6bone/attachments/20040715/6678e77f/attachment.bin From gert at space.net Thu Jul 15 06:20:38 2004 From: gert at space.net (Gert Doering) Date: Thu Jul 15 06:22:01 2004 Subject: [6bone] e.f.f.3.ip6.[int|arpa] update In-Reply-To: <1089895742.27190.30.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com> References: <20040520013657.GI1665@yeenoghu.progsoc.uts.edu.au> <40BB8B80.1060807@fpsn.net> <6.1.0.6.2.20040531153902.02058ec0@mail.addr.com> <20040630014135.GA27938@progsoc.uts.edu.au> <6.0.1.1.2.20040630120424.01dce148@kahuna.telstra.net> <6.1.0.6.2.20040630072604.02f63938@mail.addr.com> <40F5785E.6070605@fpsn.net> <1089877040.5063.124.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com> <20040715111801.GN67702@Space.Net> <1089895742.27190.30.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com> Message-ID: <20040715132038.GR67702@Space.Net> Hi, On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 02:49:02PM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote: > On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 13:18, Gert Doering wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 09:37:20AM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote: > > > With any luck it will be there when XP SP2 finally comes out (now > > > planned for August 2004), which basically is one of the few OS's which > > > is not capable of ip6.arpa resolving, the rest can also be upgraded. Of > > > course one can install the RC which also works fine(tm). > > > > The Cisco IOS resolver should also do ipv6.arpa "real soon now". > > And the Cisco PIX will be doing IPv6 firewalling "really soon now" too > ;) Dunno about that... > Or didn't you mean it sarcasticly ? :) No, I was speaking seriously. It's a known issue, the code to fix it exists (and works), and "just" needs to be rolled into the affected IOS trains. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 65398 (60210) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster@Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299 From Stig.Venaas at uninett.no Thu Jul 15 06:31:52 2004 From: Stig.Venaas at uninett.no (Stig Venaas) Date: Thu Jul 15 06:32:45 2004 Subject: [6bone] e.f.f.3.ip6.[int|arpa] update In-Reply-To: <1089895742.27190.30.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com> References: <20040520013657.GI1665@yeenoghu.progsoc.uts.edu.au> <40BB8B80.1060807@fpsn.net> <6.1.0.6.2.20040531153902.02058ec0@mail.addr.com> <20040630014135.GA27938@progsoc.uts.edu.au> <6.0.1.1.2.20040630120424.01dce148@kahuna.telstra.net> <6.1.0.6.2.20040630072604.02f63938@mail.addr.com> <40F5785E.6070605@fpsn.net> <1089877040.5063.124.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com> <20040715111801.GN67702@Space.Net> <1089895742.27190.30.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com> Message-ID: <20040715133152.GA9275@sverresborg.uninett.no> On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 02:49:02PM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote: > On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 13:18, Gert Doering wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 09:37:20AM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote: > > > With any luck it will be there when XP SP2 finally comes out (now > > > planned for August 2004), which basically is one of the few OS's which > > > is not capable of ip6.arpa resolving, the rest can also be upgraded. Of > > > course one can install the RC which also works fine(tm). > > > > The Cisco IOS resolver should also do ipv6.arpa "real soon now". > > And the Cisco PIX will be doing IPv6 firewalling "really soon now" too > ;) > > Or didn't you mean it sarcasticly ? :) I don't think he did (: It is actually quite soon now. Stig From old_mc_donald at hotmail.com Sun Jul 18 04:41:52 2004 From: old_mc_donald at hotmail.com (Gav) Date: Sun Jul 18 04:43:02 2004 Subject: [6bone] Ipv6 Enabled Web Site Message-ID: Hi All, I want to create an IPv6 only version of my web site. I want that version to be the same as the IPv4 version except for some extra content on existing pages and also some v6 only extra pages. I notice www.kame.net and a few others have at the bottom of their page a line which tells the user if they are visiting the site using a v6 address or a v4 address. I would like to know how to do this. I am guessing something to do with HTTP_REFERER is involved but not sure how to implement. The extra content I am guessing I can use SSI includes and using conditional statements include them if HTTP_REFERER is v6 or leave them out if it is v4. I am using VirtualHosts on my Apache2 server, I am thinking I implement another VirtualHost container to listen out for the v6 socket. I want to do this so as to promote the use of IPv6 and if they are not enabled, then give a short tutorial on how to get enabled, then they are rewarded with this extra content. The other thing is, although I am v6 enabled and have an account with FREENET6 , my ipv6 if seems correct, kame.net still says I am viewing using a v4 address, any ideas at what I have missed ? Thanks people, I thought you might like something to do :) Gav... www.minitutorials.com <---- The site I am thinking of using. (online when my ISP isnt playing up!) --- Checked for Viruses (Viri) , Gav... Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.720 / Virus Database: 476 - Release Date: 14/07/2004 From jeroen at unfix.org Sun Jul 18 05:31:23 2004 From: jeroen at unfix.org (Jeroen Massar) Date: Sun Jul 18 05:32:51 2004 Subject: [6bone] Ipv6 Enabled Web Site In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1090153882.9074.146.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com> On Sun, 2004-07-18 at 13:41, Gav wrote: > Hi All, > > I want to create an IPv6 only version of my web site. I want that version to > be the same as the IPv4 version > except for some extra content on existing pages and also some v6 only extra > pages. > > I notice www.kame.net and a few others have at the bottom of their page a > line which tells the user if they are visiting > the site using a v6 address or a v4 address. I would like to know how to do > this. I am guessing something to do with > HTTP_REFERER is involved but not sure how to implement. Nopes, you check the SERVER_ADDR, if it contains '.' then it is IPv4, which matches even: ::ffff:192.0.2.1 when your server does IPv4 mapped addresses. Eg in PHP: if (isset($_SERVER["SERVER_ADDR"])) { if (strstr($_SERVER["SERVER_ADDR"], ".")) { echo "IPv4 Connection Detected!\n"; } else { echo "IPv6 Connection Detected!\n"; } } else echo "Can't determine if you are using IPv4 or IPv6\n"; > The extra content I am guessing I can use SSI includes and using conditional > statements include them if HTTP_REFERER is v6 or leave them out if it is v4. > I am using VirtualHosts on my Apache2 server, I am thinking I implement > another VirtualHost container to listen out for the v6 socket. One vhost is enough as you can just let the content do the above. > I want to do this so as to promote the use of IPv6 and if they are not > enabled, then give a short tutorial on how to get enabled, then they are > rewarded with this extra content. > > The other thing is, although I am v6 enabled and have an account with > FREENET6 , my ipv6 if seems correct, kame.net still says I am viewing using > a v4 address, any ideas at what I have missed ? Are you very sure that your IPv6 is working? Check http://www.sixxs.net/tools/ipv6calc/ If that shows IPv4, try: http://www.ipv6.sixxs.net/tools/ipv6calc/ If that doesn't connect then you have no IPv6... thus check your config and of course try traceroute6's to that host to see where your connectivity stops. Applications should first try IPv6 and then IPv4 but there has lately been a trend that applications start doing IPv4 first and then IPv6 even if this is against the RFC. Their biggest reason "we now support IPv6 and when that host is unreachable we are slower than the competition because we timeout and then try IPv4". > www.minitutorials.com <---- The site I am thinking of using. (online when > my ISP isnt playing up!) You will have to add a IPv6 address to that host first: $ host -t aaaa www.minitutorials.com www.minitutorials.com has no AAAA record (Authoritative answer) Also a good 'policy' is to have: www.example.com = IPv4 + IPv6 (A+AAAA) www.ipv4.example.com = IPv4 (A) www.ipv6.example.com = IPv6 (AAAA) That way you can always use the IPv4 or IPv6 specific host and be absolutely sure that you are accessing the correct host. Greets, Jeroen -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 240 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mailman.isi.edu/pipermail/6bone/attachments/20040718/524a909f/attachment.bin From sp at iphh.net Sun Jul 18 07:40:44 2004 From: sp at iphh.net (Sascha E. Pollok) Date: Sun Jul 18 07:41:51 2004 Subject: [6bone] Ipv6 Enabled Web Site In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Gav, > I notice www.kame.net and a few others have at the bottom of their page a > line which tells the user if they are visiting > the site using a v6 address or a v4 address. I would like to know how to do > this. I am guessing something to do with I did this with creating a 2nd vhost on my v6 enabled Apache but with a different DirectoryIndex statement (e.g. using index6.html instead of index.html) and using only the v6 address in the VirtualHost tag. Dont know if this is already sufficient for your situation. Sascha From old_mc_donald at hotmail.com Sun Jul 18 14:21:37 2004 From: old_mc_donald at hotmail.com (Gav) Date: Sun Jul 18 14:22:50 2004 Subject: [6bone] Ipv6 Enabled Web Site References: <1090153882.9074.146.