From ab8kf@netscape.net Sat Sep 1 00:59:22 2001 From: ab8kf@netscape.net (ab8kf@netscape.net) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 19:59:22 -0400 Subject: No subject Message-ID: <071777D7.74A49A75.000124A0@netscape.net> list 6bone end __________________________________________________________________ Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! http://shopnow.netscape.com/ Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/ From ab8kf@netscape.net Sat Sep 1 01:05:38 2001 From: ab8kf@netscape.net (ab8kf@netscape.net) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 20:05:38 -0400 Subject: list 6bone Message-ID: <3D10AFE3.6B2C3F91.000124A0@netscape.net> end __________________________________________________________________ Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! http://shopnow.netscape.com/ Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/ From dwb7@cornell.edu Sun Sep 2 21:29:22 2001 From: dwb7@cornell.edu (Dave Botsch) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2001 16:29:22 -0400 Subject: Mbone via 6bone? Message-ID: <20010902162922.A11433@Archie.localdomain> Hi there. As someone relatively new to the 6bone, I am curious if the mbone is accessible via 6bone. After much searching on websites, I have come up with nothing useful other than a couple of statments to setting up tunnels to the mbone via the 6bone. Any info is much appreciated. Thanks! -- ******************************** David William Botsch dwb7@cornell.edu ******************************** From fish@dynam.ac Mon Sep 3 10:19:21 2001 From: fish@dynam.ac (Justin Hammond) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 17:19:21 +0800 Subject: Linux Help for ipv6 References: <20010902162922.A11433@Archie.localdomain> Message-ID: <00f801c13459$85decf30$1601010a@sg.iworld.net> Hi All, I'm attempting to setup a IPV6 network. but unfortuantly, i've hit a snag. Can anyone point me to a ipv6 related mailing list, that hopefully I can ask for help, instead of posting OT messages here? Thanks Justin Hammond From fish@dynam.ac Mon Sep 3 15:10:14 2001 From: fish@dynam.ac (Justin Hammond) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 22:10:14 +0800 Subject: Linux Help for ipv6 References: <20010902162922.A11433@Archie.localdomain> <5.1.0.14.0.20010903120704.00a9b810@mail.dante.org.uk> Message-ID: <011401c13482$2c11c740$1601010a@sg.iworld.net> Ok, I'll see if you can help me. I have setup a IPV6 Tunnel and requested a subnet to my local lan. I'm using a Linux box running Kernel 2.4.9 on a Sparc as the gateway, and have several internal PC's and Servers (Win2k, NT4.0, Redhat's etc etc etc) and I've setup the gateway according to the howto on www.bieringer.de/linux/IPv6/ (I wanted to use the usagi kernel, as I understand it has improved ipv6 support, but the stable release kernel they have won't run on my sparc box, and the latest snapshot usually locks up, so I'm using a stock standard kernel, and the reason I'm using Linux, is I need to be able to firewall, and as far as I know, no other *nix or *bsd has stable firewall code, not to mention this is a production machine!) All is fine from the gateway, I can ping6 most of the 6bone sites I can find from both the Tunnel endpoint address, and also one of the Ip's that is included in my subnet routed to me. I've also setup radvd and it is handing out the prefix and routing information to the other pc's on the network. ipv6 forwarding has also been enabled on the box This is the problem I have: from any other PC on the internal network, I cant connect/ping past the gateway, *unless* I go to the gateway and ping the host first. then for a period of about 30 seconds, I can connect/ping only the host that I pinged from the gateway, but no other host past my gateway. after about 30 Seconds, any connections I have get droped. (for eg, right now, I have a ping script running in a loop, just so I can do some application testing!) The internal machines have the locallink ip address as the default gateway (fe80::a00:20ff:fec2:ad90) even if I manually add the global ip address, still no luck, I always get Destination Unreachable back from the "global" ip address of the gateway I'm not trying to do anything fancy with Mobile IP or anything, I just want these hosts to be accessable via IPv6. I got a feeling either I'm doing somthing stupid (as I understand it, this is something to do with Neighbour Solicitation, I read the RFC's but alas, no help) or there is a bug with my distro. Can anybody point me in the right direction? Thanks Justin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Janos Mohacsi" To: "Justin Hammond" Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 7:10 PM Subject: Re: Linux Help for ipv6 > At 05:19 PM 9/3/01 +0800, you wrote: > >Hi All, > >I'm attempting to setup a IPV6 network. > >but unfortuantly, i've hit a snag. > >Can anyone point me to a ipv6 related mailing list, that hopefully I can ask > >for help, instead of posting OT messages here? > > You can ask on this list. Either you can ask on IPv6 users mailing list: > http://www.ipv6.org/mailing-lists.html or you should consult Bieringer's > web pages: http://www.bieringer.de/linux/IPv6/ > > Janos Mohacsi > > From wizard@think.to.it Mon Sep 3 15:34:23 2001 From: wizard@think.to.it (Matteo Tescione) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 16:34:23 +0200 Subject: Linux Help for ipv6 References: <20010902162922.A11433@Archie.localdomain> <00f801c13459$85decf30$1601010a@sg.iworld.net> Message-ID: <000c01c13485$8c01afa0$82f51150@local> I think the best way is to go to IRCnet in channel like #ipv6 and ask. Bye Matteo Tescione IP & Security Manager INCOM s.r.l. via Ischia I, Grottammare AP ITALY ----- Original Message ----- From: "Justin Hammond" To: <6bone@ISI.EDU> Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 11:19 AM Subject: Linux Help for ipv6 > Hi All, > I'm attempting to setup a IPV6 network. > but unfortuantly, i've hit a snag. > Can anyone point me to a ipv6 related mailing list, that hopefully I can ask > for help, instead of posting OT messages here? > > Thanks > > Justin Hammond > From pekkas@netcore.fi Mon Sep 3 18:37:51 2001 From: pekkas@netcore.fi (Pekka Savola) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 20:37:51 +0300 (EEST) Subject: Linux Help for ipv6 In-Reply-To: <011401c13482$2c11c740$1601010a@sg.iworld.net> Message-ID: Hi, Questions like this belong to, for example, linux-net mailing-list; to me, 6bone seems to generic. If replying, please remove 6bone from Cc:. As to the problem.. There might be some problem in router's neighbour discovery / NUD. In any case, please install tcpdump 3.6 if not already installed, and capture some data with 'tcpdump -n -vvv -s 512 -i any ip6'. Please post that and the IPv6 routing table (/sbin/ip -6 r l) on the router. On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Justin Hammond wrote: > Ok, > I'll see if you can help me. > > I have setup a