From yjchui@ms.chttl.com.tw Mon Mar 1 02:53:21 1999 From: yjchui@ms.chttl.com.tw (Yann-Ju Chu) Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 10:53:21 +0800 Subject: Peering with other pTLA Message-ID: <36DA0121.9DCADC9D@ms.chttl.com.tw> We have bocame a pTLA site in 6Bone and are trying to build peering with other pTLAs. I have studied two drafts: "Multihomed routing domain issues for IPv6 aggregatable scheme" and "6Bone routing practice", but still are confused with something. 1. Should I normally announce only my own address prefix (3ffe:3600::/24) to my peers? 2. If the answer is right => I should build full mesh connection with all 6Bone pTLAs, if I want a complete access to all 6Bone sites? Chu ChungHwa Telecom. Co. From fink@es.net Mon Mar 1 23:08:54 1999 From: fink@es.net (Bob Fink) Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 15:08:54 -0800 Subject: Peering with other pTLA In-Reply-To: <36DA0121.9DCADC9D@ms.chttl.com.tw> Message-ID: <4.1.19990301150013.00c082b0@imap2.es.net> At 10:53 AM 3/1/99 +0800, Yann-Ju Chu wrote: > We have bocame a pTLA site in 6Bone and are trying to build peering with >other pTLAs. I have studied two drafts: "Multihomed routing domain issues >for IPv6 aggregatable scheme" and "6Bone routing practice", but still are >confused with something. > 1. Should I normally announce only my own address prefix (3ffe:3600::/24) >to my peers? In the spirit of the 6bone you should be willing to provide transit to all other 6bone pTLAs (see section 4 of the 6Bone Routing Practice I-D below) thus you can/should be willing to announce other pTLAs as well as your own. > 2. If the answer is right => I should build full mesh connection with all >6Bone pTLAs, if I want a complete access to all 6Bone sites? Given the above, you do not need to build a full mesh, which is why we recommend 3 (again, see excerpt below). Bob === draft-ietf-ngtrans-6bone-routing-01.txt 6Bone Routing Practice 1 June 1998 4 Routing policies 6Bone backbone sites maintain the mesh into the backbone and provide an as reliable as possible service, granted the 6Bone is an experimentation tool. To achieve their mission, 6Bone backbone sites MUST maintain peerings with at least 3 (three) other back bone sites. The peering agreements across the 6Bone are by nature non-commercial, and therefore SHOULD allow transit traffic through. Eventually, the Internet registries will assign other TLAs than the 6Bone one (currently 3FFE::/16). The organizations bearing those TLAs will establish a new IPv6 network, parallel to the 6Bone. The 6Bone MIGHT interconnect with this new IPv6 Internet, but transit across the 6Bone will not be guaranteed. It will be left to each 6Bone backbone site to decide whether it will carry traffic to or from the IPv6 Internet. -end From marsman@telin.nl Tue Mar 2 10:27:19 1999 From: marsman@telin.nl (J. Marsman) Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 11:27:19 +0100 Subject: IPv6 to IPv4 on SUN Message-ID: <36DBBD05.6A17148D@telin.nl> Hello, we've got a sun with solaris 2.5 and the IPv6 packet from SUN. Now we are trying to configure this SUN as router. On one side there is an IPv6 network on the other side the internet. The problem is the sun doesn't want to route the ipv6 mapped ipv4 adresses and sends out on the IPv4 interface ICMPv6 packets. Has somebody any experience with configuring routing capabilities on a SUn (Sparc) or is this even possible. Regards, Jan Marsman Marsman@telin.nl From truman@superlink.net Tue Mar 2 16:08:28 1999 From: truman@superlink.net (Truman Boyes) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 11:08:28 -0500 (EST) Subject: nrl-ipv6+ipsec-alpha-7.1 and OpenBSD 2.4 Message-ID: Hello, has anyone used this package with OpenBSD 2.4-current. I understand there are still issues with IPSEC. I am seeing errors with the makefile, with ifconfig. missing Makefile.inc. guess i will play around with it... anyone dropped it into 2.4-frozen ? ______________________________________________________________________________ __o Truman Boyes truman@superlink.net _ \<,_ Network Operations (voice) 732-432-5454 (_)/ (_) SuperLink Internet Services (fax) 732-432-5450 ______________________________________________________________________________ From cmetz@inner.net Tue Mar 2 20:11:37 1999 From: cmetz@inner.net (Craig Metz) Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 15:11:37 -0500 Subject: nrl-ipv6+ipsec-alpha-7.1 and OpenBSD 2.4 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 02 Mar 1999 11:08:28 EST." Message-ID: <199903022010.UAA04807@inner.net> In message , you write: >has anyone used this package with OpenBSD 2.4-current. I understand there >are still issues with IPSEC. I am seeing errors with the makefile, with >ifconfig. missing Makefile.inc. guess i will play around with it... anyone >dropped it into 2.4-frozen ? The NRL Alpha 7.1 kit supports OpenBSD 2.4. That's OpenBSD 2.4. Not OpenBSD-current. OpenBSD-current has the IPv6 kernel code and PF_KEY kernel code merged in. For IPv6, you need to build the NRL Alpha 7.1 userland against the OpenBSD- current headers to get a useful system. For PF_KEY, ipsecadm(8) has been changed to use PF_KEY, and you can also use the pfkey(8) from the NRL kit. -Craig From dewell@woods.net Tue Mar 2 21:21:18 1999 From: dewell@woods.net (dewell@woods.net) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 12:21:18 -0900 (AKST) Subject: IPv6 to IPv4 on SUN In-Reply-To: <36DBBD05.6A17148D@telin.nl> References: <36DBBD05.6A17148D@telin.nl> Message-ID: <14044.22094.420076.848359@snowy.woods.net> I'd suggest using Solaris 7, not Solaris 2.5. I've used it on 2.5.1, and I know it works, but it has been a while. Upgrade, it is worth your while, really. But, on Solaris 2.5, I believe that it represents the interfaces as le0#v6 or something like that. Check to make sure that all of those interfaces are up, the entries are in the routing table (netstat -rn). That's about as far as my memory goes. Solaris 7's IPv6 prototype has much better configuration, looks (and is) more integrated, and works much better. The one for 2.5 worked, but the new stuff is much better. J. Marsman wrote: > Hello, > > we've got a sun with solaris 2.5 and the IPv6 packet from SUN. Now we > are trying to configure this SUN as router. On one side there is an IPv6 > network on the other side the internet. The problem is the sun doesn't > want to route the ipv6 mapped ipv4 adresses and sends out on the IPv4 > interface ICMPv6 packets. > > Has somebody any experience with configuring routing capabilities on a > SUn (Sparc) or is this even possible. > > Regards, > > Jan Marsman > Marsman@telin.nl > _______________________________________________________________________ |Aaron Dewell ===> dewell@woods.net | |aka local guru ===> dewell@greatland.net | |http://www.woods.net/~dewell http://www.woods.net/ | |PGP keyid 0x0D12A6B9 available from http://keys.pgp.com/ | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ From yjchui@ms.chttl.com.tw Wed Mar 3 04:04:03 1999 From: yjchui@ms.chttl.com.tw (Yann-Ju Chu) Date: Wed, 03 Mar 1999 12:04:03 +0800 Subject: new 6bone pTLA 3FFE:3600::/24 assigned to CHTTL-TW (fwd) References: Message-ID: <36DCB4B3.C581D98D@ms.chttl.com.tw> My prefix is 3ffe:3600::/24. I have set up BGP4+ with another Backbone sites(3ffe:2900::/24), but can not ping to other remote sites. and I have tried traceroute to 3ffe:1200:3001:0:80:c8ff:fe33:fa93 and get the result as following: traceroute i6 3ffe:1200:3001:0:80:c8ff:fe33:fa93 1 3ffe:2900:3600::2 261 ms 257 ms 254 ms 2 3ffe:28ff:ffff:4::100 381 ms 396 ms 377 ms 3 * * * 4 3ffe:1100::cc02:0:0:0:1 478 ms 477 ms 458 ms 5 * * * 6 * * * ....... Is