Application for pTLA from ICM-PL - review will close 4 June

bmanning@ISI.EDU bmanning@ISI.EDU
Thu, 20 May 1999 06:57:52 -0700 (PDT)


I think this is a reasonable request and should be approved.


> 
> Per the request from Kazu Yamamoto (below), I'm opening a two week window for the review of a pTLA for IIJ. I will close this on 4 June 99. Note that this will be a /28 pTLA assignment.
> 
> Thanks,
> Bob
> ====
> >To: 6bone@ISI.EDU
> >Subject: pTLA request from IIJ
> >From: Kazu Yamamoto (=?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCOzNLXE9CSScbKEI=?=)
> > <kazu@iijlab.net>|
> >Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 14:48:11 +0900
> >
> >IIJ(http://www.iij.ad.jp) would like to request one pTLA block. 
> >
> >Conformance to RFC 2546 is as follows;
> >
> >   1. The site MUST have experience with IPv6 on the 6Bone, at least as
> >      a leaf site and preferably as a transit pNLA under an existing
> >      pTLA.
> >
> >IIJ is a transit pNLA of the WIDE pTLA.
> >
> >   2. The site MUST have the ability and intent to provide "production-
> >      like" 6Bone backbone service to provide a robust and operationally
> >      reliable 6Bone backbone.
> >
> >IIJ is now providing robust connectivity services to seven IPv6 sites.
> >
> >   3. The site MUST have a potential "user community" that would be
> >      served by becoming a pTLA, e.g., the requester is a major player
> >      in a region, country or focus of interest.
> >
> >IIJ is one of the biggest IPv4 ISPs in Japan. And already connects
> >seven IPv6 sites.
> >
> >   4. Must commit to abide by the 6Bone backbone operational rules and
> >      policies as defined in the present document.
> >
> >IIJ certainly commits. Note that some of IIJ guys are actually
> >the operators of WIDE IPv6 backbone.
> >
> >--Itojun & Kazu, IIJ
> 
> 
> 


-- 
--bill