IPV6 Tunnel and requested a subnet to my local lan. > I'm using a Linux box running Kernel 2.4.9 on a Sparc as the gateway, and > have several internal PC's and Servers (Win2k, NT4.0, Redhat's etc etc etc) > and I've setup the gateway according to the howto on > www.bieringer.de/linux/IPv6/ > > (I wanted to use the usagi kernel, as I understand it has improved ipv6 > support, but the stable release kernel they have won't run on my sparc box, > and the latest snapshot usually locks up, so I'm using a stock standard > kernel, and the reason I'm using Linux, is I need to be able to firewall, > and as far as I know, no other *nix or *bsd has stable firewall code, not to > mention this is a production machine!) > > All is fine from the gateway, I can ping6 most of the 6bone sites I can find > from both the Tunnel endpoint address, and also one of the Ip's that is > included in my subnet routed to me. > I've also setup radvd and it is handing out the prefix and routing > information to the other pc's on the network. > ipv6 forwarding has also been enabled on the box > > This is the problem I have: > > from any other PC on the internal network, I cant connect/ping past the > gateway, *unless* I go to the gateway and ping the host first. > then for a period of about 30 seconds, I can connect/ping only the host that > I pinged from the gateway, but no other host past my gateway. > after about 30 Seconds, any connections I have get droped. (for eg, right > now, I have a ping script running in a loop, just so I can do some > application testing!) > > The internal machines have the locallink ip address as the default gateway > (fe80::a00:20ff:fec2:ad90) > even if I manually add the global ip address, still no luck, I always get > Destination Unreachable back from the "global" ip address of the gateway > > I'm not trying to do anything fancy with Mobile IP or anything, I just want > these hosts to be accessable via IPv6. > > I got a feeling either I'm doing somthing stupid (as I understand it, this > is something to do with Neighbour Solicitation, I read the RFC's but alas, > no help) > or there is a bug with my distro. > > Can anybody point me in the right direction? > > Thanks > > Justin > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Janos Mohacsi" > To: "Justin Hammond" > Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 7:10 PM > Subject: Re: Linux Help for ipv6 > > > > At 05:19 PM 9/3/01 +0800, you wrote: > > >Hi All, > > >I'm attempting to setup a IPV6 network. > > >but unfortuantly, i've hit a snag. > > >Can anyone point me to a ipv6 related mailing list, that hopefully I can > ask > > >for help, instead of posting OT messages here? > > > > You can ask on this list. Either you can ask on IPv6 users mailing list: > > http://www.ipv6.org/mailing-lists.html or you should consult Bieringer's > > web pages: http://www.bieringer.de/linux/IPv6/ > > > > Janos Mohacsi > > > > > -- Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted, Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall" Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords From linux-net@vger.kernel.org Mon Sep 3 22:12:47 2001 From: linux-net@vger.kernel.org (Jeroen Massar) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 23:12:47 +0200 Subject: Linux Help for ipv6 In-Reply-To: <011401c13482$2c11c740$1601010a@sg.iworld.net> Message-ID: <000f01c134bd$2f2742d0$420d640a@HELL> Justin Hammond wrote: > www.bieringer.de/linux/IPv6/ Excellent starting point.... you could also take a peek at http://hs247.com > This is the problem I have: > > from any other PC on the internal network, I cant > connect/ping past the > gateway, *unless* I go to the gateway and ping the host first. > then for a period of about 30 seconds, I can connect/ping > only the host that > I pinged from the gateway, but no other host past my gateway. > after about 30 Seconds, any connections I have get droped. > (for eg, right > now, I have a ping script running in a loop, just so I can do some > application testing!) On the gateway do a : route add -A inet6 2000::/3 dev This is because (most) versions of net-tools on linux don't work correctly with the default route... :) Matteo Tescione [wizard@think.to.it] wrote: > I think the best way is to go to IRCnet in channel like #ipv6 and ask. Who will nicely point you to the http://hs247.com and http://www.bieringer.de sites... Greets, Jeroen PS: CC & "Reply to" set to: linux-net@vger.kernel.org :) From feico@pasta.cs.uit.no Tue Sep 4 09:42:32 2001 From: feico@pasta.cs.uit.no (Feico Dillema) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 10:42:32 +0200 Subject: Linux Help for ipv6 In-Reply-To: <011401c13482$2c11c740$1601010a@sg.iworld.net>; from fish@dynam.ac on Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 10:10:14PM +0800 References: <20010902162922.A11433@Archie.localdomain> <5.1.0.14.0.20010903120704.00a9b810@mail.dante.org.uk> <011401c13482$2c11c740$1601010a@sg.iworld.net> Message-ID: <20010904104230.E24141@pasta.cs.uit.no> On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 10:10:14PM +0800, Justin Hammond wrote: > (I wanted to use the usagi kernel, as I understand it has improved ipv6 > support, but the stable release kernel they have won't run on my sparc box, > and the latest snapshot usually locks up, so I'm using a stock standard > kernel, and the reason I'm using Linux, is I need to be able to firewall, > and as far as I know, no other *nix or *bsd has stable firewall code, not to > mention this is a production machine!) AFAIK NetBSD's ipfilter is pretty stable also with IPv6. But I must admit, I have only used it for some simple things. Feico. From fish@dynam.ac Tue Sep 4 15:36:04 2001 From: fish@dynam.ac (Justin Hammond) Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 17:36:04 +0300 (EEST) Subject: Linux Help for ipv6 References: <20010902162922.A11433@Archie.localdomain> <5.1.0.14.0.20010903120704.00a9b810@mail.dante.org.uk> Message-ID: <011401c13482$2c11c740$1601010a@sg.iworld.net> Ok, I'll see if you can help me. I have setup a IPV6 Tunnel and requested a subnet to my local lan. I'm using a Linux box running Kernel 2.4.9 on a Sparc as the gateway, and have several internal PC's and Servers (Win2k, NT4.0, Redhat's etc etc etc) and I've setup the gateway according to the howto on www.bieringer.de/linux/IPv6/ (I wanted to use the usagi kernel, as I understand it has improved ipv6 support, but the stable release kernel they have won't run on my sparc box, and the latest snapshot usually locks up, so I'm using a stock standard kernel, and the reason I'm using Linux, is I need to be able to firewall, and as far as I know, no other *nix or *bsd has stable firewall code, not to mention this is a production machine!) All is fine from the gateway, I can ping6 most of the 6bone sites I can find from both the Tunnel endpoint address, and also one of the Ip's that is included in my subnet routed to me. I've also setup radvd and it is handing out