From yjchui@ms.chttl.com.tw Wed Aug 9 04:52:23 2000 From: yjchui@ms.chttl.com.tw (Yann-Ju Chu) Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2000 11:52:23 +0800 Subject: 6to4 question Message-ID: <3990D577.CC47DECA@ms.chttl.com.tw> I have been trying the 6to4 protocol and studying the related documents. In the draft "draft-ietf-ngtrans-6to4-06.txt", there is description as the following: On its native IPv6 interface, the relay router MUST advertise a route to 2002::/16. It MUST NOT advertise a longer 2002:: routing prefix on that interface. I have doubt about this. Why can we have two relay routers in the same domain advertisng different LONGER prefixes such as 2002:ca27:9d8e::/48 and 2002:ca27:9d8f::/48 respectively? Then, different relay routers can be used for different 2002::/48 to connect 6o4 site and pure IPv6 site. Thanks -- --------------------------------- Yann-Ju Chu Telecommunication Laboratories ChungHwa Telecom Co., Ltd. TEL: +886 3 424-5681 FAX: +886 3 424-4888 http://www.chttl.com.tw --------------------------------- From Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr Wed Aug 9 09:17:00 2000 From: Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr (Francis Dupont) Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2000 10:17:00 +0200 Subject: 6to4 question In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 09 Aug 2000 11:52:23 +0800. <3990D577.CC47DECA@ms.chttl.com.tw> Message-ID: <200008090817.KAA17236@givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr> In your previous mail you wrote: I have been trying the 6to4 protocol and studying the related documents. In the draft "draft-ietf-ngtrans-6to4-06.txt", there is description as the following: On its native IPv6 interface, the relay router MUST advertise a route to 2002::/16. It MUST NOT advertise a longer 2002:: routing prefix on that interface. I have doubt about this. => I have no doubt about this because we DON'T want to have the whole IPv4 routing table injected into 2002:xx:yy::/48 stuff... Whether the MUST NOT is enough is another question (I don't think so then I proposed to swap the bytes of the embedded IPv4 address in 6to4 prefixes in order to make this impossible. Perhaps I was/am too pessimistic... We'll see). Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr From brian@hursley.ibm.com Wed Aug 9 15:08:25 2000 From: brian@hursley.ibm.com (Brian E Carpenter) Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2000 09:08:25 -0500 Subject: 6to4 question References: <200008090817.KAA17236@givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr> Message-ID: <399165D9.B856C72A@hursley.ibm.com> Well, the 6to4 specification is written to forbid any possibility of injecting the IPv4 routing table into the IPv6 routing table. As Francis says, people think this would be evil. With today's routers, they would most likely run out of memory and CPU. (Remember that an IPv6 route entry is ~4 times bigger.) So the answer is: you could do it, and it would probably work for a few cases, but you MUST NOT. Brian Francis Dupont wrote: > > In your previous mail you wrote: > > I have been trying the 6to4 protocol and studying the related documents. > > In the draft "draft-ietf-ngtrans-6to4-06.txt", there is description as > the following: > > On its native IPv6 interface, the relay router MUST > advertise a route > to 2002::/16. It MUST NOT advertise a longer 2002:: routing > prefix on > that interface. > > I have doubt about this. > > => I have no doubt about this because we DON'T want to have the > whole IPv4 routing table injected into 2002:xx:yy::/48 stuff... > Whether the MUST NOT is enough is another question (I don't think so > then I proposed to swap the bytes of the embedded IPv4 address in > 6to4 prefixes in order to make this impossible. Perhaps I was/am > too pessimistic... We'll see). > > Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr From wmaton@ryouko.dgim.crc.ca Thu Aug 10 00:17:53 2000 From: wmaton@ryouko.dgim.crc.ca (William F. Maton) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2000 19:17:53 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Testing an IPv6 web site - guinea pigs wanted Message-ID: Greetings I've got me a copy of apache 1.3.12, patched to use IPv6. This patch, in part, comes out of the work originally done by itojun, further patches coming from the Polish linux distrib. and ultimately from the Debian folk. The system is running linux kernel version 2.2.16 with glibc 2.1.3. To enhance browsing pleasure (this is all I could come up with for web content at short notice), the following URL's are available for testing: http://stats.ipv6.crc.ca/cgi-bin/j-e and http://stats.ipv6.crc.ca/cgi-bin/wwwjdic Let me know if it works, and feel free to pound the site with prototype spiders and such. tia! wfms P.S. No, I don't have an IPv6 browser, I'm behind a firewall, and use a squid proxy for web access. I know, I know.... (lftp seems to shown it to work though). From john@kspu.kr.ua Fri Aug 11 18:15:02 2000 From: john@kspu.kr.ua (John Savitsky) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 20:15:02 +0300 Subject: Question about the future In-Reply-To: <200006131633.MAA0000009573@yquarry.zk3.dec.com>; from bound@zk3.dec.com on Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 12:33:29PM -0400 References: <39465173.A647C47C@hursley.ibm.com> <200006131633.MAA0000009573@yquarry.zk3.dec.com> Message-ID: <20000811201502.A27043@kspu.kr.ua> On Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 12:33:29PM -0400, Jim Bound wrote: > Brian, > > I think we should track down the author of this mail and make a federal > case out of it? This is unacceptable to IBM or any company. I am > appalled by such behavior. > > That mail could have leaked to a critical account situation in the IBM > field and had a negative impact on IBM. I consider such bogus mail > criminal. And it should be dealt with as such. Oh-oh-oh! > regards, > /jim ... ×ÏÎÉ ÛÕËÁÀÔØ ÔÅ, ÞÏÇÏ ÎÅÍÁ, ÝÏ ÄÏ×ÅÓÔÉ ÝÏ ÊÏÇÏ ÎÅ ¦ÓÎÕ¤. -- Sincerely yours, John Savitsky DE UR5VIB From brian@hursley.ibm.com Fri Aug 11 19:17:36 2000 From: brian@hursley.ibm.com (Brian E Carpenter) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 13:17:36 -0500 Subject: Question about the future References: <39465173.A647C47C@hursley.ibm.com> <200006131633.MAA0000009573@yquarry.zk3.dec.com> <20000811201502.A27043@kspu.kr.ua> Message-ID: <39944340.A13F7501@hursley.ibm.com> John, This was two months ago, was due to some level of misunderstanding and/or miscommunication, and was dealt with appropriately at the time. Brian John Savitsky wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 12:33:29PM -0400, Jim Bound wrote: > > Brian, > > > > I think we should track down the author of this mail and make a federal > > case out of it? This is unacceptable to IBM or any company. I am > > appalled by such behavior. > > > > That mail could have leaked to a critical account situation in the IBM > > field and had a negative impact on IBM. I consider such bogus mail > > criminal. And it should be dealt with as such. > > Oh-oh-oh! > > > regards, > > /jim > > ... ×ÏÎÉ ÛÕËÁÀÔØ ÔÅ, ÞÏÇÏ ÎÅÍÁ, ÝÏ ÄÏ×ÅÓÔÉ ÝÏ ÊÏÇÏ ÎÅ ¦ÓÎÕ¤. > -- > Sincerely yours, John Savitsky DE UR5VIB From Giuliano Peritore Sun Aug 13 16:43:20 2000 From: Giuliano Peritore (Giuliano Peritore) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2000 17:43:20 +0200 Subject: IPv6 sniffer and protocol analyzer Message-ID: <200008131543.RAA01755@www2.webmail.it> Dear list members, two years ago I released a free Sniffing and Network analyzing tool for Linux called COLD which supports a lot of different protocols and which had discrete success. The sniffer is able to gather data from different interfaces (eth, ppp, tr, lo, isdn) and supports 802.1 BPDU, 802.2 LLC, 802.3 MAC, 802.5 Token Ring, SNAP, NETBIOS, IPX, ARP, IPv6, ICMP6, IP, ICMP, TCP, UDP in compliance with lots of standards and RFCs. Today I released a