[6bone] Re: ip6 conversion script
Gert Doering
gert@space.net
Wed, 4 Sep 2002 10:22:03 +0200
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 12:37:01PM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
> >>> this still doesn't answer the question *why* those delegations are not
> >>> visible under ip6.arpa.
> >> ask your local RIR
> > What's wrong with delegating e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa to the same set of servers
> > that hold e.f.f.3.ip6.int?
> nothing that comes to mind right off
So why do you expect those delegations to be never visible under ip6.int?
> > No need to involve RIRs here
> who do you think has to delagate?
$ dig ip6.arpa soa
[..]
;; ANSWER SECTION:
ip6.arpa. 23h30m IN SOA dns1.icann.org. hostmaster.icann.org. (
2002071701 ; serial
1H ; refresh
30M ; retry
1W ; expiry
3H ) ; minimum
;; ANSWER SECTION:
ip6.arpa. 1d23h59m38s IN NS ns.icann.org.
ip6.arpa. 1d23h59m38s IN NS buchu.arin.net.
ip6.arpa. 1d23h59m38s IN NS svc00.apnic.net.
ip6.arpa. 1d23h59m38s IN NS arrowroot.arin.net.
ip6.arpa. 1d23h59m38s IN NS ns.ripe.net.
ip6.arpa. 1d23h59m38s IN NS ns.apnic.net.
doesn't look like a RIR to me. Secondaries, yes. But not the primary.
The actual handling of the individual delegations inside 3ffe::/16 could
be done the same way it's done with ip6.int now. As I don't hold 3ffe
space, I don't know how e.f.f.3.ip6.int works right now, but it's no
*technical* problem we're talking about.
*And* the RIRs are *not* involved.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 46812 (46611)
SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster@Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299