the prefix and routing information to the other pc's on the network. ipv6 forwarding has also been enabled on the box This is the problem I have: from any other PC on the internal network, I cant connect/ping past the gateway, *unless* I go to the gateway and ping the host first. then for a period of about 30 seconds, I can connect/ping only the host that I pinged from the gateway, but no other host past my gateway. after about 30 Seconds, any connections I have get droped. (for eg, right now, I have a ping script running in a loop, just so I can do some application testing!) The internal machines have the locallink ip address as the default gateway (fe80::a00:20ff:fec2:ad90) even if I manually add the global ip address, still no luck, I always get Destination Unreachable back from the "global" ip address of the gateway I'm not trying to do anything fancy with Mobile IP or anything, I just want these hosts to be accessable via IPv6. I got a feeling either I'm doing somthing stupid (as I understand it, this is something to do with Neighbour Solicitation, I read the RFC's but alas, no help) or there is a bug with my distro. Can anybody point me in the right direction? Thanks Justin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Janos Mohacsi" To: "Justin Hammond" Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 7:10 PM Subject: Re: Linux Help for ipv6 > At 05:19 PM 9/3/01 +0800, you wrote: > >Hi All, > >I'm attempting to setup a IPV6 network. > >but unfortuantly, i've hit a snag. > >Can anyone point me to a ipv6 related mailing list, that hopefully I can ask > >for help, instead of posting OT messages here? > > You can ask on this list. Either you can ask on IPv6 users mailing list: > http://www.ipv6.org/mailing-lists.html or you should consult Bieringer's > web pages: http://www.bieringer.de/linux/IPv6/ > > Janos Mohacsi > > From jeroen@unfix.org Tue Sep 4 21:01:47 2001 From: jeroen@unfix.org (Jeroen Massar) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 22:01:47 +0200 Subject: REMOVAL REQUEST!!! In-Reply-To: <88A22044FD671544AF82E4BF66DCFB2D4CAEF7@LNXDAYEXCH05.lexis-nexis.com> Message-ID: <000701c1357c$6decb210$420d640a@HELL> Richardson, Jeremy (LNG) [mailto:jeremy.richardson@lexisnexis.com] wrote: > To: 6bone@ISI.EDU; 'jeroen@unfix.org' > Dear List Members, And what do I have to do with that??? > I have been trying futilely to have my name removed from the > 6Bone mailing > list. > > I receive a large number of e-mails daily and I do not want them. > > The 6Bone administrator has informed me he cannot remove my > name from the > distribution list, because my address is on another list that > spawns (???) Check the headers of message you receive from the list... anything after hosts from isi.edu... have fun :) Greets, Jeroen From pekkas@netcore.fi Mon Sep 3 18:37:51 2001 From: pekkas@netcore.fi (Pekka Savola) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 20:37:51 +0300 (EEST) Subject: Linux Help for ipv6 In-Reply-To: <011401c13482$2c11c740$1601010a@sg.iworld.net> Message-ID: Hi, Questions like this belong to, for example, linux-net mailing-list; to me, 6bone seems to generic. If replying, please remove 6bone from Cc:. As to the problem.. There might be some problem in router's neighbour discovery / NUD. In any case, please install tcpdump 3.6 if not already installed, and capture some data with 'tcpdump -n -vvv -s 512 -i any ip6'. Please post that and the IPv6 routing table (/sbin/ip -6 r l) on the router. On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Justin Hammond wrote: > Ok, > I'll see if you can help me. > > I have setup a IPV6 Tunnel and requested a subnet to my local lan. > I'm using a Linux box running Kernel 2.4.9 on a Sparc as the gateway, and > have several internal PC's and Servers (Win2k, NT4.0, Redhat's etc etc etc) > and I've setup the gateway according to the howto on > www.bieringer.de/linux/IPv6/ > > (I wanted to use the usagi kernel, as I understand it has improved ipv6 > support, but the stable release kernel they have won't run on my sparc box, > and the latest snapshot usually locks up, so I'm using a stock standard > kernel, and the reason I'm using Linux, is I need to be able to firewall, > and as far as I know, no other *nix or *bsd has stable firewall code, not to > mention this is a production machine!) > > All is fine from the gateway, I can ping6 most of the 6bone sites I can find > from both the Tunnel endpoint address, and also one of the Ip's that is > included in my subnet routed to me. > I've also setup radvd and it is handing out the prefix and routing > information to the other pc's on the network. > ipv6 forwarding has also been enabled on the box > > This is the problem I have: > > from any other PC on the internal network, I cant connect/ping past the > gateway, *unless* I go to the gateway and ping the host first. > then for a period of about 30 seconds, I can connect/ping only the host that > I pinged from the gateway, but no other host past my gateway. > after about 30 Seconds, any connections I have get droped. (for eg, right > now, I have a ping script running in a loop, just so I can do some > application testing!) > > The internal machines have the locallink ip address as the default gateway > (fe80::a00:20ff:fec2:ad90) > even if I manually add the global ip address, still no luck, I always get > Destination Unreachable back from the "global" ip address of the gateway > > I'm not trying to do anything fancy with Mobile IP or anything, I just want > these hosts to be accessable via IPv6. > > I got a feeling either I'm doing somthing stupid (as I understand it, this > is something to do with Neighbour Solicitation, I read the RFC's but alas, > no help) > or there is a bug with my distro. > > Can anybody point me in the right direction? > > Thanks > > Justin > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Janos Mohacsi" > To: "Justin Hammond" > Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 7:10 PM > Subject: Re: Linux Help for ipv6 > > > > At 05:19 PM 9/3/01 +0800, you wrote: > > >Hi All, > > >I'm attempting to setup a IPV6 network. > > >but unfortuantly, i've hit a snag. > > >Can anyone point me to a ipv6 related mailing list, that hopefully I can > ask > > >for help, instead of posting OT messages here? > > > > You can ask on this list. Either you can ask on IPv6 users mailing list: > > http://www.ipv6.org/mailing-lists.html or you should consult Bieringer's > > web pages: http://www.bieringer.de/linux/IPv6/ > > > > Janos Mohacsi > > > > > -- Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted, Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall" Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords From ab8kf@netscape.net Thu Sep 6 19:21:01 2001 From: ab8kf@netscape.net (ab8kf@netscape.net) Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 14:21:01 -0400 Subject: Mbone via 6bone? Message-ID: <68431972.5BC41EAB.000124A0@netscape.net> Two entirely