that posssible that 3ffe:1100::/ filters out my prefix, 3ffe:3600::/24 ? Thanks Chu From tesi_tlc@ing240.unife.it Wed Mar 3 15:47:10 1999 From: tesi_tlc@ing240.unife.it (Tesi TLC (G. MazzinI)) Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 16:47:10 +0100 (MET) Subject: tunnel v6 in v4 Message-ID: This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. ---559023410-851401618-919186961=:5768 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-ID: Hi ! We are two students of Italian University ! We work with 2 pc (named : ing58 and ing211). We installed ipv6 on our linux machines using the Bieriger's HOWTO ! We compiled inet6-apps0.34, net-tools1.50, telnet ........etc This is our situation : ( it is possible this configuration ? ) ____________________________ ethernet NE2000| | tunnel v6 in v4 to CSELT ______|____ ____|_____ | | | | | ing211 | | ing58 | |__________| |__________| We set up tunnel (v6 in v4 from ing58 to CSELT). CSELT are connect to 6bone! We haven't problems if we ping v6 from ing58 to CSELT router, and from ing211 to ing58 but we don't understand how configure ing209 for to ping from ing211 to CSELT router. It is possible this configuration ? We tried also this configuration : tunnel v6 in v4 to CSELT ________________ ____________ eth0 | eth0 | | eth1 ______|___ _|_____|__ | | | | | ing211 | | ing58 | |__________| |__________| We ping from ing211 to ing58 (addr eth1) but we don't ping from ing211 to CSELT router ! Our problem is : how it configure host (ing211) in local LAN for to send packets v6 in v4 through tunnel (ing58) If you have some advice, can you tell us ? Thanks Luca & Giancarlo ---559023410-851401618-919186961=:5768-- From brett.bielby@skeksis.net Fri Mar 5 06:06:42 1999 From: brett.bielby@skeksis.net (Brett Bielby) Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 23:06:42 -0700 Subject: FW: Spooky!! Message-ID: <000601be66ce$57bf3f00$cc01a8c0@monolith.skeksis.net> -----Original Message----- From: Arthur D Bielby [mailto:Arthur.D.Bielby-1@usa.dupont.com] Sent: Sunday, February 28, 1999 7:59 AM To: bielby@aol.com Subject: Spooky!! << > > Consider this... > > > > And remember that it's ALL COMPLETELY TRUE... > > > > Abraham Lincoln was elected to Congress in 1846. > > > > John F. Kennedy was elected to Congress in 1946. > > > > Abraham Lincoln was elected President in 1860. > > > > John F. Kennedy was elected President in 1960. > > > > The names Lincoln and Kennedy each contain seven letters. > > > > Both were particularly concerned with civil rights. > > > > Both wives lost their children while living in the White House. > > > > Both Presidents were shot on a Friday. > > > > Both were shot in the head. > > > > Lincoln's secretary was named Kennedy. > > > > Kennedy's secretary was named Lincoln. > > > > Both were assassinated by Southerners. > > > > Both were succeeded by Southerners. > > > > Both successors were named Johnson. > > > > Andrew Johnson, who succeeded Lincoln, was born in 1808. > > > > Lyndon Johnson, who succeeded Kennedy, was born in 1908. > > > > John Wilkes Booth, who assassinated Lincoln, was born in 1839. > > > > Lee Harvey Oswald, who assassinated Kennedy, was born in 1939. > > > > Both assassins were known by their three names. > > > > Both names comprise fifteen letters. > > > > Booth ran from the theater and was caught in a warehouse. > > > > Oswald ran from a warehouse and was caught in a theater. > > > > Booth and Oswald were both assassinated before their trials. > > > > > > From kato@wide.ad.jp Sun Mar 7 06:01:00 1999 From: kato@wide.ad.jp (Akira Kato) Date: Sun, 07 Mar 1999 15:01:00 +0900 Subject: Meeting on IPv6 Address Allocation Policy Message-ID: <19990307150100I.kato@nezu.wide.ad.jp> Folks, The Regional Registries (ARIN, RIPE/NCC, APNIC) is about to define the IPv6 address allocation policy. Their current draft may be referred from your regional registries. In the case of APNIC, you can get through the URL below: http://www.apnic.net/ipv6draft.html The registries held a meeting to discuss the guidelines last week in Singapore (in conjunction with Apricot'99) and some IPv6 people have been invited to the meeting. Althrough I was not able to attend it, a quick report from my colleague said that there was some discussion on the current bootstrap condition which requires an IPv6 (s)TLA applicant should have at least 100 non-dialup customers (corresponding to the 8th paragraph of 4.1.1 in the case of APNIC draft). One of the conclusion of the meeting was to hold a continuous discussion during the Minnepolis IETF meeting. Current candidate timeslot is just after the first NGtrans session is over (May 16 (TUE) 11:30 -- 12:30, in Room Salon G). Please note that the above schedule is tentative and may be changed or even entirely cancelled. Those who are interested to participate it, please stay tuned. -- Akira Kato, WIDE Project From jabley@clear.co.nz Mon Mar 8 01:02:22 1999 From: jabley@clear.co.nz (Joe Abley) Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 14:02:22 +1300 Subject: Meeting on IPv6 Address Allocation Policy In-Reply-To: <19990307150100I.kato@nezu.wide.ad.jp>; from Akira Kato on Sun, Mar 07, 1999 at 03:01:00PM +0900 References: <19990307150100I.kato@nezu.wide.ad.jp> Message-ID: <19990308140222.F799@clear.co.nz> On Sun, Mar 07, 1999 at 03:01:00PM +0900, Akira Kato wrote: > > The Regional Registries (ARIN, RIPE/NCC, APNIC) is about to define the > IPv6 address allocation policy. Their current draft may be referred > from your regional registries. In the case of APNIC, you can get > through the URL below: > http://www.apnic.net/ipv6draft.html I think that many of the emotional responses that will probably result from this draft will centre around the issue that unless a network operates as a TLA (or unless sub-TLA advertisements are widely accepted and distributed, like the hole- punching that is de regeur in IPv4), multi-homing is a vague and complicated issue. Given that many organisations which are most definitely not TLA candidates have requirements to multi-home (e.g. end user networks), it seems to me that a coherent multi-homing strategy is required before regional members can comment sensibly on the TLA address allocation policy. In the absense of such a multi-homing plan, if I might reasonably say "everybody who can show that they are multi-homed act as a TLA". I won't say that, because I appreciate the scaling issues involved in the core, but if I was an end-user I might. Joe From brian@hursley.ibm.com Mon Mar 8 11:22:00 1999 From: brian@hursley.ibm.com (Brian E Carpenter) Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 11:22:00 +0000 Subject: Meeting on IPv6 Address Allocation Policy References: <19990307150100I.kato@nezu.wide.ad.jp> <19990308140222.F799@clear.co.nz> Message-ID: <36E3B2D8.E31A326@hursley.ibm.com> Joe, A multihomed IPv6 site would be expected to have multiple prefixes, possibly taken from multiple TLAs. But multihoming is a very hard problem, and we can't afford to delay the start of IPv6 address assignment in the hope that someone solves it. What we are talking about is not *whether* subTLA assignment starts in April, but what the assignment guidelines are *when* it starts. Brian Joe Abley wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 07, 1999 at 03:01:00PM +0900, Akira Kato wrote: > > > > The Regional Registries (ARIN, RIPE/NCC, APNIC) is about to define the > > IPv6 address allocation policy. Their current draft may be referred > > from your regional registries. In the case of APNIC, you can get > > through the URL below: > > http://www.apnic.net/ipv6draft.html > > I think that many of the emotional responses that will probably result from > this draft will centre around the issue that unless a network operates as > a TLA (or unless sub-TLA advertisements are widely accepted and distributed, > like the hole- punching that is de regeur in IPv4), multi-homing is a vague > and complicated issue. > > Given that many organisations which are most definitely not TLA candidates > have requirements to multi-home (e.g. end user networks), it seems to me > that a coherent multi-homing strategy is required before regional members > can comment sensibly on the TLA address allocation policy. > > In the absense of such a multi-homing plan, if I might reasonably say > "everybody who can show that they are multi-homed act as a TLA". I won't > say that, because I appreciate the scaling issues involved in the core, > but if I was an end-user I might. > > Joe From bound@zk3.dec.com Mon Mar 8 15:13:48 1999 From: bound@zk3.dec.com (Jim Bound) Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 10:13:48 -0500 Subject: Meeting on IPv6 Address Allocation Policy In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 08 Mar 1999 11:22:00 GMT." <36E3B2D8.E31A326@hursley.ibm.com> Message-ID: <199903081513.KAA0000012845@quarry.zk3.dec.com> >A multihomed IPv6 site would be expected to have multiple >prefixes, possibly taken from multiple TLAs. But multihoming >is a very hard problem, and we can't afford to delay the start >of IPv6 address assignment in the hope that someone solves it. >What we are talking about is not *whether* subTLA assignment >starts in April, but what the assignment guidelines are *when* >it starts. Exactly. It is time to provide IPv6 addresses. I also now agree with IAB response to the previous paper I looked at that /29 should be allocated for the sub-TLA's. And all the quantity reqs for startup and references at least need to be tripled. Also though I support conservation, initially we need to make sure efforts like 6REN do not have to jump thru major hoops to get started, which are good for Ipv6 and a real need for 6REN customers outside of the U.S. WHere will this paper be discussed at Minneapolis? Or will it not and just email? /jim From rrockell@sprint.net Mon Mar 8 20:38:10 1999 From: rrockell@sprint.net (Robert Rockell) Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 15:38:10 -0500 (EST) Subject: DNS setup questions Message-ID: This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. ---559023410-1804928587-920925490=:21706 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Good a forum as any :) I was finally getting my DNS stuff set up (apologies to my customers for taking so long) and I am having trouble delegating anything longer than 9th level. I get the following: 52 (iscserv) /iscserv/home2/rrockell -> dig @v6-sol.sprintlink.net 9.2.e.f.f.3.ip6.int. axfr ; <<>> DiG 8.1 <<>> @v6-sol.sprintlink.net 9.2.e.f.f.3.ip6.int. axfr ; (1 server found) $ORIGIN 9.2.e.f.f.3.ip6.int. @ 1D IN SOA v6-sol.sprintlink.net. rrockell.sprint.net. ( 1999030802 ; serial 1H ; refresh 15M ; retry 1W ; expiry 1M ) ; minimum 1M IN NS v6-sol.sprintlink.net. 1M IN NS ns.isi.edu. 0 1M IN NS ns1.slug.net. @ 1D IN SOA v6-sol.sprintlink.net. rrockell.sprint.net. ( 1999030802 ; serial 1H ; refresh 15M ; retry 1W ; expiry 1M ) ; minimum ;; Received 7 answers (7 records). ;; FROM: iscserv to SERVER: 199.0.232.93 ;; WHEN: Mon Mar 8 15:30:03 1999 so it seems to be working. However, now when I try to delegate down a /48 of my customer's, the line does not show up on a dig. I played with this, and it only seems to be working with exactly one extra character (viewed as 9th level delegation by dns). for example 1.9.2.e.f.f.3.ip6.int would work, but 2.1.9.2.e.f.f.e.ip6.int would not I dug around with some other v6 dns machines out there and it seems that they run perfectly well. I even see PTR records out to /128!!! If anyone has encountered this before, please let me know. I am hoping It is not something silly that I simply forgot. Any help would be appreciated. named.conf and zonefile attached Thanks Rob Rockell Sprintlink Internet Service Center Operations Engineering 703-689-6322 1-800-724-3329, PIN 385-8833 Ines|e gnyne qh vagr bz s|e Ino ngg una {e hgr bpu plxyne? ---559023410-1804928587-920925490=:21706 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name="named.conf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: Content-Description: b3B0aW9ucyB7DQogICAgICAgIGRpcmVjdG9yeSAiL3Zhci9uYW1lZCI7DQp9 Ow0Kem9uZSAibG9jYWxob3N0IiBJTiB7DQogICAgICAgIHR5cGUgbWFzdGVy Ow0KICAgICAgICBmaWxlICJsb2NhbGhvc3Quem9uZSI7DQp9Ow0Kem9uZSAi MC4wLjEyNy5pbi1hZGRyLmFycGEiIHsNCiAgICAgICAgdHlwZSBtYXN0ZXI7 DQogICAgICAgIGZpbGUgIm5hbWVkLmxvY2FsIjsNCn07DQp6b25lICIuIiB7 DQogICAgICAgIHR5cGUgaGludDsNCiAgICAgICAgZmlsZSAibmFtZWQucm9v dCI7DQp9Ow0Kem9uZSAic3ByaW50djYubmV0IiB7DQoJdHlwZSBtYXN0ZXI7 DQoJZmlsZSAicHJpbWFyeS9zcHJpbnR2Ni5uZXQiOw0KfTsNCnpvbmUgIjku Mi5lLmYuZi4zLmlwNi5pbnQiIHsNCgl0eXBlIG1hc3RlcjsNCglmaWxlICJw cmltYXJ5LzkuMi5lLmYuZi4zLmlwNi5pbnQiOw0KfTsNCgkNCg== ---559023410-1804928587-920925490=:21706 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name="9.2.e.f.f.3.ip6.int" Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: Content-Description: OS4yLmUuZi5mLjMuaXA2LmludC4gICAgODY0MDAgICBTT0EgICAgIHY2LXNv bC5zcHJpbnRsaW5rLm5ldC4gIHJyb2NrZWxsLnNwcmludC5uZXQuICgNCiAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIDE5OTkwMzA4MDIgICAgICA7c2VyaWFs DQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAzNjAwICAgIAk7cmVmcmVzaA0K ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgOTAwICAgICAJO3JldHJ5DQogICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICA2MDQ4MDAgIAk7ZXhwaXJlDQogICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICA2MCApIAkJO21pbmltDQo7DQo5LjIuZS5mLmYu My5pcDYuaW50LgkJCQlJTglOUwl2Ni1zb2wuc3ByaW50bGluay5uZXQuDQo5 LjIuZS5mLmYuMy5pcDYuaW50LgkJCQlJTglOUwlucy5pc2kuZWR1Lg0KOw0K MAkJCQkJCUlOCU5TCW5zMS5zbHVnLm5ldC4NCjkuMi5lLmYuZi4zLmlwNi5p bnQuCQkJCUlOCU5TCW5zMS53b29kcy5uZXQuDQoxLjAuMC4wLjAuMC5kLjEu ZS5mLmYuMy5pcDYuaW50LgkJSU4JTlMJbnMxLnNsdWcubmV0Lg0K ---559023410-1804928587-920925490=:21706-- From crawdad@fnal.gov Mon Mar 8 21:17:54 1999 From: crawdad@fnal.gov (Matt Crawford) Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 15:17:54 -0600 Subject: DNS setup questions In-Reply-To: Your message of Mon, 08 Mar 1999 15:38:10 EST. Message-ID: <199903082117.PAA05158@gungnir.fnal.gov> I'm not sure exactly what you're saying isn't working, but I do notice two important things. > However, now when I try to delegate down a /48 of my customer's, the line > does not show up on a dig. I played with this, and it only seems to be > working with exactly one extra character (viewed as 9th level delegation by > dns). > > for example > > 1.9.2.e.f.f.3.ip6.int would work, but > 2.1.9.2.e.f.f.e.ip6.int would not The latter is missing a "3" before "ip6", but I assume that's just a typo in your message. In your zone file ... 9.2.e.f.f.3.ip6.int. 86400 SOA v6-sol.sprintlink.net. rrockell.sprint.net. ( [...] 