Who is in charge of the 2002::/16 reverse DNS ?

[Michel Py]

Jeroen,

> Jeroen Massar wrote:
> Also 6to4 is a _transistion_ method... so I wonder why
> somebody wants to get their company/organisation relying
> on something that will go away in the long run, which could
> take it's time ofcourse.

The time frame we are looking at here is ten years or more, so it is perfectly legitimate to want reverse lookup for 6to4 addresses for the time being.


> You'd still be better off getting some real IPv6 space from
> your upstreams.

Yes, but sometimes, it is not available. Most of the time, these days. It is sad to say, bit in terms of performance 6to4 is better than regular tunnels and will be used because of this.


> And renumbering a network with IPv6 is a piece of cake

This is simply not true. In the 6bone meeting in Minneapolis, the renumbering of /24 and /28 pTLAs was discussed, and several people contributed that renumbering anything bigger that a dial-up connection is not a piece of cake.

Michel