[6bone] Is minimum allocation /64 now?
Pekka Savola
pekkas@netcore.fi
Thu, 23 Oct 2003 15:20:57 +0300 (EEST)
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 ipv6@cuhk.edu.hk wrote:
> I am sorry that I am a little bit outdated. I notice that min allocation
> of address space is /48 instead of /64 in the past for IXes. I have
> also read some old messages that /64 is used because of automatic
> configuration. But then how about P2P? Is there a practice to use a
> /64 or /127 for P2P link? Will it break something if I use prefix
> longer than /64? Thanks for your advice.
As for P2P links (between routers, I take you mean)..
Don't use /127, but anything between that and /64 is operationally fine.
Architecturally one should use /64. We use /112's ourselves.
Read RFC 3627 for more.
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings