Tunnels...

[Jason]

Correct, I am planning on (Actually I am), dishing 2 tunnels out to other
sites.

I emailed Merit and asked for a transit pLNA so we'll see.

Jason

---
Jason Slagle - CCNA - CCDA
Network Administrator - Toledo Internet Access - Toledo Ohio
- raistlin@tacorp.net - jslagle@toledolink.com - WHOIS JS10172

On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, Bob Fink wrote:

> At 03:57 PM 2/14/2000 -0500, Greg Maxwell wrote:
> >On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, Bob Fink wrote:
> >
> > > Jason,
> > >
> > > At 10:39 PM 2/13/2000 -0500, Jason wrote:
> > > >Is it acceptable for me to dish out tunnels as an end site, and if I do
> > > >this, should I document them with tunnel attributes.
> > >
> > > If you are a pNLA end-site (versue a transit) with a /48 then the only
> > > tunnels would be for parts of your own network, i.e., some other SLA ID.
> >
> >Since only my home is on the 6bone right now (as opposed to my work), I'm
> >not reall one to comment here but...
> >
> >I don't agree, what about peering? Even end-sites can peer with other end
> >sites to exchange traffic among themselves. This is useful in the face of
> >v6-in-v4 tunnels causing very unoptimim paths between end-sites. This is
> >also useful when they are IPv4 peers in 'real life'/
> 
> 
> I agree with you. I was assuming the other use for delegation as he said 
> dish out, not peer.
> 
> Bob
>