different animals. The 6bone network supports IPv6 multicasting, but IPv4 multicasting is not supported on 6bone. The mbone virtual network, if it still exists, is a IPv4 multicast virtual network backbone. Most networks in the US, Canada, Europe, and Far East support native multicasting at this present time, either through mrouted or other tools. Is there a reason you want to access mbone? -Sean Walton Dave Botsch wrote: >Hi there. > >As someone relatively new to the 6bone, I am curious if the mbone is accessible via 6bone. After much searching on websites, I have come up with nothing useful other than a couple of statments to setting up tunnels to the mbone via the 6bone. > >Any info is much appreciated. > >Thanks! > >-- >******************************** >David William Botsch >dwb7@cornell.edu >******************************** > __________________________________________________________________ Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! http://shopnow.netscape.com/ Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/ From ab8kf@netscape.net Sun Sep 9 03:13:52 2001 From: ab8kf@netscape.net (ab8kf@netscape.net) Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2001 22:13:52 -0400 Subject: Using Jumbo Packets Message-ID: <7E2E2DDE.714E6570.000124A0@netscape.net> I have been searching several sources and trying all types of avenues. *Is support for Jumbo packets automatic?* RFC1883 says it's supposed to be, but I can't get Linux 2.4.5 to sendto() a message larger than 65535 bytes. Has anyone had any success with the jumbo packet feature, or is this feature still vaporware? __________________________________________________________________ Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! http://shopnow.netscape.com/ Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/ From kre@munnari.OZ.AU Sun Sep 9 11:56:19 2001 From: kre@munnari.OZ.AU (Robert Elz) Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2001 17:56:19 +0700 Subject: Using Jumbo Packets In-Reply-To: <7E2E2DDE.714E6570.000124A0@netscape.net> References: <7E2E2DDE.714E6570.000124A0@netscape.net> Message-ID: <2027.1000032979@brandenburg.cs.mu.OZ.AU> Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2001 22:13:52 -0400 From: ab8kf@netscape.net Message-ID: <7E2E2DDE.714E6570.000124A0@netscape.net> | Has anyone had any success with the jumbo packet feature, Jumbograms aren't allowed to be fragmented (the fragment header doesn't support it, even if it wouldn't simply defeat the purpose of them in any case). So you can only send one if you have an interface with an MTU that's big enough. That isn't any kind of ethernet, token ring, fddi, ... There's no point an implementation providing support for them unless it has support for one of the very few link layers where it makes sense, so even if you could nominally send a jumbogram through the loopback interface if you define its MTU high enough, I wouldn't expect implementations to support just that one use. The only point using the things is if you're using an interface where handling an interrupt to process a packet is comparatively very expensive. kre From paitken@cisco.com Mon Sep 10 15:46:47 2001 From: paitken@cisco.com (Paul Aitken) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 15:46:47 +0100 Subject: ipv6-router.cisco.com decommissioned Message-ID: <3B9CD257.8EAD9375@cisco.com> Folks, ipv6-router.cisco.com was decommissioned this morning after 5 years of faithful service. Over the past weeks we've been porting customers over to our new 7200, ipv6-lab-gw.cisco.com, from where we will continue to provide 6bone connectivity. The 7200 is faster than the old 4500 and has more memory. It's running the latest Cisco IPv6 EFT image. -- Paul Aitken IPv6 Development, Cisco Systems Ltd, Edinburgh, Scotland. EH6 6LX From johanneshubrich@web.de Mon Sep 10 22:46:11 2001 From: johanneshubrich@web.de (Johannes Hubrich) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 23:46:11 +0200 Subject: Exchange points Message-ID: <200109102146.f8ALkBx05105@mailgate5.cinetic.de> Hi everybody, for my masterthesis I study the routing in IPv6. Now I have heard, that there are exchange points in the old IPv4 backbones. I don't find anything about those special routers(?) in the RFCs or the Internet-Drafts. Has someone a paper or any else informations about those items? Thanks in advance Johannes _______________________________________________________________________ 1.000.000 DM gewinnen - kostenlos tippen - http://millionenklick.web.de IhrName@web.de, 8MB Speicher, Verschluesselung - http://freemail.web.de From bmanning@ISI.EDU Tue Sep 11 05:02:22 2001 From: bmanning@ISI.EDU (Bill Manning) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 21:02:22 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Exchange points In-Reply-To: <200109102146.f8ALkBx05105@mailgate5.cinetic.de> from "Johannes Hubrich" at Sep 10, 2001 11:46:11 PM Message-ID: <200109110402.f8B42M222118@zed.isi.edu> % % Hi everybody, % % for my masterthesis I study the routing in IPv6. % Now I have heard, that there are exchange points in the old IPv4 backbones. There are "backbones" and there are "exchange points" in both IPv4 and IPv6 space. % I don't find anything about those special routers(?) in the RFCs or the Internet-Drafts. % Has someone a paper or any else informations about those items? And it is unlikely that you would. These are implementation and operational features, not protocol issues and so their uptake in the IETF would be a violation of IETF charter. You might find some pointers on exchanges, both IPv4 and IPv6 at www.ep.net % % Thanks in advance % Johannes % % _______________________________________________________________________ % 1.000.000 DM gewinnen - kostenlos tippen - http://millionenklick.web.de % IhrName@web.de, 8MB Speicher, Verschluesselung - http://freemail.web.de % % -- --bill From koemon07@yahoo.com Wed Sep 12 09:32:11 2001 From: koemon07@yahoo.com (Yuttana) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 15:32:11 +0700 Subject: Linux Help for ipv6 References: <20010902162922.A11433@Archie.localdomain> <5.1.0.14.0.20010903120704.00a9b810@mail.dante.org.uk> <011401c13482$2c11c740$1601010a@sg.iworld.net> Message-ID: <00f201c13b65$6be68650$14cf9acb@Zerg> Hi all, I'm a beginner of IPv6 and I don't know about AAAA and A6 record of name server. How are different about it? Can anybody explain it for me? Thank you Mon _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com From Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.qc.ca Wed Sep 12 13:45:09 2001 From: Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.qc.ca (Marc Blanchet) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 08:45:09 -0400 Subject: Exchange points In-Reply-To: <200109102146.f8ALkBx05105@mailgate5.cinetic.de> Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.1.20010912084455.0217ffc8@127.0.0.1> site of ipv6 exchange points: http://www.v6nap.net. Marc. At/À 23:46 