From xavier@euro.net Tue May 2 12:24:08 2000
From: xavier@euro.net (Xavier Mertens)
Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 13:24:08 +0200 (MET DST)
Subject: IPv6 tunnel & NAT
Message-ID:
Hi *,
I had a Linux box running an IPv6 tunnel to a Cisco.
Now my box is behind a router with NAT!
Is there a way to re-setup my tunnel to the Cisco even with the address
translation?
TIA!
--
Xavier Mertens, . . EuroNet Internet "Contrary to popular belief,
NOC Manager . * a subsidiary of Unix is userfriendly. It
XM3-RIPE XM1-6BONE . France Telecom just happens to be selective
about who it makes friends
with."
From mkt@ecs.soton.ac.uk Tue May 2 14:10:41 2000
From: mkt@ecs.soton.ac.uk (Mark Thompson)
Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 14:10:41 +0100
Subject: IPv6 tunnel & NAT
In-Reply-To: ; from xavier@euro.net on Tue, May 02, 2000 at 01:24:08PM +0200
References:
Message-ID: <20000502141041.N1933@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
On 13:24(GMT) 02-05-00, Xavier Mertens wrote:
> I had a Linux box running an IPv6 tunnel to a Cisco.
> Now my box is behind a router with NAT!
>
> Is there a way to re-setup my tunnel to the Cisco even with the address
> translation?
Short of scripting your config on the Cisco, not really. (Yuck. I didn't
just suggest that!)
A solution would be to move away from using the Cisco as a tunnel
endpoint and run something like CSELT's tunnel broker on a BSD box -
dynamically creating tunnels as and when you need them.
... or use a different transition technique.
1 cent spent,
Mark/
--
iam: networks and distributed systems
From FRANCISCOD@advance.com.ar Tue May 2 14:43:37 2000
From: FRANCISCOD@advance.com.ar (Francisco, Diego)
Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 10:43:37 -0300
Subject: Stupid question - need DNS? (2)
Message-ID: <96A02275DD84D311B765006008C50AEA75EDF6@advtal10.inadvance.com.ar>
Pardon by the shortage of my explanation which happens is that I am
very bad for ingles, which I need to know is I number IP of some DNS that
turns for example http://altavista.ipv6.digital.com to me into ffef:1cd::1.
And if somebody knows like forming it in a 2.2.14 Linux serious ideal.
I connect myself through freenet6 with ipv4 on ipv6.
Thank you very much.
in spanish:
Perdón por la escasez de mi explicación lo que pasa es que soy muy malo para
el ingles, lo que necesito saber es el numero IP de algún DNS que me
convierta por ejemplo http://altavista.ipv6.digital.com/ en ffef:1cd::1.
Y si alguien sabe como configurarlo en un Linux 2.2.14 seria ideal.
Yo me conecto a través de freenet6 con ipv4 sobre ipv6.
Muchas Gracias.
From ksbn@kt.co.kr Wed May 3 03:38:08 2000
From: ksbn@kt.co.kr (ksb)
Date: Wed, 03 May 2000 11:38:08 +0900
Subject: v4/v6 translator
Message-ID: <390F9110.DFE0C4B6@kt.co.kr>
How are you?
What IPv4/IPv6 translators(implemented) can we use now?
Thanks.
--
Kim, Sahng-Beom / Korea Telecom
TEL : +82-42-870-8322
FAX : +82-42-870-8329
E-mail : ksbn@kt.co.kr
--
From rrockell@sprint.net Wed May 3 22:57:30 2000
From: rrockell@sprint.net (Robert J. Rockell)
Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 17:57:30 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Sprint (3ffe:2900::/24) outage
Message-ID:
Sprint's 6bone main core is experiencing an outage, partially due to a power
hit, and partially due to archaic hardware. We will be bringing service back
online as soon as possible. Please bear with us though this outage.
(ASN6175).
Thanks
Rob Rockell
Sprintlink Internet Service Center
Operations Engineering,
703-689-6322
1-800-724-3329, PIN 385-8833
Ines|e gnyne qh vagr bz s|e gbqq ngg una {e hgr bpu plxyne? (OFOTD)
From revirieg@hotmail.com Thu May 4 18:48:41 2000
From: revirieg@hotmail.com (Pedro Revriego)
Date: Thu, 04 May 2000 10:48:41 PDT
Subject: Access to the 6bone in Spain
Message-ID: <20000504174841.49965.qmail@hotmail.com>
Hi,
I am looking for a conection to the 6bone in Spain.
It is for a private company (we can not connect to REDIRIS).
Can anyone help us ???
Best Regards,
Pedro Reviriego
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
From wmaton@ryouko.dgim.crc.ca Fri May 5 16:56:33 2000
From: wmaton@ryouko.dgim.crc.ca (William F. Maton)
Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 11:56:33 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Looking for IPv6 email guinea pigs
Message-ID:
All,
I have compiled and installed ftpmail on our biggish FTP site. It
is a linux box with IPv6 enabled in the kernel running sendmail compiled
with IPv6 support. What I'd like to have is for folks to send email to
ftpmail@ftp.ipv6.crc.ca to coax some bulk IPv6 traffic out of it. To
fetch something, just do this in the body of the message:
open ftp.crc.ca anonymous email_address@someplace.edu
get /some/file.tar.gz
Information on what packages are available is located at:
ftp://ftp.crc.ca/STATUS.html
Yeah, I know, I should install a working IPv6 FTP server, but that's RSN.
I'm working on getting an apache built that will make the archive
available via:
http://ftp.ipv6.crc.ca/test/
In theory anyways.
Thanks, and have fun.
wfms
From phae@uswest.net Sat May 6 04:22:57 2000
From: phae@uswest.net (Peter Abrahamsen)
Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 20:22:57 -0700
Subject: Stupid question - need DNS? (2)
In-Reply-To: <96A02275DD84D311B765006008C50AEA75EDF6@advtal10.inadvance.com.ar>; from FRANCISCOD@advance.com.ar on Tue, May 02, 2000 at 10:43:37AM -0300
References: <96A02275DD84D311B765006008C50AEA75EDF6@advtal10.inadvance.com.ar>
Message-ID: <20000505202257.B21877@sage.cortland.com>
On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 10:43:37AM -0300, Francisco, Diego wrote:
> Perdón por la escasez de mi explicación lo que pasa es que soy muy malo para
No te preocupes, señor :)
> el ingles, lo que necesito saber es el numero IP de algún DNS que me
> convierta por ejemplo http://altavista.ipv6.digital.com/ en ffef:1cd::1.
El que usas funcionará. Uso el de mi ISP, y puedo decir por ejemplo:
0 (20:06)(root@peidran)(~)# host -t AAAA altavista.ipv6.digital.com
altavista.ipv6.digital.com AAAA 3FFE:1200:2001:1:8000:0:0:1
> Y si alguien sabe como configurarlo en un Linux 2.2.14 seria ideal.
> Yo me conecto a través de freenet6 con ipv4 sobre ipv6.
¿Estás seguro que las copias tuyas de dnsutils y netstd incluyen ipv6? Querrás
ver el HOWTO de ipv6 para linux:
http://www.bieringer.de/linux/IPv6/
Lo siento, pero no hay versión española.
Peter
From pilot0920@sina.com Tue May 9 21:58:14 2000
From: pilot0920@sina.com (pilot0920)
Date: Tue May 9 14:58:14 CST 2000
Subject: No subject
Message-ID: <20000509065814.21921.qmail@sina.com>
I have joined the 6bone mail list, and I want to join the 6bone.
So what should I do the next step?
How and where can I find a point on the 6bone to attach to?
______________________________________
===================================================================
ÐÂÀËÃâ·Ñµç×ÓÓÊÏä http://mail.sina.com.cn
From psb@ast.cam.ac.uk Tue May 9 10:47:35 2000
From: psb@ast.cam.ac.uk (Peter Bunclark)
Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 10:47:35 +0100 (BST)
Subject: your mail
In-Reply-To: <20000509065814.21921.qmail@sina.com>
Message-ID:
On Tue, 9 May -1, pilot0920 wrote:
> I have joined the 6bone mail list, and I want to join the 6bone.
> So what should I do the next step?
> How and where can I find a point on the 6bone to attach to?
Read all about it at the 6bone home page:
http://www.6bone.net/
Pete.
From wmaton@ryouko.dgim.crc.ca Thu May 11 15:42:37 2000
From: wmaton@ryouko.dgim.crc.ca (William F. Maton)
Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 10:42:37 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Announcing biggish FTP archive reachable via IPv6
Message-ID:
Greetings,
Could folks kindly try aiming their IPv6-enabled clients at
bear.dgim.crc.ca, which is a Solaris 8 box housing ftp.crc.ca's FTP
archive, and let me know if any of you can successfully download stuff?
This is another case where I know if *I* use it, it always works. :-)
But I'm paranoid, so I'm asking. Also, if folks like to mirror any part
of the archive _via IPv6_ it would be most appreciated (and of course,
you're welcome to do so), as I'd like to get some numbers out of the
router and box.
Thanks in advance and enjoy!
wfms
From wmaton@ryouko.dgim.crc.ca Thu May 11 17:47:00 2000
From: wmaton@ryouko.dgim.crc.ca (William F. Maton)
Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 12:47:00 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Announcing biggish FTP archive reachable via IPv6
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
On 11 May 2000, Simon Leinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what's the IPv6 address of that box?
Sigh. Forgot "make reload"
bear IN AAAA 2001:410:401:8::2
> --
> Simon.
>
> $ dig aaaa bear.dgim.crc.ca
>
> ; <<>> DiG 8.2 <<>> aaaa bear.dgim.crc.ca
> ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
> ;; got answer:
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 4
> ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
> ;; QUERY SECTION:
> ;; bear.dgim.crc.ca, type = AAAA, class = IN
>
> ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
> dgim.crc.ca. 2h59m25s IN SOA ns1.crc.ca. dns.crc.ca. (
> 2000051002 ; serial
> 1H ; refresh
> 15M ; retry
> 1W ; expiry
> 8H ) ; minimum
>
>
> ;; Total query time: 12 msec
> ;; FROM: babar to SERVER: default -- 130.59.1.30
> ;; WHEN: Thu May 11 18:16:40 2000
> ;; MSG SIZE sent: 34 rcvd: 89
>
> > Greetings,
>
> > Could folks kindly try aiming their IPv6-enabled clients at
> > bear.dgim.crc.ca, which is a Solaris 8 box housing ftp.crc.ca's FTP
> > archive, and let me know if any of you can successfully download stuff?
> > This is another case where I know if *I* use it, it always works. :-)
> > But I'm paranoid, so I'm asking. Also, if folks like to mirror any part
> > of the archive _via IPv6_ it would be most appreciated (and of course,
> > you're welcome to do so), as I'd like to get some numbers out of the
> > router and box.
>
> > Thanks in advance and enjoy!
>
> > wfms
>
wfms
From thejoker@infostream.ro Thu May 11 22:37:24 2000
From: thejoker@infostream.ro (Radu Malica)
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 00:37:24 +0300 (EEST)
Subject: hi, i have some problems
Message-ID:
Hello
i'am a newbine with IPv6. I managed to get my eth0 interface with an IPv6
addres from Freenet6 but i also applied to 6bone, i registered my PERSON
object and ipv6-site object now i'm wainting for the MNTner object. I also
talked wit UUnet UK to setup a tunneling.. I want to applyt for a class of
addreses (IPv6 ones) but this new standard confuses me....I also have some
problesm with the routes .. i have 2 same rotues on different devices,,
one with eth0 that only "sees" the local LAN, and one with sit1 which is
the tunneling to freenet6...any help for setting up a functional IPv6 site
in Romania would be GREATLY appreciated
Thanks
Radu Malica
InfoStream Ltd
Techical Manager
From zszhang@krdl.org.sg Fri May 12 04:24:49 2000
From: zszhang@krdl.org.sg (zhang zhishou)
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 11:24:49 +0800
Subject: IPv6 configuration on Linux box
Message-ID: <391B7981.B8A47279@krdl.org.sg>
Hi,
I am a IPv6 newbie. I have managed to add the ipv6-in-ipv4 interface
(sit0) in my linux box.
When I try to ping local machine using "ping -a inet6 ::1", or "ping -a
inet6 ::127.0.0.1", or "ping -a inet6 ::192.168.133.24"
(::192.168.133.24 is the ipv4-compatible ipv6 address of my linux box),
the following is what I get :
ping: icmp6: unkown protocol
ping: ::1: No IP version 4 or IP version 6 addresses available.
Anybody could tell me how to solve the problem?
Thanks!!!
From psb@ast.cam.ac.uk Fri May 12 08:06:09 2000
From: psb@ast.cam.ac.uk (Peter Bunclark)
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 08:06:09 +0100 (BST)
Subject: Announcing biggish FTP archive reachable via IPv6
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
On Thu, 11 May 2000, William F. Maton wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Could folks kindly try aiming their IPv6-enabled clients at
> bear.dgim.crc.ca, which is a Solaris 8 box housing ftp.crc.ca's FTP
Yes, I can download to Cambridge, tunnel to JANET and beyond.
Is there a reverse-DNS for bear.dgim.crc.ca ?
Pete.
From ina@mimos.my Fri May 12 08:06:06 2000
From: ina@mimos.my (Raja Azlina Raja Mahmood)
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 15:06:06 +0800 (MYT)
Subject: IPv6 configuration on Linux box
In-Reply-To: <391B7981.B8A47279@krdl.org.sg>
Message-ID:
I had the same problem before. Do check the /etc/protocols file
and see if you have "icmp6" defined there. Hope it would help!
regards,
-azlina-
On Fri, 12 May 2000, zhang zhishou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am a IPv6 newbie. I have managed to add the ipv6-in-ipv4 interface
> (sit0) in my linux box.
> When I try to ping local machine using "ping -a inet6 ::1", or "ping -a
> inet6 ::127.0.0.1", or "ping -a inet6 ::192.168.133.24"
> (::192.168.133.24 is the ipv4-compatible ipv6 address of my linux box),
> the following is what I get :
>
> ping: icmp6: unkown protocol
> ping: ::1: No IP version 4 or IP version 6 addresses available.
>
> Anybody could tell me how to solve the problem?
> Thanks!!!
>
>
From thor@zwerg.at Fri May 12 10:06:23 2000
From: thor@zwerg.at (Silvia Baumann)
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 11:06:23 +0200 (MEST)
Subject: IPv6 configuration on Linux box
In-Reply-To: <391B7981.B8A47279@krdl.org.sg>
Message-ID:
> When I try to ping local machine using "ping -a inet6 ::1", or "ping -a
> inet6 ::127.0.0.1", or "ping -a inet6 ::192.168.133.24"
> (::192.168.133.24 is the ipv4-compatible ipv6 address of my linux box),
> the following is what I get :
>
> ping: icmp6: unkown protocol
> ping: ::1: No IP version 4 or IP version 6 addresses available.
Have a look at /etc/protocols, copy the line with icmpv6 and replace
icmpv6 with icmp6 in the copied line. It should work then (at least it did
at my linux box :))
Best regards,
Silvia Baumann
. .
|\-=-/|
/| |O _ O| |\
/' \ \_^-^_/ / `\
/' \-/ ~ \-/ `\
| /\\ //\ |
+-------\|\|\/-""-""-\/|/|/-----------------------------------------------+
| thor@atpforest.tuwien.ac.at Silvia Baumann |
| silvia.baumann@fh-sbg.ac.at Prueckelmayrgasse 4/11/15 |
| A-1230 Wien |
| http://atpforest.tuwien.ac.at/~thor/ Tel.-Nr.: +43 1 8872053 |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
From bluezy@dreamwiz.com Fri May 12 12:06:42 2000
From: bluezy@dreamwiz.com (=?EUC-KR?B?wMy8usH4KFN1bmctSmluLkxlZSk=?=)
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 20:06:42 +0900 (KST)
Subject: Hi, i got a question about v6 Routing system
Message-ID: <200005121106.e4CB6hK58891@mail2.dreamwiz.com>
--0-268579752-958129603=:58888
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Hi all.
i'm planning to connect to 6bone
So, need to setup Routing system supporting IPv6.
I've searched how to set it up on PC environment so far.
Then I founded the FreeBSD is the only one way to Support
IPv6 Routing on PC as far i know.
am i rignt ?
or are there any other way ?
best regards.
Eddie Lee
-------------------------------------------------
DreamWiz Free Mail @ http://www.dreamwiz.com/
--0-268579752-958129603=:58888
Content-Type: TEXT/HTML; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Hi all.
i'm planning to connect to 6bone
So, need to setup Routing system supporting IPv6.
I've searched how to set it up on PC environment so far.
Then I founded the FreeBSD is the only one way to Support
IPv6 Routing on PC as far i know.
am i rignt ?
or are there any other way ?
best regards.
Eddie Lee
Your life on the net
-------------------------------------------------
DreamWiz Free Mail @ http://www.dreamwiz.com/
--0-268579752-958129603=:58888--
From wmaton@ryouko.dgim.crc.ca Fri May 12 13:55:14 2000
From: wmaton@ryouko.dgim.crc.ca (William F. Maton)
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 08:55:14 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Announcing biggish FTP archive reachable via IPv6
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
On Fri, 12 May 2000, Peter Bunclark wrote:
> On Thu, 11 May 2000, William F. Maton wrote:
>
> > Could folks kindly try aiming their IPv6-enabled clients at
> > bear.dgim.crc.ca, which is a Solaris 8 box housing ftp.crc.ca's FTP
>
> Yes, I can download to Cambridge, tunnel to JANET and beyond.
>
> Is there a reverse-DNS for bear.dgim.crc.ca ?
Not as yet, no. However, there are forward and reverse mappings for
"bear.ipv6.crc.ca" which is the same box as bear.dgim.crc.ca.
> Pete.
wfms
From jim@thehousleys.net Fri May 12 16:41:59 2000
From: jim@thehousleys.net (James Housley)
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 11:41:59 -0400
Subject: Hi, i got a question about v6 Routing system
References: <200005121106.e4CB6hK58891@mail2.dreamwiz.com>
Message-ID: <391C2647.C01182AD@thehousleys.net>
À̼ºÁø(Sung-Jin.Lee) wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> i'm planning to connect to 6bone
> So, need to setup Routing system supporting IPv6.
> I've searched how to set it up on PC environment so far.
> Then I founded the FreeBSD is the only one way to Support
> IPv6 Routing on PC as far i know.
>
> am i rignt ?
> or are there any other way ?
>
FreeBSD 4.0 or 5.0, OpenBSD and probably Linux
Jim
--
"...there's no idea that's so good you can't
ruin it with a few well-placed idiots."
-- Charles Spickman
From jsaker@pensat.com Fri May 12 16:50:30 2000
From: jsaker@pensat.com (James Saker Jr.)
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 10:50:30 -0500
Subject: Hi, i got a question about v6 Routing system
Message-ID: <0622C1632EC6D211997A0008C70961731949AB@geneva.pensat.com>
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
------_=_NextPart_001_01BFBC29.CD0A6ADA
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="KS_C_5601-1987"
Try http://freenet6.net
JRS
James R. Saker Jr.
Vice President, Internet Services
Pensat Communications, Inc.
jsaker@pensat.com
-----Original Message-----
From: bluezy@dreamwiz.com [mailto:bluezy@dreamwiz.com]
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2000 6:07 AM
To: 6bone@ISI.EDU
Subject: Hi, i got a question about v6 Routing system
Hi all.
i'm planning to connect to 6bone
So, need to setup Routing system supporting IPv6.
I've searched how to set it up on PC environment so far.
Then I founded the FreeBSD is the only one way to Support
IPv6 Routing on PC as far i know.
am i rignt ?
or are there any other way ?
best regards.
Eddie Lee
Your life on the net
-------------------------------------------------
DreamWiz Free Mail @ http://www.dreamwiz.com/
------_=_NextPart_001_01BFBC29.CD0A6ADA
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="KS_C_5601-1987"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=
JRS
James R. Saker Jr.