1.0.0.0.0.0.d.1.e.f.f.3.ip6.int. IN NS ns1.slug.net. This last line is not part of your zone, as it doesn't end with "9.2.e.f.f.3.ip6.int". Isn't there a warning from bind when you load this? From rrockell@sprint.net Mon Mar 8 21:52:21 1999 From: rrockell@sprint.net (Robert Rockell) Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 16:52:21 -0500 (EST) Subject: DNS setup questions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: thanks for the responses. Apparently, it was in fact a ID-10-T error on my part. It is working now. thanks again for the prompt help. Thanks Rob Rockell Sprintlink Internet Service Center Operations Engineering 703-689-6322 1-800-724-3329, PIN 385-8833 Ines|e gnyne qh vagr bz s|e Ino ngg una {e hgr bpu plxyne? On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, Robert Rockell wrote: ->Good a forum as any :) -> ->I was finally getting my DNS stuff set up (apologies to my customers for ->taking so long) and I am having trouble delegating anything longer than 9th ->level. -> ->I get the following: -> ->52 (iscserv) /iscserv/home2/rrockell -> dig @v6-sol.sprintlink.net ->9.2.e.f.f.3.ip6.int. axfr -> ->; <<>> DiG 8.1 <<>> @v6-sol.sprintlink.net 9.2.e.f.f.3.ip6.int. axfr ->; (1 server found) ->$ORIGIN 9.2.e.f.f.3.ip6.int. ->@ 1D IN SOA v6-sol.sprintlink.net. ->rrockell.sprint.net. ( -> 1999030802 ; serial -> 1H ; refresh -> 15M ; retry -> 1W ; expiry -> 1M ) ; minimum -> -> 1M IN NS v6-sol.sprintlink.net. -> 1M IN NS ns.isi.edu. ->0 1M IN NS ns1.slug.net. ->@ 1D IN SOA v6-sol.sprintlink.net. ->rrockell.sprint.net. ( -> 1999030802 ; serial -> 1H ; refresh -> 15M ; retry -> 1W ; expiry -> 1M ) ; minimum -> ->;; Received 7 answers (7 records). ->;; FROM: iscserv to SERVER: 199.0.232.93 ->;; WHEN: Mon Mar 8 15:30:03 1999 -> -> ->so it seems to be working. -> ->However, now when I try to delegate down a /48 of my customer's, the line ->does not show up on a dig. I played with this, and it only seems to be ->working with exactly one extra character (viewed as 9th level delegation by ->dns). -> ->for example -> ->1.9.2.e.f.f.3.ip6.int would work, but ->2.1.9.2.e.f.f.e.ip6.int would not -> ->I dug around with some other v6 dns machines out there and it seems ->that they run perfectly well. I even see PTR records out to /128!!! -> ->If anyone has encountered this before, please let me know. I am hoping It is ->not something silly that I simply forgot. Any help would be appreciated. -> ->named.conf and zonefile attached -> ->Thanks ->Rob Rockell ->Sprintlink Internet Service Center ->Operations Engineering ->703-689-6322 ->1-800-724-3329, PIN 385-8833 ->Ines|e gnyne qh vagr bz s|e Ino ngg una {e hgr bpu plxyne? -> From kato@wide.ad.jp Wed Mar 10 01:48:50 1999 From: kato@wide.ad.jp (Akira Kato) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 10:48:50 +0900 Subject: Meeting on IPv6 Address Allocation Policy In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 07 Mar 1999 15:01:00 +0900" <19990307150100I.kato@nezu.wide.ad.jp> References: <19990307150100I.kato@nezu.wide.ad.jp> Message-ID: <19990310104850I.kato@nezu.wide.ad.jp> I sent the pre-announcement attached below in Mar 07 afternoon. I got positive responses from at least two Regional Registries and I would like to confirm the meeting. The purpose of the meeting is *not* to bash the registries but to - Demonstrate how we are requiring IPv6 address space, - Understand the current situation of each Regional Registry, - Find out what kind of help from IPv6 community to the registries is needed to expedite the allocation process, - so on. Note that we will only have only 1 hour slot. So please understand that we can not discuss the issues in detail. Also please read the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy in advance. See you soon in Minneapolis! -- Akira Kato, WIDE Project > Folks, > > The Regional Registries (ARIN, RIPE/NCC, APNIC) is about to define the > IPv6 address allocation policy. Their current draft may be referred > from your regional registries. In the case of APNIC, you can get > through the URL below: > http://www.apnic.net/ipv6draft.html > > The registries held a meeting to discuss the guidelines last week in > Singapore (in conjunction with Apricot'99) and some IPv6 people have > been invited to the meeting. Althrough I was not able to attend it, > a quick report from my colleague said that there was some discussion > on the current bootstrap condition which requires an IPv6 (s)TLA > applicant should have at least 100 non-dialup customers (corresponding > to the 8th paragraph of 4.1.1 in the case of APNIC draft). > > One of the conclusion of the meeting was to hold a continuous > discussion during the Minnepolis IETF meeting. Current candidate > timeslot is just after the first NGtrans session is over (May 16 (TUE) > 11:30 -- 12:30, in Room Salon G). > > Please note that the above schedule is tentative and may be changed or > even entirely cancelled. Those who are interested to participate it, > please stay tuned. > > -- Akira Kato, WIDE Project From kato@wide.ad.jp Wed Mar 10 03:21:36 1999 From: kato@wide.ad.jp (Akira Kato) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 12:21:36 +0900 Subject: Meeting on IPv6 Address Allocation Policy In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 10 Mar 1999 10:48:50 +0900" <19990310104850I.kato@nezu.wide.ad.jp> References: <19990310104850I.kato@nezu.wide.ad.jp> Message-ID: <19990310122136X.kato@nezu.wide.ad.jp> Oops, in my previous mail, the date/time and place of the meeting is not explicitly noted. I apologize it. It will be held as below: May 16 (TUE), 11:30 -- 12:30 in Room Salon G (-- 11:15, the first NGtrans meeting held in the same room) -- Akira Kato, WIDE Project From marsman@telin.nl Wed Mar 10 12:57:01 1999 From: marsman@telin.nl (J. Marsman) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 13:57:01 +0100 Subject: Flowlabel/Traffic Class Message-ID: <36E66C1C.555E95F3@telin.nl> Hello, We've got an small IPv6 network and like to test some programs. At the moment we have an webserver up and running and IE communicating with it over IPv6. Are there any other programs, next to finger,ping,telnet and ftp, which are IPv6 compatible? like video and audio conferencing. Another question is: What is the status of the traffic calss field and the flowlabel. In RFC 2460 we can read that testing is going on but.. Can we participate in this kind of testing or can we test it ourselfs. None of the software we've found is using QoS. Regards, Jan Marsman Telematica Institute Marsman@telin.nl From bound@zk3.dec.com Wed Mar 10 13:20:51 1999 From: bound@zk3.dec.com (Jim Bound) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 08:20:51 -0500 Subject: Flowlabel/Traffic Class In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 10 Mar 1999 13:57:01 +0100." <36E66C1C.555E95F3@telin.nl> Message-ID: <199903101320.IAA0000017766@quarry.zk3.dec.com> Hi, >We've got an small IPv6 network and like to test some programs. At the >moment we have an webserver up and running and IE communicating with it >over IPv6. Are there any other programs, next to finger,ping,telnet and >ftp, which are IPv6 compatible? like video and audio conferencing. None at our end yet. But are looking at these kind of apps now. I think we need to do some testing of your second paragraph.. >Another question is: What is the status of the traffic calss field and >the flowlabel. In RFC 2460 we can read that testing is going on but.. >Can we participate in this kind of testing or can we test it ourselfs. >None of the software we've found is using QoS. I have not see enough yet of the defaults to put the traffic class bits on for IPv6. But I think after Minneapolis we all need to start setting the defaults. What a server should do with diff serv draft just came out and for our IPv6 we need to look at that draft for traffic class. For the flowlabel we have implemented RSVP for IPv6 and if you pull our kit over and have an Alpha running 4.0d Tru64 UNIX you can start testing the flowlabel. You also may want see if you can write test code via rapi to the rsvp daemon too. We are ready to test RSVP and the flowlabel with IPv6 when others are ready and it should be requested at the next UNH IPv6 bakeoff. There are also several drafts that just came out speaking to how rsvp applicability statements work with diff serv for IPv4 and IPv6. See www.digital.com/info/ipv6/ to get to what we implemented thus far ad also wee www.ipv6.org page. /jim Regards, Jan Marsman Telematica Institute Marsman@telin.nl From richdr@microsoft.com Wed Mar 10 18:06:29 1999 From: richdr@microsoft.com (Richard Draves) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 10:06:29 -0800 Subject: Flowlabel/Traffic Class Message-ID: <4D0A23B3F74DD111ACCD00805F31D8100AF81EF5@RED-MSG-50> > We've got an small IPv6 network and like to test some programs. At the > moment we have an webserver up and running and IE > communicating with it > over IPv6. Are there any other programs, next to > finger,ping,telnet and > ftp, which are IPv6 compatible? like video and audio conferencing. One of the MSR IPv6 downloads has sdr & rat (audio conferencing), ports from the UCL code base. See http://www.research.microsoft.com/msripv6. Rich From aaguirre@zofri.cl Wed Mar 10 19:58:24 1999 From: aaguirre@zofri.cl (Armando S. Aguirre Schlick) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 15:58:24 -0400 Subject: Flowlabel/Traffic Class References: <36E66C1C.555E95F3@telin.nl> Message-ID: <36E6CEE0.1645DFE3@zofri.cl> J. Marsman wrote: > > Hello, > > We've got an small IPv6 network and like to test some programs. At the > moment we have an webserver up and running and IE communicating with it > over IPv6. Are there any other programs, next to finger,ping,telnet and > ftp, which are IPv6 compatible? like video and audio conferencing. Which O.S. are you taking about?? NT, Win95?? I know a large list of aplication for linux, but I don't know how many aplications for WinX are... Somebody knows the status of Winxx-ipv6?? bye.. -- Armando S. Aguirre Schlick fono: (56 57) 403300 Coordinador de Proyectos de Desarrollo e Innovación Tecnológica Subgerencia de Informatica ZOFRI S.A. fax : (56 57) 417241 mailto:aaguirre@zofri.cl From brian@hursley.ibm.com Thu Mar 11 10:43:17 1999 From: brian@hursley.ibm.com (Brian E Carpenter) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 10:43:17 +0000 Subject: Flowlabel/Traffic Class References: <36E66C1C.555E95F3@telin.nl> Message-ID: <36E79E45.2ABC362C@hursley.ibm.com> Hi, The traffic class field is defined in RFC 2474 and 2475, but these are so new that I expect it will be a little while before we see implementations. Brian Carpenter J. Marsman wrote: > > Hello, > > We've got an small IPv6 network and like to test some programs. At the > moment we have an webserver up and running and IE communicating with it > over IPv6. Are there any other programs, next to finger,ping,telnet and > ftp, which are IPv6 compatible? like video and audio conferencing. > > Another question is: What is the status of the traffic calss field and > the flowlabel. In RFC 2460 we can read that testing is going on but.. > Can we participate in this kind of testing or can we test it ourselfs. > None of the software we've found is using QoS. > > Regards, > > Jan Marsman > Telematica Institute > Marsman@telin.nl From tesi_tlc@ing240.unife.it Thu Mar 11 16:43:21 1999 From: tesi_tlc@ing240.unife.it (Tesi TLC (G. MazzinI)) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 17:43:21 +0100 (MET) Subject: socket ipv6 Message-ID: Hello ! Anyone knows where can we get some informations to socket for ipv6 (es function gethostbyname2, struct in6_addr, getaddresinfo,......) Thanks ! UNIVERSITA' DEGLI STUDI DI FERRARA -ITALY- DIPARTIMENTO DI INGEGNERIA Rovatti Luca personal email lucarov@ing58.unife.it Villani Giancarlo personal email gianca@ing58.unife.it G&L email tesi_tlc@ing240.unife.it tesi_tlc@ing248.unife.it From bound@zk3.dec.com Thu Mar 11 17:35:45 1999 From: bound@zk3.dec.com (Jim Bound) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 12:35:45 -0500 Subject: socket ipv6 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 11 Mar 1999 17:43:21 +0100." Message-ID: <199903111735.MAA0000021332@quarry.zk3.dec.com> >Anyone knows where can we get some informations to socket for ipv6 (es >function gethostbyname2, struct in6_addr, getaddresinfo,......) Please use: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipngwg-bsd-api-new-06.txt RFC 2133 is OBSOLETE. Does that answer your question? gethostbyname2 is deprecated by the above. There will be a replacement RFC any day now I hope. It is just awaiting a number. /jim From jorgen.aaroe@netcon.pulsen.se Fri Mar 12 10:53:37 1999 From: jorgen.aaroe@netcon.pulsen.se (=?ISO-8859-1?B?SvZyZ2VuIEFhcvZl?=) Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 11:53:37 +0100 Subject: Ipv6 and NetWare Message-ID: Hej, Dose anyone know the status for Ipv6 on NetWare? Regards, Jorgen Aaroe From fink@es.net Fri Mar 12 22:30:57 1999 From: fink@es.net (Bob Fink) Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 14:30:57 -0800 Subject: pTLA request for Internet2 In-Reply-To: <36E979B7.67AFDEAD@unl.edu> Message-ID: <4.1.19990312141325.00ad0a20@imap2.es.net> 6BONE Folk, The following pTLA request is to serve the Internet2 (I2) community with IPv6 production quality service. The I2 project will approach 200 US major universities by the end of this year. I have been working with Dale Finkelson (who is the person responsible for IPv6 activites in the I2 community) since last August planning their IPv6 deployment activity. Given the scale and scope of the I2 community, I believe this is a very important step in for IPv6 deployment activities, and strongly support their becoming a pTLA. I would like to have comments on this request sent to the list by close of business 26 March (two weeks from today). Thanks, Bob === > My name is Dale Finkelson. I work at the University of Nebraska, I am also the >chair of the Internet 2 IPv6 working group. In that capacity I would like to >apply for a 6bone pTLA. After looking at the requirements in the routing document I >believe I meet those requirements. > > I have an operational 6bone leaf site now operating within the University >of Nebraska. > > > I am in the process of building an operational IPv6 network operating >within the Internet 2 community. This network will be run as a production level >IPv6 network. It will be monitored by a 24 x 7 NOC, it will provide either native >IPv6 or tunneled IPv6 from at least 6 regional aggregation points (called Gigapops) >back to the University campuses those gigapops serve. I will have this network >installed and running by May of 1999. The first routers will be in place by early >April. This network will be national in scope, sites will range from the west coast >to the southeast. It will also peer using native IPv6 with other national and >international networks at the 6tap. > > > Because I am serving such a large University community I have a >potentially large user community. Equally importantly there is considerable stress >placed on making the user community aware of this network, the importance of using >this network and on finding services within the university and related communities >we can make available within the IPv6 network. > > We will certainly abide by current operational rules and policies. > >Thank you, > >Dale Finkelson >dmf@unl.edu > -end From crawdad@fnal.gov Fri Mar 12 23:22:45 1999 From: crawdad@fnal.gov (Matt Crawford) Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 17:22:45 -0600 Subject: pTLA request for Internet2 In-Reply-To: Your message of Fri, 12 Mar 1999 14:30:57 PST. <4.1.19990312141325.00ad0a20@imap2.es.net> Message-ID: <199903122322.RAA27991@gungnir.fnal.gov> The reason for I2 getting a 6bone pTLA instead of a registry- or IANA-derived one is to gain experience in renumbering, right? :-) Matt From fink@es.net Sat Mar 13 01:51:35 1999 From: fink@es.net (Bob Fink) Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 