[6bone] RFC2772 rewrite -- bigger scope goals

[Nicolas DEFFAYET]

On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 07:53, Alex Bik wrote:
> > Very nice, your network have only tunnels ? You don't have REAL links
> > beetween your routers ?
> 
> I think the guys at chello/upc have more real links than you can ever
> dream of.

I mean IPv6 links of course...

> >  11   -   00:00:17   134364 AS3265 xs4all
> >  14   -   00:00:35  1510577 AS8954 IPng
> >  15   -   00:00:02 57960912 AS25336 XS26
> >  16   -   00:00:56   794761 AS1890 UU.NET NL/EU
> >  30   -   00:00:14   152919 AS1200 AMSIX AIAD
> >  48   -   00:00:08   132504 AS1103 SURFnet
> 
> Maybe you should get your fact straight first. There are a more ASes you
> can peer IPv6 with at the AMS-IX. Besides, Chello *IS* at AMS-IX.

I know who is at AMS-IX, thanks.
I talked about _current_ peer of Chello/UPC/AORTA (AS6830).

> > I'm sorry but a lot of ISP use PC box with Zebra in production.
> > There is not differences when you peer with a Zebra, a Cisco, or a
> > Juniper.
> 
> Maybe you should read a little about the difference between ASIC and CPU
> based routing. Even (some) Cisco's don't need their CPU to forward every
> bit in a packet.

Roger wrote "You have shown MANY times that you do not have any clue
about how REAL network work, REAL as in real routing hardware and real
links, NOT tunnels and a few BSD/linux boxes with zebra or whatever you
use.", he don't talk about routing performance....

REAL network (like Roger said) can use Zebra for routing (see my
previous email..).

Best Regards,

-- 
Nicolas DEFFAYET, NDSoftware
NOC Website: http://noc.ndsoftwarenet.com/
FNIX6: http://www.fnix6.net/