Vice President, Internet Services
Pensat Communications, Inc.
jsaker@pensat.com
Hi all.
i'm =
planning to=20
connect to 6bone
So, need to setup Routing system supporting =
IPv6.=20
I've searched how to set it up on PC environment so far.
Then =
I=20
founded the FreeBSD is the only one way to Support
IPv6 Routing =
on PC as=20
far i know.
am i rignt ?
or are there any other way ?=20
best regards.
Eddie Lee
=20
Your life on the=20
=
net
-------------------------------------------------
D=
reamWiz=20
Free Mail @ http://www.dreamwiz.com/
------_=_NextPart_001_01BFBC29.CD0A6ADA--
From Frederick Bruckman Fri May 12 17:03:05 2000
From: Frederick Bruckman (Frederick Bruckman)
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 11:03:05 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: Hi, i got a question about v6 Routing system
In-Reply-To: <200005121106.e4CB6hK58891@mail2.dreamwiz.com>
Message-ID:
On Fri, 12 May 2000, [EUC-KR] À̼ºÁø(Sung-Jin.Lee) wrote:
> i'm planning to connect to 6bone
> So, need to setup Routing system supporting IPv6.
> I've searched how to set it up on PC environment so far.
> Then I founded the FreeBSD is the only one way to Support
> IPv6 Routing on PC as far i know.
>
> am i rignt ?
> or are there any other way ?
Also, the current (development) version of NetBSD:
.
From Carlos.Leon@edt.ericsson.se Fri May 12 17:33:16 2000
From: Carlos.Leon@edt.ericsson.se (Carlos Leon (BCT))
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 18:33:16 +0200
Subject: Hi All
Message-ID:
Hi all,
Im a newbeginner att IPv6, I know IPv4 well, because its my work. I just wonder if someone can help me start learning IPv6, for example how do I set up two PC:s to cooperate over IPv6, or just some very easy understanding textintroduction that you know is good.
Med vänlig hälsning/Kind regards
Carlos Leon
Data Communication Architect
Microsoft Certified Professional
Tel: +46 8 58530266
Ericsson IT- Services
TO/BCT/I/ONF - Netgroup
E-Mail: carlos.leon@edt.ericsson.se
From gmaxwell@Martin.FL.US Fri May 12 17:45:47 2000
From: gmaxwell@Martin.FL.US (Greg Maxwell)
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 12:45:47 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Hi, i got a question about v6 Routing system
In-Reply-To: <200005121106.e4CB6hK58891@mail2.dreamwiz.com>
Message-ID:
On Fri, 12 May 2000, [EUC-KR] À̼ºÁø(Sung-Jin.Lee) wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> i'm planning to connect to 6bone
> So, need to setup Routing system supporting IPv6.
> I've searched how to set it up on PC environment so far.
> Then I founded the FreeBSD is the only one way to Support
> IPv6 Routing on PC as far i know.
>
> am i rignt ?
> or are there any other way ?
Linux 2.2.x+ too.
From Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr Fri May 12 18:23:39 2000
From: Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr (Francis Dupont)
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 19:23:39 +0200
Subject: Hi, i got a question about v6 Routing system
In-Reply-To: Your message of Fri, 12 May 2000 20:06:42 +0900.
<200005121106.e4CB6hK58891@mail2.dreamwiz.com>
Message-ID: <200005121723.TAA73240@givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr>
In your previous mail you wrote:
Then I founded the FreeBSD is the only one way to Support
IPv6 Routing on PC as far i know.
am i rignt ?
or are there any other way ?
=> there are other (NetBSD, Linux, Solaris 8, ...) but FreeBSD is
the best one!
Regards
Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr
From Stefan.Gasteiger@Gendorf.de Fri May 12 20:13:50 2000
From: Stefan.Gasteiger@Gendorf.de (Stefan.Gasteiger@Gendorf.de)
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 21:13:50 +0200
Subject:
Message-ID: <4185051FE012D411A98B0008C7337A2E01D37A@atlantis.gendorf.hoechst.com>
Take a look at:
http://www.6bone.net/6bone_hookup.html
Stefan Gasteiger
--
SG5599-RIPE
I+K Betrieb (zertifiziert nach DIN EN ISO 9001)
InfraServ Gendorf
Tel.: +49 8679 7 5599
Fax: +49 8679 7 39 5599
Mobiltel.: +49 172 8649205
E-Mail: Stefan.Gasteiger@gendorf.de
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pilot0920 [mailto:pilot0920@sina.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2000 10:58 PM
> To: 6bone@ISI.EDU
> Subject:
>
>
> I have joined the 6bone mail list, and I want to join the 6bone.
> So what should I do the next step?
> How and where can I find a point on the 6bone to attach to?
>
> ______________________________________
>
>
> ===================================================================
> ÐÂÀËÃâ·Ñµç×ÓÓÊÏä http://mail.sina.com.cn
>
From Stefan.Gasteiger@Gendorf.de Fri May 12 20:15:31 2000
From: Stefan.Gasteiger@Gendorf.de (Stefan.Gasteiger@Gendorf.de)
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 21:15:31 +0200
Subject: Hi, i got a question about v6 Routing system
Message-ID: <4185051FE012D411A98B0008C7337A2E01D37B@atlantis.gendorf.hoechst.com>
Take a look at:
http://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng/html/ipng-implementations.html
Stefan Gasteiger
SG5599-RIPE
I+K Betrieb (zertifiziert nach DIN EN ISO 9001)
InfraServ Gendorf
Tel.: +49 8679 7 5599
Fax: +49 8679 7 39 5599
Mobiltel.: +49 172 8649205
E-Mail: Stefan.Gasteiger@gendorf.de
-----Original Message-----
From: bluezy@dreamwiz.com [mailto:bluezy@dreamwiz.com]
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2000 1:07 PM
To: 6bone@ISI.EDU
Subject: Hi, i got a question about v6 Routing system
Hi all.
i'm planning to connect to 6bone
So, need to setup Routing system supporting IPv6.
I've searched how to set it up on PC environment so far.
Then I founded the FreeBSD is the only one way to Support
IPv6 Routing on PC as far i know.
am i rignt ?
or are there any other way ?
best regards.
Eddie Lee
Your life on the net
-------------------------------------------------
DreamWiz Free Mail @ http://www.dreamwiz.com/
From Stefan.Gasteiger@Gendorf.de Fri May 12 20:19:27 2000
From: Stefan.Gasteiger@Gendorf.de (Stefan.Gasteiger@Gendorf.de)
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 21:19:27 +0200
Subject: Hi All
Message-ID: <4185051FE012D411A98B0008C7337A2E01D37C@atlantis.gendorf.hoechst.com>
You may have a look at:
http://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng/html/INET-IPng-Paper.html
which is a fine introduction to v6.
Stefan Gasteiger
SG5599-RIPE
I+K Betrieb (zertifiziert nach DIN EN ISO 9001)
InfraServ Gendorf
Tel.: +49 8679 7 5599
Fax: +49 8679 7 39 5599
Mobiltel.: +49 172 8649205
E-Mail: Stefan.Gasteiger@gendorf.de
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carlos Leon (BCT) [mailto:Carlos.Leon@edt.ericsson.se]
> Sent: Friday, May 12, 2000 6:33 PM
> To: '6bone@isi.edu'
> Subject: Hi All
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Im a newbeginner att IPv6, I know IPv4 well, because its my
> work. I just wonder if someone can help me start learning
> IPv6, for example how do I set up two PC:s to cooperate over
> IPv6, or just some very easy understanding textintroduction
> that you know is good.
>
> Med vänlig hälsning/Kind regards
>
> Carlos Leon
> Data Communication Architect
> Microsoft Certified Professional
>
> Tel: +46 8 58530266
> Ericsson IT- Services
> TO/BCT/I/ONF - Netgroup
> E-Mail: carlos.leon@edt.ericsson.se
>
>
From joe@chimera.zyan.com Fri May 12 22:01:51 2000
From: joe@chimera.zyan.com (Joe Gilbert)
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 14:01:51 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Hi, i got a question about v6 Routing system
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
You should check the link below:
http://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng/html/ipng-implementations.html
It contains information on all of the platforms that support v6. Not only
are there implementations for various UNIX flavors but there is
information on implementations for Win 95/98/NT.
Joe Gilbert
Grepmaster
----------------------------
There is no place like ~.
----------------------------
On Fri, 12 May 2000, Greg Maxwell wrote:
> On Fri, 12 May 2000, [EUC-KR] À̼ºÁø(Sung-Jin.Lee) wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi all.
> >
> > i'm planning to connect to 6bone
> > So, need to setup Routing system supporting IPv6.
> > I've searched how to set it up on PC environment so far.
> > Then I founded the FreeBSD is the only one way to Support
> > IPv6 Routing on PC as far i know.
> >
> > am i rignt ?
> > or are there any other way ?
>
> Linux 2.2.x+ too.
>
From bluezy@dreamwiz.com Sat May 13 02:18:12 2000
From: bluezy@dreamwiz.com (=?EUC-KR?B?wMy8usH4KFN1bmctSmluLkxlZSk=?=)
Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 10:18:12 +0900 (KST)
Subject: Linux can be used as a Router ??
Message-ID: <200005130118.e4D1ICK68707@mail2.dreamwiz.com>
--0-121262272-958180692=:68704
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
thanx for warm answers.
i've already checked the sites u recommended
before i wrote the previous mail.
but i'm still not clear.....
i thought Linux only can be used as a IPv6 host till now.
i need a Router. so i considered FreeBSD.
does Linux can be used as a IPv6 Router ?
regards
-------------------------------------------------
DreamWiz Free Mail @ http://www.dreamwiz.com/
--0-121262272-958180692=:68704
Content-Type: TEXT/HTML; CHARSET=US-ASCII
thanx for warm answers.
i've already checked the sites u recommended
before i wrote the previous mail.
but i'm still not clear.....
i thought Linux only can be used as a IPv6 host till now.
i need a Router. so i considered FreeBSD.
does Linux can be used as a IPv6 Router ?
regards
Your life on the net
-------------------------------------------------
DreamWiz Free Mail @ http://www.dreamwiz.com/
--0-121262272-958180692=:68704--
From Stefan.Gasteiger@Gendorf.de Sat May 13 07:40:42 2000
From: Stefan.Gasteiger@Gendorf.de (Stefan.Gasteiger@Gendorf.de)
Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 08:40:42 +0200
Subject: Linux can be used as a Router ??
Message-ID: <4185051FE012D411A98B0008C7337A2E01D37F@atlantis.gendorf.hoechst.com>
Short answer: Yes.
The GNU Zebra routing software supports v6: http://www.zebra.org
Stefan Gasteiger
SG5599-RIPE
I+K Betrieb (zertifiziert nach DIN EN ISO 9001)
InfraServ Gendorf
Tel.: +49 8679 7 5599
Fax: +49 8679 7 39 5599
Mobiltel.: +49 172 8649205
E-Mail: Stefan.Gasteiger@gendorf.de
-----Original Message-----
From: bluezy@dreamwiz.com [mailto:bluezy@dreamwiz.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2000 3:18 AM
To: 6bone@ISI.EDU
Subject: Linux can be used as a Router ??
thanx for warm answers.
i've already checked the sites u recommended
before i wrote the previous mail.
but i'm still not clear.....
i thought Linux only can be used as a IPv6 host till now.
i need a Router. so i considered FreeBSD.
does Linux can be used as a IPv6 Router ?
regards
Your life on the net
-------------------------------------------------
DreamWiz Free Mail @ http://www.dreamwiz.com/
From jim@thehousleys.net Sun May 14 02:55:23 2000
From: jim@thehousleys.net (James Housley)
Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 21:55:23 -0400
Subject: Setting up a router
Message-ID: <391E078B.6CF43228@thehousleys.net>
I have FreeBSD 4-STABLE rounning to my "gateway" machine and a couple of
FreeBSD 4-STABLE machine on the internal network. I would like to be
able to run IPv6 on the internal network, I got that figured out. Just
add dns address and name and I was all set. But I would also like to be
able route or gateway them out to the real world. That is were I am
getting confused.
I have been reading the docs I can find, many apply to NetBSD or OpenBSD
and are close. But most are out dated, since this is changing so fast.
Is it true that the gateway can't also be a host?
I do have an IPv6 address, from www.freenet6.net. Will this let me do
what I want?
Direct answers and URLs welcomed.
Thanks,
Jim
--
Unix is very user-friendly. It's just picky who its friends are.
From wojboj@lp.net.pl Sun May 14 10:17:10 2000
From: wojboj@lp.net.pl (Wojtek Bojdo/l)
Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 11:17:10 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Setting up a router
In-Reply-To: <391E078B.6CF43228@thehousleys.net>
Message-ID:
On Sat, 13 May 2000, James Housley wrote:
> I have been reading the docs I can find, many apply to NetBSD or OpenBSD
> and are close. But most are out dated, since this is changing so fast.
if you have got static ip address you can connect to 6bone in normal way
-> not freenet6...
In Linux you should only enable IPv6 forwarding.
> Is it true that the gateway can't also be a host?
no.
Gateway can be your workstation :)
(it shouldn't be but it's possible)
> I do have an IPv6 address, from www.freenet6.net. Will this let me do
> what I want?
yes.
> Direct answers and URLs welcomed.
www.6bone.net
--
Wojciech Bojdo/l
Linux & Unix Magazine
www.magazyn.tao.com.pl
From dancer@zeor.simegen.com Sun May 14 23:00:03 2000
From: dancer@zeor.simegen.com (Dancer Vesperman)
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 08:00:03 +1000
Subject: Linux can be used as a Router ??
References: <200005130118.e4D1ICK68707@mail2.dreamwiz.com>
Message-ID: <391F21E3.C524C72C@zeor.simegen.com>
À̼ºÁø(Sung-Jin.Lee) wrote:
>
>
> thanx for warm answers.
> i've already checked the sites u recommended
> before i wrote the previous mail.
>
> but i'm still not clear.....
> i thought Linux only can be used as a IPv6 host till now.
> i need a Router. so i considered FreeBSD.
>
> does Linux can be used as a IPv6 Router ?
>
>
Yes. Linux does not support the default route when forwarding ipv6
packets, however (only when originating them), but apart from that, it's
fully functional as an ipv6 router, AFAIK. I use it for that on several
machines.
D
From Marcelo Franca Alves \(MFA\)" <391F21E3.C524C72C@zeor.simegen.com>
Message-ID: <00d701bfbe11$cd7b6200$c60fbec8@mfa1>
I have 2 linux box (RedHat 6.1 and RedHat 6.2) with
IPv6 default route.
It's ok for me!!
-----
Marcelo Franca Alves (MFA) http://www.mfa.eti.br
Sao Paulo - SP - Brasil
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dancer Vesperman"
To:
Cc: <6bone@ISI.EDU>
Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2000 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: Linux can be used as a Router ??
> À̼ºÁø(Sung-Jin.Lee) wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > thanx for warm answers.
> > i've already checked the sites u recommended
> > before i wrote the previous mail.
> >
> > but i'm still not clear.....
> > i thought Linux only can be used as a IPv6 host till now.
> > i need a Router. so i considered FreeBSD.
> >
> > does Linux can be used as a IPv6 Router ?
> >
> >
>
> Yes. Linux does not support the default route when forwarding ipv6
> packets, however (only when originating them), but apart from that, it's
> fully functional as an ipv6 router, AFAIK. I use it for that on several
> machines.
>
> D
>
>
>
>
From jsaker@pensat.com Mon May 15 08:46:59 2000
From: jsaker@pensat.com (James Saker Jr.)
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 09:46:59 +0200
Subject: Hi, i got a question about v6 Routing system
Message-ID: <0622C1632EC6D211997A0008C70961731949AB@geneva.pensat.com>
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0013_01BFBE52.83F1A270
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="ks_c_5601-1987"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Try http://freenet6.net
JRS
James R. Saker Jr.
Vice President, Internet Services
Pensat Communications, Inc.
jsaker@pensat.com
-----Original Message-----
From: bluezy@dreamwiz.com [mailto:bluezy@dreamwiz.com]
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2000 6:07 AM
To: 6bone@ISI.EDU
Subject: Hi, i got a question about v6 Routing system
Hi all.
i'm planning to connect to 6bone
So, need to setup Routing system supporting IPv6.
I've searched how to set it up on PC environment so far.
Then I founded the FreeBSD is the only one way to Support
IPv6 Routing on PC as far i know.
am i rignt ?
or are there any other way ?
best regards.
Eddie Lee
Your life on the net
-------------------------------------------------
DreamWiz Free Mail @ http://www.dreamwiz.com/
------=_NextPart_000_0013_01BFBE52.83F1A270
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="ks_c_5601-1987"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
JRS
James R. Saker Jr.
Vice President, Internet Services
Pensat Communications, Inc.
jsaker@pensat.com
Hi all.
i'm =
planning to=20
connect to 6bone
So, need to setup Routing system supporting IPv6. =
I've searched how to set it up on PC environment so far.
Then =
I=20
founded the FreeBSD is the only one way to Support
IPv6 Routing on =
PC as=20
far i know.
am i rignt ?
or are there any other way ?=20
best regards.
Eddie Lee
=20
Your life on the=20
=
net
-------------------------------------------------
Dr=
eamWiz=20
Free Mail @ http://www.dreamwiz.com/
------=_NextPart_000_0013_01BFBE52.83F1A270--
From buck@priest.com Mon May 15 11:29:04 2000
From: buck@priest.com (buck dvash)
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 12:29:04 +0200
Subject: I need some explanations.
Message-ID:
I have FreeBSD 4.0 STABLE running as a router to other clients.
The thing I want to know, I read in your site I need to find a "potential
6bone pTLA/pNLA transits"
Like I think it`s finding someone to fund my 24/7 + IPv6 address...
Anyways if someone can really tell me what my job is, I`ll be glad to do it
[=
buck
From gmaxwell@Martin.FL.US Mon May 15 13:07:43 2000
From: gmaxwell@Martin.FL.US (Greg Maxwell)
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 08:07:43 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Linux can be used as a Router ??
In-Reply-To: <200005130118.e4D1ICK68707@mail2.dreamwiz.com>
Message-ID:
On Sat, 13 May 2000, [EUC-KR] À̼ºÁø(Sung-Jin.Lee) wrote:
> does Linux can be used as a IPv6 Router ?
I have two Linux systems in use a IPv6 Routers.
Zebra impliments BGP4+ for Linux.
From thejoker@infostream.ro Mon May 15 13:36:23 2000
From: thejoker@infostream.ro (Radu Malica)
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 15:36:23 +0300 (EEST)
Subject: ipv6 tunnel
Message-ID:
Hello
I got my IPv6 address and class from UUNet and they are ready to setup a
tunnel. I use a Linux Box (redhat 6.1) and i'm a bit confused about
setting up tunnels (sit0 devices) and routing...i tried it before with
freenet6 and i had same routes on 2 different devices, eth0 and sit1
Can you tell me step-by-step how to setup a tunneling for IPv6 in Linux?
Thanks a lot
Radu Malica
From jim@thehousleys.net Mon May 15 14:21:54 2000
From: jim@thehousleys.net (James Housley)
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 09:21:54 -0400
Subject: I need some explanations.
References:
Message-ID: <391FF9F2.3614A8E7@thehousleys.net>
buck dvash wrote:
>
> I have FreeBSD 4.0 STABLE running as a router to other clients.
> The thing I want to know, I read in your site I need to find a "potential
> 6bone pTLA/pNLA transits"
> Like I think it`s finding someone to fund my 24/7 + IPv6 address...
>
> Anyways if someone can really tell me what my job is, I`ll be glad to do it
> [=
I am in a similar position, and I think this
http://www.6bone.net/6bone_hookup.html page best describes it.
Jim
--
Unix is like a wigwam -- no Gates, no Windows, and an Apache inside.
From FRANCISCOD@advance.com.ar Mon May 15 14:27:34 2000
From: FRANCISCOD@advance.com.ar (Francisco, Diego)
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 10:27:34 -0300
Subject: Linux can be used as a Router ??
