[6bone] routing problem

Gert Doering gert@space.net
Mon, 12 Aug 2002 22:16:08 +0200


Hi,

On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 09:50:55PM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> There is one good way: find out the AS's who are 'bad' and depeer them
> if they don't respond in x time.
> This is just the same as for IPv4...

Yes, peer pressure should help.  Right now, I'm observing the following
two paths (only two left - so things are moving):

cisco25>sh bgp ipv6 2001:610::/35 | inc aggregated
  3561 5511 2611 2200 2602 559 513 9264 7660 2500 4697 3748 1275 762 20834 1654 6342 45589 278 6939 3274 790 8627 517 8472 6830 6726 24765 13285 786 11537 145 293, (aggregated by 1103 145.145.249.242)
  1930 13944 15982 3265 8954 13193 5410 5594 2200 9112 3320 680 1275 762 20834 1654 6342 45589 278 6939 3274 790 8627 517 8472 6830 6726 24765 13285 786 11537 145 293, (aggregated by 1103 145.145.249.242)

it would be a good start if people stopped peering with 45589 - this AS
number is unassigned and thould NEVER be used.

Oh.  Watching this - right this moment, the paths are changing rapidly, so
I think some achievement has been made...

Some minutes later...  bingo:

cisco25>sh bgp ipv6 2001:610::/35
% Network not in table
cisco25>

gone.  Does anybody know more about *who* did something which got rid
of this ghost?

> PS: Gert.. did you put an extra page in your presentation saying TLA's
> are moving to /32's?

Not yet, but it's on the TODO list.  It definitely belongs in there.

> PS2: Gert, don't get a sunburn in Rhodos ;)

I'll try to ;-)

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  46871 (46631)

SpaceNet AG                 Mail: netmaster@Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14   Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-299