2001-09-10 +0200, Johannes Hubrich you wrote/vous écriviez: >Hi everybody, > >for my masterthesis I study the routing in IPv6. >Now I have heard, that there are exchange points in the old IPv4 backbones. > >I don't find anything about those special routers(?) in the RFCs or the >Internet-Drafts. >Has someone a paper or any else informations about those items? > >Thanks in advance > Johannes > >_______________________________________________________________________ >1.000.000 DM gewinnen - kostenlos tippen - http://millionenklick.web.de >IhrName@web.de, 8MB Speicher, Verschluesselung - http://freemail.web.de From lazy@bsdbox.org Wed Sep 12 15:04:05 2001 From: lazy@bsdbox.org (lazy) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 10:04:05 -0400 Subject: Linux Help for ipv6 References: <20010902162922.A11433@Archie.localdomain> <5.1.0.14.0.20010903120704.00a9b810@mail.dante.org.uk> <011401c13482$2c11c740$1601010a@sg.iworld.net> <00f201c13b65$6be68650$14cf9acb@Zerg> Message-ID: <3B9F6B55.FCDF3C1C@bsdbox.org> ================== AAAA RECORDS ================== 2.2 AAAA data format A 128 bit IPv6 address is encoded in the data portion of an AAAA resource record in network byte order (high-order byte first). --RFC 1886 BIND Example: foo.bar.net IN AAAA 3ffe:1234:5678:1::1 ================== A6 RECORDS ================== o A new resource record type, "A6", is defined to map a domain name to an IPv6 address, with a provision for indirection for leading "prefix" bits. -- RFC 2874 BIND Example: ip6prefix IN A6 0 3ffe:1234:5678:: ns6 IN A6 48 ::1:a:b:c:d ip6prefix www6 IN A6 48 ::1:b:c:d:e ip6prefix // lazy Yuttana wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm a beginner of IPv6 and I don't know about AAAA and A6 record of name > server. > How are different about it? Can anybody explain it for me? > > Thank you > Mon > > _________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- ..:: Jesus saves, but Ctrl+S is faster. :) PGP: RSA 2048bit 0xB7673053 (keyserver.pgp.com) Web: http://packetjunkie.net http://bsdbox.org From koemon07@yahoo.com Fri Sep 14 05:22:11 2001 From: koemon07@yahoo.com (Yuttana) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 11:22:11 +0700 Subject: Linux Help for ipv6 References: <20010902162922.A11433@Archie.localdomain> <5.1.0.14.0.20010903120704.00a9b810@mail.dante.org.uk> <011401c13482$2c11c740$1601010a@sg.iworld.net> <00f201c13b65$6be68650$14cf9acb@Zerg> <3B9F6B55.FCDF3C1C@bsdbox.org> Message-ID: <019201c13cd4$d3d32cd0$14cf9acb@Zerg> Hi ,lazy and all Can I define A6 record same as AAAA? eg. > foo.bar.net IN AAAA 3ffe:1234:5678:1::1 Can I used this? > foo.bar.net IN A6 3ffe:1234:5678:1::1 Thank you Mon ----- Original Message ----- From: "lazy" To: "Yuttana" Cc: <6bone@ISI.EDU> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 9:04 PM Subject: Re: Linux Help for ipv6 > ================== > AAAA RECORDS > ================== > > 2.2 AAAA data format > > A 128 bit IPv6 address is encoded in the data portion of an AAAA > resource record in network byte order (high-order byte first). > > --RFC 1886 > > BIND Example: > foo.bar.net IN AAAA 3ffe:1234:5678:1::1 > > > ================== > A6 RECORDS > ================== > > o A new resource record type, "A6", is defined to map a domain name > to an IPv6 address, with a provision for indirection for leading > "prefix" bits. > > -- RFC 2874 > > BIND Example: > ip6prefix IN A6 0 3ffe:1234:5678:: > ns6 IN A6 48 ::1:a:b:c:d ip6prefix > www6 IN A6 48 ::1:b:c:d:e ip6prefix > > > // lazy > > Yuttana wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I'm a beginner of IPv6 and I don't know about AAAA and A6 record of name > > server. > > How are different about it? Can anybody explain it for me? > > > > Thank you > > Mon > > > > _________________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > -- > > ..:: Jesus saves, but Ctrl+S is faster. :) > PGP: RSA 2048bit 0xB7673053 (keyserver.pgp.com) > Web: http://packetjunkie.net http://bsdbox.org _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com From kre@munnari.OZ.AU Fri Sep 14 07:28:26 2001 From: kre@munnari.OZ.AU (Robert Elz) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 13:28:26 +0700 Subject: Linux Help for ipv6 In-Reply-To: <019201c13cd4$d3d32cd0$14cf9acb@Zerg> References: <019201c13cd4$d3d32cd0$14cf9acb@Zerg> <20010902162922.A11433@Archie.localdomain> <5.1.0.14.0.20010903120704.00a9b810@mail.dante.org.uk> <011401c13482$2c11c740$1601010a@sg.iworld.net> <00f201c13b65$6be68650$14cf9acb@Zerg> <3B9F6B55.FCDF3C1C@bsdbox.org> Message-ID: <1151.1000448906@brandenburg.cs.mu.OZ.AU> Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 11:22:11 +0700 From: "Yuttana" Message-ID: <019201c13cd4$d3d32cd0$14cf9acb@Zerg> | Can I define A6 record same as AAAA? Almost, but not quite | eg. | > foo.bar.net IN AAAA 3ffe:1234:5678:1::1 | Can I used this? | > foo.bar.net IN A6 3ffe:1234:5678:1::1 No, but you can use foo.bar.net IN A6 0 3ffe:1234:5678:1::1 kre From bmanning@ISI.EDU Fri Sep 14 12:12:24 2001 From: bmanning@ISI.EDU (Bill Manning) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 04:12:24 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Linux Help for ipv6 In-Reply-To: <019201c13cd4$d3d32cd0$14cf9acb@Zerg> from "Yuttana" at Sep 14, 2001 11:22:11 AM Message-ID: <200109141112.f8EBCOR29643@zed.isi.edu> % % Hi ,lazy and all % % Can I define A6 record same as AAAA? No. % eg. % > foo.bar.net IN AAAA 3ffe:1234:5678:1::1 This is good. % Can I used this? % > foo.bar.net IN A6 3ffe:1234:5678:1::1 No. But you can use this: foo.bar.net IN A6 0 3ffe:1234:5678:1::1 Be sure to also do this: 1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.1.0.0.0.8.7.6.5.4.3.2.1.e.f.f.3.ip6.int. in ptr foo.bar.net. % % Thank you % Mon % ----- Original Message ----- % From: "lazy" % To: "Yuttana" % Cc: <6bone@ISI.EDU> % Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 9:04 PM % Subject: Re: Linux Help for ipv6 % % % > ================== % > AAAA RECORDS % > ================== % > % > 2.2 AAAA data format % > % > A 128 bit IPv6 address is encoded in the data portion of an AAAA % > resource record in network byte order (high-order byte first). % > % > --RFC 1886 % > % > BIND Example: % > foo.bar.net IN AAAA 3ffe:1234:5678:1::1 % > % > % > ================== % > A6 RECORDS % > ================== % > % > o A new resource record type, "A6", is defined to map a domain name % > to an IPv6 address, with a provision for indirection for leading % > "prefix" bits. % > % > -- RFC 2874 % > % > BIND Example: % > ip6prefix IN A6 0 3ffe:1234:5678:: % > ns6 IN A6 48 ::1:a:b:c:d ip6prefix % > www6 IN A6 48 ::1:b:c:d:e ip6prefix % > % > % > // lazy % > % > Yuttana wrote: % > > % > > Hi all, % > > % > > I'm a beginner of IPv6 and I don't know about AAAA and A6 record of name % > > server. % > > How are different about it? Can anybody explain it for me? % > > % > > Thank you % > > Mon % > > % > > _________________________________________________________ % > > Do