Message-ID: <96A02275DD84D311B765006008C50AEA75EE2D@advtal10.inadvance.com.ar>
you can use route -A inet6 add default dev eth0 for example.
i have red hat 6.0 whit net-tools-1.55 and default don't work i use ::/0
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Marcelo Franca Alves (MFA) [mailto:mfa@mfa.eti.br]
Enviado el: domingo 14 de mayo de 2000 23:01
Para: Dancer Vesperman; bluezy@dreamwiz.com
Cc: 6bone@ISI.EDU
Asunto: Re: Linux can be used as a Router ??
I have 2 linux box (RedHat 6.1 and RedHat 6.2) with
IPv6 default route.
It's ok for me!!
-----
Marcelo Franca Alves (MFA) http://www.mfa.eti.br
Sao Paulo - SP - Brasil
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dancer Vesperman"
To:
Cc: <6bone@ISI.EDU>
Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2000 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: Linux can be used as a Router ??
> À̼ºÁø(Sung-Jin.Lee) wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > thanx for warm answers.
> > i've already checked the sites u recommended
> > before i wrote the previous mail.
> >
> > but i'm still not clear.....
> > i thought Linux only can be used as a IPv6 host till now.
> > i need a Router. so i considered FreeBSD.
> >
> > does Linux can be used as a IPv6 Router ?
> >
> >
>
> Yes. Linux does not support the default route when forwarding ipv6
> packets, however (only when originating them), but apart from that, it's
> fully functional as an ipv6 router, AFAIK. I use it for that on several
> machines.
>
> D
>
>
>
>
From buck@priest.com Mon May 15 15:29:55 2000
From: buck@priest.com (buck dvash)
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 16:29:55 +0200
Subject: Setting up a local area net IPv6 router
Message-ID:
How can I set up my FreeBSD an IPv6 IP and setting up my clients (win9x and
linux)?
From Robbie_harrell@INS.COM Mon May 15 15:32:38 2000
From: Robbie_harrell@INS.COM (Robbie_harrell@INS.COM)
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 09:32:38 -0500
Subject: No subject
Message-ID: <00e201bfbe7a$6b342410$bd59a4d0@ins.com>
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_00DF_01BFBE50.8245B210
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
unsubscribe
------=_NextPart_000_00DF_01BFBE50.8245B210
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
unsubscribe
------=_NextPart_000_00DF_01BFBE50.8245B210--
From gmaxwell@Martin.FL.US Mon May 15 15:48:14 2000
From: gmaxwell@Martin.FL.US (Greg Maxwell)
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 10:48:14 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Linux can be used as a Router ??
In-Reply-To: <20000515164711.A29424@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Message-ID:
On Mon, 15 May 2000, Martin Mares wrote:
> Hello!
[snip]
> BIRD (ftp://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/pub/bird/bird-0.0.0.tar.gz)
> should work have working BGP4+ as well. It's under development now, but
> the core and BGP should be relatively stable.
Hi! Yes, I've played with Bird some. I've not used it's BGP4+ support yet,
but BIRD has a wonderful config file syntax (unlike Zebra's pseudo-cisco
gunk) and looks very promising.
From wojboj@lp.net.pl Mon May 15 17:54:35 2000
From: wojboj@lp.net.pl (Wojtek Bojdo/l)
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 18:54:35 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: ipv6 tunnel
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
On Mon, 15 May 2000, Radu Malica wrote:
> I got my IPv6 address and class from UUNet and they are ready to setup a
> tunnel. I use a Linux Box (redhat 6.1) and i'm a bit confused about
> setting up tunnels (sit0 devices) and routing...i tried it before with
> freenet6 and i had same routes on 2 different devices, eth0 and sit1
>
> Can you tell me step-by-step how to setup a tunneling for IPv6 in Linux?
/sbin/ip tun add icm mode sit local 195.205.178.226 remote 193.219.28.246
ttl 64
/sbin/ip link set icm up
/sbin/ip addr add 3ffe:8010:16::2/126 dev icm
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/forwarding
and you can also:
/sbin/ip route add 3000::/3 dev icm
if you don't use bgp.
--
Wojciech Bojdo/l
Linux & Unix Magazine
From Marcelo Franca Alves \(MFA\)"
Message-ID: <018701bfbe8d$9f0c1aa0$5413bec8@mfa1>
Important: the address below are only for example
Interface eth1 IPv6 address
/sbin/ifconfig eth1 add 3ffe:3c00:200:101::1/64
Enabling Routing
echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/forwarding
Enabling default tunnel interface (sit0)
/sbin/ifconfig sit0 up
Remote IPv4 address of Tunnel
/sbin/ifconfig sit0 tunnel ::200.136.200.141
Enabling tunnel interface
/sbin/ifconfig sit1 up
IPv6 local tunnel address
/sbin/ifconfig sit1 inet6 add 3ffe:3c00:700:3::2/126
Default route - IPv6 remote tunnel address (use ::0/0 don't use the word:
default)
/sbin/route -A inet6 add ::0/0 gw 3ffe:3c00:700:3::1 dev sit1
See more details in http://www.ipv6.mfa.eti.br (in portuguese)
-----
Marcelo Franca Alves (MFA) http://www.mfa.eti.br
Sao Paulo - SP - Brasil
----- Original Message -----
From: "Radu Malica"
To: <6bone@ISI.EDU>
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2000 9:36 AM
Subject: ipv6 tunnel
>
> Hello
>
> I got my IPv6 address and class from UUNet and they are ready to setup a
> tunnel. I use a Linux Box (redhat 6.1) and i'm a bit confused about
> setting up tunnels (sit0 devices) and routing...i tried it before with
> freenet6 and i had same routes on 2 different devices, eth0 and sit1
>
> Can you tell me step-by-step how to setup a tunneling for IPv6 in Linux?
>
> Thanks a lot
>
> Radu Malica
>
>
>
From joe.chung@riversoft.com Mon May 15 21:40:53 2000
From: joe.chung@riversoft.com (Joseph Chung)
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 13:40:53 -0700
Subject: ipv6 tunnel
In-Reply-To: <018701bfbe8d$9f0c1aa0$5413bec8@mfa1>
Message-ID:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_000B_01BFBE73.309D12A0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Can you tell me what steps you took to get the ip address and class from
UUNet?
Thank You,
Joseph Chung RiverSoft Inc.
joe.chung@riversoft.com One Sansome Street Suite 2100
Office: +1 (415) 438-2356 San Francisco, CA 94104
Cell: +1 (415) 577-4817
Toll free: +1 (877) OPENRIVER http://www.riversoft.com
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to
this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any
action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
prohibited and may be unlawful.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-6bone@ISI.EDU [mailto:owner-6bone@ISI.EDU]On Behalf Of
Marcelo Franca Alves (MFA)
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2000 9:50 AM
To: Radu Malica; 6bone@ISI.EDU
Subject: Re: ipv6 tunnel
Important: the address below are only for example
Interface eth1 IPv6 address
/sbin/ifconfig eth1 add 3ffe:3c00:200:101::1/64
Enabling Routing
echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/forwarding
Enabling default tunnel interface (sit0)
/sbin/ifconfig sit0 up
Remote IPv4 address of Tunnel
/sbin/ifconfig sit0 tunnel ::200.136.200.141
Enabling tunnel interface
/sbin/ifconfig sit1 up
IPv6 local tunnel address
/sbin/ifconfig sit1 inet6 add 3ffe:3c00:700:3::2/126
Default route - IPv6 remote tunnel address (use ::0/0 don't use the word:
default)
/sbin/route -A inet6 add ::0/0 gw 3ffe:3c00:700:3::1 dev sit1
See more details in http://www.ipv6.mfa.eti.br (in portuguese)
-----
Marcelo Franca Alves (MFA) http://www.mfa.eti.br
Sao Paulo - SP - Brasil
----- Original Message -----
From: "Radu Malica"
To: <6bone@ISI.EDU>
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2000 9:36 AM
Subject: ipv6 tunnel
>
> Hello
>
> I got my IPv6 address and class from UUNet and they are ready to setup a
> tunnel. I use a Linux Box (redhat 6.1) and i'm a bit confused about
> setting up tunnels (sit0 devices) and routing...i tried it before with
> freenet6 and i had same routes on 2 different devices, eth0 and sit1
>
> Can you tell me step-by-step how to setup a tunneling for IPv6 in Linux?
>
> Thanks a lot
>
> Radu Malica
>
>
>
------=_NextPart_000_000B_01BFBE73.309D12A0
Content-Type: text/x-vcard;
name="Joseph Chung.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="Joseph Chung.vcf"
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Chung;Joseph
FN:Joseph Chung
TEL;WORK;VOICE:415 438-2356
TEL;CELL;VOICE:(415) 577-4817
TEL;WORK;FAX:415 438-2358
ADR;WORK:;;One Sansome Street Suite 2100;San Francisco;CA;94104
LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=3DQUOTED-PRINTABLE:One Sansome Street Suite =
2100=3D0D=3D0ASan Francisco, CA 94104
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:joe.chung@riversoft.com
REV:20000510T234042Z
END:VCARD
------=_NextPart_000_000B_01BFBE73.309D12A0--
From nmongko@advtech.uswest.com Mon May 15 22:42:17 2000
From: nmongko@advtech.uswest.com (Nattapong Mongkolnavin)
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 15:42:17 -0600
Subject: Question About IPv6 on Linux
Message-ID: <39206F39.4D73D44@advtech.uswest.com>
Folks,
I've just got a /48 IPv6 address space from one of the pTLA providers.
I set up my cisco 2514 as my tunnel source.
On my router's ethernet0, I subnet the assigned address to a /64
network.
This network has two workstations. One of them is Mandrake 7.0 Linux.
The problem that I am experiencing is on the Linux box 's eth0.
For now I set up my router to send out a prefix-advertisement every 60
seconds and have
the prefix valid for 360 seconds. When the prefix get expired, the linux
box the releases the
global unicast address and never re-acquires the prefix.
So I temporary fix the problem by shuting down the interface and
bringing it back up after the prefix expiring.
This will make the linux box send out Neighbor Discovery messages and
then get a prefix
advertisement from the router.
I would like to know if there is anyone experience with this kind of
problem before?
Thanks,
Nattapong.
From ksbn@kt.co.kr Tue May 16 01:29:40 2000
From: ksbn@kt.co.kr (ksb)
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 09:29:40 +0900
Subject: DNSv6
Message-ID: <39209674.2C286895@kt.co.kr>
How are you members?
I hope to make DNSv6 on Solaris7.
What software is good enough to make
DNSv6 easily?
Is the software free?
Thanks.
ksb
--
Kim, Sahng-Beom / Korea Telecom
TEL : +82-42-870-8322
FAX : +82-42-870-8329
E-mail : ksbn@kt.co.kr
--
From cross@eng.us.uu.net Tue May 16 05:55:25 2000
From: cross@eng.us.uu.net (Chris P. Ross)
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 00:55:25 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: ipv6 tunnel
In-Reply-To: Joseph Chung's message of Mon, 15 May 2000 13:40:53 -0700
References: <018701bfbe8d$9f0c1aa0$5413bec8@mfa1>
Message-ID: <14624.54461.193337.705676@ballista.eng.us.uu.net>
"Joseph Chung" said:
> Can you tell me what steps you took to get the ip address and class from
> UUNet?
I cannot answer what Radu did to get his allocation, or who he got
it from. Perhaps he means UUNET-UK, aka Pipex.
UUNET-US was recently granted a pTLA allocation on the 6bone, and
the proper contact for a connection through us would be email to
ipv6ops@eng.us.uu.net. This is being done as a non-production
service, and is not yet able to pass through any of the normal sales
or support channels of UUNET Technologies, Inc.
As an additional point of information, we haven't gotten the new
address space allocation policies firmed up yet, and will need to
finish that before we can make tunnels to "customers". That may take
another week or two to be put into place.
If you are looking for address space from UUNET-UK (riversoft.com is
registered to a company in London, but you look to be west coast...)
they can probably supply that in shorter term, and they do have an
IPv6 router in the CA Bay Area... The contact for the ipv6 folks
there is, I believe, ipv6@uk.uu.net.
- Chris
--
Chris P. Ross UUNET Technologies, Inc.
cross@eng.us.uu.net R & D / Engineering
cross@uu.net
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Radu Malica"
> To: <6bone@ISI.EDU>
> Sent: Monday, May 15, 2000 9:36 AM
> Subject: ipv6 tunnel
>> Hello
>>
>> I got my IPv6 address and class from UUNet and they are ready to setup a
>> tunnel. I use a Linux Box (redhat 6.1) and i'm a bit confused about
>> setting up tunnels (sit0 devices) and routing...i tried it before with
>> freenet6 and i had same routes on 2 different devices, eth0 and sit1
>>
>> Can you tell me step-by-step how to setup a tunneling for IPv6 in Linux?
>>
>> Thanks a lot
>>
>> Radu Malica
From bmanning@ISI.EDU Tue May 16 08:47:16 2000
From: bmanning@ISI.EDU (Bill Manning)
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 00:47:16 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: DNSv6
In-Reply-To: <39209674.2C286895@kt.co.kr> from "ksb" at May 16, 2000 09:29:40 AM
Message-ID: <200005160747.AAA18672@boreas.isi.edu>
%
% How are you members?
%
% I hope to make DNSv6 on Solaris7.
% What software is good enough to make
% DNSv6 easily?
%
% Is the software free?
%
% Thanks.
% ksb
%
All versions of Bind from 4.9.4 on support AAAA and PTR support.
There is no support for native IPv6 transport until Bindv9
(modulo some early hacks to 8.2.2). Bindv9 supports A6 and DNAME
RR's as well. BIND is freely available.
--
--bill
From thejoker@infostream.ro Tue May 16 16:25:54 2000
From: thejoker@infostream.ro (Radu Malica)
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 18:25:54 +0300 (EEST)
Subject: ipv6 tunnel
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
Just create your person and ipv6-site object to 6bone and the ncontact
your nearest physical location provider.
On Mon, 15 May 2000, Joseph Chung wrote:
> Can you tell me what steps you took to get the ip address and class from
> UUNet?
>
>
> Thank You,
> Joseph Chung RiverSoft Inc.
> joe.chung@riversoft.com One Sansome Street Suite 2100
> Office: +1 (415) 438-2356 San Francisco, CA 94104
> Cell: +1 (415) 577-4817
> Toll free: +1 (877) OPENRIVER http://www.riversoft.com
>
> The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to
> this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the
> intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any
> action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
> prohibited and may be unlawful.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-6bone@ISI.EDU [mailto:owner-6bone@ISI.EDU]On Behalf Of
> Marcelo Franca Alves (MFA)
> Sent: Monday, May 15, 2000 9:50 AM
> To: Radu Malica; 6bone@ISI.EDU
> Subject: Re: ipv6 tunnel
>
>
> Important: the address below are only for example
>
> Interface eth1 IPv6 address
> /sbin/ifconfig eth1 add 3ffe:3c00:200:101::1/64
>
> Enabling Routing
> echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/forwarding
>
> Enabling default tunnel interface (sit0)
> /sbin/ifconfig sit0 up
>
> Remote IPv4 address of Tunnel
> /sbin/ifconfig sit0 tunnel ::200.136.200.141
>
> Enabling tunnel interface
> /sbin/ifconfig sit1 up
>
> IPv6 local tunnel address
> /sbin/ifconfig sit1 inet6 add 3ffe:3c00:700:3::2/126
>
> Default route - IPv6 remote tunnel address (use ::0/0 don't use the word:
> default)
> /sbin/route -A inet6 add ::0/0 gw 3ffe:3c00:700:3::1 dev sit1
>
> See more details in http://www.ipv6.mfa.eti.br (in portuguese)
> -----
> Marcelo Franca Alves (MFA) http://www.mfa.eti.br
> Sao Paulo - SP - Brasil
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Radu Malica"
> To: <6bone@ISI.EDU>
> Sent: Monday, May 15, 2000 9:36 AM
> Subject: ipv6 tunnel
>
>
> >
> > Hello
> >
> > I got my IPv6 address and class from UUNet and they are ready to setup a
> > tunnel. I use a Linux Box (redhat 6.1) and i'm a bit confused about
> > setting up tunnels (sit0 devices) and routing...i tried it before with
> > freenet6 and i had same routes on 2 different devices, eth0 and sit1
> >
> > Can you tell me step-by-step how to setup a tunneling for IPv6 in Linux?
> >
> > Thanks a lot
> >
> > Radu Malica
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
From jim@thehousleys.net Thu May 18 13:51:19 2000
From: jim@thehousleys.net (James Housley)
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 08:51:19 -0400
Subject: 1 question, 1 request
Message-ID: <3923E746.5A791BE7@thehousleys.net>
QUESTION:
What graphical web browsers that support IPv6 are available that will
work on FreeBSD or Linux?
REQUEST:
Will someone with a graphical browser please check my IPv6 enabled
site. http://www.ipv6.fbc-hanover.org should look identical to
http://www.fbc-hanover.org, with the exception the ipv6 site should have
the Kame turtles at the bottom.
Thanks,
Jim
--
"Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines"
-- Anon
From hswu@ns.6test.edu.cn Thu May 18 14:53:37 2000
From: hswu@ns.6test.edu.cn (Haisang Wu)
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 21:53:37 +0800 (CST)
Subject: About address allocating
Message-ID: <200005181353.VAA06644@ns.6test.edu.cn>
hi, I have the following questions about address allocating:
I know SLA is /48, and interface ID should be 64 bits,
does it mean that the smallest unit when allocating address is /48?
In other words, if I allocate a /48 to a large university, could I
allocate a /48 to four middle schools, thus each middle school gets
an block less than /48, which is /50. Is this plan reasonable?
And, could those who get sTLA of /35 give me some detailed plan in
address allocating? Thanks.
best
CERNET Wu Haisang
From ume@mahoroba.org Thu May 18 18:49:40 2000
From: ume@mahoroba.org (Hajimu UMEMOTO (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCR19LXBsoQiA=?=
=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCSCUbKEI=?=))
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 02:49:40 +0900 (JST)
Subject: 1 question, 1 request
In-Reply-To: <3923E746.5A791BE7@thehousleys.net>
References: <3923E746.5A791BE7@thehousleys.net>
Message-ID: <200005181749.e4IHneF94349@peace.mahoroba.org>
----Next_Part(Fri_May_19_02:49:37_2000_518)--
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>>>> On Thu, 18 May 2000 08:51:19 -0400
>>>>> James Housley said:
jim> What graphical web browsers that support IPv6 are available that will
jim> work on FreeBSD or Linux?
Mozilla-M15 will be your friend.
I attach the patches.
1st is for FreeBSD's ports-current www/mozilla. It also work on
KAME/FreeBSD3.
2nd is for Linux.