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com> Message-ID: Thanks for the reply Jeroen, looks like the PHP will do exactly what I want thanks. Now for me the confusing part. Since installing FREENET6 client I now have 9 Interfaces (I have 2 Network Cards and a Cable Modem) I can ping6 kame.net no problems I can tracert6 kame.net no problems. (11 Hops - wide.ad.jp using 4 hops ?) kame.net however still insists I am v4 I can ping6 and tracert6 ipv6.sixxs.net no problems and it tells me I am accessing using v6 address and can view www.ipv6.sixxs.net no problems, however it tells me my address 3ffe:bc0::8000::3c6a.sixxs.net does not exist (authoritive answer). That being the case how I can access the site, and why does it add on .sixxs.net onto the end ? The address 3ffe:bc0::8000::3c6a is on my Interface 2 , I thought Windows used 3,4 or 5 traditionally. I have attatched output of my 'ipv6 if' results. Interface 9 looks like the one I should be using. Looks like Spaghetti to me. Gav... --- Checked for Viruses (Viri) , Gav... Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.720 / Virus Database: 476 - Release Date: 15/07/2004 -------------- next part -------------- Interface 9: Ethernet: Local Area Connection 2 Guid {655005DA-6B2E-479D-9715-DFD865D503C8} uses Neighbor Discovery uses Router Discovery forwards packets link-layer address: 00-02-b3-5b-9e-5f preferred link-local fe80::202:b3ff:fe5b:9e5f, life infinite multicast interface-local ff01::1, 1 refs, not reportable multicast link-local ff02::1, 1 refs, not reportable multicast link-local ff02::1:ff5b:9e5f, 1 refs, last reporter link MTU 1500 (true link MTU 1500) current hop limit 128 reachable time 39500ms (base 30000ms) retransmission interval 1000ms DAD transmits 1 default site prefix length 48 Interface 7: Ethernet: Network Bridge Guid {9F42431E-3713-4622-8994-AD8E79504DAD} zones: link 7 site 2 uses Neighbor Discovery uses Router Discovery sends Router Advertisements forwards packets link-layer address: 02-80-48-ee-2f-b2 preferred global 2002:cb79:cc82:7:a888:f569:f8b7:26d4, life 47h55m49s/25m49s (temporary) preferred global 2002:cb79:cc82:7:80:48ff:feee:2fb2, life 47h55m49s/25m49s (public) preferred site-local fec0::7:80:48ff:feee:2fb2, life 47h55m49s/25m49s (public) preferred link-local fe80::80:48ff:feee:2fb2, life infinite multicast interface-local ff01::1, 1 refs, not reportable multicast link-local ff02::1, 1 refs, not reportable multicast link-local ff02::1:ffee:2fb2, 3 refs multicast interface-local ff01::2, 1 refs, not reportable multicast link-local ff02::2, 1 refs, last reporter multicast site-local ff05::2, 1 refs, last reporter anycast site-local fec0:0:0:7:: multicast link-local ff02::1:ff00:0, 2 refs, last reporter multicast link-local ff02::1:ffb7:26d4, 1 refs, last reporter anycast global 2002:cb79:cc82:7:: link MTU 1500 (true link MTU 1500) current hop limit 128 reachable time 34000ms (base 30000ms) retransmission interval 1000ms DAD transmits 1 default site prefix length 48 Interface 6: Ethernet Guid {D524E979-96EE-4A99-9100-DD1F9A257A32} zones: link 6 site 3 uses Neighbor Discovery uses Router Discovery forwards packets link-layer address: 00-80-48-ee-2f-b2 preferred global 2002:cb79:cc82:7:ddec:6fd6:ddc5:d487, life 47h55m49s/25m49s (temporary) preferred global 2002:cb79:cc82:7:280:48ff:feee:2fb2, life 47h55m49s/25m49s (public) preferred site-local fec0::7:280:48ff:feee:2fb2, life 47h55m49s/25m49s (public) preferred link-local fe80::280:48ff:feee:2fb2, life infinite multicast interface-local ff01::1, 1 refs, not reportable multicast link-local ff02::1, 1 refs, not reportable multicast link-local ff02::1:ffee:2fb2, 3 refs, last reporter multicast link-local ff02::1:ffc5:d487, 1 refs, last reporter link MTU 1500 (true link MTU 1500) current hop limit 128 reachable time 40000ms (base 30000ms) retransmission interval 1000ms DAD transmits 1 default site prefix length 48 Interface 4: Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface Guid {53DFD666-F5B6-4FB0-BDBD-D28C3334E588} zones: link 4 site 4 cable unplugged uses Neighbor Discovery uses Router Discovery forwards packets routing preference 2 link-layer address: 0.0.0.0:0 preferred link-local fe80::5445:5245:444f, life infinite multicast interface-local ff01::1, 1 refs, not reportable multicast link-local ff02::1, 1 refs, not reportable link MTU 1280 (true link MTU 1280) current hop limit 128 reachable time 44000ms (base 30000ms) retransmission interval 1000ms DAD transmits 0 default site prefix length 48 Interface 3: 6to4 Tunneling Pseudo-Interface Guid {A995346E-9F3E-2EDB-47D1-9CC7BA01CD73} does not use Neighbor Discovery does not use Router Discovery forwards packets routing preference 1 preferred global 2002:cb79:cc82::cb79:cc82, life infinite link MTU 1280 (true link MTU 65515) current hop limit 128 reachable time 21500ms (base 30000ms) retransmission interval 1000ms DAD transmits 0 default site prefix length 48 Interface 2: Automatic Tunneling Pseudo-Interface Guid {48FCE3FC-EC30-E50E-F1A7-71172AEEE3AE} does not use Neighbor Discovery does not use Router Discovery forwards packets routing preference 1 EUI-64 embedded IPv4 address: 0.0.0.0 router link-layer address: 0.0.0.0 preferred link-local fe80::5efe:203.121.204.130, life infinite preferred global 3ffe:bc0:8000::3c6b, life infinite (manual) preferred link-local fe80::5efe:192.168.0.1, life infinite link MTU 1280 (true link MTU 65515) current hop limit 128 reachable time 42500ms (base 30000ms) retransmission interval 1000ms DAD transmits 0 default site prefix length 48 Interface 1: Loopback Pseudo-Interface Guid {6BD113CC-5EC2-7638-B953-0B889DA72014} zones: link 1 site 5 does not use Neighbor Discovery does not use Router Discovery link-layer address: preferred link-local ::1, life infinite preferred link-local fe80::1, life infinite link MTU 1500 (true link MTU 4294967295) current hop limit 128 reachable time 22500ms (base 30000ms) retransmission interval 1000ms DAD transmits 0 default site prefix length 48 From old_mc_donald at hotmail.com Sun Jul 18 14:23:30 2004 From: old_mc_donald at hotmail.com (Gav) Date: Sun Jul 18 14:23:48 2004 Subject: [6bone] Ipv6 Enabled Web Site References: <1090153882.9074.146.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com> Message-ID: You will have to add a IPv6 address to that host first: $ host -t aaaa www.minitutorials.com www.minitutorials.com has no AAAA record (Authoritative answer) Also a good 'policy' is to have: www.example.com = IPv4 + IPv6 (A+AAAA) www.ipv4.example.com = IPv4 (A) www.ipv6.example.com = IPv6 (AAAA) That way you can always use the IPv4 or IPv6 specific host and be absolutely sure that you are accessing the correct host. ------------------------- Thanks Jeroen, I will do that. Gav... --- Checked for Viruses (Viri) , Gav... Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.720 / Virus Database: 476 - Release Date: 15/07/2004 From old_mc_donald at hotmail.com Sun Jul 18 14:27:38 2004 From: old_mc_donald at hotmail.com (Gav) Date: Sun Jul 18 14:27:47 2004 Subject: [6bone] Ipv6 Enabled Web Site References: Message-ID: | I did this with creating a 2nd vhost | on my v6 enabled Apache but with a different | DirectoryIndex statement (e.g. using | index6.html instead of index.html) and | using only the v6 address in the VirtualHost | tag. | | Dont know if this is already sufficient | for your situation. | | Sascha Thanks Sascha, I will look into that, not sure which is the best way to go without having '2 separate sites' as such. Two different Index pages seems a good idea, the v6 one allowing access to extra pages and content. Cheers Gav... --- Checked for Viruses (Viri) , Gav... Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.720 / Virus Database: 476 - Release Date: 15/07/2004 From iljitsch at muada.com Mon Jul 19 01:16:10 2004 From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum) Date: Mon Jul 19 01:16:48 2004 Subject: [6bone] Ipv6 Enabled Web Site In-Reply-To: References: <1090153882.9074.146.