[6bone] semi-newbie Q on IPv6 address planning

[itojun@iijlab.net]

>On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 08:26:35AM -0700, Michel Py wrote:
>> > And by the way, a /126 is perfect for Point-to-point
>> No, it is as illegal with draft-ietf-ipngwg-addr-arch-v3-08.txt than it
>> is with RFC2374, read draft-ietf-ipngwg-addr-arch-v3-08.txt again.
>Whether the standard says it's illegal or not, /127s works fine (yes,
>even /127).  Why create ambiguities by assigning more than 2 IPs to
>something that needs exactly 2?

	because "0" is reserved for subnet router anycast address, you shouldn't
	use blah:0/127 for your nodes as unicsat address.  go read the draft
	on this topic.

itojun