----Next_Part(Fri_May_19_02:49:37_2000_518)--
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: mozilla-freebsd-ipv6.diff
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="mozilla-freebsd-ipv6.diff"
Index: mozilla/Makefile
diff -u mozilla/Makefile.orig mozilla/Makefile
--- mozilla/Makefile.orig Fri Apr 28 21:42:01 2000
+++ mozilla/Makefile Fri Apr 28 21:42:16 2000
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
PORTNAME= mozilla
PORTVERSION= M15
-CATEGORIES= www
+CATEGORIES= www ipv6
MASTER_SITES= ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/releases/${PORTVERSION:S/M/m/}/src/
DISTNAME= ${PORTNAME}-source-${PORTVERSION}
Index: mozilla/patches/patch-ak
diff -u mozilla/patches/patch-ak.orig mozilla/patches/patch-ak
--- mozilla/patches/patch-ak.orig Fri Feb 4 16:45:34 2000
+++ mozilla/patches/patch-ak Fri Apr 28 22:20:58 2000
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
---- nsprpub/pr/include/md/_freebsd.h.orig Wed Dec 22 15:39:04 1999
-+++ nsprpub/pr/include/md/_freebsd.h Thu Feb 3 03:48:20 2000
+Index: nsprpub/pr/include/md/_freebsd.h
+diff -u nsprpub/pr/include/md/_freebsd.h.orig nsprpub/pr/include/md/_freebsd.h
+--- nsprpub/pr/include/md/_freebsd.h.orig Thu Dec 23 08:39:04 1999
++++ nsprpub/pr/include/md/_freebsd.h Fri Apr 28 22:14:54 2000
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#include "prthread.h"
@@ -17,3 +19,16 @@
#if !defined(_PR_PTHREADS)
/*
* libc_r doesn't have poll(). Although libc has poll(), it is not
+@@ -61,6 +62,12 @@
+ #endif
+ #define _PR_HAVE_SYSV_SEMAPHORES
+ #define PR_HAVE_SYSV_NAMED_SHARED_MEMORY
++
++#ifdef _PR_INET6
++#define _PR_HAVE_GETIPNODEBYNAME
++#define _PR_HAVE_GETIPNODEBYADDR
++#define _PR_INET6_PROBE
++#endif
+
+ #define USE_SETJMP
+
Index: mozilla/patches/patch-mi
diff -u mozilla/patches/patch-mi.orig mozilla/patches/patch-mi
--- mozilla/patches/patch-mi.orig Thu Feb 10 02:58:56 2000
+++ mozilla/patches/patch-mi Fri Apr 28 21:40:31 2000
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
---- nsprpub/config/FreeBSD.mk.orig Wed Oct 20 14:19:53 1999
-+++ nsprpub/config/FreeBSD.mk Thu Feb 3 03:48:20 2000
+Index: nsprpub/config/FreeBSD.mk
+diff -u nsprpub/config/FreeBSD.mk.orig nsprpub/config/FreeBSD.mk
+--- nsprpub/config/FreeBSD.mk.orig Thu Oct 21 06:19:53 1999
++++ nsprpub/config/FreeBSD.mk Fri Apr 28 21:01:01 2000
@@ -21,14 +21,16 @@
include $(MOD_DEPTH)/config/UNIX.mk
@@ -20,3 +22,20 @@
CPU_ARCH = x86
endif
CPU_ARCH_TAG = _$(CPU_ARCH)
+@@ -61,3 +63,16 @@
+ MKSHLIB = $(LD) $(DSO_LDOPTS)
+
+ G++INCLUDES = -I/usr/include/g++
++
++# IPv6 support part of the standard FreeBSD 4.0 release.
++ifneq (,$(filter-out 2.0 2.1 2.2 3,$(basename $(OS_RELEASE))))
++USE_IPV6 = 1
++endif
++
++# IPv6 support part of the KAME.
++ifeq ($(shell test -f /usr/local/v6/lib/libinet6.a && echo kame),kame)
++USE_IPV6 = 1
++OS_LIBS += -L/usr/local/v6/lib -linet6
++endif
++
++OS_LIBS += -lxpg4
----Next_Part(Fri_May_19_02:49:37_2000_518)--
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: mozilla-linux-ipv6.diff
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="mozilla-linux-ipv6.diff"
Index: mozilla/nsprpub/config/Linux.mk
diff -u mozilla/nsprpub/config/Linux.mk.orig mozilla/nsprpub/config/Linux.mk
--- mozilla/nsprpub/config/Linux.mk.orig Sat Apr 29 03:22:00 2000
+++ mozilla/nsprpub/config/Linux.mk Sat Apr 29 03:22:19 2000
@@ -112,3 +112,5 @@
DSO_CFLAGS = -fPIC
DSO_LDOPTS = -shared
DSO_LDFLAGS =
+
+USE_IPV6 = 1
Index: mozilla/nsprpub/pr/include/md/_linux.h
diff -u mozilla/nsprpub/pr/include/md/_linux.h.orig mozilla/nsprpub/pr/include/md/_linux.h
--- mozilla/nsprpub/pr/include/md/_linux.h.orig Thu Mar 9 01:26:16 2000
+++ mozilla/nsprpub/pr/include/md/_linux.h Sat Apr 29 03:18:59 2000
@@ -410,4 +410,8 @@
/* For writev() */
#include
+#ifdef _PR_INET6
+#define _PR_HAVE_GETHOSTBYNAME2
+#endif
+
#endif /* nspr_linux_defs_h___ */
----Next_Part(Fri_May_19_02:49:37_2000_518)--
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=".signature-world"
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
ume@mahoroba.org ume@bisd.hitachi.co.jp ume@FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
----Next_Part(Fri_May_19_02:49:37_2000_518)----
From fink@es.net Thu May 18 20:04:58 2000
From: fink@es.net (Bob Fink)
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 12:04:58 -0700
Subject: About address allocating
In-Reply-To: <200005181353.VAA06644@ns.6test.edu.cn>
Message-ID: <4.2.2.20000518115347.01cf2058@imap2.es.net>
At 09:53 PM 5/18/2000 +0800, Haisang Wu wrote:
>hi, I have the following questions about address allocating:
> I know SLA is /48, and interface ID should be 64 bits,
>does it mean that the smallest unit when allocating address is /48?
>In other words, if I allocate a /48 to a large university, could I
>allocate a /48 to four middle schools, thus each middle school gets
>an block less than /48, which is /50. Is this plan reasonable?
This is under discussion by the registries, and the outcome isn't clear
yet, i.e., what to do in general for allocating public topology prefixes
longer than /48 to smaller sites. Meanwhile, it is safe to say that your
plan is ok if you consider your multiple middle schools one logical
"individual organization", which is more likely to work for CERNET where
you speak for the organizations from an Internet policy point of view, as
opposed to a public ISP providing IPv6 service to multiple different
customers (organizations).
Quoting from RFC2374:
>>3.5 Site-Level Aggregation Identifier
>>
>> The SLA ID field is used by an individual organization to create its
>> own local addressing hierarchy and to identify subnets. This is
>> analogous to subnets in IPv4 except that each organization has a much
>> greater number of subnets. The 16 bit SLA ID field support 65,535
>> individual subnets.
>>
>> Organizations may choose to either route their SLA ID "flat" (e.g.,
>> not create any logical relationship between the SLA identifiers that
>> results in larger routing tables), or to create a two or more level
>> hierarchy (that results in smaller routing tables) in the SLA ID
>> field. The latter is shown as follows:
>>
>>
>>Hinden, et. al. Standards Track [Page 6]
>>
>>RFC 2374 IPv6 Global Unicast Address Format July 1998
>>
>>
>> | n | 16-n | 64 bits |
>> +-----+------------+-------------------------------------+
>> |SLA1 | Subnet | Interface ID |
>> +-----+------------+-------------------------------------+
>>
>> | m |16-n-m | 64 bits |
>> +----+-------+-------------------------------------+
>> |SLA2|Subnet | Interface ID |
>> +----+-------+-------------------------------------+
>>
>> The approach chosen for structuring an SLA ID field is the
>> responsibility of the individual organization.
>>
>> The number of subnets supported in this address format should be
>> sufficient for all but the largest of organizations. Organizations
>> which need additional subnets can arrange with the organization they
>> are obtaining Internet service from to obtain additional site
>> identifiers and use this to create additional subnets.
> And, could those who get sTLA of /35 give me some detailed plan in
>address allocating? Thanks.
> best
Take a look at ESnet's:
Thanks,
Bob
From jim@thehousleys.net Thu May 18 20:16:16 2000
From: jim@thehousleys.net (James Housley)
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 15:16:16 -0400
Subject: 1 question, 1 request
References:
Message-ID: <39244180.3C4CA010@thehousleys.net>
Toomas Soome wrote:
>
> something wrong with Your DNS....
>
> [103] tsoome@ut-gw:~>telnet www.ipv6.fbc-hanover.org 80
> www.ipv6.fbc-hanover.org: Unknown host
> [104] tsoome@ut-gw:~>host www.ipv6.fbc-hanover.org
> www.ipv6.fbc-hanover.org does not exist (Authoritative answer)
> [105] tsoome@ut-gw:~>host -t AAAA www.ipv6.fbc-hanover.org
> www.ipv6.fbc-hanover.org does not exist (Authoritative answer)
>
It has been fixed I hope, but I will take a while to propagate. The IP
in question is 3ffe:1ce3:6:0:2::a
Jim
--
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
-- Charles Forsythe
From Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr Fri May 19 10:11:01 2000
From: Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr (Francis Dupont)
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 11:11:01 +0200
Subject: About address allocating
In-Reply-To: Your message of Thu, 18 May 2000 21:53:37 +0800.
<200005181353.VAA06644@ns.6test.edu.cn>
Message-ID: <200005190911.LAA16011@givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr>
In your previous mail you wrote:
hi, I have the following questions about address allocating:
I know SLA is /48, and interface ID should be 64 bits,
does it mean that the smallest unit when allocating address is /48?
In other words, if I allocate a /48 to a large university, could I
allocate a /48 to four middle schools, thus each middle school gets
an block less than /48, which is /50. Is this plan reasonable?
=> we'd like to get a /48, ISPs would like to give a /64 to us:
- /48 seems a bit too large for a default allocation size
- /64 is unusable when you need subneting
then the current idea, as presented yesterday here in Budapest
at the RIPE meeting, is to introduce "small site" which get
/56 (on byte boundary, large enough for up to 256 subnetworks or
a few levels of hierarchy).
Then /56 will become the default allocation size in RIR
allocation & assignment document.
Regards
Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr
From hswu@ns.6test.edu.cn Fri May 19 12:45:19 2000
From: hswu@ns.6test.edu.cn (Haisang Wu)
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 19:45:19 +0800 (CST)
Subject: About address allocating
In-Reply-To: <200005190911.LAA16011@givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr> from Francis Dupont at "May 19, 2000 11:11: 1 am"
Message-ID: <200005191145.TAA12923@ns.6test.edu.cn>
hi,
I think /56 is a reasonable idea. In fact, as a pTLA of
6bone, CERNET has allocated block of /56 in the address space
of 3ffe:3200::/24.
But 200::/35 is "formal" addresses, anyway, I think maybe we
need a draft or something else to explain this.
best
Wu haisang
> In your previous mail you wrote:
>
> => we'd like to get a /48, ISPs would like to give a /64 to us:
> - /48 seems a bit too large for a default allocation size
> - /64 is unusable when you need subneting
> then the current idea, as presented yesterday here in Budapest
> at the RIPE meeting, is to introduce "small site" which get
> /56 (on byte boundary, large enough for up to 256 subnetworks or
> a few levels of hierarchy).
> Then /56 will become the default allocation size in RIR
> allocation & assignment document.
>
> Regards
>
> Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr
>
From Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr Sat May 20 14:17:57 2000
From: Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr (Francis Dupont)
Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 15:17:57 +0200
Subject: About address allocating
In-Reply-To: Your message of Fri, 19 May 2000 22:26:23 +0900.
<5536.958742783@coconut.itojun.org>
Message-ID: <200005201317.PAA22880@givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr>
In your previous mail you wrote:
> hi, I have the following questions about address allocating:
> I know SLA is /48, and interface ID should be 64 bits,
> does it mean that the smallest unit when allocating address is /48?
> In other words, if I allocate a /48 to a large university, could I
> allocate a /48 to four middle schools, thus each middle school gets
> an block less than /48, which is /50. Is this plan reasonable?
>
>=> we'd like to get a /48, ISPs would like to give a /64 to us:
> - /48 seems a bit too large for a default allocation size
> - /64 is unusable when you need subneting
>then the current idea, as presented yesterday here in Budapest
>at the RIPE meeting, is to introduce "small site" which get
>/56 (on byte boundary, large enough for up to 256 subnetworks or
>a few levels of hierarchy).
>Then /56 will become the default allocation size in RIR
>allocation & assignment document.
I'm not sure if introducing "small sites" is a good thing...
when we switch ISP and they force me to switch from /48 to /56,
renumber becomes very hard.
=> the idea is that it is easier for someone which needs a /48
to deal with its ISP than for a common customer to fight in order to
get a /48 because /64 is not enough: this is a compromise for common
customers (ie you at home, IIJlab is strong enough to get a /x with x <= 48).
I believe it is a good compromise...
Regards
Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr
From woeber@cc.univie.ac.at Sat May 20 17:59:23 2000
From: woeber@cc.univie.ac.at (Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet)
Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 18:59:23 +0200
Subject: About address allocating (IPv6, variable length SLA/prefixes?)
Message-ID: <009EA615.FA06CB56.10@cc.univie.ac.at>
Hi Francis et.al.,
as I said a couple of days ago in Budapest, I would like to see an
explanation and/or review from the routing point of view.
Judging from my (limited) knowledge about IPv6, going for a variable
length SLA field would either leave us with "wasted" address space (as
the network next door would be a different site and thus should have a
different NLA field anyway), or we would end up with a variable length
network prefix length (much like in the v4 environment), effectively
extending the NLA field into the SLA field.
Doing so would probably require a cross-check against existing
IPv6-aware IGPs. That is where I would like to see input from the
routing camp(s).
Regards,
Wilfried.
______________________________________________________________________
From: Francis Dupont
To: itojun@iijlab.net
CC: Haisang Wu , 6bone@ISI.EDU
Subject: Re: About address allocating
Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 15:17:57 +0200
In your previous mail you wrote:
> hi, I have the following questions about address allocating:
> I know SLA is /48, and interface ID should be 64 bits,
> does it mean that the smallest unit when allocating address is /48?
> In other words, if I allocate a /48 to a large university, could I
> allocate a /48 to four middle schools, thus each middle school gets
> an block less than /48, which is /50. Is this plan reasonable?
>
>=> we'd like to get a /48, ISPs would like to give a /64 to us:
> - /48 seems a bit too large for a default allocation size
> - /64 is unusable when you need subneting
>then the current idea, as presented yesterday here in Budapest
>at the RIPE meeting, is to introduce "small site" which get
>/56 (on byte boundary, large enough for up to 256 subnetworks or
>a few levels of hierarchy).
>Then /56 will become the default allocation size in RIR
>allocation & assignment document.
I'm not sure if introducing "small sites" is a good thing...
when we switch ISP and they force me to switch from /48 to /56,
renumber becomes very hard.
=> the idea is that it is easier for someone which needs a /48
to deal with its ISP than for a common customer to fight in order to
get a /48 because /64 is not enough: this is a compromise for common
customers (ie you at home, IIJlab is strong enough to get a /x with x <= 48).
I believe it is a good compromise...
Regards
Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_________________________________:_____________________________________
Wilfried Woeber : e-mail: Woeber@CC.UniVie.ac.at
UniVie Computer Center - ACOnet : Tel: +43 1 4277 - 140 33
Universitaetsstrasse 7 : Fax: +43 1 4277 - 9 140
A-1010 Vienna, Austria, Europe : RIPE-DB: WW144, PGP keyID 0xF0ACB369
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From carton@Ivy.NET Sat May 20 20:40:50 2000
From: carton@Ivy.NET (Miles Nordin)
Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 13:40:50 -0600
Subject: About address allocating
In-Reply-To: <200005201317.PAA22880@givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr>; from Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr on Sat, May 20, 2000 at 03:17:57PM +0200
References: <5536.958742783@coconut.itojun.org> <200005201317.PAA22880@givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr>
Message-ID: <20000520134050.A24745@casey.Ivy.NET>
On Sat, May 20, 2000 at 03:17:57PM +0200, Francis Dupont wrote:
> >is to introduce "small site" which get
> >/56 (on byte boundary, large enough for up to 256 subnetworks or
> >a few levels of hierarchy).
> => the idea is that it is easier for someone which needs a /48
> to deal with its ISP than for a common customer to fight in order to
> get a /48 because /64 is not enough:
w.t.f.? I thought the point if IPv6 was to get rid of all this stingy
political nonsense. I should have enough addresses to represent my
internal topology. I should not have to pay or fight for them. PERIOD.
Why is RIPE backpedaling from this?
I do not want a repeat of our current situation, where American fools
drinking cheap beer and checking their Hotmail accounts get service
for $40/mo, and a small oppressed minority of technically creative
people, who actually have such a thing as ``internal topology'' have
to pay $140/mo for a connection of the exact same speed, just because
we're not using the sealed web-box that The Corporation gave us.
Who is proposing giving out /64's in exchange for money? I thought
the (rather well-considered?) standard specifically recommend the
Site Level Aggregator for the use of an ISP's _subscribers_. that
part of the point of this ``standard'' was that it solved political
disputes by dividing up the address bits and assigning them to each
of the interested parties. no?
Is there really an expected shortage of IPv6 addresses? Or is this
all about people who say, ``but that seems like an awful _waste_ of
addresses, 16 bits on someone with one subnet. We shouldn't give
them out like that--addresses are precious.'' NO! Addresses
_were_ precious.
The IPv6 paper I read makes a great case for ``wasting'' addresses in
terms of improved routing performance (addresses are more aggregateable)
and elimination of special cases (NAT, proxy ARP). so, there are
technical reasons subscribers should get the SLA, and no technical
reasons that they shouldn't.
I am confused as to where this strange address-mongering way-of-thinking
is coming from. It sounds like IPv4-Think to me, and we don't do that
here in the Brave New World.
The only _political_ reason not to give subscribers the SLA is so that
you can later sell it back to them for more money. It sounds to me
like that's what's going on here. ISP's are attempting to design a
profitable future pricing structure into the IPv6 standard, and
protect their substantial existing revenues for selling hotly-contested
IPv4 space to rich corporations. The standard as it stands takes a
big chunk out of their pie--``yes, by all means, let's create a `small
subscriber'--that way, we can charge for numbers, which are free, and
make pure revenue. Any standard which throws us back to the old days
of simply charging for bandwidth & rtt is unacceptable to us.''
>From The Case for IPv6:
http://www.6bone.net/misc/case-for-ipv6.html
Next level aggregators can divide the NLA address field to create
their own hierarchy, one that maps well to the current ISP industry,
in which smaller ISPs subscribe to higher level ISPs, and so on.
This is accomplished by the further subdivision of the 32-bit
NLA field (see Figure 15). Following the NLA ID are for
<------------ 32 bits -----------> <--16 bits-> <---- 64 bits
+-------+-------------------------+------------+-------------------+
| NLA 1 | Site | SLA | Interface ID |
+-------+-------------------------+------------+-------------------+
+-------+-----------------+------------+-------------------+
| NLA 2 | Site | SLA | Interface ID |
+-------+-----------------+------------+-------------------+
+-----------------+------------+-------------------+
| NLA 3 | Site | SLA | Interface ID |
+-----------------+------------+-------------------+
Figure 15: Subdividing the NLA Address Space
subscriber site networking information: Site Level Aggregator (SLA)
and Interface ID. Typically, service providers supply subscribers
with blocks of contiguous addresses, which are then used by
individual organizations to create their own local address hierarchy
and identify subnets and hosts. The 16-bit SLA field supports up to
65,535 individual subnets.
--
Miles Nordin / v:+1 720 841-8308 fax:+1 530 579-8680
555 Bryant Street PMB 182 / Palo Alto, CA 94301-1700 / US
From nsayer@quack.kfu.com Sun May 21 02:16:40 2000
From: nsayer@quack.kfu.com (Nick Sayer)
Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 18:16:40 -0700
Subject: About address allocating
References: <5536.958742783@coconut.itojun.org> <200005201317.PAA22880@givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr> <20000520134050.A24745@casey.Ivy.NET>
Message-ID: <392738F8.16791D1F@quack.kfu.com>
Miles Nordin wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 20, 2000 at 03:17:57PM +0200, Francis Dupont wrote:
> > >is to introduce "small site" which get
> > >/56 (on byte boundary, large enough for up to 256 subnetworks or
> > >a few levels of hierarchy).
>
> > => the idea is that it is easier for someone which needs a /48
> > to deal with its ISP than for a common customer to fight in order to
> > get a /48 because /64 is not enough:
>
> w.t.f.? I thought the point if IPv6 was to get rid of all this stingy
> political nonsense. I should have enough addresses to represent my
> internal topology. I should not have to pay or fight for them. PERIOD.
