ipv6 addressing - non-routable equivalents?
Peter Håkanson
peter@ipsec.nu
Mon, 9 Oct 2000 23:31:12 +0200 (CEST)
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote:
> >The widespread adoption of MAC-based addressing has some serious hurdles
> >to overcome. In the meantime, I don't see why more traditional schemes
> >can't continue to be used or be discouraged in favor of MAC-based
> >addressing.
>
> I don't see why you try to make "us" believe that there is a problem?
>
> No part of the IPv6 Addressing Architecture requires the use of this MAC
> address magic. In fact the whole system is designed to work perfectly
> *without* that mechanism, including a mandatory mechanism to detect
> duplicate interface addresses within the same prefix space (as may
> happen due to manual and/or DHCP-style configuration activity ;-).
without the "MAC address macic" we could use 64 bit addresses. Just to mention
one difference.
>
> There is more than one IF type around these days, which does not have a
> MAC address. Still those links can be used, even using autoconfiguration
> (e.g. serial links :-).
>
> And there is a draft which deals with security issues in using the
> MAC-address based magic.
>
> And there is a draft that deals with ICPMv6 based revDNS functionality.
>
> So what. Come on, reality check, please....
the reality is that MAC addresses is the exception ...
> -WW
> _________________________________:_____________________________________
> Wilfried Woeber : e-mail: Woeber@CC.UniVie.ac.at
> UniVie Computer Center - ACOnet : Tel: +43 1 4277 - 140 33
> Universitaetsstrasse 7 : Fax: +43 1 4277 - 9 140
> A-1010 Vienna, Austria, Europe : RIPE-DB: WW144, PGP keyID 0xF0ACB369
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
--
Peter Håkanson | Melissa ? Lovletter ? Joke ? Mothers day ?
tfn 0707 328101 | Not on this mailsystem!
IPSec sverige || ipsec.nu | It's safe by design !
Lundbystrand Sweden | (in contrast to some other)