COLD beta of version 1.0.12 which supports IPv6 and ICMP6. IPv6 is supported either on Ethernet or incapsulated over IPv4. I wrote to this list since I think this is one of the biggest communities of experienced IPv6 users with lots of people probably interested in the tool. I'd love to receive comments, suggestions and bug reports before releasing the nonbeta version. Thanks in advance The download URL is http://www.panservice.it/cold -------------------------------------------------- Giuliano Peritore mailto:g.peritore@panservice.it PANSERVICE - Direzione Servizi professionali per internet e il networking Panservice e\' socio AIIP - RIPE Local Registry Phone: +39 0773 410020 -- Fax: +39 0773 470219 http://www.panservice.it mailto:info@panservice.it From Mounir.Eddabbabi@ensi.rnu.tn Sun Aug 13 21:34:47 2000 From: Mounir.Eddabbabi@ensi.rnu.tn (Mounir Eddabbabi) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2000 21:34:47 +0100 Subject: IPv6 sniffer and protocol analyzer References: <200008131543.RAA01755@www2.webmail.it> Message-ID: <39970666.192B0C45@ensi.rnu.tn> Giuliano Peritore wrote: > Dear list members, > > two years ago I released a free Sniffing and Network > analyzing tool for Linux called COLD which supports a > lot of different protocols and which had discrete > success. > > The sniffer is able to gather data from different > interfaces (eth, ppp, tr, lo, isdn) and supports 802.1 > BPDU, 802.2 LLC, 802.3 MAC, 802.5 Token Ring, SNAP, > NETBIOS, IPX, ARP, IPv6, ICMP6, IP, ICMP, TCP, UDP in > compliance with lots of standards and RFCs. > > Today I released a COLD beta of version 1.0.12 which > supports IPv6 and ICMP6. IPv6 is supported either on > Ethernet or incapsulated over IPv4. > > I wrote to this list since I think this is one of > the biggest communities of experienced IPv6 users with > lots of people probably interested in the tool. I'd > love to receive comments, suggestions and bug reports > before releasing the nonbeta version. > > Thanks in advance > > The download URL is http://www.panservice.it/cold > > -------------------------------------------------- > Giuliano Peritore mailto:g.peritore@panservice.it > PANSERVICE - Direzione > Servizi professionali per internet e il networking > Panservice e\' socio AIIP - RIPE Local Registry > Phone: +39 0773 410020 -- Fax: +39 0773 470219 > http://www.panservice.it mailto:info@panservice.it I've tried this software on my FreeBSD 4.0-RELEASE (IPv6 kame stack) and this is the result : #cold -i xl0 This is Cold Version 1.0.12beta - August 13, 2000 - by Giuliano C. Peritore This is Cold Version 1.0.12beta - August 13, 2000 - by Giuliano C. Peritore Interface: xl0, Network: 193.95.37.0, Netmask: 255.255.255.0 ERROR: socket: Protocol not supported From s.baker@ukerna.ac.uk Mon Aug 14 12:46:17 2000 From: s.baker@ukerna.ac.uk (Simon Baker) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 12:46:17 +0100 Subject: IPv6 sniffer and protocol analyzer In-Reply-To: <200008131543.RAA01755@www2.webmail.it> Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20000814124053.00acfba0@procyon> At 17:43 13/08/00 +0200, you wrote: > Dear list members, > > two years ago I released a free Sniffing and Network >analyzing tool for Linux called COLD which supports a >lot of different protocols and which had discrete >success. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hi, Is there any danger of you releasing the source code for COLD as outlined in the file COPYING which uses the GNU Public license: "For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether gratis or for a fee, you must give the recipients all the rights that you have. You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their rights." Cheers, S. Simon Baker JANET-CERT Tel: +44 1235 822383 UKERNA Fax: +44 1235 822398 Atlas Centre s.baker@ukerna.ac.uk Chilton, Didcot Oxfordshire OX11 0QS United Kingdom -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 5.5.3i for non-commercial use iQEVAwUBOZfcAXprBwubjHjfAQFrUAgA2ywoYgN5Zx+SDhRoBH1WPSekKno5VHXQ gHsYOhexsK2x1FuJSxgSwZ+ZLOg87jrznO79WsW4ShENvfWfNHwu3TNIbI7ScKgY ySN2TuGSPySlZX2KTNyI8TWjhnFl0ljpEvxFw3dKegHVuGjI/dGcmkYL+vKAYNAu mO7r2ALV7DeMm7fJjcUNIOJ6C7ACXeFQFKpsUYTwYyf4MNmfQKmhpaTEigid2h55 1EHCAJtkzfjcn+iZeWNu6IYyfGi6OnnbWyvWf9SQvyailGCrOVQeiA7Rv0amFUNW N/+VEzK1jq5r+zryB2pD83Z+i3Wg1ExhL019c8vP4+qrlF4n4dRQfw== =Ogyl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From g.peritore@panservice.it Wed Aug 16 07:41:12 2000 From: g.peritore@panservice.it (Giuliano Peritore) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 08:41:12 +0200 Subject: IPv6 sniffer and protocol analyzer In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20000814124053.00acfba0@procyon> References: <200008131543.RAA01755@www2.webmail.it> Message-ID: <4.3.0.20000816083943.01885330@moon.panservice.it> Not at this moment. The package needs some refining and some new implementation (mostly filters) before letting others to mess up with the source. >Is there any danger of you releasing the source code for COLD as >outlined in the file COPYING which uses the GNU Public license: --------------------------------------------------- Dott. Giuliano Peritore - g.peritore@panservice.it Direzione - Panservice Servizi professionali per Internet ed il Networking Panservice e' associata AIIP -- RIPE Local Registry Phone: +39 0773 410020 Fax +39 0773 470219 http://www.panservice.it --------------------------------------------------- From ksbn@kt.co.kr Thu Aug 17 11:10:03 2000 From: ksbn@kt.co.kr (ksb) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 19:10:03 +0900 Subject: telebit router Message-ID: <399BB9FB.F9295C0A@kt.co.kr> How are you? If you have the experience to use erricsson telebit IPv6 routers, will you send me merits and demerits of the IPv6 router? Thnaks. ksb -- Kim, Sahng-Beom / Korea Telecom TEL : +82-42-870-8322 FAX : +82-42-870-8279 E-mail : ksbn@kt.co.kr -- From hli@suite.fh.siue.edu Thu Aug 17 15:44:21 2000 From: hli@suite.fh.siue.edu (Li) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 09:44:21 -0500 (CDT) Subject: 6bone connection Message-ID: Hi, I just joined this list and I am new to IPv6, I set up one FreeBSD4.1 and want to connect to 6bone. Can I do this without any other equipment support? Jeff From jim@thehousleys.net Fri Aug 18 02:29:34 2000 From: jim@thehousleys.net (James Housley) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 21:29:34 -0400 Subject: 6bone connection References: Message-ID: <399C917E.3573758F@thehousleys.net> Li wrote: > > Hi, > > I just joined this list and I am new to IPv6, I set up one FreeBSD4.1 > and want to connect to 6bone. Can I do this without any other equipment > support? > Start at www.6bone.net . There is lots of good information and How-To's. Or http://www.freenet6.net/ the simplest IPv6 connection. Jim -- If it happens once, it's a bug. If it happens twice, it's a feature. If it happens more than twice, it's windows. -- Luiz de Barros From jch@oleane.net Fri Aug 18 22:09:37 2000 From: jch@oleane.net (Jean-Claude Christophe) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 23:09:37 +0200 Subject: 6bone connection In-Reply-To: ; from hli@suite.fh.siue.edu on Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 09:44:21AM -0500 References: Message-ID: <20000818230937.K2717@oleane.net> > I just joined this list and I am new to IPv6, I set up one FreeBSD4.1 > and want to connect to 6bone. Can I do this without any other equipment > support? Yes. The best way to begin is to connect you via Freenet6 (http://www.freenet6.net) -- Jean-Claude Christophe / jch@oleane.net / Oleane From jang@sps.nl Mon Aug 21 16:59:19 2000 From: jang@sps.nl (Gils van, Jan) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 17:59:19 +0200 Subject: IPv6 experience with OpenLinux from Caldera Message-ID: Hi, Thanks for reading. For a couple off months now I am working with IPv6. I am having some problems in compiling programs such