> Why is RIPE backpedaling from this?
[I at first replied privately, but would like to gather public opinion
too]
I must agree, for anyone with fixed connectivity, even down to ISDN
sorts of
bandwidth levels, a /48 is the only fair thing to do.
But I would like to inquire about providers of the bare-bones $19.95 (or
free
and add-sponsored) v.90 connectivity. The vast majority of these
customers
are connecting one computer to the Internet on-demand. Surely a /64
is good enough for them...? Who honestly believes that I need 65,535
subnets
of 2^64 addresses to hook my laptop up to the net from my hotel room at
USENIX? :-)
In either case, the time to figure out what to do is now. IPv6-over-PPP
surely will
be a product on offer sooner rather than later.
From shamrock@cypherpunks.to Sun May 21 09:37:02 2000
From: shamrock@cypherpunks.to (Lucky Green)
Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 01:37:02 -0700
Subject: About address allocating
In-Reply-To: <392738F8.16791D1F@quack.kfu.com>
Message-ID:
Nick Sayer wrote:
> But I would like to inquire about providers of the bare-bones $19.95 (or
> free
> and add-sponsored) v.90 connectivity. The vast majority of these
> customers
> are connecting one computer to the Internet on-demand. Surely a /64
> is good enough for them...? Who honestly believes that I need 65,535
> subnets
> of 2^64 addresses to hook my laptop up to the net from my hotel room at
> USENIX? :-)
Will you need a /48 for your laptop? Probably not. But I thought the 128 bit
address space was chosen to permanently doing away with having to beg for
address space. I well remember the early discussions about IPng in which
some advocated for a moderate, rather than a massive, increase in address
space. They lost the argument. And I happen to be glad they did. With the
address space available under IPv6, there is no reason whatsoever to not
give everybody the address space they desire.
Please, there is plenty of address space for everybody. Let's not revisit
the pains of IPv4.
--Lucky Green
"Among the many misdeeds of British rule in India, history will look
upon the Act depriving a whole nation of arms as the blackest."
- Mohandas K. Gandhi, An Autobiography, pg 446
http://www.citizensofamerica.org/missing.ram
From nsayer@quack.kfu.com Sun May 21 18:20:12 2000
From: nsayer@quack.kfu.com (Nick Sayer)
Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 10:20:12 -0700
Subject: About address allocating
References:
Message-ID: <39281ACC.383E07FE@quack.kfu.com>
Lucky Green wrote:
>
> Will you need a /48 for your laptop? Probably not. But I thought the 128 bit
> address space was chosen to permanently doing away with having to beg for
> address space. I well remember the early discussions about IPng in which
> some advocated for a moderate, rather than a massive, increase in address
> space. They lost the argument. And I happen to be glad they did. With the
> address space available under IPv6, there is no reason whatsoever to not
> give everybody the address space they desire.
>
> Please, there is plenty of address space for everybody. Let's not revisit
> the pains of IPv4.
Sure, but let's not swing the pendulum too far in the other direction.
There are lots and lots and lots of ISPs that run small modem banks used
by dial-on-demand analog users who get dynamic IP addresses. I'm one of
them.
Having every one of those providers having to get a /48 for every single
modem they have is ludicrous overkill. The way the PPP RFCs for IPv6
read,
the path of least resistance is to give each modem _bank_ a /64. The
prefix
is sufficient to route to a specific bank. The dialup link will provide
its own EID, which has the added benefit of making
hijack-by-connection-reuse
less likely and means that such dynamic users who dial the same bank
probably
_do_ have a static IP address after all (since their EID is not
likely/supposed
to change).
No, we don't have to be misers with v6 address space like we did under
v4.
And yes, I think that anyone with a dedicated link of any kind really
ought to
get a /48. Even dialup customers who do the dedicated-dialup trick ought
to.
But I have no problem drawing the line at on-demand-dynamic-dialup
customers.
Just because a resource is plentiful doesn't _require_ us to waste it.
From eichin-6bone@thok.org Sun May 21 18:37:13 2000
From: eichin-6bone@thok.org (eichin-6bone@thok.org)
Date: 21 May 2000 13:37:13 -0400
Subject: About address allocating
In-Reply-To: Lucky Green's message of "Sun, 21 May 2000 01:37:02 -0700"
References:
Message-ID:
> Will you need a /48 for your laptop? Probably not. But I thought the 128 bit
> address space was chosen to permanently doing away with having to beg for
Mmmm, *probably* not, but if you've got the one convenient phone line
in the airport lounge and a coworker shows up, being able to hand him
an address to route through your wavelan card would be *useful*...
From tony@lava.net Sun May 21 20:33:02 2000
From: tony@lava.net (Antonio Querubin)
Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 09:33:02 -1000 (HST)
Subject: starting up ipv6 on redhat linux
Message-ID:
I'm trying to get IPv6 working on a Redhat 6.1 system for the first time.
The kernel and modules have been recompiled with ipv6 and ipip tunneling
enabled. I've also recompiled the latest net-tools package with ipv6
enabled. However, whenever I try to install the ipv6 module (ie. modprobe
ipv6) I receive a bunch of error messages. These all look like ipv4
functions that should already be in the kernel or a module. Maybe I've
left some other kernel/module option off that should also be enabled.
Can somebody point me in the right direction? I've already gone through
the FAQs but maybe I'm just overlooking something obvious.
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_init_xmit_timers
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol
tcp_rcv_state_process
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol
sysctl_max_syn_backlog
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_sync_mss
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol
tcp_simple_retransmit
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol
tcp_clear_xmit_timers
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_connect
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_v4_send_check
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_write_space
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol inet_sendmsg
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_ioctl
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_make_synack
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_check_req
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol __tcp_inc_slow_timer
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_v4_syn_recv_sock
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol udp_prot
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol inet_poll
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_prot
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_do_sendmsg
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_ehash_size
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_rcv_established
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol net_timer
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_ehash
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol ip_queue_xmit
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol destroy_sock
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_port_rover
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_openreq_cachep
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol inet_recvmsg
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol
tcp_timewait_state_process
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol udp_port_rover
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_statistics
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_bhash_size
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_read_wakeup
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol ipv4_specific
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol inet_accept
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol
tcp_v4_rebuild_header
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_slt_array
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol inet_listen
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol memcpy_fromiovecend
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol inet_dgram_connect
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol net_statistics
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_v4_conn_request
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol
tcp_tw_death_row_slot
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_recvmsg
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol inet_setsockopt
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol __tcp_put_port
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_setsockopt
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol
csum_partial_copy_fromiove
cend
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol udp_hash
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_inherit_port
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol udp_sendmsg
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_shutdown
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol
tcp_create_openreq_child
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol udp_ioctl
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_put_port
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_getsockopt
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol xrlim_allow
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_accept
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol dev_loopback_xmit
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_parse_options
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_poll
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol udp_connect
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol inet_stream_ops
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol inet_stream_connect
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol inet_getsockopt
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_bucket_create
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_close
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_regs
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_v4_do_rcv
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_listening_hash
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol inet_release
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol inet_shutdown
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_write_wakeup
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_bhash
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol tcp_v4_connect
/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/ipv6/ipv6.o: unresolved symbol
sysctl_local_port_range
From matthew@davin.ottawa.on.ca Sun May 21 22:22:43 2000
From: matthew@davin.ottawa.on.ca (Matthew Darwin)
Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 17:22:43 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: IPv6 over IPv4 over PPPoE?
Message-ID:
Has anyone successfully connected to freenet6 when connected to the
internet via PPPoE? I'm connected to my ISP using Nortel's 1meg modem
technology.
Here's the steps I do on my Linux 2.2.15 box. I can ping myself, but
nobody else. I'm sure the MTU sizes are all screwed, but an ICMP packet
should not be affected by that.
------------------------------------------------------------
% ifconfig sit0 up
% ifconfig ppp0 add 3ffe:b00:c18:1fff:0:0:0:c3
% ifconfig sit0 tunnel ::206.123.31.102
% ifconfig sit1 up
% route -A inet6 add default gw fe80::206.123.31.102 dev sit1
default: Resolver Error 0 (no error) << This is a weird message?
% ifconfig
cipcb2 Link encap:IPIP Tunnel HWaddr
inet addr:192.168.0.1 P-t-P:192.168.0.2 Mask:255.255.255.255
UP POINTOPOINT NOTRAILERS RUNNING NOARP MTU:1442 Metric:1
RX packets:4792 errors:3 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:3
TX packets:4885 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:80:C8:67:A5:A1
inet6 addr: fe80::280:c8ff:fe67:a5a1/10 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:212959 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:2
TX packets:180406 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:787 txqueuelen:100
Interrupt:7 Base address:0xb800
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:21:66:5D:71
inet addr:192.168.0.1 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::200:21ff:fe66:5d71/10 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:48961 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:18437
TX packets:33738 errors:3 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:6
collisions:67 txqueuelen:100
Interrupt:12 Base address:0xb400
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3924 Metric:1
RX packets:56442 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:56442 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
ppp0 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
inet addr:209.217.122.211 P-t-P:209.217.122.1 Mask:255.255.255.255
inet6 addr: 3ffe:b00:c18:1fff::c3/0 Scope:Global
UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1400 Metric:1
RX packets:212956 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:180399 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:10
sit0 Link encap:IPv6-in-IPv4
inet6 addr: ::127.0.0.1/96 Scope:Unknown
inet6 addr: ::209.217.122.211/96 Scope:Compat
inet6 addr: ::192.168.0.1/96 Scope:Compat
inet6 addr: ::192.168.0.1/96 Scope:Compat
UP RUNNING NOARP MTU:1480 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
sit1 Link encap:IPv6-in-IPv4
inet6 addr: fe80::d1d9:7ad3/10 Scope:Link
inet6 addr: fe80::c0a8:1/10 Scope:Link
inet6 addr: fe80::c0a8:1/10 Scope:Link
UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MTU:1380 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
% route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
209.217.122.1 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0
192.168.0.2 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 cipcb2
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
10.0.0.0 192.168.0.2 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 cipcb2
172.17.0.0 192.168.0.2 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 cipcb2
192.168.0.0 192.168.0.2 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 cipcb2
0.0.0.0 209.217.122.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 ppp0
% route -A inet6 -n
Kernel IPv6 routing table
Destination Next Hop Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
::1/128 :: U 0 0 0 lo
::127.0.0.1/128 :: U 0 0 0 lo
::192.168.0.1/128 :: U 0 0 0 lo
::209.217.122.211/128 :: U 0 0 0 lo
::/96 :: U 256 0 0 sit0
3ffe:b00:c18:1fff::c3/128 :: U 0 0 0 lo
fe80::c0a8:1/128 :: U 0 0 0 lo
fe80::d1d9:7ad3/128 :: U 0 0 0 lo
fe80::200:21ff:fe66:5d71/128 :: U 0 0 0 lo
fe80::280:c8ff:fe67:a5a1/128 :: U 0 0 0 lo
fe80::/10 :: UA 256 0 0 eth0
fe80::/10 :: UA 256 0 0 eth1
fe80::/10 :: UA 256 0 0 ppp0
fe80::/10 :: UA 256 0 0 sit1
ff00::/8 :: UA 256 0 0 eth0
ff00::/8 :: UA 256 0 0 eth1
ff00::/8 :: UA 256 0 0 ppp0
ff00::/8 :: UA 256 0 0 sit1
::/0 :: UA 256 0 0 ppp0
::/0 :: UDA 256 0 0 eth0
::/0 :: UDA 256 0 0 eth1
From ipv6@the.whole.net Mon May 22 00:17:42 2000
From: ipv6@the.whole.net (ipv6@the.whole.net)
Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 19:17:42 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: starting up ipv6 on redhat linux
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
I just added IPv6 to a Redhat 6.1 machine but it was a monolithic kernel.
It compiled and works well so I would suggest recompiling your kernel with
IPv6 included, not as a module. You can also find some good nuggets of
information regarding using IPv6 with Linux at
http://www.bieringer.de/linux/IPv6/IPv6-HOWTO/IPv6-HOWTO.html
Hope this helps!
-Dave Munroe
On Sun, 21 May 2000, Antonio Querubin wrote:
> I'm trying to get IPv6 working on a Redhat 6.1 system for the first time.
> The kernel and modules have been recompiled with ipv6 and ipip tunneling
> enabled. I've also recompiled the latest net-tools package with ipv6
> enabled. However, whenever I try to install the ipv6 module (ie. modprobe
> ipv6) I receive a bunch of error messages. These all look like ipv4
> functions that should already be in the kernel or a module. Maybe I've
> left some other kernel/module option off that should also be enabled.
> Can somebody point me in the right direction? I've already gone through
> the FAQs but maybe I'm just overlooking something obvious.
From FRANCISCOD@advance.com.ar Mon May 22 14:05:00 2000
From: FRANCISCOD@advance.com.ar (Francisco, Diego)
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 10:05:00 -0300
Subject: IPv6 over IPv4 over PPPoE?
Message-ID: <9C7241D1432FD411B777006008C50AEA522D24@advtal10.inadvance.com.ar>
try with
route -A inet6 add ::/0 gw fe80::206.123.31.102 dev sit1
but, the route program not has defined the default alias then your machine
try to resolve this like a host.
good look.
pardon by my english.
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Matthew Darwin [mailto:matthew@davin.ottawa.on.ca]
Enviado el: domingo 21 de mayo de 2000 18:23
Para: 6bone@ISI.EDU
Asunto: IPv6 over IPv4 over PPPoE?
Has anyone successfully connected to freenet6 when connected to the
internet via PPPoE? I'm connected to my ISP using Nortel's 1meg modem
technology.
Here's the steps I do on my Linux 2.2.15 box. I can ping myself, but
nobody else. I'm sure the MTU sizes are all screwed, but an ICMP packet
should not be affected by that.
------------------------------------------------------------
% ifconfig sit0 up
% ifconfig ppp0 add 3ffe:b00:c18:1fff:0:0:0:c3
% ifconfig sit0 tunnel ::206.123.31.102
% ifconfig sit1 up
% route -A inet6 add default gw fe80::206.123.31.102 dev sit1
default: Resolver Error 0 (no error) << This is a weird message?
% ifconfig
cipcb2 Link encap:IPIP Tunnel HWaddr
inet addr:192.168.0.1 P-t-P:192.168.0.2 Mask:255.255.255.255
UP POINTOPOINT NOTRAILERS RUNNING NOARP MTU:1442 Metric:1
RX packets:4792 errors:3 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:3
TX packets:4885 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:80:C8:67:A5:A1
inet6 addr: fe80::280:c8ff:fe67:a5a1/10 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:212959 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:2
TX packets:180406 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:787 txqueuelen:100
Interrupt:7 Base address:0xb800
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:21:66:5D:71
inet addr:192.168.0.1 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::200:21ff:fe66:5d71/10 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:48961 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:18437
TX packets:33738 errors:3 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:6
collisions:67 txqueuelen:100
Interrupt:12 Base address:0xb400
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3924 Metric:1
RX packets:56442 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:56442 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
ppp0 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
inet addr:209.217.122.211 P-t-P:209.217.122.1
Mask:255.255.255.255
inet6 addr: 3ffe:b00:c18:1fff::c3/0 Scope:Global
UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1400 Metric:1
RX packets:212956 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:180399 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:10
sit0 Link encap:IPv6-in-IPv4
inet6 addr: ::127.0.0.1/96 Scope:Unknown
inet6 addr: ::209.217.122.211/96 Scope:Compat
inet6 addr: ::192.168.0.1/96 Scope:Compat
inet6 addr: ::192.168.0.1/96 Scope:Compat
UP RUNNING NOARP MTU:1480 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
sit1 Link encap:IPv6-in-IPv4
inet6 addr: fe80::d1d9:7ad3/10 Scope:Link
inet6 addr: fe80::c0a8:1/10 Scope:Link
inet6 addr: fe80::c0a8:1/10 Scope:Link
UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MTU:1380 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
% route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
209.217.122.1 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0
192.168.0.2 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0
cipcb2
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
10.0.0.0 192.168.0.2 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0
cipcb2
172.17.0.0 192.168.0.2 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0
cipcb2
192.168.0.0 192.168.0.2 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0
cipcb2
0.0.0.0 209.217.122.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 ppp0
% route -A inet6 -n
Kernel IPv6 routing table
Destination Next Hop
Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
::1/128 ::
U 0 0 0 lo
::127.0.0.1/128 ::
U 0 0 0 lo
::192.168.0.1/128 ::
U 0 0 0 lo
::209.217.122.211/128 ::
U 0 0 0 lo
::/96 ::
U 256 0 0 sit0
3ffe:b00:c18:1fff::c3/128 ::
U 0 0 0 lo
fe80::c0a8:1/128 ::
U 0 0 0 lo
fe80::d1d9:7ad3/128 ::
U 0 0 0 lo
fe80::200:21ff:fe66:5d71/128 ::
U 0 0 0 lo
fe80::280:c8ff:fe67:a5a1/128 ::
U 0 0 0 lo
fe80::/10 ::
UA 256 0 0 eth0
fe80::/10 ::
UA 256 0 0 eth1
fe80::/10 ::
UA 256 0 0 ppp0
fe80::/10 ::
UA 256 0 0 sit1
ff00::/8 ::
UA 256 0 0 eth0
ff00::/8 ::
UA 256 0 0 eth1
ff00::/8 ::
UA 256 0 0 ppp0
ff00::/8 ::
UA 256 0 0 sit1
::/0 ::
UA 256 0 0 ppp0
::/0 ::
UDA 256 0 0 eth0
::/0 ::
UDA 256 0 0 eth1
From brian@hursley.ibm.com Mon May 22 14:51:25 2000
From: brian@hursley.ibm.com (Brian E Carpenter)
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 08:51:25 -0500
Subject: About address allocating (IPv6, variable length SLA/prefixes?)
References: <009EA615.FA06CB56.10@cc.univie.ac.at>
Message-ID: <39293B5D.7392ACD8@hursley.ibm.com>
Wilfried,
Architecturally, IPv6 has the equivalent of variable length subnet masks
built in. There are really only two boundaries that are not flexible-
the boundary between the format prefix and the rest of the address, and the
/64 boundary. (The format prefix is in fact variable length, but it is
architecturally defined.) So any IGP or EGP design needs to be fully flexible
to the left of /64. Subnetting to the right of /64 would be tricky.
Brian
"Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet" wrote:
>
> Hi Francis et.al.,
>
> as I said a couple of days ago in Budapest, I would like to see an
> explanation and/or review from the routing point of view.
>
> Judging from my (limited) knowledge about IPv6, going for a variable
> length SLA field would either leave us with "wasted" address space (as
> the network next door would be a different site and thus should have a
> different NLA field anyway), or we would end up with a variable length
> network prefix length (much like in the v4 environment), effectively
> extending the NLA field into the SLA field.
>
> Doing so would probably require a cross-check against existing
> IPv6-aware IGPs. That is where I would like to see input from the
> routing camp(s).
>
> Regards,
> Wilfried.
> ______________________________________________________________________
> From: Francis Dupont
> To: itojun@iijlab.net
> CC: Haisang Wu , 6bone@ISI.EDU
> Subject: Re: About address allocating
> Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 15:17:57 +0200
>
> In your previous mail you wrote:
>
>
> > hi, I have the following questions about address allocating:
> > I know SLA is /48, and interface ID should be 64 bits,
> > does it mean that the smallest unit when allocating address is /48?
> > In other words, if I allocate a /48 to a large university, could I
> > allocate a /48 to four middle schools, thus each middle school gets
> > an block less than /48, which is /50. Is this plan reasonable?
> >
> >=> we'd like to get a /48, ISPs would like to give a /64 to us:
> > - /48 seems a bit too large for a default allocation size
> > - /64 is unusable when you need subneting
> >then the current idea, as presented yesterday here in Budapest
> >at the RIPE meeting, is to introduce "small site" which get
> >/56 (on byte boundary, large enough for up to 256 subnetworks or
> >a few levels of hierarchy).