You Yahoo!? % > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com % > % > -- % > % > ..:: Jesus saves, but Ctrl+S is faster. :) % > PGP: RSA 2048bit 0xB7673053 (keyserver.pgp.com) % > Web: http://packetjunkie.net http://bsdbox.org % % % _________________________________________________________ % Do You Yahoo!? % Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com % -- --bill From john@sixgirls.org Sun Sep 16 20:52:23 2001 From: john@sixgirls.org (John Klos) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 15:52:23 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Linux Help for ipv6 In-Reply-To: <019201c13cd4$d3d32cd0$14cf9acb@Zerg> Message-ID: Hello, Does anyone know what might cause this warning? Sep 16 15:05:33 reva /netbsd: nd6_lookup: failed to add route for a neighbor(3ffe:80c0:0220::0034), errno=17 (My address = 3ffe:80c0:0220::0035; remote address = 3ffe:80c0:0220::0034; default route for inet6 = 3ffe:80c0:0220::0034) Thanks, John Klos sixgirls.org Systems Administrator -- "On two occasions I have been asked [by members of Parliament!], `Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." -- Charles Babbage From itojun@iijlab.net Sun Sep 16 23:45:47 2001 From: itojun@iijlab.net (itojun@iijlab.net) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 07:45:47 +0900 Subject: netbsd Help for ipv6 In-Reply-To: john's message of Sun, 16 Sep 2001 15:52:23 -0400. Message-ID: <22482.1000680347@itojun.org> >Does anyone know what might cause this warning? >Sep 16 15:05:33 reva /netbsd: nd6_lookup: failed to add route for a >neighbor(3ffe:80c0:0220::0034), errno=17 >(My address = 3ffe:80c0:0220::0035; remote address = 3ffe:80c0:0220::0034; >default route for inet6 = 3ffe:80c0:0220::0034) i guess you are using netbsd if you configure your tunnel interface like below, the above message will appear. # ifconfig gif0 A B prefixlen 127 # ifconfig gif0 A B prefixlen 64 correct configuration is like this. # ifconfig gif0 A B prefixlen 128 itojun From exyll@xs4all.nl Mon Sep 17 00:31:26 2001 From: exyll@xs4all.nl (Ramon Smits) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 01:31:26 +0200 Subject: IPv6 on the Windows platform In-Reply-To: <200109141112.f8EBCOR29643@zed.isi.edu> Message-ID: <000001c13f07$b4c98070$0300a8c0@Subliminal.local> Hi all, I am new to IPv6 but want to learn more about it. I have the following network at the moment WindowsXP 1. <---(IPv4)---> 2. Windows2000 3. <---(IPv4)---> 4. ISP Interface 1, 2 and 3 and NIC's. A VPN connection is build over interface 3. I have installed/started IPv6 on my XP box as stated at: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/pro/techinfo/administration/ipv6/defa ult.asp There seem to be 2 IPv6 drivers for Windows2000. A technology preview and a research version. Which one would be the best to install? I thing IPv6 should be possible on my LAN (traffic between interfaces 1 and 2). And IPv6 over IPv4 with my ISP connection. How should I configure my client (XP box) to use IPv6 and not to do IPv6 over IPv4 routing. How should I configure my server (2000 box) to do IPv6 on my LAN and IPv6 over IPv4 with my ISP connection. How do I configure my server to do the IPv6 routing for my client. My VPN dialup (DSL) to my ISP has a static IP. I do not need a step by step manual but more like the actions I have to do to make this work because I am new to this stuff. Are there already applications available for the Windows platform that use IPv6? With that I do not mean ping, tracert, etc. :-) Yours sincerely, Ramon From fink@es.net Tue Sep 18 22:42:53 2001 From: fink@es.net (Bob Fink) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 14:42:53 -0700 Subject: pTLA request for XS4ALL-NL (http://www.xs4all.nl) - review closes 2 October 2001 Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20010918143803.032d4f18@imap2.es.net> 6bone Folk, XS4ALL-NL (http://www.xs4all.nl) has requested a pTLA allocation. The open review period for this will close 2 October 2001. Please send your comments to me or the list. Thanks, Bob === >Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 16:26:00 +0200 >From: Erik Bos >To: fink@es.net >Cc: remcovz@xs4all.net >Subject: 6bone pTLA request > >hi Bob, > >We would like to apply for a 6bone pTLA allocation, please let us know if >you have any further questions. > >regards, > >Erik > >-- >The following rules apply to qualify for a 6Bone pTLA allocation. It > should be recognized that holders of 6Bone pTLA allocations are > expected to provide production quality backbone network services for > the 6Bone. > > 1. The pTLA Applicant must have a minimum of three (3) months > qualifying experience as a 6Bone end-site or pNLA transit. During > the entire qualifying period the Applicant must be operationally > providing the following: > > a. Fully maintained, up to date, 6Bone Registry entries for their > ipv6-site inet6num, mntner, and person objects, including each > tunnel that the Applicant has. > >ipv6-site: XS4ALL-NL exists in the 6bone registry. It currently has a >contact 'XS42-RIPE' (a role) and two references to persons. We have >requested a maintainer object MNT-XS4ALL from the registry and will use >this to guard our objects in the future. > > b. Fully maintained, and reliable, BGP4+ peering and connectivity > between the Applicant's boundary router and the appropriate > connection point into the 6Bone. This router must be IPv6 > pingable. This criteria is judged by members of the 6Bone > Operations Group at the time of the Applicant's pTLA request. > >We are connected to the AMS-IX IPv6 shared medium and have been allocated >the following address: 3ffe:3000::a500:3265:1 > >We are natively connected to other dutch/european networks via this IPv6 >network and have no outgoing tunnels on which we do IPv6 (BGP) peering >yet, due to us having a /48 from the INTOUCH-NL sTLA. We do, however >maintain BGP4+ to INTOUCH-NL, NTT Europe, and RIPE-NCC. > > c. Fully maintained DNS forward (AAAA) and reverse (ip6.int) > entries for the Applicant's router(s) and at least one host > system. > >* We maintain a forward for ipv6.xs4all.nl in the xs4all.nl nameservers: >xs4all.nl. name server ns.ripe.net. >xs4all.nl. name server ns.xs4all.nl. >xs4all.nl. name server ns2.xs4all.nl. > >* We have nameservers responding to IPv4 queries regarding the following >zonefile: (2001:6e0:20a::/48) >a.0.2.0.0.e.6.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.int. name server ns.xs4all.nl. >a.0.2.0.0.e.6.