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com> Message-ID: On 18-jul-04, at 23:21, Gav wrote: > I can ping6 kame.net no problems > I can tracert6 kame.net no problems. (11 Hops - wide.ad.jp using 4 > hops ?) > kame.net however still insists I am v4 It may be your browser. Remember that applications must also support IPv6. But you're using Windows, right? IE should automatically prefer IPv6 when you have it. You can test if you have an IPv6-capable browser by going to http://www.ipv6.bgpexpert.com/ Since this FQDN doesn't have an IPv6 address, either it won't load or it will load over IPv6. You can go to the same site without the "ipv6" part and look at the bottom (where you see the address you're using) to see if your browser also _prefers_ IPv6. > can view www.ipv6.sixxs.net no problems, > however it tells me my address 3ffe:bc0::8000::3c6a.sixxs.net does not > exist > (authoritive answer). That being the case how I can access the site, > and why > does it add on .sixxs.net onto the end ? > The address 3ffe:bc0::8000::3c6a is on my Interface 2 That can't be right, as this isn't a valid IPv6 address: it has two "::" sequences in it. Only one is allowed. The sixxs scripts probably think this is a hostname and attach their domain to it to create an FQDN which of course doesn't exist. Or maybe this happens in the DNS. Iljitsch BTW, Jeroen: coming to Ede next week? From jeroen at unfix.org Mon Jul 19 02:47:11 2004 From: jeroen at unfix.org (Jeroen Massar) Date: Mon Jul 19 02:47:49 2004 Subject: [6bone] Ipv6 Enabled Web Site In-Reply-To: References: <1090153882.9074.146.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com> Message-ID: <1090230430.9074.285.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com> On Sun, 2004-07-18 at 23:21, Gav wrote: > Thanks for the reply Jeroen, looks like the PHP will do exactly what I want > thanks. > > Now for me the confusing part. > > Since installing FREENET6 client I now have 9 Interfaces (I have 2 Network > Cards and a Cable Modem) You also have 6to4 enabled and some bridging running which makes it a fine mess ;) Also: Interface 2: Automatic Tunneling Pseudo-Interface Guid {48FCE3FC-EC30-E50E-F1A7-71172AEEE3AE} does not use Neighbor Discovery does not use Router Discovery forwards packets routing preference 1 EUI-64 embedded IPv4 address: 0.0.0.0 router link-layer address: 0.0.0.0 preferred link-local fe80::5efe:203.121.204.130, life infinite preferred global 3ffe:bc0:8000::3c6b, life infinite (manual) preferred link-local fe80::5efe:192.168.0.1, life infinite link MTU 1280 (true link MTU 65515) current hop limit 128 reachable time 42500ms (base 30000ms) retransmission interval 1000ms DAD transmits 0 default site prefix length 48 Thus you are behind a NAT I (192.168.0.1 == rfc1918), as that IPv6 did hit the webserver it apparently worked though: 3ffe:bc0:8000::3c6b - - [18/Jul/2004:14:49:04 +0200] "GET /tools/ipv6calc/ HTTP/1 .1" 200 6981 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)" > I can ping6 kame.net no problems > I can tracert6 kame.net no problems. (11 Hops - wide.ad.jp using 4 hops ?) > kame.net however still insists I am v4 Then it must be a timeout issue in your browser I assume, I guess that even though you are physically close to the box your IPv6 packets will go twice around the world before they reach that box. > I can ping6 and tracert6 ipv6.sixxs.net no problems and it tells me I am > accessing using v6 address and can view www.ipv6.sixxs.net no problems, > however it tells me my address 3ffe:bc0::8000::3c6a.sixxs.net does not exist > (authoritive answer). That being the case how I can access the site, and why > does it add on .sixxs.net onto the end ? Can you screenshot that and mail the JPG to info@sixxs.net as I can't reproduce it. Are you sure it is ::3c6a , especially the _a_ as the logs show a 'b' in the end. Assuming freenet6 still uses /127's, the 'a' would be the freenet6 side of the tunnel. > The address 3ffe:bc0::8000::3c6a is on my Interface 2 , I thought Windows > used 3,4 or 5 traditionally. > I have attatched output of my 'ipv6 if' results. Interface 9 looks like the > one I should be using. Looks like Spaghetti to me. Doesn't really say a thing as they can be mixed up and it totally depends on installation order etc. On XP you should drop usage of the ipv6.exe command in favor of netsh.exe. It also seems that there are differences between "ipv6 install" and "netsh interface ipv6 install", though what exactly the differences are, je ne sais pas.s On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 10:16, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > On 18-jul-04, at 23:21, Gav wrote: > > > can view www.ipv6.sixxs.net no problems, > > however it tells me my address 3ffe:bc0::8000::3c6a.sixxs.net does not > > exist > > (authoritive answer). That being the case how I can access the site, > > and why > > does it add on .sixxs.net onto the end ? > > > The address 3ffe:bc0::8000::3c6a is on my Interface 2 > > That can't be right, as this isn't a valid IPv6 address: it has two > "::" sequences in it. Only one is allowed. The sixxs scripts probably > think this is a hostname and attach their domain to it to create an > FQDN which of course doesn't exist. Or maybe this happens in the DNS. That is the normal IPv6calc by Peter Bieringer, nevertheless it should not be doing that. > BTW, Jeroen: coming to Ede next week? Nope and for the moment it seems like I will be only visiting .nl for a few days in August and then again in October. Greets, Jeroen -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 240 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mailman.isi.edu/pipermail/6bone/attachments/20040719/88493f95/attachment.bin From old_mc_donald at hotmail.com Mon Jul 19 03:15:16 2004 From: old_mc_donald at hotmail.com (Gav) Date: Mon Jul 19 03:15:49 2004 Subject: [6bone] Ipv6 Enabled Web Site References: <1090153882.9074.146.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com> Message-ID: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Iljitsch van Beijnum" | On 18-jul-04, at 23:21, Gav wrote: | It may be your browser. Remember that applications must also support | IPv6. But you're using Windows, right? IE should automatically prefer | IPv6 when you have it. Internet Explorer seems to be behaving correctly. | | You can test if you have an IPv6-capable browser by going to | http://www.ipv6.bgpexpert.com/ Since this FQDN doesn't have an IPv6 | address, either it won't load or it will load over IPv6. You can go to | the same site without the "ipv6" part and look at the bottom (where you | see the address you're using) to see if your browser also _prefers_ | IPv6. Went to both addresses, bgpexpert told me I was connected using IPv6 both times. | | > can view www.ipv6.sixxs.net no problems, | > however it tells me my address 3ffe:bc0::8000::3c6a.sixxs.net does not | > exist | > (authoritive answer). That being the case how I can access the site, | > and why | > does it add on .sixxs.net onto the end ? | | > The address 3ffe:bc0::8000::3c6a is on my Interface 2 | | That can't be right, as this isn't a valid IPv6 address: it has two | "::" sequences in it. Only one is allowed. The sixxs scripts probably | think this is a hostname and attach their domain to it to create an | FQDN which of course doesn't exist. Or maybe this happens in the DNS. Whoops my bad, it is 3ffe:bc0:8000::3c6a and on another computer in my network it is allocated 2002:cb79:cc82:7:20b3:d73c:32b1:1318. Again,this computer will connect to sixxs.net and bgpexpert.com over IPv6 no problems. This computer is also told by Kame.net that it is connecting over IPv4, although it can ping6 and tracert6 it no problem. Is Kame.net giving out the wrong information ? Maybe it is broken somewhere. Gav... --- Checked for Viruses (Viri) , Gav... Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.720 / Virus Database: 476 - Release Date: 14/07/2004 From old_mc_donald at hotmail.com Mon Jul 19 04:46:22 2004 From: old_mc_donald at hotmail.com (Gav) Date: Mon Jul 19 04:47:00 2004 Subject: [6bone] Ipv6 Enabled Web Site References: <1090153882.9074.146.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com> <1090230430.9074.285.