> >Then /56 will become the default allocation size in RIR
> >allocation & assignment document.
>
> I'm not sure if introducing "small sites" is a good thing...
> when we switch ISP and they force me to switch from /48 to /56,
> renumber becomes very hard.
>
> => the idea is that it is easier for someone which needs a /48
> to deal with its ISP than for a common customer to fight in order to
> get a /48 because /64 is not enough: this is a compromise for common
> customers (ie you at home, IIJlab is strong enough to get a /x with x <= 48).
> I believe it is a good compromise...
>
> Regards
>
> Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _________________________________:_____________________________________
> Wilfried Woeber : e-mail: Woeber@CC.UniVie.ac.at
> UniVie Computer Center - ACOnet : Tel: +43 1 4277 - 140 33
> Universitaetsstrasse 7 : Fax: +43 1 4277 - 9 140
> A-1010 Vienna, Austria, Europe : RIPE-DB: WW144, PGP keyID 0xF0ACB369
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Brian E Carpenter
Program Director, Internet Standards & Technology, IBM
On assignment for IBM at http://www.iCAIR.org
Attend INET 2000: http://www.isoc.org/inet2000
Non-IBM email: brian@icair.org
From matthew@davin.ottawa.on.ca Mon May 22 15:32:52 2000
From: matthew@davin.ottawa.on.ca (Matthew Darwin)
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 10:32:52 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: IPv6 over IPv4 over PPPoE?
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
Ok, the route is there now. Thanks.
However, I'm still having problems in that I can't ping the other end of
my tunnel. (3ffe:b00:c18:1fff:0:0:0:c2). I see the traffic going out my
ppp0 interface, but I never get any replies.
Ideas? I've been playing with my MTU, but that doesn't seem to help.
My ISP recommends using an MTU of 1400 for regular traffic on my PPP
link, so I reduced all the sitX interfaces by 100.
% modprobe ipv6
% echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/forwarding
% ifconfig sit0 up mtu 1380
% ifconfig ppp0 add 3ffe:b00:c18:1fff:0:0:0:c3
% ifconfig sit0 tunnel ::206.123.31.102
% ifconfig sit1 up mtu 1280
% route -A inet6 add ::0/0 gw fe80::206.123.31.102 dev sit1
On Mon, 22 May 2000, Chris Kennedy wrote:
> I think one thing that may be the only problem is the default route, the
> Linux 'route' program doesn't understand the default route by name, it
> wants 'route -A inet6 add ::/0 gw fe80::206.123.31.102 dev sit1'. That
> error means it is not adding the default route at all, I was confused by
> it at first too (I actually now use the iproute2 package, ip utilities,
> since they work better but are less documented). I included my hack at a
> script for Linux and the ip utilities, it has Freenet6's default values
> (network and tunnel server ip) in it but could be used for any tunnel if
> adjusted, and may help if wanting to use the iproute2 package (this
> package is in the most of the newest Linux Distributions).
From ot@cisco.com Mon May 22 15:46:24 2000
From: ot@cisco.com (Ole Troan)
Date: 22 May 2000 15:46:24 +0100
Subject: About address allocating (IPv6, variable length SLA/prefixes?)
In-Reply-To: Brian E Carpenter's message of "Mon, 22 May 2000 08:51:25 -0500"
References: <009EA615.FA06CB56.10@cc.univie.ac.at>
<39293B5D.7392ACD8@hursley.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <7t58zx2wslb.fsf@jaws.cisco.com>
> Architecturally, IPv6 has the equivalent of variable length subnet masks
> built in. There are really only two boundaries that are not flexible-
> the boundary between the format prefix and the rest of the address, and the
> /64 boundary. (The format prefix is in fact variable length, but it is
> architecturally defined.) So any IGP or EGP design needs to be fully flexible
> to the left of /64. Subnetting to the right of /64 would be tricky.
all IGP's and EGP's have to support all prefix-lengths. e.g you
want to announce host routes, /96 for NAT-PT, etc.
for that matter, the implementation(s) I know will let you create
subnets of whatever size you like.
/ot
From brian@hursley.ibm.com Mon May 22 16:06:21 2000
From: brian@hursley.ibm.com (Brian E Carpenter)
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 10:06:21 -0500
Subject: About address allocating (IPv6, variable length SLA/prefixes?)
References: <009EA615.FA06CB56.10@cc.univie.ac.at>
<39293B5D.7392ACD8@hursley.ibm.com> <7t58zx2wslb.fsf@jaws.cisco.com>
Message-ID: <39294CED.E262CF6@hursley.ibm.com>
Ole Troan wrote:
>
> > Architecturally, IPv6 has the equivalent of variable length subnet masks
> > built in. There are really only two boundaries that are not flexible-
> > the boundary between the format prefix and the rest of the address, and the
> > /64 boundary. (The format prefix is in fact variable length, but it is
> > architecturally defined.) So any IGP or EGP design needs to be fully flexible
> > to the left of /64. Subnetting to the right of /64 would be tricky.
>
> all IGP's and EGP's have to support all prefix-lengths. e.g you
> want to announce host routes, /96 for NAT-PT, etc.
> for that matter, the implementation(s) I know will let you create
> subnets of whatever size you like.
Yes, but there are other problems if you subnet to the right of /64
(autoconfiguration for example). I said tricky, not impossible.
Brian
From crawdad@fnal.gov Mon May 22 16:31:26 2000
From: crawdad@fnal.gov (Matt Crawford)
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 10:31:26 -0500
Subject: About address allocating
In-Reply-To: Your message of Sun, 21 May 2000 10:20:12 PDT.
<39281ACC.383E07FE@quack.kfu.com>
Message-ID: <200005221531.KAA10232@gungnir.fnal.gov>
I don't think anyone ever argued against allowing a dial-up host to
receive a single IPv6 address. (Which you might call a /128.) There
has been talk of allowing (or disallowing) assignment of a single
subnet (a /64) to a dialup connection. I don't recall any official
position. And the real world being what it is, an official
declaration would likely have little operational impact.
But I think everyone involved in the IPv6 process would stand firm
against the use of any prefix lengths in the range 65 to 127
inclusive *under format prefix 001 binary*, and against the
assignment to a "site" or "organization" (whatever that is) of a
prefix with length greater than 48.
______________________________________________________________________________
Matt Crawford crawdad@fnal.gov Fermilab
"A5.1.5.2.7.1. Remove all classified and CCI boards from the COMSEC equipment,
thoroughly smash them with a hammer or an ax, and scatter the pieces."
From deering@cisco.com Mon May 22 16:37:39 2000
From: deering@cisco.com (Steve Deering)
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 08:37:39 -0700
Subject: About address allocating (IPv6, variable length SLA/prefixes?)
In-Reply-To: <39294CED.E262CF6@hursley.ibm.com>
References: <009EA615.FA06CB56.10@cc.univie.ac.at>
<39293B5D.7392ACD8@hursley.ibm.com> <7t58zx2wslb.fsf@jaws.cisco.com>
<39294CED.E262CF6@hursley.ibm.com>
Message-ID:
At 10:06 AM -0500 5/22/00, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>Yes, but there are other problems if you subnet to the right of /64
>(autoconfiguration for example).
It depends on the address format. Not all format prefixes require the
64-bit interface ID field.
Agreed that, in the global aggregatable format, subnet prefixes longer
than /64 create problems.
However, implementations should be kept unaware of the magic /64 boundary,
as much as possible. (Obviously, the piece of code that does stateless
autoconfig has to know about it, but certainly not any routing code.)
Steve
From Marcelo Franca Alves \(MFA\)"
Anyone here had success compiling
libpcap-0.5 + tcpdump-3.5 in RedHat 6.2 for IPv6?
I am receiving very errors messages, and need help.
Thanks
-----
Marcelo Franca Alves (MFA) http://www.mfa.eti.br
Sao Paulo - SP - Brasil
From brian@hursley.ibm.com Mon May 22 19:49:40 2000
From: brian@hursley.ibm.com (Brian E Carpenter)
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 13:49:40 -0500
Subject: About address allocating (IPv6, variable length SLA/prefixes?)
References: <009EA615.FA06CB56.10@cc.univie.ac.at>
<39293B5D.7392ACD8@hursley.ibm.com> <7t58zx2wslb.fsf@jaws.cisco.com>
<39294CED.E262CF6@hursley.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <39298144.B4BDA3B3@hursley.ibm.com>
Steve Deering wrote:
>
> At 10:06 AM -0500 5/22/00, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> >Yes, but there are other problems if you subnet to the right of /64
> >(autoconfiguration for example).
>
> It depends on the address format. Not all format prefixes require the
> 64-bit interface ID field.
>
> Agreed that, in the global aggregatable format, subnet prefixes longer
> than /64 create problems.
>
> However, implementations should be kept unaware of the magic /64 boundary,
> as much as possible. (Obviously, the piece of code that does stateless
> autoconfig has to know about it, but certainly not any routing code.)
I didn't mean to imply otherwise.
Brian
From jim@thehousleys.net Mon May 22 20:20:21 2000
From: jim@thehousleys.net (James Housley)
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 15:20:21 -0400
Subject: IPv6 over IPv4 over PPPoE?
References:
Message-ID: <39298875.62D898AF@thehousleys.net>
Matthew Darwin wrote:
>
> Ideas? I've been playing with my MTU, but that doesn't seem to help.
> My ISP recommends using an MTU of 1400 for regular traffic on my PPP
> link, so I reduced all the sitX interfaces by 100.
>
You shouldn't have to because it is inside a packet with the correct MTU, unless fragments are note allowed?
Jim
--
Nothing is fool proof, because fools are too ingenious.
From matthew@davin.ottawa.on.ca Mon May 22 20:30:14 2000
From: matthew@davin.ottawa.on.ca (Matthew Darwin)
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 15:30:14 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: IPv6 over IPv4 over PPPoE?
In-Reply-To: <39298875.62D898AF@thehousleys.net>
Message-ID:
It seems that PPPoE can't deal with fragments. All workstations on my
network have an MTU of 1400 so that all PPPoE driver has to do is add the
PPP header.
There is an module (mssfwclamp) that supposed to get rid of the MTU
problem for masquerading (so an MTU of 1500 on a workstation is not a
problem), but I'm not using this.
On Mon, 22 May 2000, James Housley wrote:
> Matthew Darwin wrote:
> >
> > Ideas? I've been playing with my MTU, but that doesn't seem to help.
> > My ISP recommends using an MTU of 1400 for regular traffic on my PPP
> > link, so I reduced all the sitX interfaces by 100.
> >
> You shouldn't have to because it is inside a packet with the correct MTU, unless fragments are note allowed?
>
> Jim
> --
> Nothing is fool proof, because fools are too ingenious.
>
--
Matthew Darwin Westend Family Cinema
Community Volunteer The home of great family movies!
matthew@davin.ottawa.on.ca webmaster@familycinema.org
http://www.davin.ottawa.on.ca/~matthew/ http://www.familycinema.org
From burgess@mitre.org Tue May 23 14:16:36 2000
From: burgess@mitre.org (David Burgess)
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 08:16:36 -0500
Subject: About address allocating
References: <39281ACC.383E07FE@quack.kfu.com>
Message-ID: <392A84B4.5C99B1B2@mitre.org>
Nick Sayer wrote:
>
> Lucky Green wrote:
> Having every one of those providers having to get a /48 for every
> single modem they have is ludicrous overkill. The way the PPP RFCs
> for IPv6 read, the path of least resistance is to give each modem
> _bank_ a /64. The prefix is sufficient to route to a specific bank.
> The dialup link will provide its own EID, which has the added benefit
> of making hijack-by-connection-reuse less likely and means that such
> dynamic users who dial the same bank probably _do_ have a static IP
> address after all (since their EID is not likely/supposed > to
> change).
>
> No, we don't have to be misers with v6 address space like we did
> under v4. And yes, I think that anyone with a dedicated link of any
> kind really ought to get a /48. Even dialup customers who do the
> dedicated-dialup trick ought to.
> But I have no problem drawing the line at on-demand-dynamic-dialup
> customers. Just because a resource is plentiful doesn't _require_
> us to waste it.
I agree with this 100%. The US Robotics Total Control can now manage
16 incoming T1s in a single cabinet. Even then, that's only 384
modems. A /64 should be sufficient for those. There are plenty of
addresses for people who need subnets, and the management for each
(single) modem is fairly easy. Autodiscovery should take care of
the rest.
From NGARCIA@teldat.es Tue May 23 15:51:46 2000
From: NGARCIA@teldat.es (Noelia Garcia)
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 16:51:46 +0200
Subject: IPv6 WWW Client and IPv6 DNS Server
Message-ID: <41FAD0CB3B6BD3118BE600C04F43DB202B4146@CORREO>
I would like installing an Ipv6 WWW client for Windows NT. I have probed
with Lyns and Mozilla bust I do not know which DNS Server I must configure
to resolve the ipv6 address. Could someone helping me???
From Robbie_harrell@INS.COM Tue May 23 17:58:38 2000
From: Robbie_harrell@INS.COM (Robbie_harrell@INS.COM)
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 11:58:38 -0500
Subject: No subject
Message-ID: <002b01bfc4d8$25e13740$bd59a4d0@ins.com>
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0028_01BFC4AE.3AF8F110
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
unsubscribe
------=_NextPart_000_0028_01BFC4AE.3AF8F110
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
unsubscribe
------=_NextPart_000_0028_01BFC4AE.3AF8F110--
From nsayer@quack.kfu.com Wed May 24 23:17:43 2000
From: nsayer@quack.kfu.com (Nick Sayer)
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 15:17:43 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: IPv6 DNS autoconfiguration?
Message-ID: <200005242217.PAA12155@medusa.kfu.com>
I have some random thoughts for how one could achieve IPv6 DNS
autoconfiguration, which I regard as the last step before
plug-n-play networking truly arrives.
One simply needs to fill in the "nameserver" line, really.
Everything else is optional.
It could be as simple as a recommendation that a particular
link-local alias (fe80::35?) always either be a name server or
a redirector. Or perhaps a particular site-local address
(ff00::35?) ?
... Or do people envision using a dumbed-down DHCP for this?
Maybe it's just me, but the ability to define site-local
aliases so easily makes me think that nothing is gained from
using DHCP instead of an alias. What does everyone think?
From liuyx@comp.nus.edu.sg Thu May 25 03:04:02 2000
From: liuyx@comp.nus.edu.sg (Liu Yongxiang)
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 10:04:02 +0800 (GMT-8)
Subject: IPv6 DNS autoconfiguration?
In-Reply-To: <200005242217.PAA12155@medusa.kfu.com>
Message-ID:
Good idea indeed.
On Wed, 24 May 2000, Nick Sayer wrote:
> I have some random thoughts for how one could achieve IPv6 DNS
> autoconfiguration, which I regard as the last step before
> plug-n-play networking truly arrives.
>
> One simply needs to fill in the "nameserver" line, really.
> Everything else is optional.
>
> It could be as simple as a recommendation that a particular
> link-local alias (fe80::35?) always either be a name server or
> a redirector. Or perhaps a particular site-local address
> (ff00::35?) ?
>
> ... Or do people envision using a dumbed-down DHCP for this?
> Maybe it's just me, but the ability to define site-local
> aliases so easily makes me think that nothing is gained from
> using DHCP instead of an alias. What does everyone think?
>
From kre@munnari.OZ.AU Thu May 25 03:46:50 2000
From: kre@munnari.OZ.AU (Robert Elz)
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 12:46:50 +1000
Subject: IPv6 DNS autoconfiguration?
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 24 May 2000 15:17:43 MST."
<200005242217.PAA12155@medusa.kfu.com>
Message-ID: <4135.959222810@mundamutti.cs.mu.OZ.AU>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 15:17:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: Nick Sayer
Message-ID: <200005242217.PAA12155@medusa.kfu.com>
| One simply needs to fill in the "nameserver" line, really.
| Everything else is optional.
The nameserver line is optional too - then it defaults to a nameserver
on localhost.
The only difference between this and a hundred other services that need
to be configured (or might) (and OK, perhaps a half dozen...) is that
a nameserver is less frequently actually run on the local host than many
of the others.
But, I'm just as likely to need to fine my SMTP server, POP server,
printer server, NFS server for my user files, NTP server, HTTP proxy, ...
Without having ever actually looked at what is going on out there, I had
always half imagined that it was ssvrloc's job to help find all of these
kinds of things.
DHCP can do it as well, usually at the cost of more configuration (one
can imagine servers registering themselves somehow with svrloc, but not
with dhcp .. but maybe that's just because I know dhcp better). I'm
not sure I'd like to race around defining lots of well known link-local
aliases, and then require routers to be configured to forward them to
the right places (when they're not really local). Actually, it is worse
than that, sending to a link local, I should be using a link local source,
if the actual nameserver is not on the local subnet, but remote, that
can't work at all - the router would need to do very nasty tricks.
kre
From davidg@uk.uu.net Thu May 25 06:48:12 2000
From: davidg@uk.uu.net (David Gethings)
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 06:48:12 +0100
Subject: IPv6 DNS autoconfiguration?
Message-ID:
Unfortunately Nick I don't think it's quite as simple :(
Most people use their ISP's resolvers, so link-local and site-local
addresses won't be much use.
One way around this (and I haven't thought about this *too* hard!) is to get
the info from the router. Virtually all routers have resolver addresses
configured into them, so they could pass this config to the hosts on the
LAN.
Even as I typed the above it sounded like a nasty hack rather than a proper
solution! For one thing its provider dependant.
I'm sure someone with more time (and a bigger brain ;)) will find a proper
solution, but I wouldn't hold your breath.
Regards
David "No doubt there's a RFC detailing how to do this somewhere" Gethings
Network Operations Engineer
UUNET, an MCI WorldCom Company
-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Sayer [mailto:nsayer@quack.kfu.com]
Sent: 24 May 2000 11:18
To: 6bone@ISI.EDU
Subject: IPv6 DNS autoconfiguration?
I have some random thoughts for how one could achieve IPv6 DNS
autoconfiguration, which I regard as the last step before
plug-n-play networking truly arrives.
One simply needs to fill in the "nameserver" line, really.
Everything else is optional.
It could be as simple as a recommendation that a particular
link-local alias (fe80::35?) always either be a name server or
a redirector. Or perhaps a particular site-local address
(ff00::35?) ?
... Or do people envision using a dumbed-down DHCP for this?
Maybe it's just me, but the ability to define site-local
aliases so easily makes me think that nothing is gained from
using DHCP instead of an alias. What does everyone think?
From carton@Ivy.NET Thu May 25 09:17:55 2000
From: carton@Ivy.NET (Miles Nordin)
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 02:17:55 -0600
Subject: IPv6 DNS autoconfiguration?
In-Reply-To: <4135.959222810@mundamutti.cs.mu.OZ.AU>; from kre@munnari.OZ.AU on Thu, May 25, 2000 at 12:46:50PM +1000
References: <200005242217.PAA12155@medusa.kfu.com> <4135.959222810@mundamutti.cs.mu.OZ.AU>
Message-ID: <20000525021755.A6978@casey.Ivy.NET>
On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 12:46:50PM +1000, Robert Elz wrote:
> [special cases for finding a nameserver] ... But, I'm just as likely
> to need to fine my SMTP server, POP server, printer server, NFS server
> for my user files, NTP server, HTTP proxy, ...
The difference is, you are likely to ``find'' all those other servers using
symbolic names. Especially when their numeric ``name'' is forty characters
long, you will be inclined to deal with textual hostnames even if you are a
sloppy and artless sysadmin. Therefore, you must find the nameserver before
you go looking for all that other PeeCee Workstation nonsense.
For example, on Unix when I boot diskless boxes I make sure they have a
reslov.conf immediately so I can use hostnames in fstab. They need a
nameserver even before they grab themselves an NFS server for /usr. The
nameserver is different from those other servers you mentioned.