17:51:35 -0800 Subject: pTLA request for Internet2 In-Reply-To: <199903122322.RAA27991@gungnir.fnal.gov> References: Message-ID: <4.1.19990312155518.00927f00@imap2.es.net> At 05:22 PM 3/12/99 -0600, Matt Crawford wrote: >The reason for I2 getting a 6bone pTLA instead of a registry- or >IANA-derived one is to gain experience in renumbering, right? :-) Well, if we could get a production assigned sTLA that would be great. However, we still have no clear idea on when this will happen. In addition, I consider it very good form to have 6bone pTLA credentials when applying to the registries for an sTLA. I'll take your comment as a yes on giving a pTLA to Internet2 :-) Bob From yjchui@ms.chttl.com.tw Mon Mar 15 00:58:43 1999 From: yjchui@ms.chttl.com.tw (Yann-Ju Chu) Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 08:58:43 +0800 Subject: about 6Bone registry server Message-ID: <36EC5B43.91C94244@ms.chttl.com.tw> Hi: It seems that the 6Bone registry server has been down for some times because there is not response about my registry update. Chu CHTTL-TW From Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.qc.ca Mon Mar 15 06:05:53 1999 From: Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.qc.ca (Marc Blanchet) Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 00:05:53 -0600 Subject: about 6Bone registry server In-Reply-To: <36EC5B43.91C94244@ms.chttl.com.tw> Message-ID: <4.1.19990315000358.00d4d120@mail.viagenie.qc.ca> At 08:58 99-03-15 +0800, Yann-Ju Chu wrote: > Hi: > It seems that the 6Bone registry server has been down for some times >because there is not response about my registry update. > Chu > CHTTL-TW Yeap. the registry has been down since many days. David is trying to fix it. We are running a mirror of it so you can browse it (http://www.viagenie.qc.ca/en/ipv6/whois.html) but we don't accept updates now. We had the plan to make redundancy for updates, but this is not done yet. Regards, Marc. ----------------------------------------------------------- Marc Blanchet | Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.qc.ca Viagénie inc. | http://www.viagenie.qc.ca 3107 des hôtels | tél.: 418-656-9254 Ste-Foy, Québec | fax.: 418-656-0183 Canada, G1W 4W5 | radio: VA2-JAZ ------------------------------------------------------------ Internet Engineering Standards/Normes d'ingénierie Internet http://www.normos.org ------------------------------------------------------------ From Pontus Lidman Mon Mar 15 12:22:09 1999 From: Pontus Lidman (Pontus Lidman) Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 13:22:09 +0100 (MET) Subject: Trouble creating ipv6-site object Message-ID: Hello. I'm playing around with IPv6 at my local network, trying to learn something. I've been offered a tunnel to the 6bone through SICS. However, I have some troubles creating an ipv6-site object in the RIPE registry. Specifically, how do I obtain the values that should go into the "origin" and "ipv6-site" mandatory fields? Regards, Pontus From brendan@ec.co.za Tue Mar 16 05:59:36 1999 From: brendan@ec.co.za (Brendan) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 07:59:36 +0200 Subject: Removal fromt Mailing list Message-ID: <99031608003301.00717@lexx.ec.co.za> I would like to be removed fromt this list. How do I go about it? Regards, Brendan From fink@es.net Tue Mar 16 06:17:08 1999 From: fink@es.net (Bob Fink) Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 22:17:08 -0800 Subject: pTLA request for FIBEREL/AR Message-ID: <4.1.19990315220855.00b16dd0@imap2.es.net> --=====================_63824106==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" 6bone Folk, Below is Patricio Latini's request for a pTLA for Fibertel in Argentina. Please return your comments to me by close of business on 30 March 1999 so I can process this per your comments. Thanks, Bob === > > From: "Patricio Latini" > To: > Subject: Aplying for pTLA > Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 00:19:27 -0300 > > Hello Bob: > I am interested in apply for been a pTLA, these are the > fundaments for my aplication, > > 1) We are the biggest Cable Modem provider in Latin America (more than 2000 > installed an more than 2.000.000 of houses passed) > 2) We have the biggest ring of fiber optic in Bs. As. and we are expanding > our to cover all the country > 3) We are the only ISP in argentina running a ATM ring to serve multiple > points. > 4) We are provider a leased lines to other isps, enterprises, and othe > companies. > 5) I have been experimented with IPv6 and now i am conected to multiple pTLAs > (vBNS ::/32, 3COM, BAYNetworks, Digital, Sprint)and i have a cisco router > running BGP4+. We have connected one experimental network with many hosts and > many plataforma like Sun, Linux and Windows NT. > 6) We can be the first pTLA in Latinamerica and we can give connection the > other people interested in the 6bone project reducing the link times between > these users end the whole 6bone using our uplink. > 7) Because Latin America had an spectacular grow of internet in the las 5 > years specially Argentina. > 8) My company is very interested in the proyect and in the research of new > technologies. > 9) Because it is very important that 6bone tree grow in all the directions > and we can be the trunk of the tree for the region. > 10) Because we have the fastest uplink to the USA in the region. > > Well these are some of the reasons that made me think that we can be a > potential pTLA, and i saw that i meet with all the requirements told in the > 6bone page. > > If you have some question please ask to me.. > > Thanks > > Patricio Latini > Fibertel TCI2 > Argentina --=====================_63824106==_.ALT Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" 6bone Folk,

Below is Patricio Latini's request for a pTLA for Fibertel in Argentina. Please return your comments to me by close of business on 30 March 1999 so I can process this per your comments.


Thanks,

Bob

===
From: "Patricio Latini" <platini@dynamo.com.ar>
To: <fink@es.net>
Subject: Aplying for pTLA
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 00:19:27 -0300

Hello Bob:
                I am interested in apply for been a pTLA, these are the fundaments for my aplication,
 
1) We are the biggest Cable Modem provider in Latin America (more than 2000 installed an more than 2.000.000 of houses passed)
2) We have the biggest ring of fiber optic in Bs. As. and we are expanding our to cover all the country
3) We are the only ISP in argentina running a ATM ring to serve multiple points.
4) We are provider a leased lines to other isps, enterprises, and othe companies.
5) I have been experimented with IPv6 and now i am conected to multiple pTLAs (vBNS ::/32, 3COM, BAYNetworks, Digital, Sprint)and i have a cisco router running BGP4+. We have connected one experimental network with many hosts and many plataforma like Sun, Linux and Windows NT.
6) We can be the first pTLA in Latinamerica and we can give connection the other people interested in the 6bone project reducing the link times between these users end the whole 6bone using our uplink.
7) Because Latin America had an spectacular grow of internet in the las 5 years specially Argentina.
8) My company is very interested in the proyect and in the research of new technologies.
9) Because it is very important that 6bone tree grow in all the directions and we can be the trunk of the tree for the region.
10) Because we have the fastest uplink to the USA in the region.
 
Well these are some of the reasons that made me think that we can be a potential pTLA, and i saw that i meet with all the requirements told in the 6bone page.
 
If you have some question please ask to me..