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com> Message-ID: Hi Jeroen, Screenshot of what I get a sixxs.net. J>You also have 6to4 enabled and some bridging running which makes it a fine mess ;) Ok, it seems when enabling and using automatic tools, yes they are easy to use , but can make a mess of things and just enable everything in site and attatch a v6 address to it. I have now removed the Bridge and disabled 6to4 . I have also disabled Teredo, although the Interface still shows up as unplugged. >From that it seems to have cured (unless it was cured elsewhere) my kame.net problem (hops reduced) and I can now see the dancing turtle and kame states I am using IPv6. However my other computers in the network are now unable to connect via IPv6. J>Are you sure it is ::3c6a , especially the _a_ as the logs show a 'b' in the end. Assuming freenet6 still uses /127's, the 'a' would be the freenet6 side of the tunnel. Other way round it seems, the Freenet6 Server is assigned the 'b' while my Server has the 'a'. I have attached my updated view of 'ipv6 if' with the above changes. I now have to change my tspc.conf file (Freenet6) but not sure where now to point these to: if_tunnel=2 if_prefix=3 Looks like I need to point these to maybe 2 and 11 respectively? Dont *think* I need to change anything else in there. When setting up the Listen directive on my Apache Server , do I use 3ffe:bc0:8000::3c6a or 3ffe:bc0:8000::3c6b or something else? Thanks for your time. Gav... --- Checked for Viruses (Viri) , Gav... Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.720 / Virus Database: 476 - Release Date: 14/07/2004 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: sixxs.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 22996 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mailman.isi.edu/pipermail/6bone/attachments/20040719/7d9ff188/sixxs-0001.jpg -------------- next part -------------- Interface 12: Ethernet: Local Area Connection Guid {D524E979-96EE-4A99-9100-DD1F9A257A32} zones: link 12 admin 6 site 2 uses Neighbor Discovery uses Router Discovery forwards packets link-layer address: 00-80-48-ee-2f-b2 preferred link-local fe80::280:48ff:feee:2fb2, life infinite multicast interface-local ff01::1, 1 refs, not reportable multicast link-local ff02::1, 1 refs, not reportable multicast link-local ff02::1:ffee:2fb2, 1 refs, last reporter link MTU 1500 (true link MTU 1500) current hop limit 128 reachable time 38000ms (base 30000ms) retransmission interval 1000ms DAD transmits 1 default site prefix length 48 Interface 11: Ethernet: Local Area Connection 2 Guid {655005DA-6B2E-479D-9715-DFD865D503C8} uses Neighbor Discovery uses Router Discovery forwards packets link-layer address: 00-02-b3-5b-9e-5f preferred link-local fe80::202:b3ff:fe5b:9e5f, life infinite multicast interface-local ff01::1, 1 refs, not reportable multicast link-local ff02::1, 1 refs, not reportable multicast link-local ff02::1:ff5b:9e5f, 1 refs, last reporter link MTU 1500 (true link MTU 1500) current hop limit 128 reachable time 29000ms (base 30000ms) retransmission interval 1000ms DAD transmits 1 default site prefix length 48 Interface 4: Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface Guid {53DFD666-F5B6-4FB0-BDBD-D28C3334E588} zones: link 4 site 4 cable unplugged uses Neighbor Discovery uses Router Discovery forwards packets routing preference 2 link-layer address: 0.0.0.0:0 preferred link-local fe80::5445:5245:444f, life infinite multicast interface-local ff01::1, 1 refs, not reportable multicast link-local ff02::1, 1 refs, not reportable link MTU 1280 (true link MTU 1280) current hop limit 128 reachable time 31500ms (base 30000ms) retransmission interval 1000ms DAD transmits 0 default site prefix length 48 Interface 3: 6to4 Tunneling Pseudo-Interface Guid {A995346E-9F3E-2EDB-47D1-9CC7BA01CD73} does not use Neighbor Discovery does not use Router Discovery routing preference 1 link MTU 1280 (true link MTU 65515) current hop limit 128 reachable time 34500ms (base 30000ms) retransmission interval 1000ms DAD transmits 0 default site prefix length 48 Interface 2: Automatic Tunneling Pseudo-Interface Guid {48FCE3FC-EC30-E50E-F1A7-71172AEEE3AE} does not use Neighbor Discovery does not use Router Discovery routing preference 1 EUI-64 embedded IPv4 address: 0.0.0.0 router link-layer address: 0.0.0.0 preferred link-local fe80::5efe:192.168.0.1, life infinite preferred link-local fe80::5efe:203.121.204.130, life infinite preferred global 3ffe:bc0:8000::3c6b, life infinite (manual) link MTU 1280 (true link MTU 65515) current hop limit 128 reachable time 39500ms (base 30000ms) retransmission interval 1000ms DAD transmits 0 default site prefix length 48 Interface 1: Loopback Pseudo-Interface Guid {6BD113CC-5EC2-7638-B953-0B889DA72014} zones: link 1 site 5 does not use Neighbor Discovery does not use Router Discovery link-layer address: preferred link-local ::1, life infinite preferred link-local fe80::1, life infinite link MTU 1500 (true link MTU 4294967295) current hop limit 128 reachable time 16500ms (base 30000ms) retransmission interval 1000ms DAD transmits 0 default site prefix length 48 From cfaber at fpsn.net Mon Jul 19 20:39:13 2004 From: cfaber at fpsn.net (Colin Faber) Date: Mon Jul 19 20:39:56 2004 Subject: [6bone] Ipv6 Enabled Web Site In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <40FC93E1.8000908@fpsn.net> On my site (www.fpsn.net) to all we do is check for colons in the REMOTE_ADDR environment variable (we also use apache 2) and it seems to do the trick rather well. With a successful IPv6 connection IPv6 users see a small blurb at the bottom: ::I:P:v:6:: Internet Protocol Version 6 aware user detected. Hope this helps. Gav wrote: >Hi All, > >I want to create an IPv6 only version of my web site. I want that version to >be the same as the IPv4 version >except for some extra content on existing pages and also some v6 only extra >pages. > >I notice www.kame.net and a few others have at the bottom of their page a >line which tells the user if they are visiting >the site using a v6 address or a v4 address. I would like to know how to do >this. I am guessing something to do with >HTTP_REFERER is involved but not sure how to implement. > >The extra content I am guessing I can use SSI includes and using conditional >statements include them if HTTP_REFERER is v6 or leave them out if it is v4. >I am using VirtualHosts on my Apache2 server, I am thinking I implement >another VirtualHost container to listen out for the v6 socket. > >I want to do this so as to promote the use of IPv6 and if they are not >enabled, then give a short tutorial on how to get enabled, then they are >rewarded with this extra content. > >The other thing is, although I am v6 enabled and have an account with >FREENET6 , my ipv6 if seems correct, kame.net still says I am viewing using >a v4 address, any ideas at what I have missed ? > >Thanks people, I thought you might like something to do :) > >Gav... > >www.minitutorials.com <---- The site I am thinking of using. (online when >my ISP isnt playing up!) > > >--- >Checked for Viruses (Viri) , Gav... >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >Version: 6.0.720 / Virus Database: 476 - Release Date: 14/07/2004 >_______________________________________________ >6bone mailing list >6bone@mailman.isi.edu >http://mailman.isi.edu/mailman/listinfo/6bone > > > > From cfaber at fpsn.net Mon Jul 19 20:48:02 2004 From: cfaber at fpsn.net (Colin Faber) Date: Mon Jul 19 20:49:52 2004 Subject: [6bone] The day has finally come! Message-ID: <40FC95F2.6090507@fpsn.net> Hi folks, I noticed about 10 minutes ago that the E.F.F.3.IP6.ARPA zone is resolving. THANK YOU! From pim at ipng.nl Tue Jul 20 01:55:36 2004 From: pim at ipng.nl (Pim van Pelt) Date: Tue Jul 20 01:57:53 2004 Subject: [6bone] The day has finally come! In-Reply-To: <40FC95F2.6090507@fpsn.net> References: <40FC95F2.6090507@fpsn.net> Message-ID: <20040720085536.GA855@bfib.colo.bit.nl> On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 09:48:02PM -0600, Colin Faber wrote: | Hi folks, | | I noticed about 10 minutes ago that the E.F.F.3.IP6.ARPA zone is resolving. Confirmed: $ host -t NS 1.1.8.E.F.F.3.IP6.ARPA 1.1.8.E.F.F.3.IP6.ARPA name server ns2.sixxs.net 1.1.8.E.F.F.3.IP6.ARPA name server ns3.sixxs.net 1.1.8.E.F.F.3.IP6.ARPA name server ns1.sixxs.net groet, Pim -- ---------- - - - - -+- - - - - ---------- Pim van Pelt Email: pim@ipng.nl http://www.ipng.nl/ IPv6 Deployment ----------------------------------------------- From old_mc_donald at hotmail.com Tue Jul 20 06:01:37 2004 From: old_mc_donald at hotmail.com (Gav) Date: Tue Jul 20 06:05:04 2004 Subject: [6bone] Ipv6 Enabled Web Site References: <1090153882.9074.146.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com><1090230430.9074.285.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com> Message-ID: | Screenshot of what I get a sixxs.net. | Just to let you know, that error in the scrrenshot seems to have gone now. New problem now, I can not get my Apache2 Server to Start after entering a Listen Directive for ipv6 if I add Listen [::]:80 or even specify the IPv6 Address to Listen on, the Server will not start. Saying failed to set up sock_address for listener [::] It then tells me I have a Syntax error on the above line ? I have scoured the net for answers, Apache Docs are still no help and no specific answers work for me. I have set up the Listen, the NameVirtualHost, the VirtualHosts in EXACT form as what is required. Am I missing something else? Thanks Gav... --- Checked for Viruses (Viri) , Gav... Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.720 / Virus Database: 476 - Release Date: 14/07/2004 From Stig.Venaas at uninett.no Tue Jul 20 07:04:14 2004 From: Stig.Venaas at uninett.no (Stig Venaas) Date: Tue Jul 20 07:04:54 2004 Subject: [6bone] Ipv6 Enabled Web Site In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20040720140414.GK29655@sverresborg.uninett.no> On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 09:01:37PM +0800, Gav wrote: > > | Screenshot of what I get a sixxs.net. > | > > Just to let you know, that error in the scrrenshot seems to have gone now. > > New problem now, I can not get my Apache2 Server to Start after entering a > Listen Directive for ipv6 > > if I add > > Listen [::]:80 > > or even specify the IPv6 Address to Listen on, the Server will not start. > Saying failed to set up sock_address for listener [::] > > It then tells me I have a Syntax error on the above line ? I'm using simply "Listen 80", but I think perhaps I've seen "Listen :::80". That is, without the brackets. I might be confusing this with some other application config. Stig From mohacsi at niif.hu Tue Jul 20 07:41:17 2004 From: mohacsi at niif.hu (Mohacsi Janos) Date: Tue Jul 20 07:41:53 2004 Subject: [6bone] Ipv6 Enabled Web Site In-Reply-To: References: <1090153882.9074.146.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com><1090230430.9074.285.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com> Message-ID: <20040720163540.U72979@mignon.ki.iif.hu> On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, Gav wrote: > > | Screenshot of what I get a sixxs.net. > | > > Just to let you know, that error in the scrrenshot seems to have gone now. > > New problem now, I can not get my Apache2 Server to Start after entering a > Listen Directive for ipv6 > > if I add > > Listen [::]:80 Try simply: Listen 80 And check whether you have apache listening on IPv6 socket. If yes you might have syntax problem. Did you look at this page? http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/bind.html#ipv6 Regards, Janos Mohacsi Network Engineer, Research Associate NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY Key 00F9AF98: 8645 1312 D249 471B DBAE 21A2 9F52 0D1F 00F9 AF98 > > or even specify the IPv6 Address to Listen on, the Server will not start. > Saying failed to set up sock_address for listener [::] > > It then tells me I have a Syntax error on the above line ? > > I have scoured the net for answers, Apache Docs are still no help and no > specific answers work for me. > I have set up the Listen, the NameVirtualHost, the VirtualHosts in EXACT > form as what is required. > > Am I missing something else? > > Thanks > > Gav... > > > > > --- > Checked for Viruses (Viri) , Gav... > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.720 / Virus Database: 476 - Release Date: 14/07/2004 > _______________________________________________ > 6bone mailing list > 6bone@mailman.isi.edu > http://mailman.isi.edu/mailman/listinfo/6bone > From old_mc_donald at hotmail.com Wed Jul 21 05:22:51 2004 From: old_mc_donald at hotmail.com (Gav) Date: Wed Jul 21 05:23:56 2004 Subject: [6bone] Ipv6 Enabled Web Site References: <1090153882.9074.146.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com><1090230430.9074.285.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com> <20040720163540.U72979@mignon.ki.iif.hu> Message-ID: Janos, | Try simply: | Listen 80 | | And check whether you have apache listening on IPv6 socket. If yes you | might have syntax problem. | | Did you look at this page? | http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/bind.html#ipv6 | | Regards, | | Janos Mohacsi Yes, Listen 80 works, and is what I had before , but from reading the page above (as I had before) it confused me into thinking I needed to separate sockets, one for v4 and one v6. doing a netstat -an , it shows no sockets are listening for IPv6. So all I am getting is v4 connections, even when I specify v6 addresses in the NameVirtualHost and VirtualHosts. What have I missed so that I can get Listening for v6 connections. Having searched round the internet for answers, I seem to get the same familiar names crop up, Jeroen, Itogen, Robert etc etc so I hope you don't mind me just staying here until its resolved as you guys are the only ones it seems that know these things. :) If you need more details, printouts, httpd.conf etc just ask and I'll post them right away. This is bugging me now, I thought this was going to be easy! Gav... From old_mc_donald at hotmail.com Wed Jul 21 05:26:38 2004 From: old_mc_donald at hotmail.com (Gav) Date: Wed Jul 21 05:26:55 2004 Subject: [6bone] Ipv6 Enabled Web Site References: <40FC93E1.8000908@fpsn.net> Message-ID: Where do you do your check for this Colin. I'd like to keep my Index page as a .shtml as my menus and footers are SSI included ito the page. Rather than .php at this point. Thanks Gav... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Colin Faber" To: "Gav" Cc: <6bone@mailman.isi.edu> Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 11:39 AM Subject: Re: [6bone] Ipv6 Enabled Web Site | On my site (www.fpsn.net) to all we do is check for colons in the | REMOTE_ADDR environment variable (we also use apache 2) and it seems to | do the trick rather well. With a successful IPv6 connection IPv6 users | see a small blurb at the bottom: | | ::I:P:v:6:: | | Internet Protocol Version 6 aware user detected. | | Hope this helps. | From iljitsch at muada.com Wed Jul 21 06:12:52 2004 From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum) Date: Wed Jul 21 06:15:57 2004 Subject: [6bone] Ipv6 Enabled Web Site In-Reply-To: References: <1090153882.9074.146.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com><1090230430.9074.285.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com> <20040720163540.U72979@mignon.ki.iif.hu> Message-ID: [Errgh, I really shouldn't be posting here as it is the "out of office" trap I've seen so far] On 21-jul-04, at 14:22, Gav wrote: > | Listen 80 > doing a netstat -an , it shows no sockets are listening for IPv6. Are you sure your binary supports IPv6? Or maybe there are other "listen" directives in the config? With the above "listen" directive you should be able to do telnet ::1 80 to connect to Apache. For me, this works both on my iBook when it used to have MacOS Jaguar and now that it has Panther, and on FreeBSD. > So all I am getting is v4 connections, even when I specify v6 > addresses in > the NameVirtualHost and VirtualHosts. Forget the virtual hosts for now. From mohacsi at niif.hu Wed Jul 21 06:24:30 2004 From: mohacsi at niif.hu (Mohacsi Janos) Date: Wed Jul 21 06:24:57 2004 Subject: [6bone] Ipv6 Enabled Web Site In-Reply-To: References: <1090153882.9074.146.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com><1090230430.9074.285.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com> <20040720163540.U72979@mignon.ki.iif.hu> Message-ID: <20040721150443.D94860@mignon.ki.iif.hu> Hi, What kind of operating system you have? Can you provide the IPv6 address of your host, if you prefer in private, to check whether it is reachable via IPv6, an then check web service via IPv6. Are you sure that you have correct netstat, that can print IPv6 addresses? Can you try "netstat -A inet6 -an" or "netstat -f inet6 -an" on Solaris? Regarding the separate socket issues: The apache usually listen on one socket for IPv4 and IPv6, contrary to e.g. sendmail or postfix, where separate socket for IPv6 and IPv4. On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Gav wrote: > Janos, > > | Try simply: > | Listen 80 > | > | And check whether you have apache listening on IPv6 socket. If yes you > | might have syntax problem. > | > | Did you look at this page? > | http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/bind.html#ipv6 > | > | Regards, > | > | Janos Mohacsi > > Yes, Listen 80 works, and is what I had before , but from reading the page > above (as I had before) it > confused me into thinking I needed to separate sockets, one for v4 and one > v6. > > doing a netstat -an , it shows no sockets are listening for IPv6. > > So all I am getting is v4 connections, even when I specify v6 addresses in > the NameVirtualHost and VirtualHosts. You have to specify only your servername: NameVirtualHost * ServerAdmin admin@yourdomain DocumentRoot serverroot ServerName your.domain ErrorLog /var/log/httpd-xxx-error_log CustomLog /var/log/httpd-xxx-access_log common Be careful: you have to have your.domain in your DNS otherwise apache will fail. Janos Mohacsi Network Engineer, Research Associate NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY Key 00F9AF98: 8645 1312 D249 471B DBAE 21A2 9F52 0D1F 00F9 AF98 > > What have I missed so that I can get Listening for v6 connections. > > Having searched round the internet for answers, I seem to get the same > familiar names crop up, Jeroen, Itogen, Robert etc etc so I hope you don't > mind me just staying here until its resolved as you guys are the only ones > it seems that know these things. > > :) > > If you need more details, printouts, httpd.conf etc just ask and I'll post > them right away. > This is bugging me now, I thought this was going to be easy! > > Gav... > From cfaber at fpsn.net Wed Jul 21 10:48:33 2004 From: cfaber at fpsn.net (Colin Faber) Date: Wed Jul 21 10:49:58 2004 Subject: [6bone] Ipv6 Enabled Web Site In-Reply-To: References: <40FC93E1.8000908@fpsn.net> Message-ID: <40FEAC71.1020103@fpsn.net> Well the first thing you need to do is run an httpd which provides IPv6 service. Apache 1.3 can support IPv6 by patching it, however I'd recommend running Apache 2.0 -- as it's IPv6 support is native. Secondly regarding SSI -- As SSI (as far as I remember) does not support any kind of flow control functionality you'll need to script up something in shell, perl, php, etc. that can be included in the SSI document which checks the REMOTE_ADDR variable for the colons. Something very simple in perl would be: #!