I have seen some vendor Unixes that will even resort to setting their
hostnames from reverse lookup records. Consider:
1) get local IPaddr with address discovery or some built-in IPv6 stuff
2) find nameserver using built-in mysterious clever scheme
3) perform a reverse-lookup to get hostname.domainname. Set the
hostname and the 'search' domainlist.
4) default to well-known CNAME's:
mail.domainname
pop.domainname
time.domainname
Thus, there is a crude way of ``finding'' all these less important services,
even without DHCP, given a way to automatically find a nameserver first.
It isn't a particularly _good_ way, but it isn't a rediculous way either.
It serves to demonstrate the ``specialness'' of the nameserver.
While I lack the knowledge to comment on the worthiness of N. Sayer's
specific scheme, it seems clear to me that giving the nameserver special
treatment compared to other random daemons is a reasonable thing to do.
Not necessarily desireable, but reasonable to a first order. I disagree
with your analogy.
--
Miles Nordin / v:+1 720 841-8308 fax:+1 530 579-8680
555 Bryant Street PMB 182 / Palo Alto, CA 94301-1700 / US
From tsoome@ut.ee Thu May 25 11:55:52 2000
From: tsoome@ut.ee (Toomas Soome)
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 12:55:52 +0200
Subject: IPv6 DNS autoconfiguration?
References:
Message-ID: <392D06B8.13E5F51@ut.ee>
David Gethings wrote:
>
> Unfortunately Nick I don't think it's quite as simple :(
>
> Most people use their ISP's resolvers, so link-local and site-local
> addresses won't be much use.
>
As DNS is "global" naming service, it is not too easy to integrate local
names such as site local or even worse - link local with it. Even if you
have to reconfigure your global names, it's major pain..... We had to
change our domain master server some years ago and it took about week to
get old address to vanish, for example. The problem at client side, I
think, is choosing the right address to make connection with - if host
has severall addresses - ipv4, ipv6 global, site local and link local,
the client resolver must not resolve adresses whicha are clearly not
reachable. I mean, if the target host is from different subnet, the
resolver must not give me link local adress. If the target is from
different site, resolver must not give site local etc. Just now I can
configure my naming service to include all addresses and this will work
as long as all hosts are reachable for all addresses.... but this all is
for resolving names and connecting to host. name registering and related
security is another issue...
toomas
--
HE: Let's end it all, bequeathin' our brains to science.
SHE: What?!? Science got enough trouble with their OWN brains.
-- Walt Kelley
From burgess@mitre.org Thu May 25 14:40:33 2000
From: burgess@mitre.org (David Burgess)
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 08:40:33 -0500
Subject: IPv6 DNS autoconfiguration?
References:
Message-ID: <392D2D51.3ADC8F83@mitre.org>
David Gethings wrote:
>
> Unfortunately Nick I don't think it's quite as simple :(
>
> Most people use their ISP's resolvers, so link-local and site-local
> addresses won't be much use.
>
That is a problem.
> One way around this (and I haven't thought about this *too* hard!) is to get
> the info from the router. Virtually all routers have resolver addresses
> configured into them, so they could pass this config to the hosts on the
> LAN.
>
Since we can (according to the IPv6 hype I've seen) autodiscover
routers, we should be able do something like autodiscovery of name
services the same way. Extending the paradigm to include DNS might
work.
> Even as I typed the above it sounded like a nasty hack rather than a proper
> solution! For one thing its provider dependant.
>
I agree again - this would be something very ISP specific. Symbolic
autodiscovery (suggested in another thread) would be problematic as
well.
One egrgiously bad way to do it would be to start up an 'nmap' style
scan of the local network looking for nameservers, etc. You could
then keep track of the local services you need and press on out from
there.
Of course, DHCP6 would also solve the problem by providing all of that
information. If we could autodiscover a local DHCP6 server, then we
could query it for all of the services we'd be interested in.
From tsoome@ut.ee Thu May 25 17:02:51 2000
From: tsoome@ut.ee (Toomas Soome)
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 18:02:51 +0200
Subject: IPv6 DNS autoconfiguration?
References: <257.959267341@lychee.itojun.org>
Message-ID: <392D4EAB.1CCA07BE@ut.ee>
Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote:
>
> >> Unfortunately Nick I don't think it's quite as simple :(
> >> Most people use their ISP's resolvers, so link-local and site-local
> >> addresses won't be much use.
> >As DNS is "global" naming service, it is not too easy to integrate local
> >names such as site local or even worse - link local with it.
>
> I think distinction has to be made here. Original posting mentioned
> use of link-local/site-local address as DNS server's IPv6 address,
> which will be used by clients to contact DNS servers.
> You are talking about putting scoped address into DNS database.
> They are very different topic (modulo NS record), I believe.
>
oops, I'm sorry, my mistake.
toomas
--
There are two ways to write error-free
programs; only the third one works.
From bound@zk3.dec.com Fri May 26 04:20:07 2000
From: bound@zk3.dec.com (Jim Bound)
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 23:20:07 -0400
Subject: IPv6 DNS autoconfiguration?
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 24 May 2000 15:17:43 PDT."
<200005242217.PAA12155@medusa.kfu.com>
Message-ID: <200005260320.XAA0000724698@anw.zk3.dec.com>
I don't think link-locals or site-locals belong in the DNS.
Today.
But I do agree with global addresses.
/jim
From liuyx@comp.nus.edu.sg Thu May 25 03:04:02 2000
From: liuyx@comp.nus.edu.sg (Liu Yongxiang)
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 10:04:02 +0800 (GMT-8)
Subject: IPv6 DNS autoconfiguration?
In-Reply-To: <200005242217.PAA12155@medusa.kfu.com>
Message-ID:
Good idea indeed.
On Wed, 24 May 2000, Nick Sayer wrote:
> I have some random thoughts for how one could achieve IPv6 DNS
> autoconfiguration, which I regard as the last step before
> plug-n-play networking truly arrives.
>
> One simply needs to fill in the "nameserver" line, really.
> Everything else is optional.
>
> It could be as simple as a recommendation that a particular
> link-local alias (fe80::35?) always either be a name server or
> a redirector. Or perhaps a particular site-local address
> (ff00::35?) ?
>
> ... Or do people envision using a dumbed-down DHCP for this?
> Maybe it's just me, but the ability to define site-local
> aliases so easily makes me think that nothing is gained from
> using DHCP instead of an alias. What does everyone think?
>
From kre@munnari.OZ.AU Thu May 25 03:46:50 2000
From: kre@munnari.OZ.AU (Robert Elz)
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 12:46:50 +1000
Subject: IPv6 DNS autoconfiguration?
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 24 May 2000 15:17:43 MST."
<200005242217.PAA12155@medusa.kfu.com>
Message-ID: <4135.959222810@mundamutti.cs.mu.OZ.AU>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 15:17:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: Nick Sayer
Message-ID: <200005242217.PAA12155@medusa.kfu.com>
| One simply needs to fill in the "nameserver" line, really.
| Everything else is optional.
The nameserver line is optional too - then it defaults to a nameserver
on localhost.
The only difference between this and a hundred other services that need
to be configured (or might) (and OK, perhaps a half dozen...) is that
a nameserver is less frequently actually run on the local host than many
of the others.
But, I'm just as likely to need to fine my SMTP server, POP server,
printer server, NFS server for my user files, NTP server, HTTP proxy, ...
Without having ever actually looked at what is going on out there, I had
always half imagined that it was ssvrloc's job to help find all of these
kinds of things.
DHCP can do it as well, usually at the cost of more configuration (one
can imagine servers registering themselves somehow with svrloc, but not
with dhcp .. but maybe that's just because I know dhcp better). I'm
not sure I'd like to race around defining lots of well known link-local
aliases, and then require routers to be configured to forward them to
the right places (when they're not really local). Actually, it is worse
than that, sending to a link local, I should be using a link local source,
if the actual nameserver is not on the local subnet, but remote, that
can't work at all - the router would need to do very nasty tricks.
kre
From nsayer@quack.kfu.com Wed May 24 23:17:43 2000
From: nsayer@quack.kfu.com (Nick Sayer)
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 15:17:43 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: IPv6 DNS autoconfiguration?
Message-ID: <200005242217.PAA12155@medusa.kfu.com>
I have some random thoughts for how one could achieve IPv6 DNS
autoconfiguration, which I regard as the last step before
plug-n-play networking truly arrives.
One simply needs to fill in the "nameserver" line, really.
Everything else is optional.
It could be as simple as a recommendation that a particular
link-local alias (fe80::35?) always either be a name server or
a redirector. Or perhaps a particular site-local address
(ff00::35?) ?
... Or do people envision using a dumbed-down DHCP for this?
Maybe it's just me, but the ability to define site-local
aliases so easily makes me think that nothing is gained from
using DHCP instead of an alias. What does everyone think?
From danmorg@sc.rr.com Sun May 28 20:22:08 2000
From: danmorg@sc.rr.com (Daniel Morgan)
Date: Sun, 28 May 2000 15:22:08 -0400
Subject: 6to4 tunneling using a cable modem
Message-ID: <393171E0.49B4AED8@sc.rr.com>
I'm interested in learning IPv6, and it seems the best way to learn it
is to use it. Thus, I have several questions about 6to4 tunneling.
Can a home user using a cable modem that only assigns a dynamic IPv4
address be used in 6to4 tunneling? My cable internet is provided by
Road Runner.
What is the easiest operating system to do IPv6 with: FreeBSD, Linux,
Solaris, or Windows NT?
I will assume, for the moment, that Linux is the easiest since so much
code and information is available for it, but you can prove me wrong.
How do I enable 6to4 support in Linux to work with a cable modem?
And I guess the most important question is how do I get a IPv6 address
connected somehow to the 6BONE?
Is there any ISPs willing to provide a IPv6 address to a home user in
the southeastern United States?
Thanks in advance,
Daniel Morgan
danmorg@sc.rr.com
From spark@knoware.nl Sun May 28 21:19:52 2000
From: spark@knoware.nl (Spark)
Date: Sun, 28 May 2000 22:19:52 +0200
Subject: 6to4 tunneling using a cable modem
References: <393171E0.49B4AED8@sc.rr.com>
Message-ID: <39317F68.FE66D010@knoware.nl>
Hi Daniel,
Basically whay you need is just an IP connection to the Internet to setup
your tunnel. So a cable modem should be fine.
I use linux for my hookup to 6bone and it does the job well.
To get a tunnel i suggest to look at www.freenet6.net, they offer tunnels
to individual users and they provide a sample install script to configure
it..
The drawback is that you have to request a new tunnel each time your ip
changes..
Hope this helps..
Greetings,
Hugo
Daniel Morgan wrote:
> I'm interested in learning IPv6, and it seems the best way to learn it
> is to use it. Thus, I have several questions about 6to4 tunneling.
>
> Can a home user using a cable modem that only assigns a dynamic IPv4
> address be used in 6to4 tunneling? My cable internet is provided by
> Road Runner.
>
> What is the easiest operating system to do IPv6 with: FreeBSD, Linux,
> Solaris, or Windows NT?
> I will assume, for the moment, that Linux is the easiest since so much
> code and information is available for it, but you can prove me wrong.
>
> How do I enable 6to4 support in Linux to work with a cable modem?
>
> And I guess the most important question is how do I get a IPv6 address
> connected somehow to the 6BONE?
>
> Is there any ISPs willing to provide a IPv6 address to a home user in
> the southeastern United States?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Daniel Morgan
> danmorg@sc.rr.com
--
Hugo Trippaers
HT2-6BONE
spark@knoware.nl
From mbomar1@midsouth.rr.com Sun May 28 23:41:35 2000
From: mbomar1@midsouth.rr.com (Matt Bomar)
Date: Sun, 28 May 2000 17:41:35 -0500
Subject: 6to4 tunneling using a cable modem
References: <393171E0.49B4AED8@sc.rr.com>
Message-ID: <008101bfc8f5$e0f94b00$0200a8c0@nt5matt.coredatalogic.com>
I'm currently running IPv6 over Road Runner with Windows2000 and it works
fine.
Matt
mbomar1@midsouth.rr.com
rrtech@midsouth.rr.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Morgan"
To: <6bone@ISI.EDU>
Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2000 2:22 PM
Subject: 6to4 tunneling using a cable modem
> I'm interested in learning IPv6, and it seems the best way to learn it
> is to use it. Thus, I have several questions about 6to4 tunneling.
>
> Can a home user using a cable modem that only assigns a dynamic IPv4
> address be used in 6to4 tunneling? My cable internet is provided by
> Road Runner.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Daniel Morgan
> danmorg@sc.rr.com
From pilot0920@sina.com Mon May 29 15:51:50 2000
From: pilot0920@sina.com (pilot0920)
Date: Mon May 29 08:51:50 CST 2000
Subject: No subject
Message-ID: <20000529005150.9323.qmail@sina.com>
I'm interested in learning IPv6, and it seems the best way to learn it
is to use it. Thus, I have several questions about 6to4 tunneling.
Can a home user using a cable modem that only assigns a dynamic IPv4
address be used in 6to4 tunneling? My cable internet is provided by
Road Runner.
What is the easiest operating system to do IPv6 with: FreeBSD, Linux,
Solaris, or Windows NT?
I will assume, for the moment, that Linux is the easiest since so much
code and information is available for it, but you can prove me wrong.
How do I enable 6to4 support in Linux to work with a cable modem?
And I guess the most important question is how do I get a IPv6 address
connected somehow to the 6BONE?
______________________________________
===================================================================
ÐÂÀËÃâ·Ñµç×ÓÓÊÏä http://mail.sina.com.cn
²Î¼ÓCNNICÓн±µ÷²é£¬ÉêÇëÊ®¼ÑÍøÕ¾ÆÀѡͶƱȨ http://fsurvey.cnnic.net.cn/survey/index.html
From KFoster@C1Communications.com Mon May 29 02:43:34 2000
From: KFoster@C1Communications.com (Foster, Kristopher)
Date: Sun, 28 May 2000 21:43:34 -0400
Subject: IPv6 over IPv4 tunnels in IOS
Message-ID:
I have been searching for tunneling examples on the Cisco platform. So far
my attempts at configuring our tunnel have not been successful, any help
would be appreciated.
Sincerely,
Kristopher K. Foster
Technologist
C1 Communications
http://www.c1communications.com
office: 905/814-3320
cell: 416/728-2763
From Stefan.Gasteiger@Gendorf.de Mon May 29 06:08:39 2000
From: Stefan.Gasteiger@Gendorf.de (Stefan.Gasteiger@Gendorf.de)
Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 07:08:39 +0200
Subject: IPv6 over IPv4 tunnels in IOS
Message-ID: <4185051FE012D411A98B0008C7337A2E6516D7@atlantis.gendorf.hoechst.com>
Hi Kristopher,
Here's an example configuration with some bgp peerings.
It would be better to use a loopback interface as
tunnel source, so that the tunnel would still be
up, when the ethernet's down.
I'm also not sure, if the prefix-lists are
the best thing to do (le 128).
Comments are welcome!
<---snipp--->
version 12.0
service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
service password-encryption
!
hostname 6bone
!
enable secret 5 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
!
!
!
!
!
ip subnet-zero
ip domain-name gendorf.net
ip name-server 212.68.96.75
!
!
!
interface Tunnel0
description Tunnel to JOIN (www.join.uni-muenster.de)
no ip address
no ip directed-broadcast
ipv6 address 3FFE:401:0:1::5:2/112
tunnel source Ethernet0
tunnel destination 128.176.191.66
tunnel mode ipv6ip
!
interface Tunnel1
description Tunnel to regio.net
no ip address
no ip directed-broadcast
ipv6 address 3FFE:3500:100::11/126
tunnel source Ethernet0
tunnel destination 212.218.0.9
tunnel mode ipv6ip
!
interface Tunnel2
description Tunnel zur Uni Erlangen
(erich.meier@informatik.uni-erlangen.de)
no ip address
no ip directed-broadcast
ipv6 address 3FFE:400:50:200::2:2/112
tunnel source Ethernet0
tunnel destination 131.188.34.2
tunnel mode ipv6ip
!
interface Tunnel3
description Tunnel zur Uni Leipzig (toenjes@informatik.uni-leipzig.de)
no ip address
no ip directed-broadcast
ipv6 address 3FFE:400:280:F001::1A/126
tunnel source Ethernet0
tunnel destination 139.18.38.71
tunnel mode ipv6ip
!
interface Tunnel4
description Tunnel zu Fibertel (platini@fibertel.com.ar)
no ip address
no ip directed-broadcast
ipv6 address 3FFE:3800::A:2/112
tunnel source Ethernet0
tunnel destination 24.232.1.5
tunnel mode ipv6ip
!
interface Ethernet0
ip address 212.68.96.114 255.255.255.252
no ip directed-broadcast
media-type 10BaseT
ipv6 address 3FFE:400:3B0::CFF:EE1A:AB19/80
!
interface Ethernet1
no ip address
no ip directed-broadcast
shutdown
!
router bgp 12853
no synchronization
bgp dampening
neighbor 3FFE:400:50:200::2:1 remote-as 1275
no neighbor 3FFE:400:50:200::2:1 activate
neighbor 3FFE:400:280:F001::19 remote-as 1275
no neighbor 3FFE:400:280:F001::19 activate
neighbor 3FFE:401:0:1::5:1 remote-as 1275
no neighbor 3FFE:401:0:1::5:1 activate
neighbor 3FFE:3500:100::10 remote-as 8319
no neighbor 3FFE:3500:100::10 activate
neighbor 3FFE:3800::A:1 remote-as 10318
no neighbor 3FFE:3800::A:1 activate
!
address-family ipv6
neighbor 3FFE:400:50:200::2:1 activate
neighbor 3FFE:400:50:200::2:1 override-capability-neg
neighbor 3FFE:400:50:200::2:1 prefix-list JOIN in
neighbor 3FFE:400:50:200::2:1 prefix-list erlangen-out out
neighbor 3FFE:400:280:F001::19 activate
neighbor 3FFE:400:280:F001::19 override-capability-neg
neighbor 3FFE:400:280:F001::19 prefix-list JOIN in
neighbor 3FFE:400:280:F001::19 prefix-list leipzig-out out
neighbor 3FFE:401:0:1::5:1 activate
neighbor 3FFE:401:0:1::5:1 override-capability-neg
neighbor 3FFE:401:0:1::5:1 prefix-list FULL in
neighbor 3FFE:401:0:1::5:1 prefix-list join-out out
neighbor 3FFE:3500:100::10 activate
neighbor 3FFE:3500:100::10 override-capability-neg
neighbor 3FFE:3500:100::10 prefix-list FULL in
neighbor 3FFE:3500:100::10 prefix-list regio-out out
neighbor 3FFE:3800::A:1 activate
neighbor 3FFE:3800::A:1 override-capability-neg
neighbor 3FFE:3800::A:1 prefix-list FULL in
neighbor 3FFE:3800::A:1 prefix-list fibertel-out out
network 3FFE:400:3B0::/48
network 3FFE:3500:100::/48
aggregate-address 3FFE:400:3B0::/48
aggregate-address 3FFE:3500:100::/48
exit-address-family
!
ip default-gateway 212.68.96.113
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 212.68.96.113
no ip http server
!
