[6bone] pTLA request by CTN1 - review closes 16 December 2003
Christian Nickel
dragon@tdoi.org
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 22:54:16 +0100
From: "Nicolas DEFFAYET" <nicolas.deffayet@ndsoftware.net>
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 8:47 PM
Subject: Re: [6bone] pTLA request by CTN1 - review closes 16 December 2003
> On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 19:32, Bob Fink wrote:
> 6bone Folk,
>
> > CTN1 has requested a pTLA allocation and I find their request fully
> > compliant with RFC2772. The open review period for this closes 16
December
> > 2003. Please send your comments to me or the list.
> >
> > <http://www.ctn1.com>
> >
> > This may be the last 6bone pTLA allocation made as the phaseout plan
> > specifies no new pTLA allocations after the end of this year. Thus if
> > anyone is expecting to request a pTLA, the request must be sent to me no
> > later than 5 December to allow enough review and approval time prior to
31
> > December.
>
> The community must be open about this request.
>
> This is the last pTLA request, I think that we can allocate this pTLA.
> Closing the pTLA allocation period with a request denied don't promote
> IPv6 usage and is not good for the community. CTN1 want promote the
> IPv6, i'm agree they are very just with the time, but with deny of this
> request they can't promote IPv6 usage and they can't offer free and high
> quality IPv6 services to their customers.
>
> Open your eyes, not all pTLA request respect fully RFC2772.
> There is a problem with this request, because some people want troll
> about it.
>
> I don't work for CTN1, CTN1 is just a partner for NDSoftware. We help
> CTN1 in its IPv6 deploiement.
>
> Please note that for get a sTLA from RIPE, the requester must be a LIR,
> (a cost of ~ 4500 EUR). It's a very high cost for promote IPv6 and offer
> free IPv6 services with a minimum of quality and independance....
>
> Thanks for have read my mail, i wait your comments.
>
I do _not_ agree to the pTLA request until CTN1 let us know a bit more about
what their plans are.
e.g., IF they DO have plans to operate a large scaled IPv6 Network, WHY is
it
impossible to become a LIR and get REAL IPv6 address space.
"I have put 1.000.000 EUR. I respect your job respect my company!!!"
So, there shouldn't be a fincancial problem in this case.
As Gert said, 6bone is (nearly) dead, and is not a place to provide
commercial
services to customers. So, which research projects does CTN1 support and/or
provide?
I think we've read enough chitchat by Mr. NDSOFTWARE, and I'm awaiting
eagerly
a statement by CTN1.
Greets,
Christian Nickel
------------------------------------------
TDOI Network | www.tdoi.org | noc@tdoi.org