Re[2]: whats the deal with 54fx:: ?

[Michael Kjorling]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Apr 29 2002 20:25 +0200, Sascha Bielski wrote:

> BM>         hijacked address space?  54f8:: is not delegated.
>
> iirc that was some "old" testbed. still many 5xxx::/16 records in
> 6bone whois database...

I seem to recall having read something about that, somewhere - but
it's got to have been a long time ago, because there is no way you can
squeeze 5000::/4 (format prefix %010 == 4000::/3) into the IPv6
globally aggregatable address range (which has a format prefix of
%001, making for 2000::/3 - anyone recognizes that range?)

Of course, it's late at night and I may be way out of whack here.


Michael Kjörling

- -- 
Michael Kjörling  --  Programmer/Network administrator  ^..^
Internet: michael@kjorling.com -- FidoNet: 2:204/254.4   \/
PGP: 95f1 074d 336d f8f0 f297 6a5b 2aa3 7bfd 8a70 e33e

``And indeed people sometimes speak of man's "bestial" cruelty, but
this is very unfair and insulting to the beasts: a beast can never be
so cruel as a man, so ingeniously, so artistically cruel.''
(Ivan Karamazov, in Dostoyevsky's 'The Brothers Karamazov')
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Public key is at http://michael.kjorling.com/contact/pgp.html

iD8DBQE8zdC9KqN7/Ypw4z4RAk8sAKDN0NLMa1kLgu7MJf08uOM5wMfv1ACdE2lT
YcyQ+amfNsY+NBkACs0avJE=
=T0EY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----