[6bone] In the summer time, we got cleaning to do... Where is UUNET?

[Michel Py]

>> Michel Py wrote:
>> Remarks on this:
>> - I think that seq 30 (6to4) could be optional. I don't
>> think we want this route floating on the 6bone.

> Gert Doering wrote: 
> This would mean "not having connectivity to people using
> 6to4 IPv6".


Not at all. People providing 6to4 relay services can still feed that
route to their downstreams.

> Why is this a desireable goal?

Because by announcing 2002::/16 on the 6bone, we create another form of
anycast. Not only there already is an anycast mechanism, it is very
seldom used. I do not see any reason to re-create another one.

Let's make seq 30 optional.

Michel.