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.int. name server ns2.xs4all.nl. > > d. A fully maintained, and reliable, IPv6-accessible system > providing, at a mimimum, one or more web pages, describing the > Applicant's IPv6 services. This server must be IPv6 pingable. > >We have a Cisco 3640 at the AMS-v6-IX, directing the /48 to our head quarters >in Diemen, NL. We have a FreeBSD machine online which will host various >low yield services such as an Apache/v6, Bind9 and a simple tunnelbroker for >testing purposes. > > 2. The pTLA Applicant MUST have the ability and intent to provide > "production-quality" 6Bone backbone service. Applicants must > provide a statement and information in support of this claim. > This MUST include the following: > > a. A support staff of two persons minimum, three preferable, with > person attributes registered for each in the ipv6-site object > for the pTLA applicant. > >Remco van Zuijlen >Erik Bos >And the XS42-RIPE role, which poses as our network admin contact. > > b. A common mailbox for support contact purposes that all support > staff have access to, pointed to with a notify attribute in the > ipv6-site object for the pTLA Applicant. > >This email address is the same as for IPv4 operational communication > and has will be put into all relevant objects. > > 3. The pTLA Applicant MUST have a potential "user community" that > would be served by its becoming a pTLA, e.g., the Applicant is a > major provider of Internet service in a region, country, or focus > of interest. Applicant must provide a statement and information in > support this claim. > >XS4ALL was the first ISP in the Netherlands offering Internetaccess to the >public since 1993, we offer DSL since 1999 and would like to offer IPv6 >connectivity and services to all DSL-customers. (we currently have about 30k >DSL connections and expect to have about 60k DSL users by the end of this >year) > > 4. The pTLA Applicant MUST commit to abide by the current 6Bone > operational rules and policies as they exist at time of its > application, and agree to abide by future 6Bone backbone > operational rules and policies as they evolve by consensus of the > 6Bone backbone and user community. > >We plan to abide by these rules and policies. -end From Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.qc.ca Thu Sep 20 20:28:31 2001 From: Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.qc.ca (Marc Blanchet) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 15:28:31 -0400 Subject: NTP available on IPv6 Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.1.20010920152518.02cf7d90@127.0.0.1> Hi, We ported the Network Time Protocol (NTP) current distribution (ntp-4.1.0.tar.gz) to IPv6. The main components (client, server) have been ported to enable the use of NTP over IPv6 to synchronize clocks of IPv6 nodes, however, a few other optional components are being ported. The patches are now integrated in an ntp ipv6-dev branch of the ntp source tree by the NTP developers for further testing, code inspection and integration with the main source tree. Discussions have also started with the NTP developers and Dave Mills on the few issues that remain to be fixed (refid as an example). The port was done by Jean-François Boudreault. A Stratum-1 NTP server is running over IPv6-only at: ntp.ipv6.viagenie.qc.ca: it is using a Trimble Palisade GPS as its direct connected source. The service is available on a best effort basis without any guarantee. Information on how to get the code and how to use the NTPv6 service is available at: http://www.viagenie.qc.ca/en/ipv6/ntpv6/index.shtml. We are looking for feedback from users who would like to test the code and the server. Please send your questions/suggestions/modifications/... to ntp@viagenie.qc.ca. Regards, Marc. PS. Also an SNTP client and server has been developed (from scratch) and is also available at the same URL. From hachi@kuiki.net Thu Sep 20 20:48:22 2001 From: hachi@kuiki.net (Jonathan Steinert) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 14:48:22 -0500 Subject: Searching for 3com Message-ID: I used to have tunnel connectivity through 3com (aka 6com), but my IPv4 address allocation has changed. When I went to email my contact at 3com, I got a bounced email. All email addresses associated with 3com in the registry bounce and their phone numbers have come up as disconnected. If anyone out there knows of a new contact at 3com for 6bone tunneling/connectivity could you please let me know? Does anyone out there use a tunnel through 3com and does this tunnel still work? Thanks much ------------------------------ -- -+- -- ------------------------------- hachi@kuiki.net Jonathan Steinert http://kuiki.net/ "She smiled again, shrugged her shoulders, and became a perfect mirror." ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From psb@ast.cam.ac.uk Fri Sep 21 09:52:03 2001 From: psb@ast.cam.ac.uk (Peter Bunclark) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 09:52:03 +0100 (BST) Subject: NTP available on IPv6 In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.1.20010920152518.02cf7d90@127.0.0.1> Message-ID: On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Marc Blanchet wrote: > Hi, > We ported the Network Time Protocol (NTP) current distribution > (ntp-4.1.0.tar.gz) to IPv6. The main components (client, server) have been Brilliant! Almost... # ./ntpdate/ntpdate ntp.ipv6.viagenie.qc.ca Looking for host ntp.ipv6.viagenie.qc.ca and service 123 host found : 3ffe:b00:c18:1:202:b3ff:fe31:fa5f 21 Sep 09:48:31 ntpdate[8143]: no server suitable for synchronization found # Also, on starting ntpd, /var/adm/messages reports: Sep 21 09:44:14 cadsa ntpd[8124]: [ID 702911 daemon.notice] ntpd 4.1.0 Fri Sep 21 09:30:38 BST 2001 (1) Sep 21 09:44:14 cadsa ntpd[8124]: [ID 702911 daemon.notice] kernel time discipline status 0040 Sep 21 09:44:27 cadsa ntpd[8124]: [ID 702911 daemon.error] sendto(3ffe:b00:c18:1:202:b3ff:fe31:fa5f): Address family not supported by protocol family Sep 21 09:47:39 cadsa last message repeated 3 times Solaris 8 on Sparc 20, patched to the hilt. Pete. From malte@xray.mine.nu Fri Sep 21 12:12:04 2001 From: malte@xray.mine.nu (Malte Starostik) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 13:12:04 +0200 Subject: Beginner's question Message-ID: <200109211112.f8LBC4606544@zaphod.home.lan> Hello, please excuse my ignorance if this is offtopic here :-) I have just succeeded to set up a tunnel via freenet6. Now, I wonder what are the possibilities to get DNS working. Is there some kind of testing TLD for IPv6 only where I could get a subdomain with an NS record pointing to my local DNS server? As I don't have a static IPv4 address, I don't see how I could register a "normal" domain with an IPv4 NS record... and if so, how to get reverse lookups for 3ffe:0b80:024b::/48 to be delegated to here? Many thanks, -- Malte Starostik PGP: 1024D/D2F3C787 [C138 2121 FAF3 410A 1C2A 27CD 5431 7745 D2F3 C787] ø¿ from "Malte Starostik" at Sep 21, 2001 01:12:04 PM Message-ID: <200109211333.f8LDXh718970@zed.isi.edu> % % Hello, % % please excuse my ignorance if this is offtopic here :-) % I have just succeeded to set up a tunnel via freenet6. Now, I wonder what are % the possibilities to get DNS working. % Is there some kind of testing TLD for IPv6 only where I could get a subdomain % with an NS record pointing to my local DNS server? As I don't have a static % IPv4 address, I