[6bone] Address management transfer proposal
Alexander Koch
koch@tiscali.net
Wed, 1 Jan 2003 12:02:10 +0100
On Tue, 31 December 2002 16:06:08 +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> > - turns 3ffe::/16 into a service which requires payment
>
> Who/what says/defines that suddenly one has to 'pay' for 6bone space?
Jeroen,
there have been some ppl here receiving an AS number for
IPv6 multi- homing (ouch, man!) which can still be done
without being a RIPE LIR. Those ppl will surely not get a
/32 from RIPE for free, therefore they need to pay the
money. Although honestly I do not know what we will lose if
this happened, if anything at all.
> Also many people are moving on to RIR space, at least I think
> that is what you mean that with 'production' IPv6.
This is correct. I believe that as soon as we do standard
filtering on 6bone space we get ugly AS paths with all
tunnels under it with terrible round- trip- times. I see
more and more ppl saying 'ah, we need to migrate it to these
RIPE addresses' and some are even getting the point that self-
made tunnels are pointless if someone two hops down the road
has its backbone in Europe and the US on IPv6 completely...
> Give those people clue first and probably the only reason why they
> want reverse is to 'look cool on irc'. That's not a reason to do IPv6.
> One can IRC quite well with IPv4 too, but then those people will
> complain as they don't have I.am.the.ipv6.rular.net or similar crap.
I could not have put it into words better than this.
Regards,
Alexander
--
Alexander Koch <koch@tiscali.net> / ako4-ripe
Network Engineer, Tiscali International Network
Robert-Bosch-Strasse 32, D-63303 Dreieich, Germany
Phone +49 6103 916 480, Fax +49 6103 916 464