[6bone] routing problem
John Fraizer
tvo@EnterZone.Net
Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:38:58 -0400 (EDT)
On 12 Aug 2002, Nicolas DEFFAYET wrote:
> Many routers keep in cache and reannonce 2001:610::/35 that Surfnet
> don't announce.
Bull$hit! Too many people are running inferior BGP implementations is
more lime it. There is NO SUCH THING as "cache" in the BGP specification.
If someone is running broken code, it should be fixed/replaced. If they
don't, their peers should filter them, period the end. If not, they (and
their peers) should not be surprised to find themselfs filtered by those
of us who *do* care about routing stability.
---
John Fraizer | High-Security Datacenter Services |
EnterZone, Inc | Dedicated circuits 64k - 155M OC3 |
http://www.enterzone.net/ | Virtual, Dedicated, Colocation |