as tcpdump-3.5 and others. Are there any people out there that use OpenLinux and IPv6. What are your experiences ? Please let me know. Jan ---- Jan H. van Gils Senior Network Consultant Office +31-(0)182-302222 Internet web-page http://www.sps.nl Internet e-mail address jang@sps.nl RIPE Whois JHG5-RIPE, 6BONE Whois JHG1-6BONE From Terry" Hi, I've managed to get IPV6 working over a freenet6 tunnel - I'm now looking for a tunnel to allow the rest of my network to connect rather than a point to point link. I've started working down the PTLA list on the 6bone registry page but am becoming discouraged by either no response or negative responses. Can anybody help ? My geographical location is Spokane Wa - my ipv4 address of my router is : 63.227.98.195 My network is a small home / business network with a couple of linux boxes and a couple of windows boxes. Thanks Terry Terry Moore-Read - Computer Guru & Part-time rocket scientist NAR # 77465 Insured Level 1 From Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.qc.ca Tue Aug 22 18:37:28 2000 From: Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.qc.ca (Marc Blanchet) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 13:37:28 -0400 Subject: IPV6 working - looking for tunnel In-Reply-To: <001901c00c52$5aba8a40$0200000a@moorecomputersolutions.com> Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20000822133655.024c1840@mail.viagenie.qc.ca> we can help you out. Just send your request to ipv6@viagenie.qc.ca and someone will handle your request. Marc. At/À 09:02 2000-08-22 -0700, Terry you wrote/vous écriviez: >Hi, > >I've managed to get IPV6 working over a freenet6 tunnel - I'm now looking >for a tunnel to allow the rest of my network to connect rather than a point >to point link. > >I've started working down the PTLA list on the 6bone registry page but am >becoming discouraged by either no response or negative responses. Can >anybody help ? > >My geographical location is Spokane Wa - my ipv4 address of my router is : >63.227.98.195 > >My network is a small home / business network with a couple of linux boxes >and a couple of windows boxes. > >Thanks > > >Terry > > >Terry Moore-Read - Computer Guru & Part-time rocket scientist >NAR # 77465 Insured Level 1 Marc Blanchet Viagénie inc. tel: 418-656-9254 http://www.viagenie.qc.ca ---------------------------------------------------------- Normos (http://www.normos.org): Internet standards portal: IETF RFC, drafts, IANA, W3C, ATMForum, ISO, ... all in one place. From Terry" Message-ID: <011d01c00c8c$916d7b80$0200000a@moorecomputersolutions.com> Thanks for all the offers of help - I think I've got it taken care of now thru viagenie.qc.ca Terry Moore-Read - Computer Guru & Part-time rocket scientist ----- Original Message ----- From: Terry To: <6bone@ISI.EDU> Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 9:02 AM Subject: IPV6 working - looking for tunnel > Hi, > > I've managed to get IPV6 working over a freenet6 tunnel - I'm now looking > for a tunnel to allow the rest of my network to connect rather than a point > to point link. > > I've started working down the PTLA list on the 6bone registry page but am > becoming discouraged by either no response or negative responses. Can > anybody help ? > > My geographical location is Spokane Wa - my ipv4 address of my router is : > 63.227.98.195 > > My network is a small home / business network with a couple of linux boxes > and a couple of windows boxes. > > Thanks > > > Terry > > > Terry Moore-Read - Computer Guru & Part-time rocket scientist > NAR # 77465 Insured Level 1 > > > > From Craig@bas.co.za Wed Aug 23 13:14:36 2000 From: Craig@bas.co.za (Craig Allen) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 14:14:36 +0200 Subject: IPv6 Routing Message-ID: <1C06FB35360DD411803100508BC277FE0753@tasmania.bas.co.za> Hi. This might be a simple question but I've really got stuck and the documentation is not helping. I'm running FreeBSD 4.1 with integrated KAME IPv6 support. I've added my default IPv6 route as follows: route add -inet6 default 3ffe:1100:0:c1e::1 This connects me to the 6BONE via my gif0 Tunnel. The question is, how do I route 3ffe:1108:1002::/48 via my gif1 Tunnel to my remote site? I have read the route add command but I can't seem to get the command right. Perhaps someone can give me an example route add command how to do static IPv6 routing for my remote tunnels. Thanks for helping me. Regards Craig From nigel@forever-networks.com Wed Aug 23 18:08:16 2000 From: nigel@forever-networks.com (nigel@forever-networks.com) Date: 23 Aug 2000 10:08:16 -0700 Subject: Test adresses ? Message-ID: <20000823170816.20877.cpmta@c000.snv.cp.net> I have a tunnel connection to 6bone. (I think I do) Where can I find a list of addresses to test connectivity. Nigel Clarke Network Systems Engineer Forever Networks nigel@forever-networks.com From wmaton@ryouko.dgim.crc.ca Wed Aug 23 21:22:16 2000 From: wmaton@ryouko.dgim.crc.ca (William F. Maton) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 16:22:16 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Test adresses ? In-Reply-To: <20000823170816.20877.cpmta@c000.snv.cp.net> Message-ID: On 23 Aug 2000 nigel@forever-networks.com wrote: > I have a tunnel connection to 6bone. (I think I do) > Where can I find a list of addresses to test connectivity. A list of connected hosts? That's actually a good question. Here's a few to try: SMTP ftp.ipv6.crc.ca 2001:410:401:c::2 FTP augustus.dgim.crc.ca 2001:410:401:8::2 HTTP stats.ipv6.crc.ca 2001:410:401:3::2 > Nigel Clarke > Network Systems Engineer > Forever Networks > nigel@forever-networks.com > wfms From jch@oleane.net Wed Aug 23 21:54:20 2000 From: jch@oleane.net (Jean-Claude Christophe) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 22:54:20 +0200 Subject: Test adresses ? In-Reply-To: <20000823170816.20877.cpmta@c000.snv.cp.net>; from nigel@forever-networks.com on Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 10:08:16AM -0700 References: <20000823170816.20877.cpmta@c000.snv.cp.net> Message-ID: <20000823225420.V15432@oleane.net> > I have a tunnel connection to 6bone. (I think I do) > Where can I find a list of addresses to test connectivity. Try http://www.kame.net and look at the bottom left corner if you are really in IPV6 :-) -- Jean-Claude Christophe / jch@oleane.net / Oleane From eschbach@rsch.comm.mot.com Wed Aug 23 21:55:47 2000 From: eschbach@rsch.comm.mot.com (Jeffrey Eschbach) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 15:55:47 -0500 Subject: Bone connection References: <20000823170816.20877.cpmta@c000.snv.cp.net> Message-ID: <39A43A53.B779D3BC@rsch.comm.mot.com> I'm with Motorola Labs, and we are looking to join the 6Bone through an OC-3c connection we have to the Ameritech NAP in Chicago. I believe we can access 6Bone through 6TAP, but need to obtain a 6Bone IPv6 prefix first. Any information on how to get the prefix and what the next steps are after that? Thanks for the help. Jeff -- ------------------------------------------------------------- Jeff Eschbach Motorola Labs, Networks and Infrastructure Research eschbach@rsch.comm.mot.com Fax: (847) 576-3240 (847) 538-5846 Nextel: (847) 980-2240 From parent@viagenie.qc.ca Wed Aug 23 22:29:09 2000 From: parent@viagenie.qc.ca (Florent Parent) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 17:29:09 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Test adresses ? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: You can also try http://www.viagenie.qc.ca Or just reply to my mail (if you have an IPv6 mail client) Florent. On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, William F. Maton wrote: > On 23 Aug 2000 nigel@forever-networks.com wrote: > > > I have a tunnel connection to 6bone. (I think I do) > > Where can I find a list of addresses to test connectivity. > > A list of connected hosts? That's actually a good question. Here's a few > to try: > > SMTP ftp.ipv6.crc.ca 2001:410:401:c::2 > FTP augustus.dgim.crc.ca 2001:410:401:8::2 > HTTP stats.ipv6.crc.ca 2001:410:401:3::2 > > > Nigel Clarke > > Network Systems Engineer > > Forever Networks > > nigel@forever-networks.com > > > > > > wfms > > -- Florent Parent Florent.Parent@viagenie.qc.ca Viagénie inc. http://www.viagenie.qc.ca 2875, boul. Laurier, bur. 300 tél.: 418-656-9254 Ste-Foy (Québec) Canada G1V 2M2 fax.: 418-266-5539 PGP: B718 4543 977C BE73 2BCC 23D5 3E20 4FC9 2A90 872C From max@ipng.it Wed Aug 23 23:04:10 2000 From: max@ipng.it (Max Gargani) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 00:04:10 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Test adresses ? In-Reply-To: <20000823170816.20877.cpmta@c000.snv.cp.net> Message-ID: Try on http://www.cs-ipv6.lancs.ac.uk/ipv6/6Bone/ Regards, .. Massimiliano Gargani .. Access/Network Engineer .. EdisonTel S.p.A. On 23 Aug 2000 nigel@forever-networks.com wrote: > I have a tunnel connection to 6bone. (I think I do) > Where can I find a list of addresses to test connectivity. > > Nigel Clarke > Network Systems Engineer > Forever Networks > nigel@forever-networks.com > From jcomeau@dialtoneinternet.net Thu Aug 24 00:57:27 2000 From: jcomeau@dialtoneinternet.net (John Comeau) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 19:57:27 -0400 Subject: stuck for a week at netstat -A inet6 -an Message-ID: <39A464E7.44796E99@dialtoneinternet.net> I've been following the IPV6 Howto, or at least I think I have, and I can't seem to get past this roadblock. I've got xinetd set up with all the services, such as finger, daytime, echo, etc, and don't see any listening on IPV6 addresses. And I get connection refused on all inet6 ports. 'tail /var/log/messages' doesn't show any reason why. I'm probably doing something very stupid... flame away, but try and squeeze some useful tips in too 8^) - jc [root@cto jc]# telnet ::1 echo Trying ::1... telnet: connect to address ::1: Connection refused [root@cto jc]# netstat -? usage: netstat [-veenNcCF] [] -r netstat {-V|--version|-h|--help} netstat [-vnNcaeol] [ ...] netstat { [-veenNac] -i | [-cnNe] -M | -s } -r, --route display routing table -g, --groups display multicast group memberships -s, --statistics display networking statistics (like SNMP) -M, --masquerade display masqueraded connections -v, --verbose be verbose -n, --numeric dont resolve names -N, --symbolic resolve hardware names -e, --extend display other/more information -p, --programs display PID/Program name for sockets -c, --continuous continuous listing -l, --listening display listening server sockets -a, --all, --listening display all sockets (default: connected) -o, --timers display timers -F, --fib display Forwarding Information Base (default) -C, --cache display routing cache instead of FIB ={-t|--tcp} {-u|--udp} {-w|--raw} {-x|--unix} --ax25 --ipx --netrom =Use '-A ' or '--' Default: inet List of possible address families (which support routing): inet (DARPA Internet) inet6 (IPv6) ax25 (AMPR AX.25) netrom (AMPR NET/ROM) ipx (Novell IPX) ddp (Appletalk DDP) [root@cto jc]# ifconfig eth0 eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:4B:9C:BE:28 inet addr:10.0.1.110 Bcast:10.0.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0 inet6 addr: 3ffe:400:100:ff01::1/0 Scope:Global inet6 addr: fe80::10:4b9c:be28/10 Scope:Link inet6 addr: fe80::210:4bff:fe9c:be28/10 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:2052215 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:2635708 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:6 collisions:272078 txqueuelen:100 Interrupt:10 Base address:0xd400 [root@cto jc]# ping6 ::1 PING ::1(::1) 56 data bytes 64 bytes from ::1: icmp_seq=0 hops=64 time=0.3 ms 64 bytes from ::1: icmp_seq=1 hops=64 time=0.2 ms --- ::1 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max = 0.2/0.2/0.3 ms [root@cto jc]# netstat -A inet6 -an Active Internet connections (servers and established) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State [root@cto jc]# -- John Comeau - Chief Technology Officer Dialtone Internet - Extremely Fast Web Systems 954-581-0097x113 fax://954-581-7629 jcomeau@dialtoneinternet.net http://www.dialtoneinternet.net "We are a Responsible Internet Provider - see http://risp.org" From jln@stben.be Thu Aug 24 13:04:11 2000 From: jln@stben.be (Jean-Louis Noel) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 14:04:11 +0200 Subject: Test adresses ? References: Message-ID: <003f01c00dc3$6a2cf950$2855950a@stben.be> Hello, "Max Gargani" wrote to Subject: Re: Test adresses ? > > Try on http://www.cs-ipv6.lancs.ac.uk/ipv6/6Bone/ Lancs.ac.uk will not work for me! If I try : http://www.cs-ipv6.lancs.ac.uk/cgi-bin/ping?ADDRESS=samba.stben.be I got : IPv6 samba.stben.be = 3ffe:608:2:300:200:b4ff:fe91:9688 no answer from 3ffe:608:2:300:200:b4ff:fe91:9688 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- IPv4 /usr/sbin/ping: unknown host samba.stben.be ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- If y try : http://www.stben.be/internet/trace6.html I got : TraceRoute IPv6 Results from www.stben.be to www.cs-ipv6.lancs.ac.uk ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- traceroute to info7.cs-ipv6.lancs.ac.uk (3ffe:2101:0:c00::5) from 3ffe:608:2:300:250:4ff:fe37:5976, 30 hops max, 16 byte packets 1 rout-dom.stben.be (3ffe:608:2:300:200:b4ff:fe91:a2bb) 0.443 ms 0.139 ms 0.122 ms 2 t7.ipv6.science.belnet.net (3ffe:608:2:2::d) 200.588 ms * 339.15 ms 3 ir4.Amsterdam.surf.net (3ffe:600:8000::5) 207.867 ms * 3ffe:600:8000::d (3ffe:600:8000::d) 173.213 ms 4 surfnet-if.6r1.doc.london.ip6.pipex.net (3ffe:1100:0:c09::1) 85.577 ms * 77.251 ms 5 doc-6r1-if.6r1.paloalto.ip6.pipex.net (2001:600:4:4::2) 239.829 ms * 653.266 ms 6 pao-6r1-if.6r1.cambridge.ip6.pipex.net (2001:600:4:5::1) 911.826 ms 524.674 ms 647.894 ms 7 uunet-uk-if.ulcc.ipv6.ja.net (3ffe:1100:0:1c01::2) 687.899 ms 540.794 ms 703.926 ms 8 gate6.lancs.ac.uk (3ffe:2100:1::2) 495.853 ms 628.32 ms 767.961 ms 9 homer.cs-ipv6.lancs.ac.uk (3ffe:2101:0:800::3) 847.797 ms 716.972 ms 439.89 ms 10 homer.cs-ipv6.lancs.ac.uk (3ffe:2101:0:800::3) 3431.92 ms !H 3460.84 ms !H 4399.86 ms !H ==================== Bye, Jean-Louis From nigel@forever-networks.com Thu Aug 24 13:30:09 2000 From: nigel@forever-networks.com (nigel@forever-networks.com) Date: 24 Aug 2000 05:30:09 -0700 Subject: AW: Test adresses - Part II Message-ID: <20000824123009.5339.cpmta@c000.snv.cp.net> First of all, I wan't to thank everyone who responded to my inquiry ! I tried Freenet. My tunnel connection appears to be up. I can't ping the IPv6 addresses provided by Freenet either.... interface Tunnel0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ip mtu 1480 ipv6 enable ipv6 address 3FFE:B00:C18:1FFF::1D1/127 ipv6 rip T0 enable tunnel source Ethernet0 tunnel destination 206.123.31.102 tunnel mode ipv6ip ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 141.155.254.5 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ipv6 enable ipv6 rip T0 enable Ethernet0 is up, line protocol is up IPv6 is enabled, link-local address is FE80::200:CFF:FE3E:651C No global unicast address is configured Joined group address(es): FF02::1 FF02::2 FF02::1:FF3E:651C FF02::9 MTU is 1500 bytes ICMP error messages limited to one every 500 milliseconds ND advertised reachable time is 0 milliseconds ND advertised retransmit interval is 0 milliseconds ND router advertisements are sent every 200 seconds ND router advertisements live for 1800 seconds Hosts use stateless autoconfig for addresses. Tunnel0 is up, line protocol is up IPv6 is enabled, link-local address is FE80::C3E:651C:8 Global unicast address(es): 3FFE:B00:C18:1FFF::1D1, subnet is 3FFE:B00:C18:1FFF::1D0/127 Joined group address(es): FF02::1 FF02::2 FF02::1:FF1C:8 FF02::1:FF00:1D1 FF02::9 MTU is 1480 bytes ICMP error messages limited to one every 500 milliseconds ND advertised reachable time is 0 milliseconds ND advertised retransmit interval is 0 milliseconds