[6bone] Microsoft has released IPv6-only application for Beta

[Jeroen Massar]

Gav [mailto:old_mc_donald@hotmail.com] wrote:

> Jeroen Massar wrote:

> |
> | Use http://www.threedegrees.com.sixxs.org/ , happy now ? ;)
> 
> Why is it that I can not get to IPv6 Only sites like this.??
> The Latest IE6 should show IPv6 sites ok shouldn't it?

Looking at your data you have Windows XP
 
> Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection 5:
> 
>         Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :
>         Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Efficient 
> Networks Enternet
> P.P.P.o.
> E Adapter
>         Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 44-45-53-54-77-77
>         Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes
>         Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : No
>         IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 144.137.252.133
>         Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
>         IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . :
fe80::4645:53ff:fe54:7777%4

Only IPv4 on your ADSL (at least PPPoE should be ADSL)

> Ethernet adapter Network Bridge (Network Bridge):
> 
>         Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :
>         Description . . . . . . . . . . . : MAC Bridge Miniport
>         Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 02-40-D0-2A-AF-71
>         Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
>         IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.1
>         Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
>         IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . :
2002:c0a8:1:5:90f1:5098:252d:3eb7
>         IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . :
2002:c0a8:1:5:cc71:215c:3c83:6492
>         IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . :
2002:c0a8:1:5:480d:c580:2cc9:863e
>         IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . :
2002:c0a8:1:5:bd90:af8b:f235:a243
>         IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . :
2002:c0a8:1:5:5d0c:da6b:bacc:69f7
>         IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . :
2002:c0a8:1:5:40:d0ff:fe2a:af71

A private network with 6to4 addresses in RFC1918 space, these won't ever
work.

> Tunnel adapter 6to4 Tunneling Pseudo-Interface:
> 
>         Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :
>         Description . . . . . . . . . . . : 6to4 Tunneling 
> Pseudo-Interface
>         Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 90-89-FC-85
>         Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
>         IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 2002:9089:fc85::9089:fc85

This _could_ work, it does use your public IPv4 of your PPPoE adapter.

Based on the fact which outgoing interface your host picks it should
work.
Try some tracerouting and stuff, pings and the like and find out ;)

Also when one installs the ThreeDegrees software, and thus the P2P SDK
you get a newer IPv6 stack which supports Teredo.

IMHO (<-- watch those four letters ;) a configured tunnels is better.
Especially while debugging and based on latency times. So you would
prolly
be better off getting a tunnel. Then again checking your IPv4 address
you are located in Australia, thus, mail progsoc@<lemme think>,
check their whois:
http://www.cs-ipv6.lancs.ac.uk/ipv6/6Bone/Whois/PROGSOC.html

BTW, checking:
 http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/lg/?prefix=2002::/16&matchtype=more
I see quite a lot of more specifics for the 6to4 space. Though private
peerings are allowed there ofcourse, they should never pop up in the
dfz.

Greets,
 Jeroen