[6bone] non-global address space for IXs (was: 2001:478:: as /48)

[Gregg C Levine]

Hello (again) from Gregg C Levine
Would any of you mind doing me a favor, when this discussion reaches a
good resting point? Please reiterate the whole series of things that
led up to this discussion.

Oh, and on the sub-subject of ISPs, I happen to know from an earlier
phone call with their support staff, that even though they provide DSL
service for consumer AT&T customers, they haven't plans at the time to
make available IPv6 services. I'm still working on that issue.
-------------------
Gregg C Levine hansolofalcon@worldnet.att.net
------------------------------------------------------------
"The Force will be with you...Always." Obi-Wan Kenobi
"Use the Force, Luke."  Obi-Wan Kenobi
(This company dedicates this E-Mail to General Obi-Wan Kenobi )
(This company dedicates this E-Mail to Master Yoda )



> -----Original Message-----
> From: 6bone-admin@mailman.isi.edu
[mailto:6bone-admin@mailman.isi.edu] On
> Behalf Of Jeroen Massar
> Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 7:49 PM
> To: 'Bill Manning'
> Cc: 6bone@ISI.EDU
> Subject: RE: [6bone] non-global address space for IXs (was:
2001:478:: as /48)
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> 
> Bill Manning [mailto:bmanning@ISI.EDU] wrote:
> >
> > % > 	The -ONLY- statement made by EP.NET was that -IF-
anyone was
> > % > 	to see an entry for 2001:0478 that was smaller than a
/48, e.g.
> > % > 	a /35 or /32, that such an annoucement was in error.
> > %
> > % 2001:478::/45   2001:1418:1:400::1   12779 3549 6939 109 4555
IGP
> > % 2001:478::/45   2001:610:25:5062::62 1103 11537 6939 109 4555
IGP
> > % 2001:478::/45 > 2001:470:1fff:3::3   6939 109 4555  IGP
> > % 2001:478::/45   2001:610:ff:c::2     1888 1103 11537 6939
> > 109 4555  IGP
> > %
> > % You are in error here then, I guess?
> >
> > 	Yup.  A typo was made (one of the folks following the
"default"
> > 	of aggregation) and will be removed.
> 
> Ack.
> 
> > % Btw 'smaller' is a rather odd wording as one could say that
> > % a /32 is smaller as a /35 (smaller amount of network bits) or
say
> > % that a /35 is smaller as a /32 (smaller amount of host bits).
> > % I tend to prefer the host kind of smaller.
> >
> > 	normal CIDR notation here.
> >
> > 	32 < 35 < 45 < 48 < 64
> 
> Confusion all around :)
> 
> Greets,
>  Jeroen
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: Unfix PGP for Outlook Alpha 13 Int.
> Comment: Jeroen Massar / jeroen@unfix.org /
http://unfix.org/~jeroen/
> 
> iQA/AwUBP1pyVymqKFIzPnwjEQL69QCdEXWEb+qVgWXTq6z5gf3tAXsxu34
> AnRIZ
> rYAQikRkDc6bp9pbwyqWB96p
> =GNPf
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 6bone mailing list
> 6bone@mailman.isi.edu
> http://mailman.isi.edu/mailman/listinfo/6bone