[6bone] pTLA request by Euro6IX project for exchange experimentation - review closes 3 Sep 2002

[Bob Fink]

Michel,

At 08:48 AM 8/13/2002 -0700, Michel Py wrote:
>Bob /Jordi / 6boner,
>
>In the light of Jordi's reply, I am favorable to the request. However, I
>am not sure I read Bob correctly.
>
> > Bob Fink wrote:
> > I would also appreciate discussion of any considerations
> > that we should be aware of as a 6bone test project.
>
>Bob, do you consider Euro6IX to be a "special" pTLA?

I don't, but someone else might see something we need to consider.


>The point I am trying to make here is related to the Teredo request and
>the points that Thomas and myself brought back then. I was wondering if
>Euro6IX should be placed in the same situation.

Again, I don't thinks so, but would like folks to have a chance to comment.


>My line of thinking is that "special" requests need to have a "special"
>consequence on 6bone routing, which certainly applies to Teredo and geo
>addresses.
>
>However, in Euro6IX' case, I don't see what granting them a pTLA changes
>for my view of the routing table.

Agree.


>Reading Joao's post that just came in, I think that it might be a good
>time to clarify/change the definition of pTLA and write the definition
>of "special purpose" 6bone block. Please keep this in mind when
>finishing the RIR proposal.

Don't understand what you have in mind here.


Thanks,

Bob