Question about the future

[Matej Sustic]

No, he mislead nobody. The misunderstanding came from poor READING of his
message (I've misread it as well, but went back and I am willing to admit MY
mistake).

Just my $0.02

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Bunclark [mailto:psb@ast.cam.ac.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 2:05 AM
To: Aaron Angel
Cc: Latif LADID; 6bone@ISI.EDU
Subject: Re: Question about the future 




On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, Aaron Angel wrote:

> For the 'record', I'd like to point out he mislead no one.  He stated
> quite
> clearly in the first sentect he was a director of delevelopment for one of
> the TCP/IP stacks for IBM mainframes; he did not say he was directly from
> IBM.
> 
> -- 
> Aaron Angel <aangel@haknich.ugc.net>

On the contrary, he mislead many of us by very poor use of language. The
most misleading part was, he should have asked IBM first before this
mailing list; the wording implied very strongly, and now we know
incorrectly, that IBM weren't yet developing IPv6.  And I think we might
be forgiven for assuming that the `director of development for one of the
TCP/IP stacks for IBM mainframes' probably did work for IBM.

Peter.