IPV6 question (fwd)

[bmanning@ISI.EDU]

The IPv6 address space has had a number of proposed addressing formats.
This was one of them. It has been deemed "historic" but it works fine.
The Current format looks like it will be "historic" RSN.  


> 
> noticed some strange routes today when grooming my routing table. Anyone know
> if there is a special delegation I don't know about?
> 
> AS Paths removed in case it was a downstream/peer mistake:
> 
> 5F00:4700::0/32
>   5F00:6D00::0/32
>   5F01:7800::0/32
>   5F04:C500:CB26:1100::0/64
>   5F0B:4F00::0/32
>   5F0D:E900:CE9C:9400::0/64
>   5F0F:8800::0/32
>   5F10:8800::0/32
>   5F11:D000:CCA2:E400::0/64
> 
> These appear to be only coming from you. I must be behind on my ipv6 delegation,
> because I can't recall what 5f00::/8 is doing on the backbone. (comign from cisco
> mostly???) If you could refresh my memory, I would most appreciate it,and make
> sure not to filter it.
> 
> thanks in advance.
> 
> 
> Thanks
> Rob Rockell
> Sprintlink Internet Service Center
> Operations Engineering
> 703-689-6322
> 1-800-724-3329, PIN 385-8833
> 
> 
> 


-- 
--bill