ND router advertisements are sent every 200 seconds ND router advertisements live for 1800 seconds Hosts use stateless autoconfig for addresses. On Wed, 23 August 2000, "Stojakovic, Branislav" wrote: > > Have you tried www.freenet6.net? > They provide configured tunnel and IPv6 address to any single host with dual > stack, Solaris is supported.. > > Regards > Brani > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: nigel@forever-networks.com [SMTP:nigel@forever-networks.com] > > Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 23. August 2000 19:08 > > An: 6bone@ISI.EDU > > Betreff: Test adresses ? > > > > I have a tunnel connection to 6bone. (I think I do) > > Where can I find a list of addresses to test connectivity. > > > > Nigel Clarke > > Network Systems Engineer > > Forever Networks > > nigel@forever-networks.com Nigel Clarke Network Systems Engineer Forever Networks nigel@forever-networks.com From Florent.Parent@viagenie.qc.ca Thu Aug 24 14:44:18 2000 From: Florent.Parent@viagenie.qc.ca (Florent Parent) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 09:44:18 -0400 Subject: AW: Test adresses - Part II In-Reply-To: <20000824123009.5339.cpmta@c000.snv.cp.net> Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20000824094227.02f43ef0@localhost> I've forwarded your email to support@freenet6.net Someone will help you out. Florent. At 05:30 2000-08-24 -0700, nigel@forever-networks.com wrote: >First of all, I wan't to thank everyone who responded to my inquiry ! > >I tried Freenet. My tunnel connection appears to be up. I can't ping the >IPv6 addresses provided by Freenet >either.... > >interface Tunnel0 > no ip address > no ip directed-broadcast > ip mtu 1480 > ipv6 enable > ipv6 address 3FFE:B00:C18:1FFF::1D1/127 > ipv6 rip T0 enable > tunnel source Ethernet0 > tunnel destination 206.123.31.102 > tunnel mode ipv6ip >! >interface Ethernet0 > ip address 141.155.254.5 255.255.255.0 > no ip directed-broadcast > ipv6 enable > ipv6 rip T0 enable > >Ethernet0 is up, line protocol is up > IPv6 is enabled, link-local address is FE80::200:CFF:FE3E:651C > No global unicast address is configured > Joined group address(es): > FF02::1 > FF02::2 > FF02::1:FF3E:651C > FF02::9 > MTU is 1500 bytes > ICMP error messages limited to one every 500 milliseconds > ND advertised reachable time is 0 milliseconds > ND advertised retransmit interval is 0 milliseconds > ND router advertisements are sent every 200 seconds > ND router advertisements live for 1800 seconds > Hosts use stateless autoconfig for addresses. >Tunnel0 is up, line protocol is up > IPv6 is enabled, link-local address is FE80::C3E:651C:8 > Global unicast address(es): > 3FFE:B00:C18:1FFF::1D1, subnet is 3FFE:B00:C18:1FFF::1D0/127 > Joined group address(es): > FF02::1 > FF02::2 > FF02::1:FF1C:8 > FF02::1:FF00:1D1 > FF02::9 > MTU is 1480 bytes > ICMP error messages limited to one every 500 milliseconds > ND advertised reachable time is 0 milliseconds > ND advertised retransmit interval is 0 milliseconds > ND router advertisements are sent every 200 seconds > ND router advertisements live for 1800 seconds > Hosts use stateless autoconfig for addresses. > > >On Wed, 23 August 2000, "Stojakovic, Branislav" wrote: > > > > > Have you tried www.freenet6.net? > > They provide configured tunnel and IPv6 address to any single host with > dual > > stack, Solaris is supported.. > > > > Regards > > Brani > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > > Von: nigel@forever-networks.com [SMTP:nigel@forever-networks.com] > > > Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 23. August 2000 19:08 > > > An: 6bone@ISI.EDU > > > Betreff: Test adresses ? > > > > > > I have a tunnel connection to 6bone. (I think I do) > > > Where can I find a list of addresses to test connectivity. > > > > > > Nigel Clarke > > > Network Systems Engineer > > > Forever Networks > > > nigel@forever-networks.com > >Nigel Clarke >Network Systems Engineer >Forever Networks >nigel@forever-networks.com From ina@mimos.my Sat Aug 26 04:39:20 2000 From: ina@mimos.my (Raja Azlina) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 11:39:20 +0800 Subject: Need help with cisco bgp configuration.. Message-ID: <39A73BE7.DB500969@mimos.my> This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms3224F3A62E0C4DBCD3469B51 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I've tried to run bgp4+ with dti japan. I have the following configuration but somehow i still couldn't connect to them. Hope someone out there could help me out. Thanks.. ----config---- ! interface Tunnel1 description Tunnel to DTI Japan no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ipv6 enable ipv6 address 3FFE:8080:2000::2/64 tunnel source Ethernet0/0 tunnel destination 203.181.69.33 tunnel mode ipv6ip ! .....snipp ! router bgp 2042 no bgp default ipv4-unicast neighbor 3FFE:8080:2000::1 remote-as 4691 ! address-family ipv6 neighbor 3FFE:8080:2000::1 activate network 2001:208:110::/44 exit-address-family ! -----result------ router1.nel-ipv6.mimos.my#sh bgp ipv6 summary BGP router identifier 202.187.22.33, local AS number 2042 BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent InQ OutQ Up/Down State 3FFE:8080:2000::1 4 4691 0 0 0 0 never Active router1.nel-ipv6.mimos.my#sh bgp ipv6 neighbors BGP neighbor is 3FFE:8080:2000::1, remote AS 4691, external link BGP version 4, remote router ID 0.0.0.0 BGP state = Active Last read 00:08:39, hold time is 180, keepalive interval is 60 seconds Received 0 messages, 0 notifications, 0 in queue Sent 0 messages, 0 notifications, 0 in queue Route refresh request: received 0, sent 0 Minimum time between advertisement runs is 30 seconds For address family: IPv6 Unicast BGP table version 1, neighbor version 0 Index 1, Offset 0, Mask 0x2 0 accepted prefixes consume 0 bytes Prefix advertised 0, suppressed 0, withdrawn 0 Connections established 0; dropped 0 Last reset never No active TCP connection -azlina --------------ms3224F3A62E0C4DBCD3469B51 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIIEiwYJKoZIhvcNAQcCoIIEfDCCBHgCAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMAsGCSqGSIb3DQEHAaCC AuQwggLgMIICSaADAgECAgIYPjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFADBKMQswCQYDVQQGEwJNWTEZMBcG A1UEChQQRGlnaWNlcnQgU2RuIEJoZDEgMB4GA1UEAxQXRElHSVNJR04gaVZFU1QgQkFTSUMg VjEwHhcNOTkxMjI3MDAzODAwWhcNMDExMjI3MDAwMDAwWjCByDELMAkGA1UEBhMCTVkxFTAT BgNVBAoUDE1JTU9TIEJFUkhBRDFBMBIGA1UEKhQLUmFqYSBBemxpbmEwEwYDVQQEFAxSYWph IE1haG1vb2QwFgYDVQQtAw8AEww3MzA3MjYxMDU5NjYxJzAlBgNVBAMUHlJhamEgQXpsaW5h IEJpbnRpIFJhamEgTWFobW9vZDEbMBkGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYMaW5hQG1pbW9zLm15MRkwFwYD VQQFExA2MDM0MjAxMzAwMDAzMTM1MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQDHyqLF N8NIcOBHlP/L3gIltfvx9OQQ9DMJddpb0LgyrEeIDuijWNPrbvBYkD66jx972HsgPyd+MHsp GoahVBw7ig8+Ccj5T8V4+V5Td4sqQdrdwLTJDk+CQ69kem/0CnSpDMIvRgS6ejqirULjoC33 nFGZ0wSdpAkc6FaiTd6NdQIDAQABo1YwVDATBgNVHSMEDDAKgAhEMTAyNDAwMTASBgNVHQ4E CwQJS0EwMDAyNTc5MAsGA1UdDwQEAwIDqDARBgNVHSAECjAIMAYGBINyAQEwCQYDVR0TBAIw ADANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFAAOBgQBB3VNmt3vaSFPdmnQ1BgsNLMzN6jBrM90drILavOgJb7lh sN3jHqZzJ3NBqvEYaAHvRuNBX7RUbyhcBqC9W7jOZagRlmiqMHrxe9t+GDuA/Hn+XiRuoOO0 jg8tq2UK2oQIOmnRgDM0ZSSIFkKPTRPlBhZqiChW4lOLumr4wnRRPzGCAW8wggFrAgEBMFAw SjELMAkGA1UEBhMCTVkxGTAXBgNVBAoUEERpZ2ljZXJ0IFNkbiBCaGQxIDAeBgNVBAMUF0RJ R0lTSUdOIGlWRVNUIEJBU0lDIFYxAgIYPjAJBgUrDgMCGgUAoHcwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMQsw CTAHBgUrDgMCBzAYBgkqhkiG9w0BCQMxCwYJKoZIhvcNAQcBMBwGCSqGSIb3DQEJBTEPFw0w MDA4MjYwMzM5MjdaMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJBDEWBBQcRtMhPGOR9QyomzK46Pq6w2uY6DANBgkq hkiG9w0BAQEFAASBgHxkR/5+wv3Caun5MfTTxAQGJUmqwckU6DujB7DdUZpLO69cmVbYgx+C /AOa4smG/satO1d7oAsn0ZmN3efXF3IeE8xPogrMb4/ruxY77kJ/CIUaBZ3/wRfovcVpQaCf 9JeDwA5WwCDkDy5HyWE2S/71V947Pc9bUlc/1IkQa4l+ --------------ms3224F3A62E0C4DBCD3469B51-- From Stefan.Gasteiger@Gendorf.de Sat Aug 26 07:23:24 2000 From: Stefan.Gasteiger@Gendorf.de (Stefan.Gasteiger@Gendorf.de) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 08:23:24 +0200 Subject: Need help with cisco bgp configuration.. Message-ID: <4185051FE012D411A98B0008C7337A2ED08330@ATLANTIS> > -----Original Message----- > From: Raja Azlina [mailto:ina@mimos.my] > Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2000 5:39 AM > To: 6bone@ISI.EDU > Subject: Need help with cisco bgp configuration.. The config looks fine. [...] > router1.nel-ipv6.mimos.my#sh bgp ipv6 neighbors > BGP neighbor is 3FFE:8080:2000::1, remote AS 4691, external link > BGP version 4, remote router ID 0.0.0.0 > BGP state = Active ^^^^^^ This should be established! Perhaps you could post the *complete* configuration of your router and the remote router (delete the passwords and secrets!)