ת·¢: WINDOWS NT OR SUN SOLARIS??
Wu Haisang
hswu@ns.6test.edu.cn
Fri, 17 Nov 2000 10:18:44 -0800
Hi,
About Microsoft IPv6 stack, pls browse http://www.research.microsoft.com/msripv6,
you can get more info about their work, which I think is quite compatible with Win2000.
I have been using FreeBSD since the birth of IPv6. FreeBSD2.x+ KAME, FreeBSD3.x+KAME,
or +INRIA are pretty good. Since FreeBSD4.x, KAME is embedded into the stack, which gives
this OS much better performance.
Linux can support IPv6 with needed modules added.
To begin with IPv6, maybe FreeBSD is a good point. And, MSR has its MSRIPv6 released 1.4
free to download on website, the source code is very good. But the Win2000 Technical preview
(000925 updated) is made by product group, so only binary is availabe.
Hope to be useful.
Haisang
______________________________________________
Haisang Wu
CERNET IPv6 Testbed Operation Team
Central Mainbuilding Room 307
Tsinghua University Beijing P.R.China
Zipcode: 100084
Phone: 62785814-525(O) BP: 191-1134725
email: hswu@ns.6test.edu.cn
______________________________________________
> -----????-----
> ???: owner-6bone@ISI.EDU [mailto:owner-6bone@ISI.EDU]?? Wes Horner
> ????: 2000?11?16? 12:32
> ???: Jeroen Massar
> ??: M?Carmen Medina; 6bone@ISI.EDU
> ??: Re: WINDOWS NT OR SUN SOLARIS??
>
>
> > Sounds very strange to you maybe but.. ehmm the tech previews which
> > microsoft supply kinda have a small wininet.dll and guess what that does
> > to your Internet Explorer... yep.. it makes it IPv6 capable...
> > And all those "standard" tools like telnet etc are included too.. but
> > hey... don't mind that... there is even a nice example source which
> > comes along with it to show how to use the IPv6 stuff.
>
>
> Ok I guess I should have been more clear. I actually have windows
> 2000. I keep calling it NT. Anyway, explorer doesn't seem to have ipv6
> capabilites on that platform after installing the stack. The docs talk
> mainly about the tools that come with the stack. This is a version that
> was released in may. There may be a new stack by now.
>
>
> wes
>