OpenBSD IPv6 problem

[Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino]

>>  | 	the problem we see in "A B 127" (or 64) is ambiguity.
>>Actually, in that one particular case (127), there should be none.  With
>>a shorter subnet mask there would be for sure (for anyone who doesn't
>>see this, imagine 3ffe:9000::8/125 - configured with
>>	3ffe:9000::9 -> 3ffe:9000::A
>>and then ask yourself what you do with a packet addressed to 3ffe:9000::B)
>	I'm not objecting to assign /127 to ppp link.  I'm just trying to
>	describe how you can configure KAME node to handle /127 prefix right.

	we implemented rather picky code against the above configuration
	due to NUD handling (we need to know who is "on link" for the p2p
	link when we initiate p2p).  sorry if my memory is wrong, jinmei
	should have better answers.

itojun