? This config works fine for me: <--- snipp ---> version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime service password-encryption ! hostname 6bone ! enable secret XXXXXX ! ! ! ! ! ip subnet-zero ip domain-name gendorf.net ip name-server 212.68.96.75 ! ! ! interface Loopback0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ipv6 enable ipv6 address 3FFE:400:3B0::CF3:8C05/48 ipv6 mtu 1480 ! interface Loopback1 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ipv6 enable ipv6 address 3FFE:3500:100::CF3:8C05/48 ipv6 mtu 1480 ! interface Tunnel0 description Tunnel to JOIN (www.join.uni-muenster.de) no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ipv6 address 3FFE:401:0:1::5:2/112 tunnel source Ethernet0 tunnel destination 128.176.191.66 tunnel mode ipv6ip ! interface Tunnel1 description Tunnel to regio.net no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ipv6 address 3FFE:3500:100::11/126 tunnel source Ethernet0 tunnel destination 212.218.0.9 tunnel mode ipv6ip ! interface Tunnel2 description Tunnel zur Uni Erlangen (erich.meier@informatik.uni-erlangen.de) no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ipv6 address 3FFE:400:50:200::2:2/112 tunnel source Ethernet0 tunnel destination 131.188.34.2 tunnel mode ipv6ip ! interface Tunnel3 description Tunnel zur Uni Leipzig (toenjes@informatik.uni-leipzig.de) no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ipv6 address 3FFE:400:280:F001::1A/126 tunnel source Ethernet0 tunnel destination 139.18.38.71 tunnel mode ipv6ip ! interface Tunnel4 description Tunnel zu Fibertel (platini@fibertel.com.ar) no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ipv6 address 3FFE:3800::A:2/112 tunnel source Ethernet0 tunnel destination 24.232.1.5 tunnel mode ipv6ip ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 212.68.96.114 255.255.255.252 no ip directed-broadcast media-type 10BaseT ipv6 address 3FFE:400:3B0::CFF:EE1A:AB19/80 ! interface Ethernet1 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! router bgp 12853 no synchronization bgp dampening neighbor 3FFE:400:50:200::2:1 remote-as 1275 no neighbor 3FFE:400:50:200::2:1 activate neighbor 3FFE:400:280:F001::19 remote-as 1275 no neighbor 3FFE:400:280:F001::19 activate neighbor 3FFE:401:0:1::5:1 remote-as 1275 no neighbor 3FFE:401:0:1::5:1 activate neighbor 3FFE:3500:100::10 remote-as 8319 no neighbor 3FFE:3500:100::10 activate neighbor 3FFE:3800::A:1 remote-as 10318 no neighbor 3FFE:3800::A:1 activate ! address-family ipv6 neighbor 3FFE:400:50:200::2:1 activate neighbor 3FFE:400:50:200::2:1 override-capability-neg neighbor 3FFE:400:50:200::2:1 prefix-list JOIN in neighbor 3FFE:400:50:200::2:1 prefix-list erlangen-out out neighbor 3FFE:400:280:F001::19 activate neighbor 3FFE:400:280:F001::19 override-capability-neg neighbor 3FFE:400:280:F001::19 prefix-list JOIN in neighbor 3FFE:400:280:F001::19 prefix-list leipzig-out out neighbor 3FFE:401:0:1::5:1 activate neighbor 3FFE:401:0:1::5:1 override-capability-neg neighbor 3FFE:401:0:1::5:1 prefix-list FULL in neighbor 3FFE:401:0:1::5:1 prefix-list join-out out neighbor 3FFE:3500:100::10 activate neighbor 3FFE:3500:100::10 override-capability-neg neighbor 3FFE:3500:100::10 prefix-list FULL in neighbor 3FFE:3500:100::10 prefix-list regio-out out neighbor 3FFE:3800::A:1 activate neighbor 3FFE:3800::A:1 override-capability-neg neighbor 3FFE:3800::A:1 prefix-list FULL in neighbor 3FFE:3800::A:1 prefix-list fibertel-out out network 3FFE:400:3B0::/48 network 3FFE:3500:100::/48 aggregate-address 3FFE:400:3B0::/48 aggregate-address 3FFE:3500:100::/48 exit-address-family ! ip default-gateway 212.68.96.113 ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 212.68.96.113 no ip http server ! ! ip prefix-list FULL seq 5 permit 3FFE::/16 le 128 ip prefix-list FULL seq 10 permit 2001::/16 le 128 ip prefix-list FULL seq 15 permit 2002::/16 le 128 ! ip prefix-list JOIN seq 5 permit 3FFE:400::/24 le 128 ! ip prefix-list erlangen-out seq 5 permit 3FFE:400:3B0::/48 le 128 ip prefix-list erlangen-out seq 10 permit 3FFE:3500:100::/48 le 128 ip prefix-list erlangen-out seq 15 permit 3FFE:400:180::/48 le 128 ip prefix-list erlangen-out seq 20 permit 3FFE:400:280::/48 le 128 ! ip prefix-list fibertel-out seq 5 deny ::/0 le 128 ! ip prefix-list join-out seq 5 permit 3FFE:400:50::/48 le 128 ip prefix-list join-out seq 10 permit 3FFE:400:180::/48 le 128 ip prefix-list join-out seq 15 permit 3FFE:400:280::/48 le 128 ip prefix-list join-out seq 20 permit 3FFE:400:3B0::/48 le 128 ! ip prefix-list leipzig-out seq 5 permit 3FFE:400:3B0::/48 le 128 ip prefix-list leipzig-out seq 10 permit 3FFE:3500:100::/48 le 128 ip prefix-list leipzig-out seq 15 permit 3FFE:400:50::/48 le 128 ! ip prefix-list regio-out seq 5 permit 3FFE:3500:100::/48 le 128 ! banner motd ^CATTENTION! You are entering a private system. Unallowed access (even the attempt) is prohibited and will be prosecuted by any means of law. All transactions are recorded. ACHTUNG! Sie betreten ein privates System. Jeglicher unerlaubter Zugriff oder nur der Versuch ist verboten und wird strafrechtlich verfolgt. Alle Aktionen werden aufgezeichnet.^C ! line con 0 transport input none line aux 0 line vty 0 4 password XXXXXXXXXXX login ! end <--- snipp ---> Hope this helps! Stefan Gasteiger -- SG5599-RIPE I+K Betrieb (zertifiziert nach DIN EN ISO 9001) InfraServ Gendorf Tel.: +49 8679 7 5599 Fax: +49 8679 7 39 5599 Mobiltel.: +49 172 8649205 E-Mail: Stefan.Gasteiger@gendorf.de From ishizaki@dti.ad.jp Sat Aug 26 14:55:21 2000 From: ishizaki@dti.ad.jp (Yutaka Ishizaki) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 22:55:21 +0900 Subject: Need help with cisco bgp configuration.. In-Reply-To: <39A73BE7.DB500969@mimos.my> References: <39A73BE7.DB500969@mimos.my> Message-ID: <20000826225521B.ishizaki@dti.ad.jp> Dear Azlina, I found mistake in a tunnel destination address in your configuration. It is 203.181.69.133 instead of 203.181.69.33. please fix your configuration. > I've tried to run bgp4+ with dti japan. I have the following > configuration > but somehow i still couldn't connect to them. Hope someone out there > could help me out. Thanks.. > > ----config---- > ! > interface Tunnel1 > description Tunnel to DTI Japan > no ip address > no ip directed-broadcast > ipv6 enable > ipv6 address 3FFE:8080:2000::2/64 > tunnel source Ethernet0/0 > tunnel destination 203.181.69.33 > tunnel mode ipv6ip > ! -- Yutaka Ishizaki DREAM TRAIN INTERNET, INC. From fink@es.net Sat Aug 26 15:18:25 2000 From: fink@es.net (Bob Fink) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 07:18:25 -0700 Subject: Fwd: AW: pTLA for Berkom /t-Nova, Deutsche Telekom) Message-ID: <4.3.1.2.20000826071251.02728770@imap2.es.net> Deutsche Telekom Berkom requests a pTLA. This opens a two week review period, so please send any comments to the me or the 6bone list. This review period closes on 9 Sep 2000. Thanks, Bob ========================================================= >From: "Scheffler, Thomas" >To: Bob Fink >Cc: a.zehl@berkom.de, Christian Hahn , > Dirk Hetzer , eder@berkom.de, > leymann@berkom.de, > Olaf Bonneß >Subject: AW: pTLA for Berkom /t-Nova, Deutsche Telekom) >Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 13:22:53 +0200 > >Bob, > >I hope the following statement fulfills your requirements. >Please let us know if something is missing. > >Thanks for your fast response, >Thomas and Dirk > > >7. Guidelines for 6Bone pTLA sites > > > > The following rules apply to qualify for a 6Bone pTLA allocation. It > > should be recognized that holders of 6Bone pTLA allocations are > > expected to provide production quality backbone network services for > > the 6Bone. > > > > 1. The pTLA Applicant must have a minimum of three (3) months > > qualifying experience as a 6Bone end-site or pNLA transit. During > > the entire qualifying period the Applicant must be operationally > > providing the following: > >Berkom has been operational on the 6bone since 1996. We are currently >working in several national and international project in the context >of IPv6 research, deployment and transition. > > > a. Fully maintained, up to date, 6Bone Registry entries for their > > ipv6-site inet6num, mntner, and person objects, including each > > tunnel that the Applicant has. > >http://whois.6bone.net/cgi-bin/whois >Search for "Berkom" > > > > > b. Fully maintained, and reliable, BGP4+ peering and connectivity > > between the Applicant's boundary router and the appropriate > > connection point into the 6Bone. This router must be IPv6 > > pingable. This criteria is judged by members of the 6Bone > > Operations Group at the time of the Applicant's pTLA request. > >Our entry point into the 6Bone is via JOIN (http://www.ipv6.uni-muenster.de). >Our BGP4 router is pioneer.ipv6.berkom.de. >ping: pioneer.ipv6.berkom.de > > > c. Fully maintained DNS forward (AAAA) and reverse (ip6.int) > > entries for the Applicant's router(s) and at least one host > > system. > >dns-server: sixpack.ipv6.berkom.de >example host-system: sax6.ipv6.berkom.de > > > d. A fully maintained, and reliable, IPv6-accessible system > > providing, at a mimimum, one or more web pages, describing the > > Applicant's IPv6 services. This server must be IPv6 pingable. > >http://www.ipv6.berkom.de > > >2. Statement: > Deutsche Telekom Berkom is willing to provide "production-quality" > 6Bone backbone service. > >a) Support staff: > Dirk Hetzer dirk.hetzer@telekom.de > Olaf Bonness o.bonness@berkom.de > Nicolay Leymann n.leymann@berkom.de > Thomas Scheffler thomas.scheffler@telekom.de > Christian Hahn chahn@telekom.de > > >b) A common mailbox: mailto:ipv6-support@berkom.de > >3. Deutsche Telekom Berkom registers the pTLA on behalf of > Deutsche Telekom, the largest ISP in Germany. > Upcomming new services like UMTS, xDSL and such (may) require > the use of IPv6 in the future production network. > >4. We have understood the current 6Bone operational rules > as defined in RFC 2772. We agree to this rules and are > willing to follow them as well as possible future changes. -end From oliver.michael@gargantuan.com Sun Aug 27 20:48:44 2000 From: oliver.michael@gargantuan.com (=?utf-8?B?TWljaGFlbCBXLiBPbGl2ZXI=?=) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2000 15:48:44 -0400 Subject: =?utf-8?B?UXVlc3Rpb24gYWJvdXQgQ2lzY28gSU9T?= Message-ID: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C0103E.468015F0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Can someone tell me which version of the Cisco IOS supports IPv6? = Thanks! Regards, Michael W. Oliver mailto:oliver.michael@gargantuan.com http://michael.gargantuan.com Page me at mailto:1570482@skytel.com ****************************************************** ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C0103E.468015F0 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIF0zCCArcw ggIgoAMCAQICAwL0NTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFADCBlDELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExFTATBgNVBAgTDFdl c3Rlcm4gQ2FwZTEUMBIGA1UEBxMLRHVyYmFudmlsbGUxDzANBgNVBAoTBlRoYXd0ZTEdMBsGA1UE CxMUQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgU2VydmljZXMxKDAmBgNVBAMTH1BlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIFJTQSAx OTk5LjkuMTYwHhcNMDAwNzIzMTQyOTQ4WhcNMDEwNzIzMTQyOTQ4WjBPMR8wHQYDVQQDExZUaGF3 dGUgRnJlZW1haWwgTWVtYmVyMSwwKgYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFh1vbGl2ZXIubWljaGFlbEBnYXJnYW50 dWFuLmNvbTCBnzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEA8xVAP/+7s65v8+yERNsu+mTkc4UF IRVvfVrNyvKK9//PRqpf0nrQBHELq09oFYAmnbMC9TwAk2z2NKK+mPSjuz5TfmjpLu72r8Oh5sVX rYiOYdGaikKXpGtk9gDAl0kUpYJwtP0j992pHJaKJwZjeRqbmLVU2nH+bAwsHcVuwVsCAwEAAaNb MFkwKAYDVR0RBCEwH4Edb2xpdmVyLm1pY2hhZWxAZ2FyZ2FudHVhbi5jb20wDAYDVR0TAQH/BAIw ADAfBgNVHSMEGDAWgBSIq/Fgg2ZV9ORYx0YdwGG9I9fDjDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFAAOBgQBqnqbI X11KyXAHsBRnwfJ5Xvg9jKxDV9hnlE2gYKme6d8Qv5L3OCDTGT7/NiLuZSVqvTZEE6SClC578Leb 9O2jLMDiMMcob9sa06x1IrYRYR29ULRslA4XedP81cADDkbevtRl9R1miqSWUifc30oS6VeYda4/ Fp1g39x+0adVbTCCAxQwggJ9oAMCAQICAQswDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwgdExCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpB MRUwEwYDVQQIEwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxEjAQBgNVBAcTCUNhcGUgVG93bjEaMBgGA1UEChMRVGhh d3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcxKDAmBgNVBAsTH0NlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gU2VydmljZXMgRGl2aXNpb24x JDAiBgNVBAMTG1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBDQTErMCkGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYccGVy c29uYWwtZnJlZW1haWxAdGhhd3RlLmNvbTAeFw05OTA5MTYxNDAxNDBaFw0wMTA5MTUxNDAxNDBa MIGUMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRQwEgYDVQQHEwtEdXJiYW52 aWxsZTEPMA0GA1UEChMGVGhhd3RlMR0wGwYDVQQLExRDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTZXJ2aWNlczEoMCYG A1UEAxMfUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgUlNBIDE5OTkuOS4xNjCBnzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOB jQAwgYkCgYEAs2lal9TQFgt6tcVd6SGcI3LNEkxL937Px/vKciT0QlKsV5Xje2F6F4Tn/XI5OJS0 6u1lp5IGXr3gZfYZu5R5dkw+uWhwdYQc9BF0ALwFLE8JAxcxzPRB1HLGpl3iiESwiy7ETfHw1oU+ bPOVlHiRfkDpnNGNFVeOwnPlMN5G9U8CAwEAAaM3MDUwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADAfBgNV HSMEGDAWgBRyScJzNMZV9At2coF+d/SH58ayDjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFAAOBgQBrxlnpMfrptuyx A9jfcnL+kWBI6sZV3XvwZ47GYXDnbcKlN9idtxcoVgWL3Vx1b8aRkMZsZnET0BB8a5FvhuAhNi3B 1+qyCa3PLW3Gg1Kb+7v+nIed/LfpdJLkXJeu/H6syg1vcnpnLGtz9Yb5nfUAbvQdB86dnoJjKe+T CX5V3jGCAq4wggKqAgEBMIGcMIGUMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBl MRQwEgYDVQQHEwtEdXJiYW52aWxsZTEPMA0GA1UEChMGVGhhd3RlMR0wGwYDVQQLExRDZXJ0aWZp Y2F0ZSBTZXJ2aWNlczEoMCYGA1UEAxMfUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgUlNBIDE5OTkuOS4xNgID AvQ1MAkGBSsOAwIaBQCgggFnMBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkF MQ8XDTAwMDgyNzE5NDg0MlowIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMRYEFHF+7qzJlUsu8diP41q3sEoEEiPBMFgG CSqGSIb3DQEJDzFLMEkwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcNAwICAgCAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqG SIb3DQMCAgEoMAcGBSsOAwIaMAoGCCqGSIb3DQIFMIGtBgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxgZ8wgZwwgZQxCzAJ BgNVBAYTAlpBMRUwEwYDVQQIEwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxFDASBgNVBAcTC0R1cmJhbnZpbGxlMQ8w DQYDVQQKEwZUaGF3dGUxHTAbBgNVBAsTFENlcnRpZmljYXRlIFNlcnZpY2VzMSgwJgYDVQQDEx9Q ZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBSU0EgMTk5OS45LjE2AgMC9DUwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEgYAvZs/Q BfzLun15uq1miVotjbl5gpYVE+PN4WhYfttwr7QkpUV9hr973PFKMBUuY5N8/U6A/dff5CuDG9Hs nx+IEZmBZJ1LX38uOQ3bdGzjQLql2PhqbyHns6xPbdHks9NwT2pqIXu8rbHlfHJx4u9md2aLSv/V cZXJlySH4KGLSQAAAAAAAA== ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C0103E.468015F0-- From mjoseph@cisco.com Sun Aug 27 21:54:28 2000 From: mjoseph@cisco.com (Mathew Joseph) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2000 13:54:28 -0700 Subject: =?utf-8?B?UXVlc3Rpb24gYWJvdXQgQ2lzY28gSU9T?