!
ip prefix-list FULL seq 5 permit 3FFE::/16 le 128
ip prefix-list FULL seq 10 permit 2001::/16 le 128
ip prefix-list FULL seq 15 permit 2002::/16 le 128
!
ip prefix-list JOIN seq 5 permit 3FFE:400::/24 le 128
!
ip prefix-list erlangen-out seq 5 permit 3FFE:400:3B0::/48 le 128
ip prefix-list erlangen-out seq 10 permit 3FFE:3500:100::/48 le 128
ip prefix-list erlangen-out seq 15 permit 3FFE:400:180::/48 le 128
ip prefix-list erlangen-out seq 20 permit 3FFE:400:280::/48 le 128
!
ip prefix-list fibertel-out seq 5 deny ::/0 le 128
!
ip prefix-list join-out seq 5 permit 3FFE:400:50::/48 le 128
ip prefix-list join-out seq 10 permit 3FFE:400:180::/48 le 128
ip prefix-list join-out seq 15 permit 3FFE:400:280::/48 le 128
ip prefix-list join-out seq 20 permit 3FFE:400:3B0::/48 le 128
!
ip prefix-list leipzig-out seq 5 permit 3FFE:400:3B0::/48 le 128
ip prefix-list leipzig-out seq 10 permit 3FFE:3500:100::/48 le 128
ip prefix-list leipzig-out seq 15 permit 3FFE:400:50::/48 le 128
!
ip prefix-list regio-out seq 5 permit 3FFE:3500:100::/48 le 128
!
!
line con 0
transport input none
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
password 7 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
login
!
end
<---snipp--->
Kind regards,
Stefan Gasteiger
SG5599-RIPE
I+K Betrieb (zertifiziert nach DIN EN ISO 9001)
InfraServ Gendorf
Tel.: +49 8679 7 5599
Fax: +49 8679 7 39 5599
Mobiltel.: +49 172 8649205
E-Mail: Stefan.Gasteiger@gendorf.de
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Foster, Kristopher [mailto:KFoster@C1Communications.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 29, 2000 3:44 AM
> To: '6bone@isi.edu'
> Subject: IPv6 over IPv4 tunnels in IOS
>
>
> I have been searching for tunneling examples on the Cisco
> platform. So far
> my attempts at configuring our tunnel have not been
> successful, any help
> would be appreciated.
>
> Sincerely,
> Kristopher K. Foster
> Technologist
> C1 Communications
> http://www.c1communications.com
> office: 905/814-3320
> cell: 416/728-2763
>
From cnebody@mindspring.com Mon May 29 20:34:15 2000
From: cnebody@mindspring.com (Joel Barrett)
Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 15:34:15 -0400
Subject: IPv6 over IPv4 tunnels in IOS
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
You can check out the Cisco IPv6 website at
http://www.cisco.com/go/ipv6
While I found no specific configurations, there is quite a bit of good
information available there, plus the IOS software for the routers. The
current IOS implementation is based on IOS 12.1 and includes support for the
following functionality:
* RIPv6
* BGP4+ for IPv6
* IPv6 Static Routes
* EUI-64 Addressing
* Traffic Filtering
* IPv4 <---> IPv6 Address Translation
* Automatic and Static Tunnels
* Neighbour Discovery
* IPv6 over Ethernet, FDDI, Cisco HDLC and ATM PVCs.
* Dual Stack support for Telnet, DNS and TFTP.
* ICMPv6 and Ping
* Traceroute and Debug Command
I also found a decent IPv6 config example at
http://www.ipv6.surfnet.nl/sheets/100.html
Joel Barrett
--
Joel W. Barrett, Systems Engineer
Service Provider Channel
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
500 Northridge Rd., Suite 800
Atlanta, GA 30350
Email: joel.barrett@cisco.com
Email pager: jbarrett3@bellsouthips.com
Cell : (678)640-0634 (primary phone)
Vmail: (678)352-2753
Pager: (800)365-4578
Web : http://www.cisco.com
"Empowering the Internet Generation"
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-6bone@ISI.EDU [mailto:owner-6bone@ISI.EDU]On Behalf Of
Foster, Kristopher
Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2000 9:44 PM
To: '6bone@isi.edu'
Subject: IPv6 over IPv4 tunnels in IOS
I have been searching for tunneling examples on the Cisco platform. So far
my attempts at configuring our tunnel have not been successful, any help
would be appreciated.
Sincerely,
Kristopher K. Foster
Technologist
C1 Communications
http://www.c1communications.com
office: 905/814-3320
cell: 416/728-2763
From carton@Ivy.NET Tue May 30 00:24:28 2000
From: carton@Ivy.NET (Miles Nordin)
Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 17:24:28 -0600
Subject: How to make IPv6 work with Cabel Modemz
In-Reply-To: <20000529005150.9323.qmail@sina.com>; from pilot0920@sina.com on Mon, May 29, 2000 at 04:03:24AM +0000
References: <20000529005150.9323.qmail@sina.com>
Message-ID: <20000529172428.A28604@casey.Ivy.NET>
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 04:03:24AM +0000, pilot0920 wrote:
> What is the easiest operating system to do IPv6 with: FreeBSD, Linux,
> Solaris, or Windows NT?
I'm afraid this will degenerate into the usual Mac-vs-PeeCee style of
useless war, but that's never stopped me before.
One problem with making these (IMHO, rather important) evaluations is that
they change from month to month as each project grows in the direction of
their various goals. I get the impression that FreeBSD in particular
has made a lot of recent progress.
That said, from watching this list and keeping my eyes open for the last
few years, I absolutely cannot recommend working with any experimental
Linux feature. The project is too disorganized, poorly supported, and
overburdened with people who ask silly questions on high-traffic mailing
lists without reading any documentation first.
Your best bet if you want an IPv6 Linux machine is to keep your eyes open
at your local CompUSA for a box from RedHat or Corel or Caldera or
something that says, ``New, Improved, now with IPv6 built in!'' in
gigantic red shaking text next to a grinning stoned penguin. Buy the
box, tear off the shrinkwrap, and read the 10-page installation
manual. If you have any further questions, post immediately to your
manufacturer's mailing list and request a private reply--there's no
need to subscribe, because Linux support is excellent. The Linux
community includes a band of enthusiastic knowledgeable ``volunteers''
who are happy to answer _all_ your questions.
However, until CompUSA starts selling such a box, things are a little more
difficult. You can make them easier on yourself by avoiding Linux for now.
NetBSD is a good and all-too-often gratuitously overlooked choice. Their
integration of the KAME code is the oldest, and is not surprisingly very,
very complete. The project is lucky enough to include a few particular
developers who have kept up a long-term commitment to get things resolved
quickly and cleanly, and their progress has amazed me.
I remember a certain Bay Networks wireless driver that got IPv6-corrected
literally the day after it was integrated to -current, thus giving the
NetBSDers at the IETF conference a working wireless IPv6 to show all
their colleagues. :)
Most of the NetBSD packages collection is IPv6-enabled as well. :'
I don't even have IPv6 enabled on my system, yet:
casey:~/work$ uname -a
NetBSD casey 1.4X NetBSD 1.4X (CASEY) #8: Mon Apr 10 17:18:02 MDT 2000 carton@casey:/scratch/src/sys/arch/sparc/compile/CASEY sparc
casey:~/work$ telnet ::1
Trying ::1...
Connected to ::1.
Escape character is '^]'.
[...]
This has worked for a very long time. :)
> Linux is the easiest since so much code and information is available for it,
I have not attempted a Linux set-up. However, I would advise against this
path, and also this reasoning. First, why not the Linux path? Linux's
integration of IPv6 is recent, incomplete, and spottily-maintained. Not so
much for lack of effort, but just because it's really difficult to move
in a consistent direction on that project without the active involvement of
Linus or one of the wealthier distributions (meaning, RedHat). NetBSD (and
FreeBSD) offers a complete IPv6-aware installation out of the box. With
Linux, you need to tweak kernel parameters and integrate FreeSWAN code, all
the while working against maintainers like Linus and distributors like
RedHat who have higher priorities than integrating IPv6.
n.b. a recent posting on this list, that the IPv6 module for Linux does not
export/import the proper symbols, and therefore has to be statically linked
into the kernel. That alone would be a problem not even worth mentioning,
except that IPv6 was _offered_ to you as a module, so you have to stumble
around and figure out w.t.f. is wrong, and the brokenness changes from one
week to the next. In my experience, this is typical. BSD -current has far
fewer of these problems, and that's probably just the tip of the iceburg.
ex., ``What about Apache-v6? any one got an RPM?'' On BSD, already done.
Intuitively, it's best to get a ``distro,'' as those crazy Linux kids
keep calling it, with IPv6 built in. That means BSD.
Now, on to the reasoning that led you to Linux in the first place. Your
assumption that volume == quality is a dangerous one. One might
convincingly argue that
(a) you do not need ``much code.'' You need ``enough code.'' Given that
Implementation X, Y, and Z all work and are complete, the one with
the least code is likely to be nicer to use, configure, improve, u.s.w.
(b) the reason you can count the amount of code available for Linux is that
Linux has not integrated said code. You do not count the size of KAME
on *BSD because it's already rolled into the OS. The fact that you have
an ``amount of code'' to quantify is a bad sign.
(c) Often I've found that the reason Linux has so much documentation is that
it is rife with special cases, difficult to configure, varies
tremendously from one installation to the next. Sometimes, the
documentation is even sloppily-written ``HOWTO'' style script-kiddie
documentation littered with the second person pronouns and ``okay,
like...'' if not with 3's 1's ph's and z's. see
http://crackmonkey.org/faq.html#ANSWER26
for a continuation of my hyperbole.
I would not deny that Linux's documentation is among its greatest
strengths. For example, Linux books have basically taken over my
local bookstore. But, you should at least be aware of an alternate
perspective.
Note that the VAX and the AS/400 come with a lot of documentation,
too. Once again, personally I prefer brief, consistent, and helpful,
over long, whimsical, and condescending.
> but you can prove me wrong.
no, I can't. It's not _that_ unambiguous. I've told you what I know and
what I think, and that's all I can do.
If you're persistent, I'm sure you can get whatever system you want to
work. You may have other issues, like for example you may know Linux
better than you know any other Unix, or you may just plain like it. But,
you asked, ``which is easiest.'' I've told you what I think is easiest.
> How do I enable 6to4 support in Linux to work with a cable modem?
We could really use a list archive or something--is anyone keeping one?
Anyway, people ask your question at least three times a week, so please
don't take this personally, but...
Generally you can't get answers on this list unless you ask a question
that proves you've already done some reading. The best answer you'll get
to the question above is:
see http://www.freenet6.net and http://www.6bone.org.
I always feel bad saying that, because I'm not sure how you managed to find
this list without finding the web sites and their documentation first. But,
there's nothing for it: start reading and get to work. Good luck!
--
Miles Nordin / v:+1 720 841-8308 fax:+1 530 579-8680
555 Bryant Street PMB 182 / Palo Alto, CA 94301-1700 / US
From NGARCIA@teldat.es Tue May 30 12:35:21 2000
From: NGARCIA@teldat.es (Noelia Garcia)
Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 13:35:21 +0200
Subject: No subject
Message-ID: <41FAD0CB3B6BD3118BE600C04F43DB202D7979@CORREO>
I am looking for an Ipv6 Traffic Generator for Windows NT. I have probed
with Network Monitor V.400.351 an Sniffer Pro Version 2.50.07 but my
attempts have not been successful, any help would be appreciated.
Thanks.
Noelia
From NGARCIA@teldat.es Tue May 30 12:40:52 2000
From: NGARCIA@teldat.es (Noelia Garcia)
Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 13:40:52 +0200
Subject: ipv6 Traffic Generator(more than 100 packets per second)
Message-ID: <41FAD0CB3B6BD3118BE600C04F43DB202D7982@CORREO>
I am looking for an Ipv6 Traffic Generator for Windows NT that lets me send
more than 100 packets per second. I have probed with Network Monitor
V.400.351 an Sniffer Pro Version 2.50.07 but my attempts have not been
successful, any help would be appreciated.
Thanks.
From brian@hursley.ibm.com Tue May 30 13:54:16 2000
From: brian@hursley.ibm.com (Brian E Carpenter)
Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 07:54:16 -0500
Subject: 6to4 tunneling using a cable modem
References: <393171E0.49B4AED8@sc.rr.com> <39317F68.FE66D010@knoware.nl>
Message-ID: <3933B9F8.824FA16D@hursley.ibm.com>
Right. I don't think 6to4 has any special advantage if your IPv4 address is dynamic.
Better to find a tunnel broker.
Brian
Spark wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Basically whay you need is just an IP connection to the Internet to setup
> your tunnel. So a cable modem should be fine.
>
> I use linux for my hookup to 6bone and it does the job well.
>
> To get a tunnel i suggest to look at www.freenet6.net, they offer tunnels
> to individual users and they provide a sample install script to configure
> it..
>
> The drawback is that you have to request a new tunnel each time your ip
> changes..
>
> Hope this helps..
>
> Greetings,
>
> Hugo
>
> Daniel Morgan wrote:
>
> > I'm interested in learning IPv6, and it seems the best way to learn it
> > is to use it. Thus, I have several questions about 6to4 tunneling.
> >
> > Can a home user using a cable modem that only assigns a dynamic IPv4
> > address be used in 6to4 tunneling? My cable internet is provided by
> > Road Runner.
> >
> > What is the easiest operating system to do IPv6 with: FreeBSD, Linux,
> > Solaris, or Windows NT?
> > I will assume, for the moment, that Linux is the easiest since so much
> > code and information is available for it, but you can prove me wrong.
> >
> > How do I enable 6to4 support in Linux to work with a cable modem?
> >
> > And I guess the most important question is how do I get a IPv6 address
> > connected somehow to the 6BONE?
> >
> > Is there any ISPs willing to provide a IPv6 address to a home user in
> > the southeastern United States?
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Daniel Morgan
> > danmorg@sc.rr.com
>
> --
> Hugo Trippaers
> HT2-6BONE
> spark@knoware.nl
From Robbie_harrell@INS.COM Tue May 30 17:11:29 2000
From: Robbie_harrell@INS.COM (Robbie_harrell@INS.COM)
Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 11:11:29 -0500
Subject: No subject
Message-ID: <00d901bfca51$b6af0b70$bd59a4d0@ins.com>
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_00D6_01BFCA27.CDB74AA0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
help
------=_NextPart_000_00D6_01BFCA27.CDB74AA0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
help
------=_NextPart_000_00D6_01BFCA27.CDB74AA0--
From richdr@microsoft.com Tue May 30 19:02:06 2000
From: richdr@microsoft.com (Richard Draves)
Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 11:02:06 -0700
Subject: 6to4 tunneling using a cable modem
Message-ID: <4D0A23B3F74DD111ACCD00805F31D81023D26FFA@RED-MSG-50>
The advantage of using 6to4 is that when your IPv4 address changes, you
don't have to contact a tunnel broker to change your tunnel. You make all
the required configuration changes locally. The disadvantage of using 6to4
in this situation is that your IPv6 prefix changes so you have to renumber.
Rich
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian@hursley.ibm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2000 5:54 AM
> To: Spark
> Cc: Daniel Morgan; 6bone@ISI.EDU
> Subject: Re: 6to4 tunneling using a cable modem
>
>
> Right. I don't think 6to4 has any special advantage if your
> IPv4 address is dynamic.
> Better to find a tunnel broker.
>
> Brian
>
> Spark wrote:
> >
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > Basically whay you need is just an IP connection to the
> Internet to setup
> > your tunnel. So a cable modem should be fine.
> >
> > I use linux for my hookup to 6bone and it does the job well.
> >
> > To get a tunnel i suggest to look at www.freenet6.net, they
> offer tunnels
> > to individual users and they provide a sample install
> script to configure
> > it..
> >
> > The drawback is that you have to request a new tunnel each
> time your ip
> > changes..
> >
> > Hope this helps..
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Hugo
> >
> > Daniel Morgan wrote:
> >
> > > I'm interested in learning IPv6, and it seems the best
> way to learn it
> > > is to use it. Thus, I have several questions about 6to4
> tunneling.
> > >
> > > Can a home user using a cable modem that only assigns a
> dynamic IPv4
> > > address be used in 6to4 tunneling? My cable internet is
> provided by
> > > Road Runner.
> > >
> > > What is the easiest operating system to do IPv6 with:
> FreeBSD, Linux,
> > > Solaris, or Windows NT?
> > > I will assume, for the moment, that Linux is the easiest
> since so much
> > > code and information is available for it, but you can
> prove me wrong.
> > >
> > > How do I enable 6to4 support in Linux to work with a cable modem?
> > >
> > > And I guess the most important question is how do I get a
> IPv6 address
> > > connected somehow to the 6BONE?
> > >
> > > Is there any ISPs willing to provide a IPv6 address to a
> home user in
> > > the southeastern United States?
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance,
> > > Daniel Morgan
> > > danmorg@sc.rr.com
> >
> > --
> > Hugo Trippaers
> > HT2-6BONE
> > spark@knoware.nl
>
From brian@hursley.ibm.com Tue May 30 20:41:18 2000
From: brian@hursley.ibm.com (Brian E Carpenter)
Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 14:41:18 -0500
Subject: 6to4 tunneling using a cable modem
References: <4D0A23B3F74DD111ACCD00805F31D81023D26FFA@RED-MSG-50>
Message-ID: <3934195E.F6456476@hursley.ibm.com>
Exactly. You could write a script to set up the IPv6 tunnel each time you
connected via IPv4, but your IPv6 DNS entry would be permanent.
6to4 was not designed for this situation.
Brian
Richard Draves wrote:
>
> The advantage of using 6to4 is that when your IPv4 address changes, you
> don't have to contact a tunnel broker to change your tunnel. You make all
> the required configuration changes locally. The disadvantage of using 6to4
> in this situation is that your IPv6 prefix changes so you have to renumber.
>
> Rich
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian@hursley.ibm.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2000 5:54 AM
> > To: Spark
> > Cc: Daniel Morgan; 6bone@ISI.EDU
> > Subject: Re: 6to4 tunneling using a cable modem
> >
> >
> > Right. I don't think 6to4 has any special advantage if your
> > IPv4 address is dynamic.
> > Better to find a tunnel broker.
> >
> > Brian
> >
> > Spark wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Daniel,
> > >
> > > Basically whay you need is just an IP connection to the
> > Internet to setup
> > > your tunnel. So a cable modem should be fine.
> > >
> > > I use linux for my hookup to 6bone and it does the job well.
> > >
> > > To get a tunnel i suggest to look at www.freenet6.net, they
> > offer tunnels
> > > to individual users and they provide a sample install
> > script to configure
> > > it..
> > >
> > > The drawback is that you have to request a new tunnel each
> > time your ip
> > > changes..
> > >
> > > Hope this helps..
> > >
> > > Greetings,
> > >
> > > Hugo
> > >
> > > Daniel Morgan wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm interested in learning IPv6, and it seems the best
> > way to learn it
> > > > is to use it. Thus, I have several questions about 6to4
> > tunneling.
> > > >
> > > > Can a home user using a cable modem that only assigns a
> > dynamic IPv4
> > > > address be used in 6to4 tunneling? My cable internet is
> > provided by
> > > > Road Runner.
> > > >
> > > > What is the easiest operating system to do IPv6 with:
> > FreeBSD, Linux,
> > > > Solaris, or Windows NT?
> > > > I will assume, for the moment, that Linux is the easiest
> > since so much
> > > > code and information is available for it, but you can
> > prove me wrong.
> > > >
> > > > How do I enable 6to4 support in Linux to work with a cable modem?
> > > >
> > > > And I guess the most important question is how do I get a
> > IPv6 address
> > > > connected somehow to the 6BONE?
> > > >
> > > > Is there any ISPs willing to provide a IPv6 address to a
> > home user in
> > > > the southeastern United States?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance,
> > > > Daniel Morgan
> > > > danmorg@sc.rr.com
> > >
> > > --
> > > Hugo Trippaers
> > > HT2-6BONE
> > > spark@knoware.nl
> >
From jim@thehousleys.net Tue May 30 22:15:01 2000
From: jim@thehousleys.net (James Housley)
Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 17:15:01 -0400
Subject:
References: <00d901bfca51$b6af0b70$bd59a4d0@ins.com>
Message-ID: <39342F55.9AA755DD@thehousleys.net>
> Robbie_harrell@INS.COM wrote:
>
> help
A little more details might help us help :-).
Jim
--
Studies show that 1 out of every 4 Americans suffer some form of
mental illness. So look at your three best friends, if they
are okay it is YOU!