Bad routes update
Craig Metz
cmetz@inner.net
Tue, 20 Jul 1999 02:55:44 -0400
In message <4D0A23B3F74DD111ACCD00805F31D810145155E7@RED-MSG-50>, you write:
>> >3FFE:F00:2::0/48 11261
>>
>> This is not a bogus route per se. I told them to set it up
>> this way. I have
>> been recommending that non-pTLA multi-homed sites use a /48,
>> which happens to
>> mesh nicely with the way I've been managing tunnel address
>> space at NRL.
>
>This is bogus - the backbone should only see /24s.
First off, you're going to have a very hard time arguing that the new /28s
shouldn't be seen. Second, there *must* be some provision for sites to
multi-home without being a full pTLA, or pTLA allocations will explode as will
the allocations of pTLAs to people who shouldn't have them.
-Craig