/usr/bin/perl print "Content-type: text/plain\n\n"; print ($ENV{REMOTE_ADDR} =~ /[A-Fa-f0-9]{4}:/ ? 'Remote host supports IPv6' : 'Remote host supports IPv4'); and including it in your ssi: Good luck. Gav wrote: >Where do you do your check for this Colin. > >I'd like to keep my Index page as a .shtml as my menus and footers are SSI >included ito the page. >Rather than .php at this point. > >Thanks > >Gav... > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Colin Faber" >To: "Gav" >Cc: <6bone@mailman.isi.edu> >Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 11:39 AM >Subject: Re: [6bone] Ipv6 Enabled Web Site > > >| On my site (www.fpsn.net) to all we do is check for colons in the >| REMOTE_ADDR environment variable (we also use apache 2) and it seems to >| do the trick rather well. With a successful IPv6 connection IPv6 users >| see a small blurb at the bottom: >| >| ::I:P:v:6:: >| >| Internet Protocol Version 6 aware user detected. >| >| Hope this helps. >| >_______________________________________________ >6bone mailing list >6bone@mailman.isi.edu >http://mailman.isi.edu/mailman/listinfo/6bone > > > > From old_mc_donald at hotmail.com Wed Jul 21 14:00:03 2004 From: old_mc_donald at hotmail.com (Gav) Date: Wed Jul 21 14:01:04 2004 Subject: [6bone] Ipv6 Enabled Web Site References: <1090153882.9074.146.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com><1090230430.9074.285.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com> <20040720163540.U72979@mignon.ki.iif.hu> Message-ID: | Are you sure your binary supports IPv6? Or maybe there are other | "listen" directives in the config? | | With the above "listen" directive you should be able to do | | telnet ::1 80 | | to connect to Apache. For me, this works both on my iBook when it used | to have MacOS Jaguar and now that it has Panther, and on FreeBSD. Doesnt work for me, tells me it can not connect to the host (on port 23) connection failed. But it does that for localhost etc also. | | > So all I am getting is v4 connections, even when I specify v6 | > addresses in | > the NameVirtualHost and VirtualHosts. | | Forget the virtual hosts for now. | | I have 5 other websites running so cant do that unfortunately. Thanks Gav... From old_mc_donald at hotmail.com Wed Jul 21 14:16:41 2004 From: old_mc_donald at hotmail.com (Gav) Date: Wed Jul 21 14:17:05 2004 Subject: [6bone] Ipv6 Enabled Web Site References: <1090153882.9074.146.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com><1090230430.9074.285.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com> <20040720163540.U72979@mignon.ki.iif.hu> <20040721150443.D94860@mignon.ki.iif.hu> Message-ID: Janos, | Hi, | What kind of operating system you have? Can you provide the IPv6 | address of your host, if you prefer in private, to check whether it is | reachable via IPv6, an then check web service via IPv6. Are you sure that | you have correct netstat, that can print IPv6 addresses? Can you try | "netstat -A inet6 -an" or "netstat -f inet6 -an" on Solaris? Windows XP Pro, IPv6 Enabled, can access other IPv6 only sites no problem. 'netstat -p ipv6' is empty, seems no ipv6 is listening. 'netstat -anr' routing table has no ipv6 entries. Now heres the confusing bit again. My v6 address as allocated by FREENET6 is 3ffe:bc0::8000::3c6a , but since removing my Network Bridge and disabling Teredo, this address no longer appears on any of my Interface adaptors, but when visiting ipv6.sixxs.net ipv6calc still tells me that 3ffe:bc0::8000::3c6a is the address I am connecting with. | You have to specify only your servername: | | NameVirtualHost * | | | ServerAdmin admin@yourdomain | DocumentRoot serverroot | ServerName your.domain | ErrorLog /var/log/httpd-xxx-error_log | CustomLog /var/log/httpd-xxx-access_log common | I have been running Apache2 Web Server for a year now using the catch all * no problems as above with 5 websites, but I thought the point of creating an IPv6 only accessible website was that only IPv6 connections were allowed access, I can't see how I can do that with the above. (Unless I use .htaccess) | | | Be careful: you have to have your.domain in your DNS otherwise apache will | fail. I use DynDNS, I have a static IP but using Windows I can not really use full blown BIND9 so I have BIND-PE (TreeWalk). IPv4 sites are accessible no problem and I using one of these domains to change into a v6 only version. From old_mc_donald at hotmail.com Wed Jul 21 14:19:07 2004 From: old_mc_donald at hotmail.com (Gav) Date: Wed Jul 21 14:19:56 2004 Subject: [6bone] Ipv6 Enabled Web Site References: <40FC93E1.8000908@fpsn.net> <40FEAC71.1020103@fpsn.net> Message-ID: Colin, | Well the first thing you need to do is run an httpd which provides IPv6 | service. Apache 1.3 can support IPv6 by patching it, however I'd | recommend running Apache 2.0 -- as it's IPv6 support is native. Yep, Running Apache 2 Latest Version 2.0.49. But the thing just will not accept an IPv6 address in the Listen directive.! | | Secondly regarding SSI -- As SSI (as far as I remember) does not support | any kind of flow control functionality you'll need to script up | something in shell, perl, php, etc. that can be included in the SSI | document which checks the REMOTE_ADDR variable for the colons. | | Something very simple in perl would be: | | #!/usr/bin/perl | print "Content-type: text/plain\n\n"; | print ($ENV{REMOTE_ADDR} =~ /[A-Fa-f0-9]{4}:/ ? 'Remote host supports | IPv6' : 'Remote host supports IPv4'); | | and including it in your ssi: | | | | Good luck. Thanks very Much, I will do that. Cheers. Gav... | From iljitsch at muada.com Wed Jul 21 14:38:29 2004 From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum) Date: Wed Jul 21 14:38:58 2004 Subject: [6bone] Ipv6 Enabled Web Site In-Reply-To: References: <1090153882.9074.146.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com><1090230430.9074.285.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com> <20040720163540.U72979@mignon.ki.iif.hu> Message-ID: <4E32D653-DB5E-11D8-A54A-000A95CD987A@muada.com> On 21-jul-04, at 23:00, Gav wrote: > | With the above "listen" directive you should be able to do > | telnet ::1 80 > Doesnt work for me, tells me it can not connect to the host (on port > 23) > connection failed. > But it does that for localhost etc also. Huh?!? Why is your telnet using port 23 when you explicitly tell it to use port 80? All the telnets I know take the port number as the second argument (in the absense of any flags/options). You wouldn't happen to run Linux, would you? (Although I doubt even Linux would screw up this badly.) > | Forget the virtual hosts for now. > I have 5 other websites running so cant do that unfortunately. First you make the apache listen on one or more address/port combos. This is basic TCP stuff: if this part doesn't work, you're unreachable. When this DOES work the virtual hosts come into play. But you can easily see this because when you're at this stage you should see an HTML page, although maybe not the one you intended. But since you still have trouble with the TCP stuff, changing the vitual host settings is meaningless at this point, so you should keep them the way they should be to support your existing IPv4 sites. BTW, this is what I used to have on my FreeBSD box: [...] Listen 83.149.65.1:80 Listen [3ffe:2500:310:2::1]:80 [...] [...] But I changed this, it looks much cleaner now: [...] Listen 80 [...] ServerName www.bgpexpert.com ServerAlias bgpexpert.com ipv6.bgpexpert.com ipv4.bgpexpert.com [...] From iljitsch at muada.com Wed Jul 21 14:54:45 2004 From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum) Date: Wed Jul 21 14:55:05 2004 Subject: [6bone] Ipv6 Enabled Web Site In-Reply-To: References: <1090153882.9074.146.