don't see how I could register a "normal" domain with an IPv4 % NS record... and if so, how to get reverse lookups for 3ffe:0b80:024b::/48 to % be delegated to here? % % Many thanks, % -- % Malte Starostik % PGP: 1024D/D2F3C787 [C138 2121 FAF3 410A 1C2A 27CD 5431 7745 D2F3 C787] % ø¿ References: <200109211112.f8LBC4606544@zaphod.home.lan> Message-ID: <20010921161935.B1982@leela.home.grueneberg.de> Hi Malte, Malte Starostik wrote: > Is there some kind of testing TLD for IPv6 only where I could get a subdomain > with an NS record pointing to my local DNS server? As I don't have a static > IPv4 address, I don't see how I could register a "normal" domain with an IPv4 > NS record... and if so, how to get reverse lookups for 3ffe:0b80:024b::/48 to > be delegated to here? And why do you need to register a second level domain? Andre -- I wish the Government would put a tax on pianos for the incompetent. From malte@xray.mine.nu Fri Sep 21 15:35:31 2001 From: malte@xray.mine.nu (Malte Starostik) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 16:35:31 +0200 Subject: Beginner's question In-Reply-To: <20010921161935.B1982@leela.home.grueneberg.de> References: <200109211112.f8LBC4606544@zaphod.home.lan> <20010921161935.B1982@leela.home.grueneberg.de> Message-ID: <200109211435.f8LEZX611486@zaphod.home.lan> Am Friday 21 September 2001 16:19 schrieb Andre Grueneberg: > Hi Malte, > > Malte Starostik wrote: > > Is there some kind of testing TLD for IPv6 only where I could get a > > subdomain with an NS record pointing to my local DNS server? As I don't > > have a static IPv4 address, I don't see how I could register a "normal" > > domain with an IPv4 NS record... and if so, how to get reverse lookups > > for 3ffe:0b80:024b::/48 to be delegated to here? > > And why do you need to register a second level domain? Uhm, right, no need to, any level would do, I just didn't think about that *sigh* Thanks for reminding me, guess I'll find someone to delegate a subdomain then. -- Malte Starostik PGP: 1024D/D2F3C787 [C138 2121 FAF3 410A 1C2A 27CD 5431 7745 D2F3 C787]  $Ü,;pper From extml@ndsoftware.net Fri Sep 21 15:42:35 2001 From: extml@ndsoftware.net (NDSoftware) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 16:42:35 +0200 Subject: Beginner's question In-Reply-To: <200109211112.f8LBC4606544@zaphod.home.lan> Message-ID: <00d201c142ab$a7493c40$0102010a@localnet.ndsoftware.net> Hello, Your DNS server need a static IP. Send a e-mail to freenet6 (Viagenie) to delegate your /48 on your DNS server. Don't forget: IPv6 in DNS server use AAAA records, not A, your DNS server must support IPv6 like IPv6. Best Regards, Nicolas DEFFAYET > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-6bone@ISI.EDU [mailto:owner-6bone@ISI.EDU] On > Behalf Of Malte Starostik > Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 1:12 PM > To: 6bone@ISI.EDU > Subject: Beginner's question > > > Hello, > > please excuse my ignorance if this is offtopic here :-) > I have just succeeded to set up a tunnel via freenet6. Now, I > wonder what are > the possibilities to get DNS working. > Is there some kind of testing TLD for IPv6 only where I could > get a subdomain > with an NS record pointing to my local DNS server? As I don't > have a static > IPv4 address, I don't see how I could register a "normal" > domain with an IPv4 > NS record... and if so, how to get reverse lookups for > 3ffe:0b80:024b::/48 to > be delegated to here? > > Many thanks, > -- > Malte Starostik > PGP: 1024D/D2F3C787 [C138 2121 FAF3 410A 1C2A 27CD 5431 7745 > D2F3 C787] >  ø¿ From bmanning@ISI.EDU Fri Sep 21 19:12:11 2001 From: bmanning@ISI.EDU (Bill Manning) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 11:12:11 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Beginner's question In-Reply-To: <00d201c142ab$a7493c40$0102010a@localnet.ndsoftware.net> from "NDSoftware" at Sep 21, 2001 04:42:35 PM Message-ID: <200109211812.f8LICB301460@zed.isi.edu> % % Hello, % % Your DNS server need a static IP. % Send a e-mail to freenet6 (Viagenie) to delegate your /48 on your DNS % server. % Don't forget: IPv6 in DNS server use AAAA records, not A, your DNS % server must support IPv6 like IPv6. AAAA yes, IPv6 transport, No. % % Best Regards, % % Nicolas DEFFAYET -- --bill From extml@ndsoftware.net Fri Sep 21 20:05:23 2001 From: extml@ndsoftware.net (NDSoftware) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 21:05:23 +0200 Subject: Beginner's question In-Reply-To: <200109211812.f8LICB301460@zed.isi.edu> Message-ID: <001c01c142d0$5d8320b0$0102010a@localnet.ndsoftware.net> server must support IPv6 like IPv6. please read: server must support IPv6 like BIND9. sorry for this error. Yes the DNS server can use IPv4 for resolve IPv6... Nicolas DEFFAYET > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Manning [mailto:bmanning@ISI.EDU] > Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 8:12 PM > To: NDSoftware > Cc: 'Malte Starostik'; 6bone@ISI.EDU > Subject: Re: Beginner's question > > > % > % Hello, > % > % Your DNS server need a static IP. > % Send a e-mail to freenet6 (Viagenie) to delegate your /48 > on your DNS > % server. > % Don't forget: IPv6 in DNS server use AAAA records, not A, your DNS > % server must support IPv6 like IPv6. > > > AAAA yes, IPv6 transport, No. > > % > % Best Regards, > % > % Nicolas DEFFAYET > > -- > --bill > From paitken@cisco.com Sat Sep 22 00:02:11 2001 From: paitken@cisco.com (Paul Aitken) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 00:02:11 +0100 Subject: Cisco 6bone outage Saturday October 6th, 2001 Message-ID: <3BABC6F3.11971864@cisco.com> There is a planned electrical outage in the data centre housing our 6bone router on Saturday October 6th, 2001 from 7:00am until 4:00pm Pacific Time. As a precautionary measure, our 6bone router will be shut down ahead of this outage and service will not be restored until after the outage. Cisco will not provide any 6bone connectivity during the outage. If you have a 6bone tunnel or peering with Cisco and are planning on using the 6bone during this time, you should make alternative arrangements. Our apologies for any inconvenience this may cause. NB I've already contacted all our known tunnel customers and peers, twice. If you have a 6bone tunnel or peering with Cisco and have not yet received this notice, you should contact ipv6-support@cisco.com immediately to be added to our contact list. Thanks. -- Paul Aitken IPv6 Development, Cisco Systems Ltd, Edinburgh, Scotland. EH6 6LX From janekp@janekp.net Mon Sep 24 21:56:09 2001 From: janekp@janekp.net (Pawel Jankowski) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 22:56:09 +0200 (CEST) Subject: ASpathtree and zebra Message-ID: <20010924225507.J44906-100000@lucjusz.bimar.pl> Hi, Anyone have patch for ASpathtree for reading data from zebra? Regards, Pawel -- Covered by PPL Pawel Jankowski, janekp@IRCnet Phone: +48 71 783-14-61, GSM: +48 606 473 779 mailto: janekp@qm.pl 6bone-hdl: PJ3-6BONE