 
Thanks
 
Patricio Latini
Fibertel TCI2
Argentina

--=====================_63824106==_.ALT-- From fink@es.net Tue Mar 16 06:25:44 1999 From: fink@es.net (Bob Fink) Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 22:25:44 -0800 Subject: Removal fromt Mailing list In-Reply-To: <99031608003301.00717@lexx.ec.co.za> Message-ID: <4.1.19990315222450.00b17bb0@imap2.es.net> Brendan, At 07:59 AM 3/16/99 +0200, Brendan wrote: >I would like to be removed fromt this list. >How do I go about it? >From the 6bone mail list web page: "To unsubscribe from the 6bone mail list, send a message to majordomo@isi.edu with the line unsubscribe 6bone as the contents of the message." Thanks, Bob From bmanning@ISI.EDU Tue Mar 16 10:13:44 1999 From: bmanning@ISI.EDU (Bill Manning) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 02:13:44 -0800 (PST) Subject: Howto In-Reply-To: <99031608003301.00717@lexx.ec.co.za> from "Brendan" at Mar 16, 99 07:59:36 am Message-ID: <199903161013.CAA17069@boreas.isi.edu> > > I would like to be removed fromt this list. > How do I go about it? > > Regards, > Brendan > the same way you got on... send mail to majordomo@isi.edu in the body, unsubscribe 6bone -- --bill From tesi_tlc@ing240.unife.it Wed Mar 17 17:54:12 1999 From: tesi_tlc@ing240.unife.it (Tesi TLC (G. MazzinI)) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 18:54:12 +0100 (MET) Subject: function connect ipv6 Message-ID: This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. ---559023410-851401618-921693252=:20297 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Hi ! We are 2 italian students ! We are tried to make a IPv6 application, but when we try to open a connect in IPv6 addreswe have : invalid argument Where is the problem ? The function connect doesn't work good,but the function gethostbyname2 works good This is my client v6 in c code : /* client v6 */ #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #define DIM_BUFF 256 main (int argc, char *argv[]) { int sd, fd, nread, i ; char buff[DIM_BUFF] ; int fromlen, copiati ; struct hostent *host ; /* ptr a info per host remoto */ struct sockaddr_in6 rem_indirizzo ; /* per indirizzo socket remota */ if (argc != 3) { printf ("Usage Error: %s nomenodo nomefile\n", argv[0]) ; exit (1) ; } memset ((char *)&rem_indirizzo, 0, sizeof(struct sockaddr_in6)) ; /* Preparazione indirizzo remoto a cui connettersi */ rem_indirizzo.sin6_family = AF_INET6 ; host = gethostbyname2(argv[1],AF_INET6) ; if (host == NULL) { printf("%s not found in /etc/hosts\n",argv[1]); exit (2) ; } for (i=0; i < 16 ; i++) { rem_indirizzo.sin6_addr.s6_addr[i]=((struct in6_addr *) (host->h_addr))->s6_addr[i] ; } rem_indirizzo.sin6_port = 12345 ; /* possibile uso htons() */ sd=socket (AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, 0); printf("ho apero la socket con valore %i\n",sd); if(connect(sd,(struct sockaddr *) &rem_indirizzo, sizeof(struct sockaddr))<0) { perror("Errore in connect"); exit (1) ; } if (write(sd, argv[2], strlen(argv[2])+1)<0) { perror("write") ; exit (1); } if ((nread=read(sd,buff,DIM_BUFF))<0) { perror("read"); exit(1) ; } if (buff[0] == 'S' ) { if ((fd=open(argv[2], O_RDONLY))<0) {perror("open") ; exit(1);} while ((nread=read(fd, buff, DIM_BUFF))>0) write (sd, buff, nread) ; close (sd) ; /* ho spedito il file */ printf("File spedito\n") ; } else printf ("Il file %s esiste, termino\n",argv[1]) ; close (sd) ; exit(0) ; } We attach also serverv6.c ! Questions : where is C code to function 'connect' ? the function 'connect' has some problems if rem_indirizzo has IPv6 addres ? We have very small documentation about new structure IPv6. Could anyone help us ?? UNIVERSITA' DEGLI STUDI DI FERRARA -ITALY- DIPARTIMENTO DI INGEGNERIA Rovatti Luca personal email lucarov@ing58.unife.it Villani Giancarlo personal email gianca@ing58.unife.it G&L email tesi_tlc@ing240.unife.it ---559023410-851401618-921693252=:20297 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name="serverv6.c" Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: Content-Description: I2luY2x1ZGU8c3RkaW8uaD4NCiNpbmNsdWRlPGZjbnRsLmg+DQojaW5jbHVk ZTxzeXMvdHlwZXMuaD4NCiNpbmNsdWRlPC91c3IvaW5ldDYvaW5jbHVkZS9z eXMvdHlwZXMuaD4NCiNpbmNsdWRlPHN5cy9zb2NrZXQuaD4NCiNpbmNsdWRl PC91c3IvaW5ldDYvaW5jbHVkZS9zeXMvc29ja2V0Lmg+DQojaW5jbHVkZTxu ZXRpbmV0L2luLmg+DQojaW5jbHVkZTwvdXNyL2luZXQ2L2luY2x1ZGUvbmV0 aW5ldC9pbjYuaD4NCiNpbmNsdWRlPG5ldGRiLmg+DQojZGVmaW5lIERJTV9C VUZGIDI1Ng0KDQptYWluKGludCBhcmdjLCBjaGFyICphcmd2W10pDQp7DQog aW50IHNkLCBucywgZmQ7DQogY2hhciBidWZmW0RJTV9CVUZGXTsNCiBpbnQg ZnJvbWxlbiwgc3RhdHVzLCBucmVhZCwgY29udD0wOw0KIHN0cnVjdCBzb2Nr YWRkcl9pbjYgbWlvX2luZGlyaXp6byxyZW1faW5kaXJpenpvOw0KIHN0cnVj dCBob3N0ZW50ICpob3N0Ow0KIG1lbXNldCgoY2hhciAqKSZtaW9faW5kaXJp enpvLCAwLCBzaXplb2Yoc3RydWN0IHNvY2thZGRyX2luNikpOw0KIGZyb21s ZW49c2l6ZW9mKHN0cnVjdCBzb2NrYWRkcl9pbjYpOw0KDQogc2Q9c29ja2V0 KEFGX0lORVQ2LFNPQ0tfU1RSRUFNLDApOw0KIGlmKHNkPDApIHtwZXJyb3Io IkFwZXJ0dXJhIHNvY2tldCIpOyBleGl0KDEpO30NCg0KIG1pb19pbmRpcml6 em8uc2luNl9mYW1pbHk9QUZfSU5FVDY7DQogbWlvX2luZGlyaXp6by5zaW42 X3BvcnQ9MTIzNDU7DQoNCiBpZihiaW5kKHNkLCAoc3RydWN0IHNvY2thZGRy ICopICZtaW9faW5kaXJpenpvLHNpemVvZihzdHJ1Y3Qgc29ja2FkZHJfaW42 KSk8MCkgICAgew0KICAgICBwZXJyb3IoImJpbmQiKTtleGl0KDEpOw0KICAg fQ0KDQpsaXN0ZW4oc2QsNSk7DQoNCmNoZGlyKCIvcmljZXZ1dGkiKTsNCg0K LyogVkVSU0lPTkUgU0VRVUVOWklBTEUgKi8NCg0KIGZvcig7Oykgew0KICAg IG5zPWFjY2VwdChzZCwoc3RydWN0IHNvY2thZGRyICopJnJlbV9pbmRpcml6 em8sJmZyb21sZW4pOw0KICAgIHJlYWQgKG5zLCBidWZmLCBESU1fQlVGRik7 DQogICAgcHJpbnRmKCJJbCBzZXJ2ZXIgaGEgbGV0dG8gJXMgXG4iLGJ1ZmYp Ow0KICAgIGlmICgoZmQ9b3BlbihidWZmLCBPX1dST05MWXxPX0NSRUFUfE9f RVhDTCkpPDApDQogICAgICB7DQogICAgICAgcHJpbnRmKCJGaWxlIGVzaXN0 ZSwgbm9uIGxvIHNvdnJhc2NyaXZvXG4iKTsNCiAgICAgICB3cml0ZShucywi TiIsMSk7DQogICAgICB9DQogICAgZWxzZQ0KICAgICAgew0KICAgICAgIHBy aW50ZigiRmlsZSBub24gZXNpc3RlbnRlLCBsbyBjb3BpbyBkYWwgY2xpZW50 XG4iKTsNCiAgICAgICB3cml0ZShucywiUyIsMSk7DQogICAgICAgd2hpbGUo KG5yZWFkPXJlYWQobnMsIGJ1ZmYsIERJTV9CVUZGKSk+MCkNCiAgICAgICAg IHsNCiAgICAgICAgICAgd3JpdGUoZmQsYnVmZixucmVhZCk7DQogICAgICAg ICAgIGNvbnQrPW5yZWFkOw0KICAgICAgICAgfQ0KICAgICAgIHByaW50Zigi Q29waWEgZXNlZ3VpdGEgZGkgJWQgYnl0ZVxuIiwgY29udCk7DQogICB9DQog IGNsb3NlKG5zKTsNCn0NCn0NCg== ---559023410-851401618-921693252=:20297-- From bmanning@ISI.EDU Tue Mar 23 04:05:04 1999 From: bmanning@ISI.EDU (Bill Manning) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 20:05:04 -0800 (PST) Subject: test for bob Message-ID: <199903230405.UAA14509@boreas.isi.edu> This is a test for Bob Fink. Sorry for the wasted BW -- "When in doubt, Twirl..." -anon From sekiya@sfc.wide.ad.jp Wed Mar 24 08:47:04 1999 From: sekiya@sfc.wide.ad.jp (Yuji SEKIYA) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 17:47:04 +0900 Subject: APNIC and WIDE meeting log. Message-ID: <19990324174704K.sekiya@sfc.wide.ad.jp> APNIC membres and WIDE members had a meeting about sTLA allocation. This is the meeting log. APNIC and WIDE 6bone registries meeting Wednesday 17, March 11:30- Definition of draft. Definition of IX. Definition of site. What is ISP , IX , site ? Clear definition of ISP and other sites. Condition of providing sTLA IDs. 2 pTLA are exit in Japan. WIDE & NTT. WIDE includes some commercial ISPs. Static assignment for dial up connenction. Address Binding. Is it a lifetime lease ? Is it a IPng's issue or Registries' issue ? It's a registries' issue. Renumbering renumbering is untested. expect to determination. Renumbering sTLA to TLA in 3 month. Motivation to develop Router Renumbering and auto router configuration mechanism. But for developpers not for users and ISPs. Renumbering is too hard for ISPs. Considering for customer. No experience of renumbering in large scale. Slow start. We consider to run out sTLA. initial assignment = 50 Condition for getting a sTLA ID. How many ISPs which meet the conditions do exist in 6bone-JP ? about 4 sites. Address Allocation Initial allocation = /35 it is convenient than /29. 