new IPv6 policy draft - real soon now
Brian E Carpenter
brian@hursley.ibm.com
Thu, 15 Apr 1999 17:45:38 +0100
Daniel,
The point is that unless we are collectively foolish, IPv6 will
not have a disaggregation problem - it starts out classless
and provider-based, and dual homing will in the end be solved
by dual prefixes. I really can't see why we would *need* prefix
length based discrimination as we do for IPv4.
Brian
Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
>
> > Bernard.Tuy@urec.cnrs.fr (Bernard TUY) writes:
> > ====BT: moreover, one can imagine carriers will be able to aggregate ISPs p
> > refixes.
> > If they've got different legnth ones, I don't know how to achieve this.
>
> Aggregation is governed by topology and allocation policy.
> Hierarchy helps aggregation. I do not see how equal prefix length
> helps aggregation. Please explain.
>
> Daniel