[6bone] random walk?

[Thomas Schaefer]

6. Juni 2002 20:18 wrote Bill Manning:


> very impressive....
>
from a different point of view: 

host:~ # traceroute6 2001:478:6::1
traceroute to 2001:478:6::1 (2001:478:6::1) from 
3ffe:b80:d17:1:2a0:ccff:fe20:5d7c, 30 hops max, 16 byte packets
 1  3ffe:b80:d17:1::1 (3ffe:b80:d17:1::1)  0.87 ms  0.577 ms  0.567 ms
 2  3ffe:b80:2:95f3::1 (3ffe:b80:2:95f3::1)  365.829 ms  361.016 ms  375.314 
ms
 3  2001:780::b (2001:780::b)  814.896 ms  358.293 ms  353.315 ms
 4  3ffe:b00:c18::6b (3ffe:b00:c18::6b)  492.258 ms  461.492 ms *
 5  3ffe:b00:c18::3 (3ffe:b00:c18::3)  561.88 ms  560.234 ms  578.585 ms
 6  2001:780::b (2001:780::b)  571.196 ms  570.055 ms  570.962 ms
 7  * 3ffe:b00:c18::6b (3ffe:b00:c18::6b)  650.221 ms  660.813 ms
 8  3ffe:b00:c18::3 (3ffe:b00:c18::3)  778.641 ms  779.591 ms  776.91 ms
 9  * * 2001:780::b (2001:780::b)  775.771 ms
10  * 3ffe:b00:c18::6b (3ffe:b00:c18::6b)  857.956 ms  874.645 ms
11  3ffe:b00:c18::3 (3ffe:b00:c18::3)  1028.26 ms  1004.38 ms  1054.79 ms
12  2001:780::b (2001:780::b)  1042.59 ms  993.64 ms  999.804 ms
13  3ffe:b00:c18::6b (3ffe:b00:c18::6b)  1098.09 ms  1082.68 ms  1116.46 ms
14  3ffe:b00:c18::3 (3ffe:b00:c18::3)  1222.71 ms  1217.99 ms  1196.03 ms
15  2001:780::b (2001:780::b)  1270.78 ms  1207.47 ms  1198.48 ms
16  3ffe:b00:c18::6b (3ffe:b00:c18::6b)  1323.21 ms  1286.93 ms  1308.19 ms
17  3ffe:b00:c18::3 (3ffe:b00:c18::3)  1416.23 ms  1422.7 ms  1437.84 ms
18  2001:780::b (2001:780::b)  1414.32 ms  1413.82 ms  1445.82 ms
19  3ffe:b00:c18::6b (3ffe:b00:c18::6b)  1520.97 ms  1629.09 ms  1555.38 ms
20  * 3ffe:b00:c18::3 (3ffe:b00:c18::3)  1627.2 ms  1667.6 ms
...

host:~ # ping6  2001:478:6::1
PING 2001:478:6::1(2001:478:6::1) from 3ffe:b80:d17:1:2a0:ccff:fe20:5d7c : 56 
data bytes
From 3ffe:b00:c18::6b icmp_seq=1 Time exceeded: Hop limitFrom 3ffe:b00:c18::6b 
icmp_seq=2 Time exceeded: Hop limitFrom 3ffe:b00:c18::6b icmp_seq=3 Time 
exceeded: Hop limit
--- 2001:478:6::1 ping statistics ---
8 packets transmitted, 0 received, +3 errors, 100% loss, time 7042ms

Regards,
Thomas Schäfer