50 initial assignment. Future allocation Provide 50 sTLA ISs for bootstrap priod. Registration base providing. starting is slow allocation step by step. An idea in case of running out sTLA. 1. split another TLA into sTLA. 2. split another sTLA into smaller range. 3. revoke under utiluzed alloc. Registries think that 2 is best strategy. Motivation. Difficult to define of verify criteria. Fair start to everyone. Future alloc. Routing Problem. Incremental scale of prefix lengths establishes various prefixes. Can be used to make rational decisions on routability. Rational decision is impossible under only 2 prefixes. (TLA & sTLA) ISPs prefix. Registries define many various prefixes. Next steps. New draft out in two or three weeks. Circulate membership. Membership is important. -> Anyone who wants sTLA IS should be a membership. Registries will start to alloc sTLA in 1st May. Reverse DNS. Deligation issues. /35 is better for deligation. The setting of DNS Delegation Many delegation point of DNS are required. DNS operation. The registries are resposnsible for delegation of DNS. We should consider DNS operation. Initial routing prefix = /35 If a site want an another sTLA ID, the registries give a sTLA ID which has shorter prefix. Delegation point will be canged corresponding the lenght of sTLA ID. /35 2 /34 4 /33 8 /32 1 <- It is easy to operate. APNIC membership IPv6 membership same as IPv4 membership. Aggregation points. +-------+-------+-------+----------------+ 0 1024 2048 3072 8192 Defferent memberships at each aggregation point. Minimam allocation of NLA ?? Why /35 ? /19 /32 IPv6 +--+----------------+-----------+ sTLA NLA 19bits 13bits /19 /32 IPv4 +-------------------+-----------+ 19bits 13 bits Network ID Host ID Same as IPv4 prefix. ------------ Yuji SEKIYA sekiya@sfc.wide.ad.jp / sekiya@v6.linux.or.jp From nathan@rtfm.net Thu Mar 25 23:03:41 1999 From: nathan@rtfm.net (Nathan Dorfman) Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 18:03:41 -0500 Subject: New Tunnel Message-ID: <19990325180339.A9345@rtfm.net> I recently mailed Jimmy Kyriannis (the contact for NYU's 6bone presense), to ask for a tunnel for a few machines at my house. He replied that while he'd be happy to add a tunnel, there has been a recent desire to keep the 6bone topology somewhat parallel to the existing IPv4 one. Makes sense. As suggested, I'm e-mailing the list to find out what the canonical link point for me would be. *drum roll* My gateway to the net: limbo.rtfm.net/216.44.71.116 (all behind a 56k analog line, don't worry about bandwidth ;() I'm on fcc.net, which is on new-york.net/verio.net and uu.net. I'd prefer going through verio, as we've been seeing all kinds of lossage through uunet (lost packets, router loops, extreme lag). The closets sites seem to be IBM (whose contact I received no reply from) and NYU (who pointed me here). If it matters, the systems I intend to use are FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, Linux, perhaps Solaris is IPv6 is available with their free* setup (off-topic: anyone know)? I would really appreciate such a link. This seems like a great opportunity to play with emerging network protocols and expand my knowledge of current internetworking topics. Thanks! -- Nathan Dorfman The statements and opinions in my Unix Admin @ Frontline Communications usenet posts are mine, not FCC's. "The light at the end of the tunnel is the headlight of an approaching train." --/usr/games/fortune From tesi_tlc@ing240.unife.it Wed Mar 31 10:42:40 1999 From: tesi_tlc@ing240.unife.it (Tesi TLC (G. MazzinI)) Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 12:42:40 +0200 (MET DST) Subject: Chimera Proxy Message-ID: Hello ! we have linux system(Mandrake 5.3 kernel 2.1.126) with ipv6 support. We use chimera-2.0a14+ipv6-1. Is it possible to configure chimera for use proxy machine ???? How can we configure the source code for proxy use ?? ________________________________ ..... ____|____ ____|____ |chimera| | proxy | | host | |machine| |_______| |_______| Thanks a lot. G & L ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ UNIVERSITA' DEGLI STUDI DI FERRARA -ITALY- DIPARTIMENTO DI INGEGNERIA Rovatti Luca personal email lucarov@ing58.unife.it Villani Giancarlo personal email gianca@ing58.unife.it G&L email tesi_tlc@ing240.unife.it From Ivano.Guardini@CSELT.IT Wed Mar 31 14:26:35 1999 From: Ivano.Guardini@CSELT.IT (Guardini Ivano) Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 16:26:35 +0200 Subject: Tunnel Broker software Message-ID: <9187FF572943D211B28100805FC130FC0E038B@xrr1.cselt.stet.it> Hi all, the first version (v1.0) of the Tunnel Broker implementation developed at CSELT is now available at http://carmen.cselt.it/ipv6/download.html. We have also established a Tunnel Broker mailing list for discussion on any problems related to software installation/usage and for future software announcements. You can subscribe the CSELT TB mailing list by sending an e-mail to majordomo@jester.cselt.it with the following command in the BODY of the message: subscribe tb At present our implementation supports: - clients running IPv6 Inria FreeBSD or IPv6 for Windows NT (Microsoft Research) - Tunnel Servers running IPv6 Inria FreeBSD Anyway due to the plugin-like architecture of our software it is easy to add support for new IPv6 platforms. If you are interested in developing the missing components just follow the instructions provided in the README file included in the distribution and then send your scripts to the CSELT TB list so that anyone can start using them. Bye Ivano --------------------------------------------- Ivano Guardini CSELT SpA via G. Reiss Romoli 274 Torino (Italy) Tel. +39 11 228 5424 Fax. +39 11 228 5069 e-mail: ivano.guardini@cselt.it --------------------------------------------- From allan@cefetba.br Wed Mar 31 17:08:18 1999 From: allan@cefetba.br (Allan Edgard Silva Freitas) Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 14:08:18 -0300 Subject: Apache Server Message-ID: <199903311400.OAA00052@papai.intracefet> I'd like to know about apache IPv6 ports for linux... I'm using a Linux box with kernel 2.2.2 and apache 1.3a1 ported by Craig Metz but it doesn't working properly (I don't know why). We we access using a Ipv4 address it's working well, but with IPv4 address the page came slowly. If someone want to test then go to http://fazendeiro.ipv6.cefetba.br. Someone can help us? allan CEFET-BA