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200008272051.AAG37291@overnight.cisco.com> Michael, In response to your question, IOS support for IPv6 is currently under development. You can get the updated information by following this link. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/732/ipv6/index.html I believe the beta version of IOS images supporting IPv6 is available. This is based on IOS 12.1. Thanks Mathew Joseph At 03:48 PM 8/27/00 -0400, =?utf-8?B?TWljaGFlbCBXLiBPbGl2ZXI=?= wrote: >Can someone tell me which version of the Cisco IOS supports IPv6? Thanks! > > >Regards, > >Michael W. Oliver >mailto:oliver.michael@gargantuan.com >http://michael.gargantuan.com >Page me at mailto:1570482@skytel.com >****************************************************** > > > > > From ina@mimos.my Mon Aug 28 06:02:14 2000 From: ina@mimos.my (Raja Azlina) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 13:02:14 +0800 Subject: Need help with cisco bgp configuration.. Message-ID: <39A9F255.41B8FAE2@mimos.my> Added the "neighbor 3FFE:8080:2000::1 override-capability-neg" line and changed the tunnel destination address to "203.181.69.133" , BUT the result is still the same. Stefan.Gasteiger@Gendorf.de wrote: > Perhaps you could post the *complete* configuration of > your router and the remote router (delete the passwords > and secrets!)? I could only provide our router configuration for DTI is running zebra and not CISCO IOS(therefore I assume the syntax should be different).. fyi, currently we have a static route to singAREN for 2001::/16 network and we are trying to have BGP+ connection to DTI for 3ffe::/16 network. What is wrong with our config? Thanks for the help! ----- ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime service password-encryption ! hostname router1.nel-ipv6.mimos.my ! enable secret xxxx! ! ip subnet-zero ! ipv6 unicast-routing ! interface Tunnel0 description Tunneling to singAREN ip unnumbered Ethernet0/0 no ip directed-broadcast ip mtu 1480 ipv6 enable ipv6 address 2001:208:1:FD01::2/64 tunnel source Ethernet0/0 tunnel destination 202.8.95.2 tunnel mode ipv6ip ! interface Tunnel1 description Tunnel to DTI Japan no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ipv6 enable ipv6 address 3FFE:8080:2000::2/64 tunnel source Ethernet0/0 tunnel destination 203.181.69.133 tunnel mode ipv6ip ! interface Ethernet0/0 description Connected to 202.187.22.1 (BKJ15) ip address 202.187.22.2 255.255.255.224 no ip directed-broadcast no ip mroute-cache ipv6 enable ipv6 address 2001:208:110:1::2/64 ! router bgp 2042 no bgp default ipv4-unicast neighbor 3FFE:8080:2000::1 remote-as 4691 ! address-family ipv6 neighbor 3FFE:8080:2000::1 activate neighbor 3FFE:8080:2000::1 override-capability-neg network 2001:208:110::/44 exit-address-family ! ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 202.187.22.1 no ip http server ! ipv6 route 2001::/16 Tunnel0 ! banner motd ^C You have reached ipv6-router...Welcome but don't screw this thing up ^C ! line con 0 password 7 05252323701E1D login transport input none line aux 0 line vty 0 4 password xxxx login ! end ..... -azlina From ishizaki@dti.ad.jp Mon Aug 28 12:34:45 2000 From: ishizaki@dti.ad.jp (Yutaka Ishizaki) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 20:34:45 +0900 Subject: Need help with cisco bgp configuration.. In-Reply-To: <39A9F255.41B8FAE2@mimos.my> References: <39A9F255.41B8FAE2@mimos.my> Message-ID: <20000828203445L.ishizaki@dti.ad.jp> Dear Azlina, I didn't set BGP configuration, because tunnel connection was not established. Now, I completed to BGP configuration of our side. I have turned up the DTI side of our peer. But your route doesn't come. # show ipv6 bgp summary BGP router identifier 203.181.69.133, local AS number 4691 Neighbor AS MsgRcvd MsgSent Up/Down State/PfxRcd 3ffe:8080:2000::2 2042 84 88 01:18:21 0 > Added the "neighbor 3FFE:8080:2000::1 override-capability-neg" line and > changed the tunnel destination address to "203.181.69.133" , BUT the > result is still the same. -- Yutaka Ishizaki DREAM TRAIN INTERNET, INC. From ryan@continuity.e-boxen.com Thu Aug 31 19:31:36 2000 From: ryan@continuity.e-boxen.com (Ryan Lortie) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 12:31:36 -0600 (MDT) Subject: No responce for tunnel request. Message-ID: -- http://www.6bone.net/6bone_hookup.html -- Note that at times site contacts might be unresponsive, or slow to respond, so don't wait more than a week for response. When all else fails, query the 6bone list and ask for help in finding a contact. -- I sent a tunnel request form to Viagenie last Wednesday, and have not received any reply from them. Should I continue to wait, or would someone else be able to support my connection? Thanks, Ryan From Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.qc.ca Thu Aug 31 21:43:12 2000 From: Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.qc.ca (Marc Blanchet) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 16:43:12 -0400 Subject: No responce for tunnel request. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20000831164035.03a421c0@mail.viagenie.qc.ca> At/À 12:31 2000-08-31 -0600, Ryan Lortie you wrote/vous écriviez: >-- http://www.6bone.net/6bone_hookup.html -- >Note that at times site contacts might be unresponsive, or slow to >respond, so don't wait more than a week for response. When all else fails, >query the 6bone list and ask for help in finding a contact. >-- > >I sent a tunnel request form to Viagenie last Wednesday, and have not >received any reply from them. hummm. I'm surprised, we generally respond in the next day. We had many since a week or two, maybe yours was lost. Someone should respond to you today (it is end of the day here) or tomorrow. always send your emails for us to ipv6@viagenie.qc.ca. Marc. >Should I continue to wait, or would someone >else be able to support my connection? > >Thanks, >Ryan Marc Blanchet Viagénie inc. tel: 418-656-9254 http://www.viagenie.qc.ca ---------------------------------------------------------- Normos (http://www.normos.org): Internet standards portal: IETF RFC, drafts, IANA, W3C, ATMForum, ISO, ... all in one place. From BMcNamara@zama.net Thu Aug 31 23:03:05 2000 From: BMcNamara@zama.net (Bradley W. McNamara) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 15:03:05 -0700 Subject: DNS Root Cache Data Message-ID: <39AED619.4DD5F0EF@zama.net> I have machines that are only connected to the 6bone. Where can I find the data to populate the root cache file? Are there root nameservers on the 6bone? If there isn't any root nameservers on the 6bone, are there any "well known" nameservers that I can use? Thanks for any help. Brad McNamara ZAMA Networks From wmaton@ryouko.dgim.crc.ca Thu Aug 31 23:44:54 2000 From: wmaton@ryouko.dgim.crc.ca (William F. Maton) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 18:44:54 -0400 (EDT) Subject: No responce for tunnel request. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Ryan Lortie wrote: > -- http://www.6bone.net/6bone_hookup.html -- > Note that at times site contacts might be unresponsive, or slow to > respond, so don't wait more than a week for response. When all else fails, > query the 6bone list and ask for help in finding a contact. > -- > > I sent a tunnel request form to Viagenie last Wednesday, and have not > received any reply from them. Should I continue to wait, or would someone > else be able to support my connection? Create your own? http://www.freenet6.net/en/createTunnel.html > Ryan wfms From qh@nudt.edu.cn Mon Aug 21 04:29:51 2000 From: qh@nudt.edu.cn (qh) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 11:29:51 +0800 Subject: Applying for a tunnel Message-ID: <000b01c00b20$2294a5c0$0c0c1aac@summy.nudt.edu.cn> Hi,all. I am expriencing IPv6 technology and I have built an IPv6 system which consists of one NT machine and two Linux machines.I want to build a tunnel with the outside.Shall anyone be so kind to apply me connection endpoint?My address is 202.197.0.250. Thank you. Zhiwen