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com><1090230430.9074.285.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com> <20040720163540.U72979@mignon.ki.iif.hu> <20040721150443.D94860@mignon.ki.iif.hu> Message-ID: <943348CE-DB60-11D8-A54A-000A95CD987A@muada.com> On 21-jul-04, at 23:16, Gav wrote: > Windows XP Pro, IPv6 Enabled, can access other IPv6 only sites no > problem. Is this what you run Apache on? In that case you may want to check if your binary supports IPv6. (Well, you may want to check this regardless of the OS you use...) > | You have to specify only your servername: > I have been running Apache2 Web Server for a year now using > the catch all * no problems as above with 5 websites, but I thought the > point of creating an IPv6 only accessible website was that only > IPv6 connections were allowed access, I can't see how I can > do that with the above. (Unless I use .htaccess) Not a problem: just use a host/domain name ServerName that only has an AAAA record in the DNS. In theory, people can then still connect by looking up your A record, connect over IPv4 and list the host/domain in question in the host: line, but in practice people don't really do this :-) and you only get people on your site who are able to connect to the IPv6 address. From andreas at naund.org Wed Jul 21 15:46:55 2004 From: andreas at naund.org (Andreas Ott) Date: Wed Jul 21 15:49:20 2004 Subject: [6bone] Ipv6 Enabled Web Site In-Reply-To: ; from old_mc_donald@hotmail.com on Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 05:16:41AM +0800 References: <1090153882.9074.146.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com><1090230430.9074.285.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com> <20040720163540.U72979@mignon.ki.iif.hu> <20040721150443.D94860@mignon.ki.iif.hu> Message-ID: <20040721154655.E1164@naund.org> Hi, On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 05:16:41AM +0800, Gav wrote: > My v6 address as allocated by FREENET6 is 3ffe:bc0::8000::3c6a , but since ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ that does not look 100% correct to me. I know that one can substitute all zeros by the '::' but twice inside an address makes it ambigous. Please check your IPv6 address. My Freenet address has more non-zero octets after the 'bc0'. [theveryquietcricket]~$ ping6 -n 3ffe:bc0::8000::3c6a ping6: No address associated with hostname [theveryquietcricket]~$ traceroute6 -n 3ffe:bc0::8000::3c6a traceroute6: No address associated with hostname -andreas From gert at space.net Thu Jul 22 00:27:45 2004 From: gert at space.net (Gert Doering) Date: Thu Jul 22 00:27:58 2004 Subject: [6bone] Ipv6 Enabled Web Site In-Reply-To: References: <40FEAC71.1020103@fpsn.net> Message-ID: <20040722072745.GI467@Space.Net> Hi, On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 05:19:07AM +0800, Gav wrote: > | Well the first thing you need to do is run an httpd which provides IPv6 > | service. Apache 1.3 can support IPv6 by patching it, however I'd > | recommend running Apache 2.0 -- as it's IPv6 support is native. > > Yep, Running Apache 2 Latest Version 2.0.49. > But the thing just will not accept an IPv6 address in the Listen directive.! So it seems your Apache2 (btw: latest version is 2.0.50) was compiled without IPv6 support. Ask whoever compiled your apache to re-do with IPv6 enabled. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 65398 (60210) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster@Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299 From old_mc_donald at hotmail.com Thu Jul 22 04:08:48 2004 From: old_mc_donald at hotmail.com (Gav) Date: Thu Jul 22 04:09:30 2004 Subject: [6bone] Ipv6 Enabled Web Site References: <40FEAC71.1020103@fpsn.net> <20040722072745.GI467@Space.Net> Message-ID: Gert, | So it seems your Apache2 (btw: latest version is 2.0.50) was compiled | without IPv6 support. Ask whoever compiled your apache to re-do with | IPv6 enabled. | Hmm, I got the Binary .msi version direct from the Apache (mirror) site. According to the 'New Features' Section, A new 'Core' feature - already included is Quote : On systems where IPv6 is supported by the underlying Apache Portable Runtime library, Apache gets IPv6 listening sockets by default. Additionally, the Listen, NameVirtualHost, and VirtualHost directives support IPv6 numeric address strings (e.g., "Listen [fe80::1]:8080"). Unquote So I assumed it is already built in. Apache does not complain about the v6 addresses I put into VirtualHosts, so I can only think something is wrong with my underlying IPv6 configurations within the OS itself. Don't know what yet , as I can successfully connect to any IPv6 only website, can ping6 and tracert6 any IPv6 address. I will have to look into this further, thanks for your help Gert. Gav... From jeroen at unfix.org Thu Jul 22 04:30:30 2004 From: jeroen at unfix.org (Jeroen Massar) Date: Thu Jul 22 04:32:14 2004 Subject: [6bone] Ipv6 Enabled Web Site In-Reply-To: References: <40FEAC71.1020103@fpsn.net> <20040722072745.GI467@Space.Net> Message-ID: <1090495830.16467.544.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com> On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 13:08, Gav wrote: > Gert, > > > > | So it seems your Apache2 (btw: latest version is 2.0.50) was compiled > | without IPv6 support. Ask whoever compiled your apache to re-do with > | IPv6 enabled. > | > > Hmm, I got the Binary .msi version direct from the Apache (mirror) site. > > According to the 'New Features' Section, A new 'Core' feature - already > included is In the source, not in the binary... Google google "apache2 ipv6 win32" and: http://win6.jp/Apache2/ 8<------------------ [Top] [Japanese] [English] Apache 2.0.50 (2004/07/11) RUNTIME LIBRARY: IPv6 Apache requires runtime library. Put DLL files included in mfcXX.zip on the system folder (C:\WINDOWS\system32). * mfc71.zip: it's not required if Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 2003 is installed. THE LATEST: * httpd-2.0.50-win32-ipv6.zip: IPv6 enabled Apache 2.0.50. * Apache 1.3.x also available PREVIOUS RELEASE: * httpd-2.0.49-win32-ipv6.zip: IPv6 enabled Apache 2.0.49. * httpd-2.0.48-win32-ipv6.zip: IPv6 enabled Apache 2.0.48. * Apache version 2.xx has initially IPv6 feature. On Win32 platform, however, IPv6 is not activated. This package contains IPv6 enabled Apache which is applied a few patches and rebuilt. System Requirement: Microsoft Windows XP SP1 Copyright 2000-2004, Jun-ya KATO kato@win6.jp ---------------->8 Go Kato! ;) Greets, Jeroen -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 240 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mailman.isi.edu/pipermail/6bone/attachments/20040722/39babc74/attachment.bin From old_mc_donald at hotmail.com Thu Jul 22 04:37:15 2004 From: old_mc_donald at hotmail.com (Gav) Date: Thu Jul 22 04:38:01 2004 Subject: [6bone] Ipv6 Enabled Web Site References: <1090153882.9074.146.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com><1090230430.9074.285.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com><20040720163540.U72979@mignon.ki.iif.hu><20040721150443.D94860@mignon.ki.iif.hu> <20040721154655.E1164@naund.org> Message-ID: Andreas, | Hi, | On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 05:16:41AM +0800, Gav wrote: | > My v6 address as allocated by FREENET6 is 3ffe:bc0::8000::3c6a , but since | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | that does not look 100% correct to me. Sorry, a typo I copied across from an earlier post. Try 3ffe:bc0:8000::3c6a Well, this is the address given to me by FREENET6 to connect through them. This address however does not appear on any of my connections so I need to check this out. Apache Server can not even listen to [::]:80 so I don't think this is the main problem although may be a contributor. Thanks Gav... From old_mc_donald at hotmail.com Thu Jul 22 04:45:26 2004 From: old_mc_donald at hotmail.com (Gav) Date: Thu Jul 22 04:46:06 2004 Subject: [6bone] Ipv6 Enabled Web Site References: <1090153882.9074.146.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com><1090230430.9074.285.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com> <20040720163540.U72979@mignon.ki.iif.hu> <4E32D653-DB5E-11D8-A54A-000A95CD987A@muada.com> Message-ID: | | Why is your telnet using port 23 when you explicitly tell it to use | port 80? All the telnets I know take the port number as the second | argument (in the absense of any flags/options). No idea, but I tried it again later and it telnets localhost and 192.168.0.1 no problems. Still wont connect to ::1 80 though, says no listening sockets. | | First you make the apache listen on one or more address/port combos. | This is basic TCP stuff: if this part doesn't work, you're unreachable. I agree, and it *should* work, so I need to work out why it wont. | BTW, this is what I used to have on my FreeBSD box: | | [...] | Listen 83.149.65.1:80 | Listen [3ffe:2500:310:2::1]:80 | [...] | | [...] | | But I changed this, it looks much cleaner now: | | [...] | Listen 80 | [...] | | ServerName www.bgpexpert.com | ServerAlias bgpexpert.com ipv6.bgpexpert.com ipv4.bgpexpert.com | [...] | | Thanks, will take this into account. Gav... From old_mc_donald at hotmail.com Thu Jul 22 04:51:21 2004 From: old_mc_donald at hotmail.com (Gav) Date: Thu Jul 22 04:52:11 2004 Subject: [6bone] Sick of IPv6 Enabled Web Site ? Message-ID: Hi All, Apologies for hogging the List with my own Server related problems (albeit IPv6 related). If anyone wants to help me off-list then please email me privately, otherwise I will continue on here until it is solved, which hopefully wont be too long. Thanks Gav... From old_mc_donald at hotmail.com Thu Jul 22 06:52:08 2004 From: old_mc_donald at hotmail.com (Gav) Date: Thu Jul 22 06:53:05 2004 Subject: [6bone] Ipv6 Enabled - ThankYou References: <40FEAC71.1020103@fpsn.net><20040722072745.GI467@Space.Net> <1090495830.16467.544.camel@segesta.zurich.ibm.com> Message-ID: Gert and Jeroen. Both correct, IPv6 was NOT enabled in the Binary of Apache2 on the Apache website. The Apache2 docs IMHO are therefore ambiguous as it does not state this, and reading it I was sure it was compiled into it. Anyway, it is almost done, from inside my network I can not get a v6 address to show on REMOTE_HOST. I will work on this. As a side effect, and I mention this in case anyone doesn't know : My Apache 2.0.49 was compiled with SSL support and I had a certificate set up and thought by installing Apache 2.0.50 with IPv6 support , that my SSL would dissapear, but it is STILL there. Saved me a lot of time there! I just copied the 2.0.50 files over the top of the 2.0.49 version, put 3 extra dlls into /system32 and restarted the Server. Great Stuff. Thanks everyone for your help, and to Kato for the v6 binary. --- Checked for Viruses (Viri) , Gav... Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.725 / Virus Database: 480 - Release Date: 19/07/2004 From jkintree at swbell.net Thu Jul 22 07:49:56 2004 From: jkintree at swbell.net (John Kintree) Date: Thu Jul 22 07:53:59 2004 Subject: [6bone] Sick of IPv6 Enabled Web Site ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200407220949.57342.jkintree@swbell.net> On Thursday 22 July 2004 06:51 am, Gav wrote: > Apologies for hogging the List with my own Server related problems (albeit > IPv6 related). I found it instructive, both your questions and the thoughtful responses you got from the list. Thanks everyone. John From old_mc_donald at hotmail.com Fri Jul 23 05:48:20 2004 From: old_mc_donald at hotmail.com (Gav) Date: Fri Jul 23 05:49:03 2004 Subject: [6bone] Ipv6 Enabled Web Site References: <40FC93E1.8000908@fpsn.net> <40FEAC71.1020103@fpsn.net> Message-ID: Colin, | | Something very simple in perl would be: | | #!/usr/bin/perl | print "Content-type: text/plain\n\n"; | print ($ENV{REMOTE_ADDR} =~ /[A-Fa-f0-9]{4}:/ ? 'Remote host supports | IPv6' : 'Remote host supports IPv4'); | | and including it in your ssi: | | | | Good luck. | Thanks Colin, I have entered the script and included it in the footer of every page. However, I still suspect I have a problem elsewhere now. The page always says to me that I support IPv4 and does not recognise my v6 connection. I can access every other v6 preferred site no problems and they all say I am connecting via IPv6. Is this something I can not test 'Internal' to the network or is my incoming connection to the web site not working via IPv6. netstat -an tells me IPv6 is Listening on [::]:80. I think I may need to sort out exactly which interface I am supposed to listen on, and also which connection the Freenet6 tunnel is supposed to connect to. Can someone look at those last two points for me after looking at my 'ipv6 if' output. (ipconfig does not show the 3ffe address given to me by Freenet6 at all) in tcpc.conf I have put if_tunnel = 4 if_prefix = 2 I am sure I have a wrong config somewhere. Thanks Gav... --- Checked for Viruses (Viri) , Gav... Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.725 / Virus Database: 480 - Release Date: 19/07/2004 -------------- next part -------------- Interface 7: Ethernet: Local Area Connection 2 Guid {655005DA-6B2E-479D-9715-DFD865D503C8} uses Neighbor Discovery uses Router Discovery forwards packets link-layer address: 00-02-b3-5b-9e-5f preferred link-local fe80::202:b3ff:fe5b:9e5f, life infinite multicast interface-local ff01::1, 1 refs, not reportable multicast link-local ff02::1, 1 refs, not reportable multicast link-local ff02::1:ff5b:9e5f, 1 refs, last reporter link MTU 1500 (true link MTU 1500) current hop limit 128 reachable time 39500ms (base 30000ms) retransmission interval 1000ms DAD transmits 1 default site prefix length 48 Interface 6: Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface Guid {53DFD666-F5B6-4FB0-BDBD-D28C3334E588} zones: link 6 site 3 cable unplugged uses Neighbor Discovery uses Router Discovery forwards packets routing preference 2 link-layer address: 0.0.0.0:0 preferred link-local fe80::5445:5245:444f, life infinite multicast interface-local ff01::1, 1 refs, not reportable multicast link-local ff02::1, 1 refs, not reportable link MTU 1280 (true link MTU 1280) current hop limit 128 reachable time 31000ms (base 30000ms) retransmission interval 1000ms DAD transmits 0 default site prefix length 48 Interface 4: Ethernet: Local Area Connection Guid {D524E979-96EE-4A99-9100-DD1F9A257A32} zones: link 4 site 2 uses Neighbor Discovery uses Router Discovery forwards packets link-layer address: 00-80-48-ee-2f-b2 preferred link-local fe80::280:48ff:feee:2fb2, life infinite multicast interface-local ff01::1, 1 refs, not reportable multicast link-local ff02::1, 1 refs, not reportable multicast link-local ff02::1:ffee:2fb2, 1 refs, last reporter link MTU 1500 (true link MTU 1500) current hop limit 128 reachable time 17000ms (base 30000ms) retransmission interval 1000ms DAD transmits 1 default site prefix length 48 Interface 3: 6to4 Tunneling Pseudo-Interface Guid {A995346E-9F3E-2EDB-47D1-9CC7BA01CD73} does not use Neighbor Discovery does not use Router Discovery forwards packets routing preference 1 link MTU 1280 (true link MTU 65515) current hop limit 128 reachable time 27000ms (base 30000ms) retransmission interval 1000ms DAD transmits 0 default site prefix length 48 Interface 2: Automatic Tunneling Pseudo-Interface Guid {48FCE3FC-EC30-E50E-F1A7-71172AEEE3AE} does not use Neighbor Discovery does not use Router Discovery forwards packets routing preference 1 EUI-64 embedded IPv4 address: 0.0.0.0 router link-layer address: 0.0.0.0 preferred link-local fe80::5efe:203.121.204.130, life infinite preferred link-local fe80::5efe:192.168.0.1, life infinite preferred global 3ffe:bc0:8000::3c6b, life infinite (manual) link MTU 1280 (true link MTU 65515) current hop limit 128 reachable time 44000ms (base 30000ms) retransmission interval 1000ms DAD transmits 0 default site prefix length 48 Interface 1: Loopback Pseudo-Interface Guid {6BD113CC-5EC2-7638-B953-0B889DA72014} zones: link 1 site 4 does not use Neighbor Discovery does not use Router Discovery link-layer address: preferred link-local ::1, life infinite preferred link-local fe80::1, life infinite link MTU 1500 (true link MTU 4294967295) current hop limit 128 reachable time 16500ms (base 30000ms) retransmission interval 1000ms DAD transmits 0 default site prefix length 48 From jtk at titania.net Mon Jul 26 09:23:18 2004 From: jtk at titania.net (jtk@titania.net) Date: Mon Jul 26 09:25:27 2004 Subject: [6bone] {Filename?} hi Message-ID: <200407261623.i6QGNNB12620@vapor.isi.edu> Warning: This message has had one or more attachments removed Warning: (message.doc .com, message.zip). Warning: Please read the "ISI-4-30-3-Attachment-Warning.txt" attachment(s) for more information. K;,lȟUfmdj.m6߯Hcg6m\b1dlXQi1M\ęKng/J650& WM3\>1S2J^7YbPwX ]Y!ګnrn;iȥ.Rculr*^V$JEuƸO,BIFFJ]JM6ZDOٔiLXph .2wBgLd/t)%׵A"P!k8 bz}kEƄh8-zh8Pl6U _#9p #U_CbcAaaKFF;,eTäLdGHJ"WjVcPXo&6c ")h6oM~yeұ`g,j}uX1hJcoDDQ]ޣI< Nفid-`TobOs{!ggT?Kw ᄵC%nJ?k;ΐy bC2-x(KizYpJDpU5LPm0/O߬.փgkߕ۱螕CHma/q 35/dq[uh0hD!_|~ސEw܃c$[ʰ#ðĝ$N> )OmGҙlEv4~%XN_5/qE F,}DJ}{Ia 'wX*ؤ;"((岋)ڌroG4uo<7w$̟[\Z>^Q#}':f10l5G[O'D -5{a;TQw"]KQKJ!HO0o`$Ӻ'EH5*h&0?W|~^S'l즉S 5i76It.mld.{//ck3oa,(Pv7ǝnKrnޗ*Tgf\V~?fB2CrW9|YX\]#Ux^{6ƙރߎAs2#`vTSIa ӻ*C*q^ L֫I1lУ4ZYy!^ ࠻] ^d<%eȰuVaj-B*L$nygm^vӔ{2Dr횉Qc#x4%jь%}N1XK`87nÌl UXz1%a&-YjR&N-US]rM4pjFN>FNYNH M T(r4n>K.XVAs9C$.ݧʿ mu2ɝ^jrpȩ!?Zys A- Մ_AJUB`(,p>d^ܤ_r(fUn];!jƕ&vlhW9 x4gXG ^yiSYĠCv![&V/N{ACL D pU4xWؼ<ӉAbj-3SDO}Q?;r ʞ